4.2.9 · D3 · Maths › Calculus II — Integration › Trigonometric substitution — x = a sin θ, a tan θ, a sec θ c
Yeh parent topic ka case-atlas hai. Parent ne tumhe machinery dikhaayi. Yahan hum use har tarah ke pothole se guzaarte hain: har sign pattern, definite integrals jinka limits humein quadrants ke baare mein sochne par majboor karte hain, ek degenerate limit, ek real-world arc, aur ek exam twist jahan pattern chupi hoti hai.
Symbols se pehle, ek waada: neeche har letter earn kiya gaya hai. a hamesha ek fixed positive number hai (ek length — socho "radius"). x hamara variable hai (ek "position"). θ (theta) ek Greek letter hai jo hum angle ke liye use karte hain , radians mein measure kiya jaata hai. Ek radian bas ek angle ka size hai; π radians = seedhi line = 18 0 ∘ .
Intuition Har answer ko "machine-check" kaise karte hain
Har worked problem ke baad tumhe ek Verify line dikhegi. Is page par har numeric answer aur har antiderivative ko ===VERIFY=== block mein computer se bhi re-check kiya gaya hai: ek indefinite integral ke liye machine hamare answer ko differentiate karti hai aur confirm karti hai ki yeh original integrand ke barabar hai (differentiation easy aur unambiguous hai, isliye yeh perfect referee hai); ek definite integral ke liye yeh number ko dobara symbolically re-evaluate karti hai aur compare karti hai. Toh "Machine-checked" ka matlab hai "ek symbolic-algebra engine ne ishe independently reproduce kiya."
Har trig-sub problem in cells mein se exactly ek mein jaati hai. Neeche ke hamare examples inhe saare cover karte hain.
#
Cell (scenario)
Kaun sa sub
Kaun cover karta hai
A
a 2 − x 2 , indefinite , root denominator mein
x = a sin θ
Ex 1
B
a 2 − x 2 , definite integral (limits → quadrant care)
x = a sin θ
Ex 2
C
a 2 + x 2 , root upar , ∫ sec θ d θ chahiye
x = a tan θ
Ex 3
D
( a 2 + x 2 ) 2 power denominator, koi visible root nahi
x = a tan θ
Ex 4
E
x 2 − a 2 jab x > 0 (branch [ 0 , 2 π ) )
x = a sec θ
Ex 5
F
Negative x region x < − a (branch [ π , 2 3 π ) ) — sign trap
x = a sec θ
Ex 6
G
Pehle completing the square (offset centre, hidden pattern)
x − h = a sin θ
Ex 7
H
Word problem / geometry — ellipse cap ka area (real-world)
x = a sin θ
Ex 8
I
Degenerate / limiting case: a → 0 , kya formula survive karta hai?
—
Ex 9
Worked example Ex 1 · Cell A —
∫ 16 − x 2 x 2 d x
Forecast: radical "number minus x 2 " hai, 16 = 4 2 . Padhne se pehle sub guess karo.
Step 1. a 2 − x 2 pehchano jahan a = 4 . Set karo x = 4 sin θ , toh d x = 4 cos θ d θ , aur restrict karo θ ∈ [ − 2 π , 2 π ] .
Yeh step kyun? Sirf 1 − sin 2 θ = cos 2 θ (ek Pythagorean identity ) squares ke difference ko single square mein badalta hai, root khatam karta hai.
Step 2. Root simplify karo: 16 − 16 sin 2 θ = 16 cos 2 θ = 4 cos θ .
± kyun nahi? [ − 2 π , 2 π ] par cos θ ≥ 0 hai, toh ∣4 cos θ ∣ = 4 cos θ .
Step 3. Assemble karo. Kyunki x 2 = 16 sin 2 θ :
∫ 4 c o s θ 16 s i n 2 θ ⋅ 4 cos θ d θ = 16 ∫ sin 2 θ d θ .
Yeh step kyun? Upar ka cos θ (d x se) aur neeche ka cos θ (root se) cancel ho jaate hain — yahi sub ka poora payoff hai.
Step 4. Power-reduce karo: sin 2 θ = 2 1 − c o s 2 θ (Power-reduction & double-angle formulas se):
16 ⋅ 2 1 ( θ − 2 s i n 2 θ ) + C = 8 θ − 4 sin 2 θ + C = 8 θ − 8 sin θ cos θ + C ,
sin 2 θ = 2 sin θ cos θ use kiya.
