4.1.32 · D2Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives

Visual walkthrough — Linear approximation and differentials

2,252 words10 min readBack to topic

Before line one, three plain words we will keep using:


Step 1 — Draw the curve and mark two heights

Figure — Linear approximation and differentials

Step 2 — What "slope at " even means

Figure — Linear approximation and differentials

Step 3 — Turn "close to " into an exact equation

Figure — Linear approximation and differentials

Step 4 — Rearrange into "height = line + error"

Figure — Linear approximation and differentials

Step 5 — Why the error dies faster than the run

Figure — Linear approximation and differentials
Recall How fast, exactly? (needs an extra assumption)

The clean rule "error " is not free — it holds only when has a second derivative (i.e. is ). Then Taylor series gives the next term , so the error is . For a function that is merely differentiable (only exists), all we may claim is the weaker from the formula above — small compared to the run, but not necessarily square-law. Concavity and second derivative is exactly the that governs the quadratic case.


Step 6 — The differential: the same rise, at a working point

Figure — Linear approximation and differentials

Step 7 — Every case: where is , and which way does the curve bend?

Figure — Linear approximation and differentials

The one-picture summary

Figure — Linear approximation and differentials

This single figure stacks the whole argument: the curve , the tangent line touching at , the run , the tangent rise in red, and the tiny leftover error — small because it is smallsmall.

Recall Feynman retelling — the whole walkthrough in plain words

You are standing on a curvy hill at spot , and you know two things there: how high you are () and how steep the ground tilts (). You want to guess your height a few steps away, at . So you close your eyes and walk in a perfectly straight line in the direction the ground was tilting. After a run of steps, straight-walking has lifted you by slope run . Add that to where you started: — that is your guess, . The real hill curved a little while you walked straight, so you are off by a small gap. But here is the magic: that gap is "how much the slope drifted" () times "how far you walked" () — two small numbers multiplied, so it is tiny, and it shrinks much faster than your walk as you take fewer steps. That is why walking straight a little way is an almost-perfect shortcut.

Recall Rebuild the derivation from memory

Start from the definition of slope at ::: . Name the gap between secant and tangent slope ::: , which . Multiply through by the run and add ::: . Why the error is negligible near ::: it is = smallsmall, so error — the error is . Rename base point and run for the differential ::: base , step , giving with .


Connections

  • Derivative as a limit — Step 2 is literally its definition; the proof is unpacking that limit.
  • Tangent line — the line we build in Step 4.
  • Taylor series — the next term (when exists) that pins down the Step-5 error exactly.
  • Newton's method — repeats Step 4 to chase a root.
  • Error propagation — Step 6's in the lab.
  • Concavity and second derivative — decides over- vs under-estimate in Step 7.