Intuition What this page does
The parent note proved the two parts. Here we stress-test them. We list every kind of situation FTC can be thrown into — signed areas, moving limits, zero-width intervals, discontinuities, infinite limits, real-world questions — and work one example for each. If you meet a problem in an exam, it lands in one of these cells.
Before anything, two words we will use constantly:
Integrand — the function inside the integral sign (the thing being added up). In ∫ a b f ( x ) d x the integrand is f ( x ) .
Limits of integration — the two numbers (or expressions) a (bottom) and b (top) that say where the adding starts and stops .
Every FTC problem falls into one of these cells . The examples below are labelled with the cell they hit.
Cell
What makes it tricky
Example
A
Plain Part 2, positive area
Ex 1
B
Integrand goes negative → signed area
Ex 2
C
Degenerate : equal limits (a = b ) → zero
Ex 3
D
Reversed limits (a > b ) → sign flip
Ex 3
E
Part 1 with variable upper limit = x
Ex 4
F
Variable limit is a function of x → chain rule
Ex 5
G
Both limits move
Ex 6
H
Integrand has a jump discontinuity → FTC breaks
Ex 7
I
Real-world word problem (accumulation)
Ex 8
J
Improper / limiting behaviour (infinite limit)
Ex 9
K
Exam twist : solve for an unknown limit
Ex 10
Prerequisites we lean on: Antiderivatives and Indefinite Integrals , Riemann Sums and the Definite Integral , Chain Rule , Continuity , Improper Integrals .
Worked example Ex 1 — Cell A
Compute ∫ 0 2 ( 3 x 2 + 1 ) d x .
Forecast: the curve 3 x 2 + 1 sits entirely above the x -axis on [ 0 , 2 ] , so the answer is a plain positive number. Guess: somewhere near 10 ?
Step 1. Find any antiderivative G with G ′ ( x ) = 3 x 2 + 1 .
G ( x ) = x 3 + x .
Why this step? Part 2 needs one antiderivative; reversing the power rule (x 3 differentiates to 3 x 2 , x to 1 ) supplies it.
Step 2. Apply Part 2: plug in top minus bottom.
∫ 0 2 ( 3 x 2 + 1 ) d x = [ x 3 + x ] 0 2 = ( 8 + 2 ) − ( 0 + 0 ) = 10.
Why this step? Part 2 says the definite integral equals G ( b ) − G ( a ) — no rectangles needed.
Verify: The region is bounded below by a rectangle of area 1 × 2 = 2 (the "+ 1 ") plus ∫ 0 2 3 x 2 = 8 . 2 + 8 = 10 . ✓
The definite integral is a signed area: pieces of the curve below the x -axis count as negative .
Worked example Ex 2 — Cell B
Compute ∫ 0 π cos x d x and also the total geometric area between cos x and the axis.
Forecast: on [ 0 , π ] the cosine curve is above the axis on [ 0 , 2 π ] and below on [ 2 π , π ] . The two halves are mirror images, so the signed integral should be zero , while the geometric area is positive.
In Figure s01 the blue curve is cos x . The green shaded lobe on the left (0 to 2 π ) sits above the axis and counts + 1 ; the red shaded lobe on the right (2 π to π ) sits below and counts − 1 . The dashed vertical line marks the sign change at x = 2 π — exactly where we must split for geometric area. Notice the green and red regions are congruent reflections, which is why they cancel.
Step 1. Antiderivative of cos x is sin x (since d x d sin x = cos x ).
Why this step? Part 2 needs an antiderivative.
Step 2. Signed integral:
∫ 0 π cos x d x = [ sin x ] 0 π = sin π − sin 0 = 0 − 0 = 0.
Why this step? The positive hump (+ 1 area, green) and negative dip (− 1 area, red) cancel — the integral measures signed area.
Step 3. Geometric area — split at the sign change x = 2 π (the dashed line) and take absolute values:
= 1 ∫ 0 π /2 cos x d x + = − 1 ∫ π /2 π cos x d x = 1 + 1 = 2.
Why this step? "Area" (unsigned) needs each below-axis piece flipped positive; you must split at every root of the integrand.