Yeh step kyun? sin 2 ka seedha koi elementary antiderivative nahi hai; double-angle identity ise term by term integrate karne layak cheezein bana deti hai.
Step 5. Reference triangle se back-substitute karo: sin θ = 4 x , adjacent = 16 − x 2 , toh cos θ = 4 16 − x 2 aur θ = arcsin 4 x .
8 arcsin 4 x − 8 ⋅ 4 x ⋅ 4 16 − x 2 + C = 8 arcsin 4 x − 2 x 16 − x 2 + C .
Verify: VERIFY block 8 arcsin 4 x − 2 x 16 − x 2 ko differentiate karta hai aur confirm karta hai ki yeh exactly 16 − x 2 x 2 mein simplify hota hai. ✓
Worked example Ex 2 · Cell B —
∫ 0 3 9 − x 2 d x
Forecast: yeh radius 3 ke circle ke ek quarter ke neeche ka area hai. Compute karne se pehle number predict karo.
Step 1. a = 3 , x = 3 sin θ , d x = 3 cos θ d θ , root → 3 cos θ .
Yeh step kyun? Wahi a 2 − x 2 pattern.
Step 2 — LIMITS convert karo, back-substitute mat karo. Definite integral ke liye bounds ko θ mein push karna zyaada clean hai:
x = 0 ⇒ 3 sin θ = 0 ⇒ θ = 0 .
x = 3 ⇒ 3 sin θ = 3 ⇒ sin θ = 1 ⇒ θ = 2 π .
Yeh step kyun? Agar hum bounds abhi change kar lein, toh substitution undo karna nahi padega — answer seedha number ke roop mein aa jaata hai.
Step 3. Integrand root 9 − x 2 se 3 cos θ ⋅ d x se 3 cos θ d θ ban jaata hai — do cosines multiply hote hain, ek root replace karne se aur ek d x se:
∫ 0 π /2 3 cos θ ⋅ 3 cos θ d θ = 9 ∫ 0 π /2 cos 2 θ d θ .
Do cosines kyun aate hain? Substitution integral ko do jagah ek saath touch karti hai: root 9 − x 2 ban jaata hai 3 cos θ , aur differential d x ban jaata hai 3 cos θ d θ . Inका product 9 cos 2 θ hai — isliye ek bare cos nahi balki cos 2 show up hota hai.
Step 4. cos 2 θ = 2 1 + c o s 2 θ :
9 [ 2 θ + 4 s i n 2 θ ] 0 π /2 = 9 ( 4 π + 0 − 0 ) = 4 9 π .
sin 2 θ term kyun vanish hota hai: sin ( π ) = 0 aur sin 0 = 0 — dono endpoints ise khatam kar dete hain.
Verify: VERIFY block ∫ 0 3 9 − x 2 d x ko symbolically re-integrate karta hai aur 4 9 π paata hai; yeh geometry se bhi match karta hai, radius 3 ka quarter-disc: 4 1 π ( 3 ) 2 = 4 9 π . ✓
Neeche ki figure precisely woh number dikhati hai jo humne compute kiya — shaded quarter-disc.
Intuition Figure s01 padhna
Cyan curve y = 9 − x 2 hai, radius 3 ke circle ka top half . Amber region woh area hai jo humne integrate kiya, x = 0 se x = 3 tak. Kyunki yeh exactly ek full disc ka quarter hai, iska area zaroor 4 1 π r 2 = 4 9 π hona chahiye — yeh picture algebra ka sanity check hai.
Worked example Ex 3 · Cell C —
∫ x x 2 + 25 d x (maano x > 0 )
Forecast: "number plus x 2 ", 25 = 5 2 . Sub guess karo.
Step 1. a 2 + x 2 jahan a = 5 : set karo x = 5 tan θ , d x = 5 sec 2 θ d θ , θ ∈ ( − 2 π , 2 π ) .
Yeh step kyun? 1 + tan 2 θ = sec 2 θ squares ke sum ko ek square mein badal deta hai.
