4.1.18 · D5Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives

Question bank — Derivatives of all six trig functions

1,475 words7 min readBack to topic

Before we start, three words that recur below get pinned down so nothing is used unearned:


True or false — justify

Answer T/F, then give the reason in your own words before revealing.

holds whether is in degrees or radians.
False. It only holds in radians. In degrees , so the derivative picks up a factor : .
Since and , the pair "rotates" — applying four times returns you to .
True. . Four derivatives is a full cycle, which is exactly why and solve the oscillator equation in Simple Harmonic Motion.
is valid for all real .
False. Both and blow up where (at ). The rule holds only on the domain where exists.
The Pythagorean identity is used in deriving but not in deriving .
True. needs to collapse the numerator. The derivation of uses the two foundation limits and Angle addition formulas instead — no Pythagoras.
for every in the domain, so is always increasing.
True. since . A slope that never drops below means climbs on every interval between its vertical asymptotes.
Because is an even function (), its derivative is also even.
False. The derivative of an even function is odd. , so is odd — matching the rule that differentiating flips even odd parity.
can be checked at : it should give .
True. At , , so the derivative is . Geometrically has a minimum there (value ), and a minimum has zero slope.

Spot the error

Each line contains a flawed step. Find it, then reveal the fix.

"."
Missing the inside derivative (Chain Rule). The inside also gets differentiated: correct answer is .
"."
Forgot the factor from the inner function. Correct: . The table rule only applies when the inside is plain .
"."
Wrong sign. has no "co", so it is positive: . The minus belongs to .
"."
Notation abuse: reads as . The answer is , meaning . Write it as if unsure.
"."
This treated it as chain rule; it's a product (Product Rule): .
"For : quotient rule on gives ."
Sign slip in the numerator. Quotient Rule gives .
", so ."
Two errors: is a constant, so its derivative is ; and even a variable-degree input would need the factor. Derivative of any constant is .

Why questions

Why must the angle be in radians for ?
The whole derivation rests on , and that limit equals only when arc length equals angle measure — which is the definition of radians. Degrees rescale the angle, inserting .
Why do exactly three of the six derivatives carry a minus sign?
The three "co-" functions () decrease as their partners increase near . Structurally, each "co" derivative comes from differentiating a in a numerator (giving ) or a reciprocal of , and that minus propagates through.
Why can we derive without ever using the limit definition again?
Each is a ratio of and , whose derivatives we already earned. The Quotient Rule converts "slope of a ratio" into known slopes — no fresh limits needed.
Why does never take a negative value?
is a square divided into , so it's always positive. This encodes that only ever rises — it never turns around between asymptotes.
Why is the rate of rather than just a "related wave"?
Because literally is the limit of — the instantaneous change in . See Limit definition of the derivative. The phase shift ( leads by ) is the visual of this rate.
Why do the inverse trig derivatives (e.g. ) look algebraic, with no trig at all?
Inverting the relationship forces and friends to be rewritten via Pythagorean identity sin^2 + cos^2 = 1 back in terms of , dissolving the trig. Details in Derivatives of inverse trig functions.

Edge cases

At , what is the slope of , and what does it look like?
— the steepest the wave ever climbs. Near the origin , a line of slope , which is exactly the foundation limit made visible.
What happens to as ?
. The tangent curve becomes vertical approaching its asymptote; an infinite slope matches the graph shooting up.
Is defined at ?
No. is undefined where (including ), and blows up there. The derivative shares the parent's domain gaps.
at — value and meaning?
. has a local minimum of at , and a minimum has zero slope — consistent.
Does still hold at the peaks where is flat?
Yes. , correctly reporting zero slope at the crest. The rule handles maxima/minima automatically — no special case needed.
What is as ?
. As rockets to near , its slope is steeply negative just before — a huge downward drop into the asymptote from the right's mirror side.
If a function is a constant like , what is its derivative?
. Once the input is a fixed number, the output is a constant, and constants have zero slope — no trig rule fires at all.
Recall One-line summary of every trap

Radians only · chain rule needs the inside · "co" ⇒ minus · derivative rules inherit the parent's domain gaps · constants differentiate to .


Connections