Yeh page kuch bhi assume nahi karta. parent topic mein proofs padhne se pehle, har squiggle, letter, aur idea jis par woh tika hai — yahan neeche se upar tak, ek order mein banaya gaya hai jahan har piece apne pehle wale par tika ho.
Picture karo. Koi x chuno, curve tak jao, height padho — woh height hif(x) hai.
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye. FTC ek continuous curve f ke baare mein statement hai: yeh us curve ke neeche ke area ko us curve ki height se relate karta hai. Dono ideas ek hi picture par rehte hain.
[a,b]
matlab "saare numbers a se b tak, a aur b ko include karte hue" — ek closed interval, woh horizontal stretch jis par hum kaam karte hain.
Hum curvy area kaise measure karte hain? Hum ise patli rectangles se approximate karte hain, phir rectangles ko infinitely patla hone dete hain. Woh summing-up process ek special stretched-S symbol se likhi jaati hai.
Picture karo. Near-zero width ka ek tall column, area f(x)dx, a se b tak slide karta hai; unhe sab add karo aur total shaded area milta hai.
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye. FTC Part 2 ka left side yahi symbol hai. Iske baare mein kuch bhi prove karne ke liye hume pata hona chahiye ki iska matlab "limit of rectangle sums" hai — exactly yahi Riemann Sums and the Definite Integral mein poori tarah se banta hai.
∫aafdt
0 ke barabar hai kyunki a se a tak ke region ki zero width hai.
Picture karo.t ek finger hai jo base par a se right ki taraf slide karta hai; x woh jagah hai jahan tum finger rok dete ho. Jahaan roko woh badlo, aur shaded area badal jaata hai — isliye area x ka function hai, aur isiliye hum ise F(x) kehte hain.
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye.F(x) — "ab-tak-ka-area" function — Part 1 ka star hai. Dono letters ko seedha samajhna valid proof aur nonsense ke beech ka fark hai.
F(x)=∫axf(t)dt words mein
"f ke neeche fixed left edge a se moving right edge x tak ka area."
Picture karo. Kisi bhi closed stretch ki unbroken curve par ek sachcha peak aur ek sachcha valley hota hai — curve "ek aisi value ki taraf nahi bhaag sakti jo woh kabhi actually touch na kare."
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye.x se x+h tak ke patле sliver ka area sabse chhoti possible rectangle mh⋅h aur sabse badi Mh⋅h ke beech dabba hua hai. EVT guarantee karta hai ki woh dono heights exist karti hain. Extreme Value Theorem dekho.
Picture karo. Ek sandwich: upar ki slice aur neeche ki slice ko saath dabao aur jo bhi beech mein hai uske paas koi choice nahi — woh usi jagah milega.
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye. Jab h→0, dono mh aur Mhf(x) ki taraf slide karte hain; Squeeze Theorem difference quotient (jo unke beech hai) ko f(x) ke barabar hone par force karta hai — yahi Part 1 hai. Squeeze Theorem mein detail se diya hai.
Picture karo.hF(x+h)−F(x)F ke graph par do nearby points ko jodne wali line ka slope hai; jab h→0 woh line tangent ban jaati hai, aur uska slope F′(x) hai.
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye. Part 1 claim karta hai F′(x)=f(x). Ise prove karne ke liye hume F′ ki definition — is limit — se shuru karna hoga, aur kuch nahi. Symbol limh→0 ka matlab sirf itna hai "woh value jo h ke 0 tak shrink hone par approach ho rahi hai."
hF(x+h)−F(x) words mein
"area kitna badha, divide by region kitna choda hua" — newly added strip ki average height.
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye. Part 2 kehta hai: ∫abf paane ke liye, koi bhi antiderivative G dhundo aur G(b)−G(a) compute karo. Reverse rules se G dhundhna Antiderivatives and Indefinite Integrals ka poora content hai.
Picture karo. Start point se end point tak straight chord khiincho; kahin beech mein, curve us chord ke parallel chalta hai.
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye. Part 2 ko chahiye ki "agar (F−G)′=0 har jagah hai toh F−G constant hai." Yeh obvious nahi hai — MVT ise prove karta hai: G′(c)=0 ke saath, formula deta hai G(b)−G(a)=0 kisi bhi endpoints ke liye, toh G kabhi change nahi karta. Mean Value Theorem mein poori treatment hai.
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye. Jab upper limit plain x nahi balki x2 ya x3 jaisi koi cheez ho, jaise dxd∫0x2f, Part 1 "H′" piece handle karta hai aur Chain Rule extra factor dxd(x2)=2x deta hai. Miss karo toh galat answer milega.