Step 2. Root: 25 + 25 tan 2 θ = 5 sec θ (us range par sec θ > 0 ke saath). Substitute karo:
∫ 5 t a n θ 5 s e c θ ⋅ 5 sec 2 θ d θ = 5 ∫ t a n θ s e c 3 θ d θ .
Step 3. Structure expose karne ke liye sin/cos mein convert karo: tan θ sec 3 θ = sin θ / cos θ 1/ cos 3 θ = cos 2 θ sin θ 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Sab kuch sin/cos mein hone par hum ek clean substitution ya ek known integral dhundh sakte hain.
Step 4. Split karo cos 2 θ sin θ 1 = cos 2 θ sin θ sin 2 θ + cos 2 θ = cos 2 θ sin θ + sin θ 1 (sin 2 + cos 2 = 1 use kiya).
Yeh step kyun? Pehla piece ek perfect u = cos θ sub hai; doosra standard ∫ csc θ d θ hai.
5 ∫ c o s 2 θ s i n θ d θ + 5 ∫ csc θ d θ = 5 ⋅ c o s θ 1 + 5 ln ∣ csc θ − cot θ ∣ + C = 5 sec θ + 5 ln ∣ csc θ − cot θ ∣ + C .
Step 5. Reference triangle: tan θ = 5 x → opposite x , adjacent 5 , hyp x 2 + 25 . Toh sec θ = 5 x 2 + 25 , csc θ = x x 2 + 25 , cot θ = x 5 .
= x 2 + 25 + 5 ln x x 2 + 25 − 5 + C .
Step 6 — x < 0 branch (isliye humne "maano x > 0 " kaha). x < 0 ke liye substitution x = 5 tan θ ko ek θ chahiye jahan tan θ < 0 ho, yaani θ ∈ ( − 2 π , 0 ) , jahan sec θ abhi bhi > 0 hai — toh root abhi bhi 5 sec θ hai (roots kabhi negative nahi hote), lekin ab x = 5 tan θ < 0 jabki x 2 + 25 = 5 sec θ > 0 . Triangle ko dobara padhne par, csc θ = x x 2 + 25 negative ho jaata hai, aur 5 ln ∣ csc θ − cot θ ∣ mein absolute-value bars exactly us sign flip ko absorb kar lete hain.
Yeh kyun matter karta hai: antiderivative x 2 + 25 + 5 ln x x 2 + 25 − 5 + C mein ∣ ⋅ ∣ precisely isliye likha gaya hai taaki yeh x ke dono signs ke liye valid rahe — ∣ ⋅ ∣ decoration nahi hai, yahi x > 0 aur x < 0 branches ko ek formula mein stitch karta hai.
Verify: VERIFY block is answer ko (x > 0 ke liye) differentiate karta hai aur confirm karta hai ki yeh x x 2 + 25 mein collapse hota hai. ✓
Worked example Ex 4 · Cell D —
∫ ( x 2 + 4 ) 2 d x
Forecast: koi nahi hai! Lekin ( x 2 + 4 ) 2 = ( x 2 + 4 ) 4 . Phir bhi sub guess karo.
Step 1. x = 2 tan θ , d x = 2 sec 2 θ d θ . Toh x 2 + 4 = 4 sec 2 θ , isliye ( x 2 + 4 ) 2 = 16 sec 4 θ .
Yeh step kyun? Sign structure a 2 + x 2 dictate karta hai tan chahe root likha ho ya nahi; tan x 2 + 4 ko single sec 2 mein collapse kar deta hai.
Step 2. ∫ 16 s e c 4 θ 2 s e c 2 θ d θ = 8 1 ∫ s e c 2 θ d θ = 8 1 ∫ cos 2 θ d θ .
Yeh step kyun? 1/ sec 2 θ = cos 2 θ — sec ke powers cancel hokar friendly cos 2 banta hai.
Step 3. Power-reduce karo: 8 1 ⋅ 2 1 ( θ + 2 s i n 2 θ ) + C = 16 θ + 16 s i n θ c o s θ + C .
Step 4. Triangle: tan θ = 2 x , hyp x 2 + 4 , toh sin θ = x 2 + 4 x , cos θ = x 2 + 4 2 , θ = arctan 2 x .
= 16 1 arctan 2 x + 16 1 ⋅ x 2 + 4 2 x + C = 16 1 arctan 2 x + 8 ( x 2 + 4 ) x + C .
