4.1.10 · D4Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives

Exercises — Derivative from first principles — difference quotient definition

2,129 words10 min readBack to topic

Remember the recipe from the parent note: Plug, Subtract, Cancel, Shrink.

Figure — Derivative from first principles — difference quotient definition

Every problem is the same story as this picture: a secant line through two nearby points slowly rotating into the tangent as the second point slides in. Read Secant and Tangent lines if that picture is fuzzy.


Level 1 — Recognition

(Can you spot the pieces and run the machine on the simplest inputs?)

Exercise 1.1

State the difference quotient for , then find from first principles.

Recall Solution 1.1

Step 1 — Plug. . Step 2 — Subtract. Step 3 — Cancel. . Step 4 — Shrink. . Answer: . A straight line has one constant slope everywhere — exactly its coefficient. ✓

Exercise 1.2

Find from first principles for the constant .

Recall Solution 1.2

Plug. (no to replace). Subtract. . Cancel. for every . Shrink. . Answer: . A flat horizontal line never rises — zero steepness everywhere. ✓

Exercise 1.3

For (derived in the parent note as ), what is the slope of the tangent line at ?

Recall Solution 1.3

We already have . Substitute the single point: Answer: . On the left arm of the parabola the curve slopes downhill, so a negative slope is exactly what we expect. ✓


Level 2 — Application

(Run the full four-step machine on genuinely curved functions.)

Exercise 2.1

Find from first principles for .

Recall Solution 2.1

Plug. . Subtract. The and terms cancel — this cancellation is why a finite slope survives. Cancel. Factor : Shrink. . Answer: .

Exercise 2.2

Find from first principles for .

Recall Solution 2.2

Plug. Use . Subtract. Cancel. Every term has an : Shrink. As both and vanish: Answer: . This matches the Power Rule pattern with . ✓

Exercise 2.3

Find from first principles for .

Recall Solution 2.3

Plug. . Subtract (common denominator). Cancel. Divide by ; factor from the top: Shrink. Let : Answer: .


Level 3 — Analysis

(The algebra hides the — you must engineer it into view.)

Exercise 3.1

Find from first principles for (a shifted square root).

Recall Solution 3.1

Plug. . Subtract. — stuck, no to factor. Use the conjugate trick (multiply top and bottom by , which turns into and manufactures an ): Cancel. . Shrink. makes both roots equal: Answer: .

Exercise 3.2

Find from first principles for .

Recall Solution 3.2

Plug. . Subtract (common denominator). Expand the top: and . Subtract: So the numerator is just : Cancel. Divide by : . Shrink. : Answer: . Always positive — this function only ever climbs where it is defined. ✓

Exercise 3.3

Show, from first principles, that is not differentiable at , and identify what goes wrong. (Uses Limits — formal definition and one-sided limits.)

Recall Solution 3.3

At the difference quotient is Now split by the sign of (this is a one-sided-limit question — the two sides need not agree):

  • From the right (): , so . Limit .
  • From the left (): , so . Limit .

The right-hand slope and left-hand slope disagree, so the two-sided limit does not exist. is not differentiable at . Geometrically the graph has a sharp corner — the secant approaches a different tangent from each side, so no single tangent slope exists. (Note is continuous at ; see Continuity and Differentiability — continuous does not force differentiable.) ✓


Level 4 — Synthesis

(Combine the machine with unknown constants and general structure.)

Exercise 4.1

For the general quadratic , prove from first principles that .

Recall Solution 4.1

Plug. . Subtract. Every "position" term () cancels; only "change" terms — each carrying an — remain. Cancel. Shrink. kills the : Answer: . Check against Exercise 2.1 (): . ✓

Exercise 4.2

Prove from first principles the sum rule: if and both are differentiable, then .

Recall Solution 4.2

Plug & Subtract. Write the difference quotient and group the -parts and -parts: Shrink. A limit of a sum is the sum of the limits (a limit law from Limits — formal definition and one-sided limits), and each piece is a derivative by definition: Answer: . ✓ No algebra tricks — the whole proof is regrouping plus one limit law.

Exercise 4.3

Find the equation of the tangent line to at , using the first-principles derivative. (Ties to Secant and Tangent lines.)

Recall Solution 4.3

From the parent note , so the tangent slope at is The point of tangency is . Point–slope form : Answer: . As a check, this line passes through and has slope ; a nearby secant to has slope , already close to and shrinking toward it as . ✓


Level 5 — Mastery

(Subtle limits, degenerate points, and forecasting.)

Exercise 5.1

Find from first principles for the piecewise function and note why the ordinary "plug into a formula" instinct fails here.

Recall Solution 5.1

We must use the definition at because is defined by a special rule there. Now bound it. Since for every input, As both outer bounds go to , so the middle is squeezed to : Answer: . The derivative exists even though oscillates wildly, because the out front crushes the oscillation. You could not get this by "differentiating the formula and plugging in " — the formula isn't even defined at . Only the difference quotient reaches the answer. ✓

Exercise 5.2

Forecast, then verify. For , forecast using the pattern you've seen (, ). Then verify from first principles.

Recall Solution 5.2

Forecast. The pattern predicts . Verify. Use . Subtract. . Cancel. Factor : Shrink. Every term with an vanishes: Answer confirmed: . ✓ The forecast held — this is exactly the Power Rule being built from first principles.

Exercise 5.3

The difference quotient at is the indeterminate form $0/0$. Using at , evaluate the quotient at and state the limit it approaches. Explain why the value is not even though the fraction looks like it becomes .

Recall Solution 5.3

With , at the quotient simplifies (Step 3) to . Tabulate:

h & \frac{f(3+h)-f(3)}{h}=6+h\\ \hline 1 & 7\\ 0.1 & 6.1\\ 0.01 & 6.01 \end{array}$$ The values march toward $\mathbf{6}$, which equals $f'(3)=2(3)=6$. ✓ **Why not $0/0$?** At $h=0$ *exactly*, both rise and run are $0$ — genuinely undefined. But a limit never asks for the value *at* $h=0$; it asks what the fraction *approaches near* $h=0$. Cancelling the $h$ (Step 3) rewrites the same expression in a form that *is* defined there, and that form settles on $6$. The $0/0$ was only a disguise the algebra removed. ✓

Self-test recap

Constant has derivative
everywhere.
Slope of at
.
for from first principles
.
for
.
Why is not differentiable at ?
The right slope is and the left slope is ; they disagree, so the limit fails — a corner.
Tangent to at
.
General quadratic has derivative
.
for (with )
, by the squeeze .

Connections