This page unpacks every symbol and idea the parent note Geometric series leans on, starting from things a smart 12-year-old already knows. Nothing here assumes you've met "series", "sigma", or "limit" before — we build each from a picture.
Before "series", the simplest object is a list of numbers where each one comes from the one before by multiplying by the same number every time. To describe such a list we only need two things: where it starts and what it multiplies by.
Look at the figure. The leftmost bar is the first term a; each following bar is r times the height of the bar to its left. When r is between 0 and 1, the bars shrink — that shrinking is the whole story of convergence.
The one that trips people up: ==r0=1==. Why? Zero copies of r multiplied together is the "empty product", and multiplying nothing leaves you at the multiplication-starting-point, which is 1. This matters because a series that starts at n=0 has first term a⋅r0=a.
The convergence rule is stated with ∣r∣, not r. We need this because a negative r can still make the pieces shrink.
The figure lays r on a horizontal number line (the axis running left–right through zero). The blue double-arrow measures the distance from 0 out to −3, and the orange double-arrow measures the distance from 0 out to +3. Both arrows have the same length, 3 — which is exactly the picture of ∣−3∣=∣3∣=3: the arrows point in opposite directions, but only their length is what ∣r∣ reports.
We can never add infinitely many numbers by hand. The trick is to add only the first few, then watch a pattern.
The figure shows the running total climbing as we add more terms. For shrinking pieces (blue) the running total flattens toward a ceiling; for growing pieces (orange) it shoots up forever. The parent note's whole proof is about finding a clean formula for this climbing total and then asking where it ends up.
This is the one genuinely new idea, and the entire convergence question rides on it.
The single fact the proof needs is the behaviour of rN as N→∞:
∣r∣<1: each multiply by r makes it smaller in size, so rN→0. (Pieces vanish.)
∣r∣>1: each multiply makes it bigger, so ∣rN∣→∞. (No destination.)
r=1: rN=1 forever. (Never shrinks.)
r=−1: rN flips 1,−1,1,−1,…. (Bounces, never settles.)
Every case in the figure. Notice: only when the dots march into zero (the ∣r∣<1 curves) can the total settle down. This is exactly why the convergence condition is ∣r∣<1.
Factoring. Pulling a common piece out front: ax−ay=a(x−y). The proof uses a−arN=a(1−rN) and SN−rSN=SN(1−r).
The term-by-term cancellation (WHY the middle vanishes). The proof's key move is to compute SN−rSN. Write the two sums stacked, aligning matching powers of r:
Now subtract the bottom row from the top row, column by column:
The a in SN has nothing beneath it in rSN → it survives.
The ar appears in both rows → ar−ar=0, gone.
The ar2 appears in both rows → ar2−ar2=0, gone.
Every middle term ark (for k=1,2,…,N−1) shows up once in each row, because multiplying SN by r just shifts every term up one power — so each middle term meets an identical twin and cancels.
The arN in rSN has nothing above it in SN → it survives, carrying its minus sign.
So the entire middle collapses and only the two ends are left:
SN−rSN=a−arN.
Dividing to isolate. Factor both sides: SN(1−r)=a(1−rN). Dividing both sides by (1−r) frees SN:
SN=1−ra(1−rN).
This division is only legal when 1−r=0, i.e. r=1 — which is exactly why the parent note treats r=1 separately.
The diagram below traces how each foundation feeds the next, ending at the topic's two headline results. Read it top-to-bottom: the fixed multiplier and its powers give us notation (∑) and a way to measure shrinkage (∣r∣); those build the partial sum; the partial sum plus the limit deliver the convergence condition and the sum formula.
Each box on the left must be solid before the topic's proof (the two bottom boxes) makes sense.
Cover the right side and answer aloud — if any stumps you, reread that section before the parent note.
What is the first term a?
The starting number of the list — the opening term (with no r attached) before any multiplying happens.
What does the common ratio r mean, in words?
The fixed number you multiply by to get from each term to the next; equal to (next term)÷(this term).
What is r0 and why?
r0=1 — zero multiplications leaves you at the multiplication starting point, 1.
What does ∣r∣ measure?
The distance of r from zero on the number line — its size, ignoring sign.
Why does the convergence rule use ∣r∣ instead of r?
Because whether the pieces shrink depends on size, not sign; ∣r∣<1 covers both positive and negative shrinking ratios.
How do you read ∑n=0N−1arn, and what does the "⋯" stand for?
Let n run through 0,1,…,N−1, plug each into arn, and add all the results; the dots mean "continue the same pattern (exponent +1 each step) through all the middle terms".
What is the partial sum SN?
The total of just the first N terms of the series.
In SN−rSN, why do the middle terms cancel?
Multiplying by r shifts every term up one power, so each middle term ark appears in both rows and subtracts to zero; only a and −arN survive.
What does limN→∞SN ask?
As N grows without end, does the running total SN home in on one fixed number?
What is limN→∞rN when ∣r∣<1?
0 — repeated multiplying by something smaller than 1 in size drives it to zero.
What does a convergent geometric series sum to, and when?
1−ra, valid exactly when ∣r∣<1.
What is the sum when r=0?
Just a — all later terms are zero, and 1−0a=a.
Why must we exclude r=1 from the partial-sum formula?
Because dividing by 1−r means dividing by zero when r=1; that case is handled separately as SN=aN.
Why is a limit needed to define an infinite sum at all?
You can't finish adding infinitely many terms, so the infinite sum is defined as the destination of the partial sums.