Verify: VERIFY block is answer ko differentiate karta hai aur confirm karta hai ki yeh ( x 2 + 4 ) 2 1 ke barabar hai. ✓
Worked example Ex 5 · Cell E —
∫ x 2 x 2 − 9 d x , maano x > 3
Forecast: "x 2 minus number". Kaun sa sub?
Step 1. x 2 − a 2 , a = 3 : x = 3 sec θ , d x = 3 sec θ tan θ d θ . x > 3 ke liye hum branch θ ∈ [ 0 , 2 π ) par hain, jahan tan θ ≥ 0 .
Yeh step kyun? sec 2 θ − 1 = tan 2 θ root hata deta hai; branch choice tan θ (isliye root) ko non-negative rakhti hai.
Step 2. Root: 9 sec 2 θ − 9 = 3 tan θ . Aur x 2 = 9 sec 2 θ . Substitute karo:
∫ 9 s e c 2 θ ⋅ 3 t a n θ 3 s e c θ t a n θ d θ = 9 1 ∫ s e c θ d θ = 9 1 ∫ cos θ d θ .
Yeh step kyun? Sab kuch cos θ tak cancel ho jaata hai — yahi inaam hai.
Step 3. = 9 1 sin θ + C .
Step 4. Triangle: sec θ = 3 x → hyp x , adjacent 3 , opposite x 2 − 9 , toh sin θ = x x 2 − 9 .
= 9 x x 2 − 9 + C .
Verify: VERIFY block 9 x x 2 − 9 ko (x > 3 ke liye) differentiate karta hai aur confirm karta hai ki yeh x 2 x 2 − 9 1 ke barabar hai. ✓
Step 4 mein use kiya gaya reference triangle neeche draw kiya gaya hai.
Intuition Figure s02 padhna
Yeh x = 3 sec θ ke liye reference triangle hai. Humne adjacent side = a = 3 aur hypotenuse = x choose ki, kyunki sec θ = adj hyp = 3 x exactly hamaari substitution hai. Pythagoras phir opposite side ko x 2 − 9 force karta hai — wahi root jo problem mein hai. sin θ = hyp opp = x x 2 − 9 seedha is picture se padhna hi Step 4 mein angle ko x mein wapas badhalne ka tarika hai.
Worked example Ex 6 · Cell F —
∫ − 4 − 3 4 x x 2 − 4 d x (saare x < − 2 )
Forecast: parent ke Ex 3 jaisi hi shape, lekin ab x negative hai. Kya x 2 − 4 = 2 tan θ abhi bhi sach hoga? Predict karo.
Step 1. a = 2 , x = 2 sec θ . x < − 2 ke liye, sec θ < − 1 , toh humein branch θ ∈ [ π , 2 3 π ) use karni padegi. Wahan tan θ ≥ 0 , toh x 2 − 4 = 4 tan 2 θ = 2 tan θ (abhi bhi + — branch precisely isliye choose ki gayi taaki yeh hold kare).
Yeh step kyun? u 2 = ∣ u ∣ . Doosra branch choose karna guarantee karta hai tan θ ≥ 0 , toh absolute value cleanly hat jaata hai — yahi [ π , 2 3 π ) restriction ka poora reason hai.
Step 2 — limits convert karo, branch [ π , 2 3 π ) par rehte hue. Is branch par har angle principal arccos value plus π hai (taaki quadrant III mein land ho):
x = − 4 ⇒ sec θ = 2 x = − 2 ⇒ cos θ = − 2 1 . Is cosine wala quadrant-III angle θ 1 = π + 3 π = 3 4 π hai.
x = − 3 4 ⇒ sec θ = 2 x = − 3 2 ⇒ cos θ = − 2 3 . Is cosine wala quadrant-III angle θ 2 = π + 6 π = 6 7 π hai.
π kyun add karein? Principal arccos angle ko quadrant II mein land karta hai (2 π aur π ke beech), jahan tan < 0 hai aur hamaari root identity fail ho jaati. + π se reflect karna use hamaari chosen branch par quadrant III mein le jaata hai, jahan tan ≥ 0 hai aur x 2 − 4 = 2 tan θ hold karta hai. Negative x hi hai jo in quadrant-III angles ko force karta hai.
