4.3.5 · D4 · HinglishCalculus III — Sequences & Series

ExercisesTelescoping series

2,162 words10 min read↑ Read in English

4.3.5 · D4 · Maths › Calculus III — Sequences & Series › Telescoping series

Yeh page ek self-testing ladder hai. Har problem ek collapsible solution callout ke andar hai — problem padho, try karo, phir solution kholo. Levels "sirf pehchano" se "khud banao" tak jaate hain.

Yahan sab kuch parent result se aata hai jo Telescoping Series mein hai:

Figure — Telescoping series

Level 1 — Recognition

(Kya tum woh difference dekh sakte ho jo already wahan hai, aur do survivors padh sakte ho?)

L1.1

diya hai, ke pehle char terms likho aur batao bina fractions ko lambe tarike se add kiye.

Recall Solution

Hum kya karte hain: bas substitute karo. . Kyun mushkil tarike se add nahi karte: master formula already batata hai answer first minus last hai. ke saath: Yeh kaisa lagta hai: term ka , term ke ko khatam kar deta hai; bhi kha liye jaate hain. Sirf (front se) aur (back se) bachte hain.

L1.2

Inme se kaunsa as written telescoping hai (already form mein)? Jo hain unke liye batao. (a) (b) (c)

Recall Solution

(a) As written telescoping nahi hai — yeh ek single blob hai, koi difference visible nahi. (Iska koi elementary telescoping split bhi nahi hai; chhod do.) (b) Haan, lekin reversed sign order ke saath: jahan . Yeh phir bhi telescoping hai — survivors ka sign bas swap ho jaata hai: . (c) Haan, textbook form: , toh . ✓ Kyun (b) phir bhi count karta hai: telescoping ko sirf consecutive cancellation chahiye; upar jaaye ya neeche yeh sirf sign bookkeeping ka detail hai, koi naya phenomenon nahi.


Level 2 — Application

(Partial Fraction Decomposition se difference banao, phir sum karo.)

L2.1

ki exact value nikalo.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — split karo. Chahiye . Kyun partial fractions? Yeh woh engine hai jo ek fraction ko ek difference mein badalta hai jise hum telescope kar sakte hain. Denominators clear karo: . set karo: . set karo: . Step 2 — identify karo. , aur . Gap-1 telescope. ✓ Step 3 — partial sum. Step 4 — limit. , toh

L2.2

evaluate karo.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — split karo. . se: ; . Step 2 — gap of 2 dekho. Yeh hai jahan , nahi . Toh har end par do terms bachte hain. Step 3 — likho aur collapse karo: baad wale ko kha leta hai, wagera. Front survivors: . Back survivors: . Step 4 — limit. Dono tail terms :

Figure — Telescoping series

Level 3 — Analysis

(Difference hidden hai ya sum nahi hai. Tumhe reason karna hoga ki kya bachta hai.)

L3.1

compute karo.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — identify karo. Yahan , aur term literally hai. Koi partial fractions nahi chahiye. Step 2 — partial sum. Step 3 — crucial limit. Yahan , nahi (dekho Limits of Sequences). Toh: Kyun answer negative hai: har pair ki taraf neeche step karta hai, lekin running total minus ceiling pe anchored hai. Yahan poori baat yahi "last" survivor hai jo vanish nahi hota — middle cancel ho jaata hai, lekin "aakhri" survivor nahi jaata.

L3.2

Dikhao ki converge karta hai aur uski value nikalo.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — log ko difference mein split karo. Logs products/quotients ko sums/differences mein badal dete hain: Expand karke check karo: ✓. Step 2 — identify karo. , term . Gap-1 telescope. Step 3 — partial sum. Step 4 — limit. Jab , , toh . Isliye


Level 4 — Synthesis

(Ideas combine karo, ya shifted starting index handle karo.)

L4.1

evaluate karo. (Note: se start hota hai.)

Recall Solution

Step 1 — same split. , toh . Step 2 — starting index ko respect karo. Sum run karta hai. Pehla surviving term hai, nahi: Step 3 — limit. , toh Sanity check: se full sum hai; pehle do terms subtract karo toh milta hai. ✓

L4.2

Gap-1 telescope banate hue nikalo.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — clever grouping. Notice karo Verify karo: common denominator deta hai ✓. Yeh shape kyun? Hum chahte hain . set karne se milta hai — perfect gap-1 telescope. Step 2 — partial sum. Step 3 — limit. Tail :


Level 5 — Mastery

(Invent karo, generalise karo, ya aisi series defeat karo jo sirf real kaam ke baad telescope karti hai.)

L5.1

evaluate karo. (Hint: likho.)

Recall Solution

Step 1 — difference engineer karo. use karke: Yeh trick kyun? Humein telescoping shape chahiye tha; factorials ek step shrink hote hain jab numerator se match kare. Toh . Step 2 — partial sum. Step 3 — limit. (factorials bahut bade ho jaate hain), toh

L5.2

Ek general theorem jo tum prove karo. Maan lo (ek finite limit). Dikhao ki Phir ise pe apply karo aur re-derive karo.

Recall Solution

Part A — gap-2 theorem. Partial sum likho aur survivors match karo: se tak sab kuch dono brackets mein appear karta hai aur cancel ho jaata hai. Front survivors: . Back survivors: . lo: kyunki , dono tail terms , jo deta hai Part B — pe apply karo (toh ). Tab , aur theorem deta hai isliye . ✓ (Parent note se match karta hai — general theorem us example ko contain karta hai.)


Answer Key (quick check)

Problem Answer
L1.1
L2.1
L2.2
L3.1
L3.2
L4.1
L4.2
L5.1
L5.2 ; applied

Connections

  • Partial Fraction Decomposition — L2.1, L2.2, L4.2 ko power deta hai.
  • Sequence of Partial Sums — har solution actually " nikalo, phir limit lo" hai.
  • Limits of Sequences — woh jo L3.1 aur har mastery problem decide karta hai.
  • Convergence Tests for Series — telescoping exact value deta hai, sirf convergence nahi.
  • Method of Differences — L5.2 yahi idea ek theorem ki tarah stated hai.
  • Geometric Seriesdoosri exact-sum family; mechanism se contrast karo.

Solution Strategy Map

already a difference

single fraction

log of a product

factorial

find gap k

take limit

check L finite

Series term a_n

Read off b_n

Partial fractions

Split the log

Rewrite numerator

Difference b_n minus b_n+k

k front and k back survive

S_N equals leads minus trailing

Sum equals leads minus k times L

Exact value