These test only: do you know which formula, with the right sign, no chain rule yet?
Recall Solution 1.1
dxdarccosx=−1−x21.Why the minus: as the ratio x grows, the angle arccosxshrinks (arccos runs from π down to 0). A function that decreases has a negative slope. Same 1−x2 shape as arcsin, opposite sign.
Recall Solution 1.2
dxdarctanx=1+x21,dxdarccotx=−1+x21.
No square root at all — that cleanliness comes from the identity sec2y=1+tan2y (see Pythagorean Identities), which needs no square root when we solve. The co-partner just flips the sign.
Recall Solution 1.3
Only arcsec and arccsc carry the ∣x∣:
dxdarcsecx=∣x∣x2−11.
At x=2: ∣2∣=2 and 4−1=3, so the value is
231=63≈0.2887.
Now the inside is not a bare x, so the Chain Rule earns its keep.
Recall Solution 2.1
Inside u=5x, so u′=5.
f′(x)=1+(5x)21⋅5=1+25x25.
The lone extra factor is the derivative of the inside — miss it and you are off by a factor of 5.
Recall Solution 2.2
Inside u=x=x1/2, so u′=21x−1/2=2x1. Also u2=x.
g′(x)=1−(x)21⋅2x1=1−x1⋅2x1=2x(1−x)1.
Note how (x)2 collapses to x — always simplify the inside-squared before writing the answer.
Recall Solution 2.3
Inside u=ex, so u′=ex. Arccos brings a minus sign.
h′(x)=−1−(ex)21⋅ex=1−e2x−ex.
Valid only where ex<1, i.e. x<0 — outside that the ratio exceeds 1 and arccos is undefined.
Recall Solution 2.4
Inside u=x3, u′=3x2, and u2=x6.
p′(x)=1+x63x2,p′(1)=1+13=23.
Combine formulas; watch for cancellations and simplifications.
Recall Solution 3.1
Product rule: (uv)′=u′v+uv′ with u=x,v=arctanx.
f′(x)=1⋅arctanx+x⋅1+x21=arctanx+1+x2x.
No further collapse — the two pieces are genuinely different kinds of term (an angle plus a rational function).
Recall Solution 3.2
Inside u=1/x=x−1, so u′=−x−2=−x21, and u2=x21.
g′(x)=1+x211⋅(−x21)=x2+1x2⋅(−x21)=−1+x21.
This equals dxdarccotx exactly — reassuring, since arctan(1/x)=arccotx for x>0.
Recall Solution 3.3
1−x21−(−1−x21)=1−x22.
The two derivatives add (because subtracting the negative flips it), giving twice the arcsin derivative.
Recall Solution 3.4
Recognise 1−x22x as the double-angle for tangent: if x=tanθ then 1−x22x=tan(2θ), so y=2arctanx on ∣x∣<1. Then
dxdy=2⋅1+x21=1+x22.
(Brute-force quotient-rule differentiation gives the same 1+x22 — the identity just saves the algebra.)
Build proofs and connect derivatives to the integrals from Integration by Inverse Trig.
Recall Solution 4.1
dxd(arctanx+arccotx)=1+x21+(−1+x21)=0.
A zero derivative on an interval means the function is constant (a flat graph). Evaluate at x=1:
arctan1+arccot1=4π+4π=2π.
So arctanx+arccotx=2π for all x.
Recall Solution 4.2
Since dxdarctanx=1+x21, the antiderivative is arctanx.
∫011+x2dx=[arctanx]01=arctan1−arctan0=4π−0=4π.
Recall Solution 4.3
The integrand is dxdarcsinx, so
∫01/21−x2dx=[arcsinx]01/2=arcsin21−arcsin0=6π−0=6π.
Recall Solution 4.4
Inside u=x/a, u′=1/a, u2=x2/a2.
dxdarctan(ax)=1+a2x21⋅a1=a2+x2a2⋅a1=a2+x2a.
So the antiderivative of a2+x21 is a1arctan(ax). Then
∫0aa2+x2dx=a1[arctanax]0a=a1(arctan1−arctan0)=a1⋅4π=4aπ.
The genuinely tricky cases: signs, absolute values, and degenerate/limiting behaviour.
Recall Solution 5.1
Look at the two red curve pieces. For x>1 the arcsec curve rises from 0 toward 2π; for x<−1 it rises from 2π toward π. Both pieces go uphill, so the slope is positive on each. The raw algebra gives xx2−11, which would be negative for x<−1 (since x<0 there). Wrapping x in ∣x∣ keeps the denominator positive on both sides, so the derivative stays positive everywhere arcsec is increasing:
dxdarcsecx=∣x∣x2−11.
Check at x=−2: ∣−2∣31=231>0 ✓ (the bare-x version would wrongly give −231).
Recall Solution 5.2
dxdarcsinx=1−x21.
As x→1−, the quantity 1−x2→0+, so 1−x2→0+, and the whole fraction →+∞. In the figure the arcsin curve rears up vertically at x=1: the tangent line's slope blows up. Geometrically, near a ratio of 1 the angle changes enormously for a tiny change in ratio — that steepness is the exploding derivative. The same thing happens (mirror image) as x→−1+.
Recall Solution 5.3
Inside u=x2, u′=2x, and u2=x4. Since u=x2≥0, we have ∣u∣=x2.
y′=∣x2∣(x2)2−11⋅2x=x2x4−12x=xx4−12.Domain: arcsec needs ∣u∣≥1, i.e. x2≥1, so ∣x∣≥1. And the derivative needs x4>1, i.e. ∣x∣>1 strictly (equality gives a vertical tangent). Note xx4−12 genuinely keeps the sign of x: it is positive for x>1 and negative for x<−1, which is correct because arcsec(x2) increases then decreases across the two branches.
Recall Solution 5.4
Let u=x+1x−1. Quotient rule:
u′=(x+1)2(1)(x+1)−(x−1)(1)=(x+1)2(x+1)−(x−1)=(x+1)22.
Now the tricky simplification of 1−u2:
1−u2=1−(x+1)2(x−1)2=(x+1)2(x+1)2−(x−1)2=(x+1)24x.
(Difference of squares: (x+1)2−(x−1)2=4x.) So 1−u2=∣x+1∣2x (valid where x>0, giving x+1>0 so ∣x+1∣=x+1). With arccos's minus sign:
y′=−1−u21⋅u′=−2xx+1⋅(x+1)22=−x(x+1)1.
Clean result: y′=−x(x+1)1, valid for x>0.
Recall One-line self-test recap
Recognition sign rule ::: sin/tan/sec positive, their co-partners negative
Chain-rule extra factor for arctan(5x) ::: multiply by u′=5 giving 1+25x25∫011+x2dx ::: arctan1−arctan0=4π
Why ∣x∣ in arcsec derivative ::: keeps the slope positive on both branches
Limit of dxdarcsinx as x→1− ::: +∞ (vertical tangent)