Step 3. d x = 2 sec θ tan θ d θ aur root 2 tan θ ke saath:
∫ 2 s e c θ 2 t a n θ ⋅ 2 sec θ tan θ d θ = ∫ 2 tan 2 θ d θ = 2 ∫ ( sec 2 θ − 1 ) d θ = 2 ( tan θ − θ ) + C .
sec 2 − 1 kyun: tan 2 directly integrable nahi hai; tan 2 = sec 2 − 1 hai.
Step 4 — branch angles ke beech evaluate karo. Endpoint x = − 4 lower x -limit hai aur θ 1 = 3 4 π map karta hai; endpoint x = − 3 4 upper x -limit hai aur θ 2 = 6 7 π map karta hai. Toh
∫ − 4 − 4/ 3 x x 2 − 4 d x = [ 2 ( tan θ − θ ) ] θ = 4 π /3 θ = 7 π /6 .
Is branch par, tan 3 4 π = 3 aur tan 6 7 π = 3 1 . Isliye
=2\left(\tfrac{1}{\sqrt3}-\sqrt3+\tfrac{\pi}{6}\right).$$
Numerically $\tfrac{1}{\sqrt3}-\sqrt3=-\tfrac{2}{\sqrt3}\approx-1.1547$, toh answer hai $2(-1.1547+0.5236)\approx -1.262$.
**Step 5 — back-substitution sanity ($x$ mein express karo).** Kyunki $\tan\theta=\tfrac{\sqrt{x^2-4}}{|x|}$ aur yahan $x<0$ toh $|x|=-x$, antiderivative $2(\tan\theta-\theta)$ $x$-language mein $-\dfrac{2\sqrt{x^2-4}}{x}-2\,\theta(x)$ padhta hai; is $x$-form ko $x=-4$ aur $x=-\tfrac4{\sqrt3}$ par evaluate karne par wahi $2\left(\tfrac1{\sqrt3}-\sqrt3+\tfrac\pi6\right)$ milta hai. Integrand $\frac{\sqrt{x^2-4}}{x}$ $x<0$ par **negative** hai (numerator $\ge0$, denominator $<0$), aur hum positive width par left-to-right integrate karte hain, toh **negative** answer bilkul expected hai. ✓
**Verify:** VERIFY block $\int_{-4}^{-4/\sqrt3}\frac{\sqrt{x^2-4}}{x}\,dx$ ko symbolically re-compute karta hai; yeh $2\left(\tfrac{1}{\sqrt3}-\sqrt3+\tfrac{\pi}{6}\right)\approx -1.262$ ke barabar hai, aur sign confirmed negative hai. ✓
> [!mistake] Branch trap
> $x=-4$ ke liye $\theta=\tfrac{2\pi}{3}$ likhna tempting hai (iska bhi $\cos=-\tfrac12$). Lekin $\tfrac{2\pi}{3}$ quadrant II mein hai jahan $\tan\theta<0$, toh $\sqrt{x^2-4}=2\tan\theta$ **galat** hoga. $x<-a$ ke liye tumhe $[\pi,\tfrac{3\pi}{2})$ mein land karna zaroori hai — isliye $\tfrac{4\pi}{3}$, naa ki $\tfrac{2\pi}{3}$.
Neeche ki figure dikhati hai kyun quadrant III correct branch hai: yeh wahi jagah hai jahan substitution ka tangent non-negative rehta hai taaki root identity survive kare.
Intuition Figure s03 padhna
Cyan unit circle par do shaded wedges hain. Quadrant III (π ≤ θ < 2 3 π ) mein amber wedge x < − 2 ke liye hamaari chosen branch hai: wahan dono sin aur cos negative hain, toh tan θ = c o s s i n > 0 — exactly yahi x 2 − 4 = 2 tan θ (ek non-negative root) ko valid banata hai. Quadrant II mein white wedge trap hai: cos < 0 lekin sin > 0 , toh wahan tan θ < 0 hai aur root identity break ho jaati. Hamare dono limit-angles 6 7 π aur 3 4 π dono amber wedge ke andar hain.
Worked example Ex 7 · Cell G —
∫ 5 + 4 x − x 2 d x
Forecast: linear term 4 x hai, toh koi bare a 2 − x 2 nahi. Substitute karne se pehle hume kya karna chahiye?
