Exercises — Fundamental Theorem of Calculus — Part 1 and Part 2 — full proofs
Level 1 — Recognition
Can you spot which engine (Part 1 or Part 2) applies, and turn the crank once?
L1.1 Compute .
L1.2 Find .
L1.3 Compute for any number .
Recall Solution L1.1
This is a definite integral with constant limits → Part 2 (and is continuous, so we are allowed to use it). We need an antiderivative with . Reversing the power rule (, so to undo it we add one to the power and divide): Now plug in the endpoints (top minus bottom):
Recall Solution L1.2
The upper limit is exactly (not , not ), and is continuous, so Part 1 applies directly. Part 1 says: differentiating an area-so-far function hands you back the integrand, evaluated at the top limit. Notice we did not find an antiderivative — has no elementary one. That is Part 1's whole point: it answers "what is the rate of area accumulation?" without ever summing rectangles.
Recall Solution L1.3
The limits are equal, so we are asked for the area of a slab of zero width. Via Part 2 it is also obvious: for any antiderivative . This tiny fact is the "base value" that makes Part 1's .
Level 2 — Application
Turn the crank in slightly disguised situations.
L2.1 Compute .
L2.2 Compute .
L2.3 Compute and explain the answer with a picture.
Recall Solution L2.1
Part 2 (and is continuous). We need with . Since , take .
Recall Solution L2.2
Break the integral into pieces (integrals add across sums). Rewrite . Note is continuous on (no zero in the way), so Part 2 is legal.
- Antiderivative of is .
- Antiderivative of : use the power rule "add one to the power, divide by the new power." The new power is , so The two minus signs (one from the coefficient, one from dividing by ) cancel. Check: So .
Recall Solution L2.3
Antiderivative of is .
Why zero? Look at the figure. is an odd function: the piece from to lies below the axis (negative signed area) and is a mirror image of the piece from to above the axis (positive). They cancel exactly.

Level 3 — Analysis
Now the upper limit is a function of , so Part 1 must team up with the Chain Rule.
L3.1 Find .
L3.2 Find .
L3.3 Find .
Recall Solution L3.1
The top limit is , not , so Part 1 alone is not enough — we must account for how fast the limit itself moves. Set and . By Part 1 ( continuous), . By the chain rule (rate through the inner variable): General rule earned here: .
Recall Solution L3.2
The variable is the lower limit. Flip the limits first (swapping limits flips the sign): Now the top limit is , and is continuous, so Part 1 gives: Takeaway: a moving lower limit contributes with a minus sign.
Recall Solution L3.3
Both limits move. Split at any constant (interval additivity), where is just some fixed number we pick as a "meeting point": Apply the general rule from L3.1 to each piece (with , which is continuous): Why the answer doesn't depend on : the split introduces the constant pieces and , but every -flavoured contribution is baked into the lower limit , which is a constant — and the derivative of a constant limit is . So changing shifts each of the two integrals by a fixed number that differentiates away. The moving limits and are all that survive. Top limit adds; bottom limit subtracts — each carrying its own chain-rule factor.
Level 4 — Synthesis
Combine FTC with limits, roots, and the definition-of-derivative machinery.
L4.1 Let . Find every where has a local maximum or minimum, and classify each.
L4.2 Evaluate .
L4.3 Find (a definite integral of a function with a corner).
Recall Solution L4.1
By Part 1 (the integrand is continuous), . Critical points where : and . Sign chart of :
- : both factors negative → (rising).
- : → (falling).
- : both positive → (rising).
So rises, then falls, then rises: local maximum at , local minimum at .

Recall Solution L4.2
As the integral and , giving the indeterminate form . Two clean routes:
Route A — recognise the derivative. Let , so and by Part 1 ( continuous) . Then That limit is the definition of the derivative of at .
Route B — L'Hôpital. form, differentiate top and bottom: top (Part 1), bottom . Limit .
Recall Solution L4.3
The integrand has a corner at where the inside of changes sign. Split at the corner and drop the absolute value with the correct sign on each piece:
- On : , so .
- On : , so .
Total . (Geometrically: two right triangles, each area .)
Level 5 — Mastery
Prove-and-generalise. These test whether you own the theorem, not just its formulas.
L5.1 Suppose is continuous and satisfies for all . Find , and find .
L5.2 Let . Compute .
L5.3 (Conceptual.) Give a continuous on for which but is not identically zero — and explain in one sentence why this does not contradict Part 1.
Recall Solution L5.1
Differentiate both sides. The left side is an area-so-far function with top limit (and is given continuous), so Part 1 gives . The right side needs the product rule: Therefore At :
Recall Solution L5.2
Peel one layer at a time. Let ; the integrand is continuous. By Part 1, Differentiate again, using Part 1 on : Hence (Two nested integrals ⇒ two applications of Part 1 to strip them.)
Recall Solution L5.3
Take (or any odd continuous function). Then yet is not the zero function. Why no contradiction with Part 1: Part 1 talks about the derivative of the variable-limit function , saying . It says nothing forcing a single definite integral over a fixed interval to be nonzero. Signed area can cancel to while the height is genuinely nonzero.
Active recall — the reusable rules
Recall The four crank-turns to remember (all assume
continuous) Constant-limit definite integral ::: (Part 2), any antiderivative . Top limit is ::: (Part 1). Top limit is ::: (Part 1 + Chain Rule). Both limits move ::: (split at a constant).
Prerequisite threads if any step felt shaky: Riemann Sums and the Definite Integral, Antiderivatives and Indefinite Integrals, Continuity, Mean Value Theorem, Extreme Value Theorem, Squeeze Theorem, Improper Integrals.