Verify: [ sin x ] 0 π /2 = 1 − 0 = 1 and [ sin x ] π /2 π = 0 − 1 = − 1 . Sum of magnitudes = 2 , sum with signs = 0 . ✓
Common mistake "Area equals the integral, always."
Why it feels right: for a curve above the axis they are equal. The bug: below the axis the integral goes negative. Fix: for geometric area, split at every zero of the integrand and add absolute values.
These are the "edge inputs" people forget on exams.
Worked example Ex 3 — Cells C and D
(a) Compute ∫ 5 5 e t 2 d t . (b) Compute ∫ 3 1 2 x d x .
Forecast: (a) a strip of zero width has zero area → 0 . (b) integrating "backwards" should just flip the sign of the forward integral.
Step 1 (a). Equal limits: a = b = 5 .
∫ 5 5 e t 2 d t = 0.
Why this step? By definition ∫ a a f = G ( a ) − G ( a ) = 0 — no accumulation happens over zero length. Note we never needed an antiderivative of e t 2 (it has no elementary one).
Step 2 (b). Reversed limits: top = 1 is below bottom = 3 . Use the rule ∫ b a f = − ∫ a b f .
∫ 3 1 2 x d x = [ x 2 ] 3 1 = 1 − 9 = − 8.
Why this step? Part 2 blindly computes G ( top ) − G ( bottom ) = G ( 1 ) − G ( 3 ) ; the ordering handles the sign automatically.
Verify: Forward, ∫ 1 3 2 x d x = [ x 2 ] 1 3 = 9 − 1 = 8 ; reversing gives − 8 . ✓ And ∫ 5 5 of anything is 0 . ✓
Worked example Ex 4 — Cell E
Find d x d ∫ 2 x 1 + t 4 d t .
Forecast: Part 1 says "the rate area accumulates = the curve's height at the top edge." So the answer should just be the integrand with t replaced by x . No antiderivative required.
Step 1. Recognise the exact form of Part 1: upper limit is literally x , lower limit is a constant.
Why this step? Part 1 applies only when the top limit is x and the integrand is continuous — 1 + t 4 is continuous everywhere.
Step 2. Read off the answer:
d x d ∫ 2 x 1 + t 4 d t = 1 + x 4 .
Why this step? This is FTC Part 1: d x d ∫ a x f ( t ) d t = f ( x ) . The lower limit 2 is a constant and disappears under differentiation.
Verify (sanity by numbers): approximating F ( x ) = ∫ 2 x 1 + t 4 d t , the difference quotient 0.001 F ( 2.001 ) − F ( 2 ) should be ≈ 1 + 2 4 = 17 ≈ 4.123 . The thin sliver has width 0.001 and height ≈ 17 , giving that ratio. ✓
Worked example Ex 5 — Cell F
Find d x d ∫ 0 s i n x ln ( 1 + u 2 ) d u .
Forecast: the top limit is sin x , not x . Part 1 gives the rate with respect to the limit ; but the limit itself moves as x changes. Two rates chained together → expect an extra factor cos x .
Figure s02 shows the two stacked rates. The red curve is the inner limit w = sin x ; its steepness at a chosen x (red arrow) is cos x — how fast the top edge slides. The blue curve is the outer accumulated value H ( sin x ) ; the blue arrow marks how fast that stored area grows per unit of w , which Part 1 says is ln ( 1 + w 2 ) . The final rate is the product of the red slope and the blue slope — that is exactly what the chain rule multiplies together.
Step 1. Name the inner limit. Let w = sin x and define H ( w ) = ∫ 0 w ln ( 1 + u 2 ) d u .
Why this step? Splitting into H (an integral with limit w ) and w = sin x (a plain function) separates the two dependencies so we can apply each rule cleanly.
Step 2. By Part 1, H ′ ( w ) = ln ( 1 + w 2 ) .
Why this step? Now the upper limit is the variable w — exact Part 1 form.
Step 3. By the Chain Rule , d x d H ( sin x ) = H ′ ( sin x ) ⋅ d x d ( sin x ) .
= ln ( 1 + sin 2 x ) ⋅ cos x .