Step 1. Root ke andar square complete karo:
5 + 4 x − x 2 = − ( x 2 − 4 x ) + 5 = − ( ( x − 2 ) 2 − 4 ) + 5 = 9 − ( x − 2 ) 2 .
Yeh step kyun? Trig sub sirf teen canonical shapes pehchaanta hai. Square complete karna shifted quadratic ko a 2 − u 2 mein convert karta hai jahan u = x − 2 , a = 3 .
Step 2. u = x − 2 lo (toh d u = d x ). Ab ∫ 9 − u 2 d u , ek standard a 2 − u 2 jahan a = 3 .
Yeh step kyun? Yeh ab identically parent ka memorised form hai.
Step 3. u = 3 sin θ ⇒ ∫ 3 c o s θ 3 c o s θ d θ = θ = arcsin 3 u .
Step 4. u = x − 2 restore karo:
∫ 5 + 4 x − x 2 d x = arcsin 3 x − 2 + C .
Verify: VERIFY block arcsin 3 x − 2 ko differentiate karta hai aur confirm karta hai d x d = 9 − ( x − 2 ) 2 1 = 5 + 4 x − x 2 1 . ✓
Worked example Ex 8 · Cell H — Elliptical window cap ka area
Ek stained-glass window ellipse 16 x 2 + 9 y 2 = 1 hai (units: metres). Ek horizontal glazing bar y = 1.5 par chhalta hai. Bar ke upar wala cap ka area dhundho (region y ≥ 1.5 ellipse ke andar).
Forecast: x ke liye solve karne par number − y 2 milega. y mein sub guess karo.
Step 1 — set up karo. Ellipse se, x = ± 4 1 − 9 y 2 = ± 3 4 9 − y 2 . Height y par cap x = − 3 4 9 − y 2 se x = + 3 4 9 − y 2 tak phaila hai, width 2 ⋅ 3 4 9 − y 2 hai. Toh
A = ∫ 1.5 3 3 8 9 − y 2 d y .
Yeh step kyun? Area = bar y = 1.5 se ellipse top y = 3 tak horizontal strip widths ka sum.
Step 2. 9 − y 2 pehchano, a = 3 : y = 3 sin θ , d y = 3 cos θ d θ , root → 3 cos θ .
Limits: y = 1.5 ⇒ sin θ = 2 1 ⇒ θ = 6 π ; y = 3 ⇒ sin θ = 1 ⇒ θ = 2 π .
Yeh step kyun? 9 − y 2 a 2 − y 2 pattern hai; limits convert karna back-substitution se bachata hai.
Step 3. Root 3 cos θ times d y = 3 cos θ d θ do cosines deta hai → ek cos 2 :
A = 3 8 ∫ π /6 π /2 3 cos θ ⋅ 3 cos θ d θ = 24 ∫ π /6 π /2 cos 2 θ d θ .
Step 4. cos 2 θ = 2 1 + c o s 2 θ , aur ∫ cos 2 θ d θ = 2 θ + 4 s i n 2 θ :
=24\left[\left(\frac\pi4+\frac{\sin\pi}{4}\right)-\left(\frac{\pi}{12}+\frac{\sin(\pi/3)}{4}\right)\right].$$
$\sin\pi=0$ aur $\sin\tfrac\pi3=\tfrac{\sqrt3}{2}$ ke saath:
$$A=24\left(\frac\pi4-\frac\pi{12}-\frac{\sqrt3}{8}\right)=24\cdot\frac\pi6-24\cdot\frac{\sqrt3}{8}=4\pi-3\sqrt3\approx 7.371\ \text{m}^2.$$
*Yeh step kyun?* Power-reduction hi $\cos^2$ integrate karne ka ek maatra tarika hai; endpoints phir seedhe plug in hote hain.
**Verify (units + magnitude):** poori ellipse ka area $\pi(4)(3)=12\pi\approx 37.7\text{ m}^2$ hai; hamaara cap ek top slice hai, toh kuch m² sensible lagta hai. Units: $\text{m}\times\text{m}=\text{m}^2$. VERIFY block re-integrate karta hai aur exact value $4\pi-3\sqrt3$ aur numeric $7.371$ confirm karta hai. ✓
Intuition Figure s04 padhna
Cyan ellipse window hai; dashed white line y = 1.5 par glazing bar hai. Uske upar amber region woh cap hai jiska area humne nikala, 4 π − 3 3 ≈ 7.37 m 2 . Iske size ko poori ellipse (12 π ≈ 37.7 m 2 ) se compare karo: shaded slice clearly ek modest fraction hai, jo hamare number se match karta hai.
