Exercises — Geometric series — convergence condition, proof
This page is a self-test ladder built on top of the parent proof. Each problem states cleanly what to find. The full worked solution lives in a collapsible
[!recall]-callout — try the problem first, THEN unfold. Levels climb from recognising a geometric series to synthesising several ideas at once.
Everything here rests on two facts from the parent note, restated so you never have to leave this page:
Two skills decide every problem below:
- Find : plug the starting index into the term and compute the first actual number.
- Find : divide any term by the one before it — .
Level 1 — Recognition
(Can you spot , , and whether it converges?)
L1.1 — Is geometric? If so, give and , and state converge/diverge.
Recall Solution L1.1
Test for geometric: divide consecutive terms. , , . The ratio is the same number every time, so yes, it is geometric.
- (the first term written down).
- . Converge? , so the terms grow and the series diverges.
L1.2 — For , write out the first three terms, and give and .
Recall Solution L1.2
Plug in : So the series is .
- (the term).
- . Since , it converges.
L1.3 — Which of these converge? (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) .
Recall Solution L1.3
Convergence depends only on .
- (a) → converges.
- (b) → converges (sign of does not matter for whether it converges, only for the value).
- (c) → diverges (terms grow).
- (d) → diverges ( oscillates and never settles).
Level 2 — Application
(Plug into the formula correctly — mind the starting index.)
L2.1 — Evaluate .
Recall Solution L2.1
( term), , ✓.
L2.2 — Evaluate . (Same series as L2.1 but starting at .)
Recall Solution L2.2
WHAT changed: the index now starts at , so the term () is missing. The first written term is the term: The ratio is still . Sanity check: L2.1 minus its term should equal L2.2: ✓.
L2.3 — Evaluate .
Recall Solution L2.3
, , ✓. The denominator is . Negative makes the denominator bigger, so the sum lands below :
L2.4 — Write (i.e. ) as a fraction using a geometric series. See Repeating decimals as fractions.
Recall Solution L2.4
Group the repeating block "" as chunks of two decimal places: First written term , ratio . Check: ✓.
Level 3 — Analysis
(Pull apart, re-index, or reason about parameters.)
L3.1 — For which real does converge, and what is its sum there? (This is the model behind Power series and radius of convergence.)
Recall Solution L3.1
Here the ratio is and . Convergence needs : On that interval: The centre is and the radius is — see the figure below. It shows a horizontal number line: the accent-red open segment from to is exactly where the series converges, with the black centre mark at and the two regions outside labelled "diverges."

L3.2 — A geometric series has and second term . Find and .
Recall Solution L3.2
Two equations: From (1): . Substitute into (2): Factor: , so or . Both satisfy , so two valid solutions:
- Check: : ✓, sum ✓. : ✓, sum ✓.
L3.3 — Split into two geometric series and evaluate.
Recall Solution L3.3
WHY split: . A finite sum of convergent series may be added term by term. Total: .
Level 4 — Synthesis
(Combine geometric series with another idea.)
L4.1 — A ball dropped from height m rebounds to of its previous height each bounce. Find the total vertical distance it travels before coming to rest.
Recall Solution L4.1
Picture it: the first drop is m (down only). After that, every bounce goes up to a peak and back down — so each subsequent height is counted twice.

- Initial drop: .
- Peaks: , each travelled up and down. The tail is geometric with first written term , ratio :
L4.2 — Solve for : , and confirm the ratio actually satisfies .
Recall Solution L4.2
Ratio , . Sum condition: Simplify the denominator: . So Check ratio: , and ✓ — the sum is genuinely valid.
Level 5 — Mastery
(Re-derive, or handle a subtle/degenerate case.)
L5.1 — Re-derive the partial sum from scratch using the telescoping subtraction, then explain in one line why the limit needs .
Recall Solution L5.1
Write and aligned: Subtract — every middle term appears in both and cancels, leaving only the first term of and the last of : Why for the limit: as , only when ; then . If , does not go to (it grows or oscillates), so the limit fails. See Sequences — limits and convergence.
L5.2 — Evaluate the shifted series two ways: (a) directly via the correct first term, (b) as "full sum minus the first two terms."
Recall Solution L5.2
, ✓. (a) Direct. First written term is at : . (b) Full minus early terms. Full sum from : . Subtract and terms: . Both routes agree — a clean check on re-indexing.
L5.3 (Degenerate case) — What is when ? Discuss for all , including .
Recall Solution L5.3
If , every term is regardless of : . The partial sums are all , so they trivially converge to even when . This is why the divergence statement in the parent note carries the caveat "with ." The convergence gate matters only when there is actually something nonzero to sum.
Connections
- Geometric series — convergence condition, proof (parent — the formula and proof)
- Partial sums and series convergence (L5.1 re-derivation)
- Sequences — limits and convergence (why needs )
- Ratio Test (generalises the constant-ratio idea)
- Power series and radius of convergence (L3.1's interval of convergence)
- Repeating decimals as fractions (L2.4)
- Telescoping series (the cancellation in L5.1)
Skill Map
The diagram below is the decision path you run on any candidate series. In words: start from a given series; divide consecutive terms to test whether the ratio is constant (is it geometric?). If yes, find and . Then check the gate . If the gate fails and , the series diverges; if the gate fails but (the degenerate case), the sum is simply . If the gate passes, the sum is — but you must still (i) read off the actual starting index, and (ii) for parameter problems, substitute your answer back to confirm .
Recall One-line self-check before you submit any answer
Did I (1) confirm the ratio is constant, (2) compute from the actual starting index, (3) check , and (4) — for parameters — substitute back to confirm ? Answer ::: If any box is unticked, the answer is unverified.