Why this step? The chain rule multiplies the "outer rate" H ′ (blue arrow) by the "inner rate" d x d w = cos x (red arrow) — the figure shows why both stack.
Verify: At x = 0 : sin 0 = 0 , so the answer is ln ( 1 ) ⋅ cos 0 = 0 ⋅ 1 = 0 . Independently, near x = 0 the top limit barely moves off 0 where the integrand ln ( 1 + u 2 ) ≈ 0 , so the rate is ≈ 0 . ✓
Common mistake "Just plug the top limit in — done."
Why it feels right: Part 1 says "evaluate integrand at the top." The bug: it forgets the top limit is itself changing. Fix: multiply by the derivative of the top limit (chain rule).
Worked example Ex 6 — Cell G
Find d x d ∫ x 2 x 3 1 + t 2 1 d t .
Forecast: both ends slide. Break the interval at a fixed point, differentiate each piece with the chain rule, and combine — top piece positive, bottom piece negative.
Step 1. Split at a constant a (say a = 0 ):
∫ x 2 x 3 = ∫ 0 x 3 − ∫ 0 x 2 .
Why this step? Part 1 and the chain rule only handle a variable upper limit against a constant lower one; splitting turns a moving lower limit into a subtracted moving upper limit.
Step 2. Differentiate each with Cell F's method. With g ( t ) = 1 + t 2 1 :
d x d ∫ 0 x 3 g = g ( x 3 ) ⋅ 3 x 2 , d x d ∫ 0 x 2 g = g ( x 2 ) ⋅ 2 x .
Why this step? Each is Part 1 + chain rule (Cell F).
Step 3. Subtract:
d x d ∫ x 2 x 3 1 + t 2 d t = 1 + x 6 3 x 2 − 1 + x 4 2 x .
Why this step? The upper limit contributes + , the lower limit contributes − (it was subtracted).
Verify: At x = 1 both limits equal 1 so the interval collapses (Cell C) — the derivative need not be zero, but the two terms give 2 3 − 2 2 = 2 1 , a finite number, as expected for a smooth accumulation. ✓
Worked example Ex 7 — Cell H
Let f ( t ) = { 1 , 3 , t < 1 t ≥ 1 and F ( x ) = ∫ 0 x f ( t ) d t . Is F ′ ( 1 ) = f ( 1 ) ?
Forecast: Part 1 needs a continuous integrand. Here f jumps at t = 1 . So the "rate area accumulates" should change abruptly at x = 1 , and F ′ ( 1 ) may not exist. Guess: no clean F ′ ( 1 ) .
Figure s03 has two panels. On the left , the orange integrand f ( t ) leaps from height 1 to height 3 at t = 1 (open circle = value not taken, filled circle = value taken). On the right , the blue accumulated area F ( x ) rises with slope 1 before x = 1 and slope 3 after — the red dot marks the corner where the two straight pieces meet. Because the left slope (1 ) and right slope (3 ) disagree, the graph has a sharp kink, so no single tangent exists there.
Step 1. Compute F on each side. For x ≤ 1 : F ( x ) = ∫ 0 x 1 d t = x . For x ≥ 1 : F ( x ) = ∫ 0 1 1 1 + ∫ 1 x 3 d t = 1 + 3 ( x − 1 ) = 3 x − 2 .
Why this step? Piecewise integrands are integrated piece by piece (interval additivity).
Step 2. Compare one-sided slopes at x = 1 (the corner in the figure).
F ′ ( 1 − ) = slope of x = 1 , F ′ ( 1 + ) = slope of 3 x − 2 = 3.
Why this step? A derivative exists only if the left and right slopes agree.
Step 3. They differ (1 = 3 ), so F ′ ( 1 ) does not exist — Part 1's conclusion fails exactly where continuity fails.
Why this step? This is why the theorem demands continuity: EVT and the Squeeze in the proof both broke here.
Verify: F is continuous everywhere (F ( 1 ) = 1 from both formulas: x → 1 gives 1 , 3 x − 2 → 1 ) but has a corner — continuous yet non-differentiable, matching the Continuity vs differentiability gap. ✓
Worked example Ex 8 — Cell I
Water flows into a tank at rate r ( t ) = 6 t litres per minute, t in minutes. How many litres enter between t = 1 and t = 4 minutes?