Worked example Ex 9 · Cell I — kya
∫ 0 a a 2 − x 2 d x a → 0 par sensibly behave karta hai?
Forecast: geometrically yeh integral radius a ka quarter-disc hai. Jab a 0 tak shrink hota hai, disc ek point tak shrink hoti hai — area 0 jaana chahiye. Predict karo kitni tez se .
Step 1 — integral generally karo. x = a sin θ use karke exactly Ex 2 ki tarah (limits 0 → 2 π , root → a cos θ , d x → a cos θ d θ ):
∫ 0 a a 2 − x 2 d x = a 2 ∫ 0 π /2 cos 2 θ d θ = a 2 ⋅ 4 π = 4 π a 2 .
Yeh step kyun? Wahi a 2 − x 2 machinery; a 2 front mein factor out ho jaata hai, a -dependence isolate ho jaati hai.
Step 2 — degenerate check a → 0 + . 4 π a 2 → 0 , aur yeh quadratically karta hai (a 2 ki tarah) — a halve karna area quarter kar deta hai, exactly jaisa shrinking disc ko karna chahiye. Koi blow-up nahi, koi undefined arcsin nahi: iska argument x / a poore interval mein [ − 1 , 1 ] mein rehta hai.
Yeh step kyun? Degenerate inputs wahan hain jahan formulas secretly zero se divide karte hain. Yahan answer a mein ek clean polynomial hai, toh yeh limit survive karta hai.
Step 3 — doosri degeneracy: x → a neeche se. Indefinite formula 2 a 2 arcsin a x + 2 x a 2 − x 2 mein, jab x → a term 2 x a 2 − x 2 → 0 aur arcsin a x → arcsin 1 = 2 π — dono finite . Toh even though integrand ka slope d x d a 2 − x 2 x = a par blow up karta hai (ek vertical tangent), area finite hai.
Yeh kyun matter karta hai: integrand ka vertical tangent area ko infinite nahi banata — sirf vertical asymptote (integrand → ∞ ) hi aisa karta. Yahan integrand khud bounded rehta hai (0 ≤ a 2 − x 2 ≤ a ), toh hum safe hain.
Verify: VERIFY block symbolically confirm karta hai ∫ 0 a a 2 − x 2 d x = 4 π a 2 , ki yeh a → 0 par → 0 hota hai, aur a = 2 par yeh π ke barabar hai (quarter of π ⋅ 2 2 ). ✓
Recall Har scenario ke liye one-line reflex
Difference a 2 − x 2 ::: x = a sin θ ; limits → arcsin , quarter-disc geometry.
Sum a 2 + x 2 (root upar) ::: x = a tan θ ; sec 3 / csc integral ke liye dhyan rakho.
Power ( a 2 + x 2 ) n koi root nahi ::: phir bhi x = a tan θ ; sec ke powers cancel hokar cos powers bante hain.
Difference x 2 − a 2 , x > a ::: x = a sec θ , branch [ 0 , 2 π ) .
Difference x 2 − a 2 , x < − a ::: x = a sec θ , branch [ π , 2 3 π ) — sign trap!
Linear term present hai ::: pehle square complete karo, phir u = x − h sub karo.
Definite integral ::: LIMITS ko θ mein convert karo; back-substitution skip karo.
Degenerate a → 0 ya endpoint ::: check karo formula finite rehta hai; vertical tangent ≠ infinite area.
Parent topic (Hinglish) — core machinery.
Pythagorean identities — har root khatam karta hai.
Integration by substitution (u-sub) — andar ke u -subs (Ex 3, Ex 7).
Power-reduction & double-angle formulas — har cos 2 / sin 2 step.
Reference right triangle method — saari back-substitutions.
Partial fractions — alternative jab koi root nahi hota.
Arc length and surface area — jahan yeh a 2 ± x 2 integrals naturally aate hain.
Hyperbolic substitution — x 2 ± a 2 ke liye ek parallel tool.