Exercises — Integration by parts — derivation from product rule, LIATE mnemonic
Level 1 — Recognition
Here you only pick the pieces and set up the split. No full computation yet — the goal is to make the choice automatic.
Exercise 1.1. For , state which factor is , which is , and write down and .
Exercise 1.2. For , state , , , .
Exercise 1.3. For , explain why this is secretly a product, then state , , , .
Recall Solution 1.1
Types: is Algebraic, is Trigonometric. LIATE says A comes before T, so Differentiate and integrate : Why this choice: differentiating turns it into the constant — the polynomial "disappears," making the new integral simpler. Had we chosen , then never simplifies and gives , which makes the leftover integral worse.
Recall Solution 1.2
Types: is Logarithmic, is Algebraic. L before A, so Why: has no tidy elementary antiderivative to reach for directly, but its derivative is clean. So we differentiate it, never integrate it.
Recall Solution 1.3
Write the "hidden product" . Now there are two factors. Types: is Inverse-trig, the is Algebraic. I before A, so Why: inverse-trig functions are unpleasant to integrate but have rational derivatives — perfect material.
Level 2 — Application
One clean pass of the formula, all the way to the answer with .
Exercise 2.1. Evaluate .
Exercise 2.2. Evaluate .
Exercise 2.3. Evaluate .
Recall Solution 2.1
(A), (T), so , . Verify by differentiating: ✓
Recall Solution 2.2
(A), (E). Then and Why the : the chain rule means , so to undo it we divide by . Verify: ✓
Recall Solution 2.3
Hidden product: . Take , . Why : by the chain rule . (Also , whose derivative is plainly .) Verify: ✓
Level 3 — Analysis
Now one pass is not enough: you either repeat parts (polynomial degree ) or the integral loops back on itself.
Exercise 3.1. Evaluate .
Exercise 3.2. Evaluate (the "loop" trick).
Exercise 3.3. Evaluate .
Recall Solution 3.1
(A), , so , : The leftover still has a product, so apply parts again with , (, ): Combine (mind the leading minus): Why it terminates: each pass drops the polynomial degree by one; after two passes the is gone. Verify: ✓
Recall Solution 3.2
Let . Take , (, ): Apply parts to the new integral with , (, ): Substitute back: Why it works: the original integral reappears, so we solve for it algebraically rather than integrating forever. (Keep the choice consistent — both times the exponential is — or the loop cancels to .) Verify: ✓
Recall Solution 3.3
(L), . Then and, by the chain rule, Now do parts on : , , , : Combine: Verify: differentiating gives (checked in VERIFY).
Level 4 — Synthesis
Combine integration by parts with another technique — substitution first, or a definite-integral evaluation.
Exercise 4.1. Evaluate (a definite integral).
Exercise 4.2. Evaluate . Hint: substitute first, then parts.
Exercise 4.3. Evaluate .
Recall Solution 4.1
First find the antiderivative (parent Example 1): . By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, evaluate between the limits: Answer: . For definite integrals you may also carry the limits through each step directly: .
Recall Solution 4.2
Substitute first to remove the awkward . Let , so and . Now this is Exercise 2.1's shape. With , (, ): Back-substitute : Why substitution first: parts alone cannot handle — there is no clean split. The substitution turns it into a plain polynomial-times-trig product, which parts eats easily. This is the "try Integration by substitution to set up parts" pattern. Verify: differentiating returns (checked in VERIFY).
Recall Solution 4.3
(I), . Then , : The leftover integral is a rational one. Split by writing : Therefore Verify: derivative equals (checked in VERIFY).
Level 5 — Mastery
Reduction formulae, reasoning about the method, and a proof-flavoured task.
Exercise 5.1. Derive the reduction formula then use it to evaluate .
Exercise 5.2. Show that .
Exercise 5.3 (reasoning). Explain, using tabular integration, why can be written down in one alternating-sign sweep — and give that answer directly.
Recall Solution 5.1
Take (A), , so , : This is the reduction formula: each application lowers the power by one. Now unroll from , using : Verify: differentiating gives (checked in VERIFY).
Recall Solution 5.2
Antiderivative from Exercise 2.1: . (Same as ? No — that was . For : , , , giving .) Evaluate on : At : . At : .
Recall Solution 5.3
Tabular integration is repeated parts organised in a table: Differentiate down to , Integrate (which stays ), and read off products along diagonals with alternating signs :
| sign | D (derivatives of ) | I (integrals of ) |
|---|---|---|
Multiply each D-row by the I-row one step down, apply the sign: Why it matches 5.1: tabular integration is the reduction formula applied repeatedly — the alternating signs are exactly the minus signs stacking up. It works whenever one factor differentiates to after finitely many steps (polynomials) and the other integrates cleanly every time.
Connections
- Parent note — the derivation and LIATE.
- Reduction formulae — Exercise 5.1 is one.
- Tabular integration (DI method) — the fast form of repeated parts (Exercise 5.3).
- Integration by substitution — set up parts when a or nested argument blocks it (Exercise 4.2).
- Definite integrals & Fundamental Theorem of Calculus — evaluating parts between limits (Exercises 4.1, 5.2).