Forecast: total water = accumulated flow = area under the rate curve. Since the rate grows linearly, expect the answer to be the area of a trapezoid.
Step 1. Total added = ∫ 1 4 r ( t ) d t = ∫ 1 4 6 t d t .
Why this step? By FTC, integrating a rate over time gives the total change of the quantity — this is Part 2 read as "endpoints of the amount function."
Step 2. Antiderivative of 6 t is 3 t 2 ; apply Part 2:
∫ 1 4 6 t d t = [ 3 t 2 ] 1 4 = 48 − 3 = 45 litres .
Why this step? d t d ( 3 t 2 ) = 6 t , so 3 t 2 is the amount-so-far function; subtract endpoint values.
Verify (units + geometry): rate is L/min, time in min → integral in litres ✓. Trapezoid area: heights r ( 1 ) = 6 , r ( 4 ) = 24 , width 3 : 2 ( 6 + 24 ) ⋅ 3 = 45 . ✓
Worked example Ex 9 — Cell J
Evaluate the improper integral ∫ 1 ∞ x 2 1 d x .
Forecast: the top limit is infinite. We can't "plug in ∞ ." Instead accumulate to a finite b and watch the limit as b → ∞ . The tail 1/ x 2 shrinks fast, so the total area should be finite .
Step 1. Replace ∞ by a variable b and take a limit:
∫ 1 ∞ x 2 d x = lim b → ∞ ∫ 1 b x 2 d x .
Why this step? FTC (Part 2) only applies over a closed finite interval; the improper integral is defined as this limit.
Step 2. Antiderivative of x − 2 is − x − 1 ; apply Part 2:
∫ 1 b x 2 d x = [ − x 1 ] 1 b = − b 1 + 1 = 1 − b 1 .
Why this step? d x d ( − x − 1 ) = x − 2 .
Step 3. Take the limit:
lim b → ∞ ( 1 − b 1 ) = 1.
Why this step? As b → ∞ , b 1 → 0 ; the leftover area in the far tail vanishes.
Verify: each finite piece 1 − b 1 < 1 and increases toward 1 — bounded and monotone, so the value 1 is consistent. ✓
Worked example Ex 10 — Cell K
Find the value b > 0 such that ∫ 0 b 2 x d x = 9 .
Forecast: the area under 2 x from 0 is x 2 , a triangle-ish growth; we solve for the top edge that gives area 9 . Guess b = 3 .
Step 1. Use Part 2 to turn the integral into an equation in b :
∫ 0 b 2 x d x = [ x 2 ] 0 b = b 2 .
Why this step? FTC converts the "find the limit" problem into ordinary algebra.
Step 2. Set equal to 9 and solve:
b 2 = 9 ⇒ b = 3 ( take b > 0 ) .
Why this step? We reject b = − 3 because the problem asks b > 0 (also ∫ 0 − 3 would give a reversed -limit reading, Cell D).
Verify: ∫ 0 3 2 x d x = [ x 2 ] 0 3 = 9 . ✓
Recall Which cell? Match the trigger to the fix.
Integrand dips below the axis ::: Cell B — split at each zero, take absolute values for geometric area.
Top and bottom limits are equal ::: Cell C — the integral is 0 regardless of the integrand.
Bottom limit bigger than top ::: Cell D — flip sign, ∫ b a = − ∫ a b .
Upper limit is g ( x ) , not x ::: Cell F — Part 1 then multiply by g ′ ( x ) (chain rule).
Both limits are functions of x ::: Cell G — split at a constant, subtract two chain-rule terms.
Integrand has a jump ::: Cell H — Part 1 fails; F may have a corner (no derivative there).
A limit is ∞ ::: Cell J — rewrite as lim b → ∞ , then apply FTC to the finite piece.
Mnemonic The whole matrix in one line
Sign (B), Zero-width (C), Reverse (D), Plain-x (E), Chain (F), Both-move (G), Jump-breaks-it (H), Rate→total (I), Limit-to-∞ (J), Solve-for-limit (K).