4.1.7 · D4Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives

Exercises — Continuity — definition, types of discontinuity (removable, jump, infinite)

2,382 words11 min readBack to topic

Before we start, one shared picture — the three "pen-lift" shapes you will keep meeting:

Figure — Continuity — definition, types of discontinuity (removable, jump, infinite)
  • Blue hollow dot = a hole (value missing but limit fine) → removable.
  • Orange step = left and right land at different heights → jump.
  • Red rocket = a side shoots to → infinite.

Level 1 — Recognition

(Read off the type from a description or a formula, no heavy algebra.)

Recall Solution — L1·Q1

Both one-sided limits are equal and finite (), so the two-sided limit exists. The only thing wrong is the missing value. Condition 2 ✓ (limit exists), condition 1 ✗ (value undefined) → removable. Patch: define .

Recall Solution — L1·Q2

At least one side is infinite (here both), so the limit does not exist as a finite number. → Infinite discontinuity (a vertical asymptote at ). See Vertical asymptotes and rational functions.

Recall Solution — L1·Q3

Both one-sided limits are finite but unequal () → jump discontinuity. Jump size . (The value of is irrelevant to the type here — no single value can close a gap between two different heights.)


Level 2 — Application

(Run the 3-step check on concrete formulas.)

Recall Solution — L2·Q1

Step 1: — undefined. Step 2: Factor the numerator: . For , Why factor? The limit ignores the point itself; cancelling the common factor reveals the height the graph approaches. So . Verdict: limit exists (), value undefined → removable. Patch: .

Recall Solution — L2·Q2

Step 1: — undefined (numerator , denominator : no cancellation possible). Step 2: Just below , is a tiny negative, numerator , so . Just above, is a tiny positive, so . Verdict: infinite discontinuity (vertical asymptote at ).

Recall Solution — L2·Q3

Step 1: satisfies , so use the second piece: . (Defined.) Step 2: Verdict: both finite, jump, size .


Level 3 — Analysis

(Decide why the type is what it is; use the standard limit; handle two suspect points.)

Recall Solution — L3·Q1

Step 1: (defined). Step 2: Use the standard limit . Why this tool? Direct substitution gives ; the standard limit is the machine built exactly to resolve . Rewrite so the argument matches the denominator: Verdict: limit exists and is finite, but removable (redefine ). Why removable, not jump? Left and right both approach the same value ; only the plotted dot is misplaced.

Recall Solution — L3·Q2

The denominator factors: , zero at and . Both are suspect points. At : the cancels, so (finite), but undefined → removable, patch . At : the factor does not cancel. , infinite (asymptote at ). Summary: removable at , infinite at .


Level 4 — Synthesis

(Choose an unknown so continuity holds; combine conditions.)

Recall Solution — L4·Q1

Continuity at means .

  • .
  • (the second piece also gives the value since it's ). Set them equal: . Check: with , . All three conditions hold — pen never lifts.
Recall Solution — L4·Q2

Only the two seams and can break; each middle/edge piece is a line (continuous on its own). At : left value ; right approach . Continuity ⇒ a + b = 2. \tag{i} At : left approach ; right value . Continuity ⇒ 3a + b = 3. \tag{ii} Subtract (i) from (ii): . Then . Check: at , ✓; at , ✓.


Level 5 — Mastery

(Deeper reasoning: an Intermediate Value Theorem hook, and a subtle "looks removable but isn't" trap.)

Recall Solution — L5·Q1

The absolute value splits by sign of :

  • For : , so .
  • For : , so . Hence , , both finite but unequal. And is undefined. Verdict: jump, size . Why not removable, despite the ? A form does not guarantee the limit exists — here the two sides settle on different constants, so no single patch works.
Recall Solution — L5·Q2

is a polynomial, hence continuous on the closed interval — including the two endpoints, each of which we check with the relevant one-sided limit (no holes, jumps, or poles anywhere, so this is automatic). Evaluate the endpoints: The sign changes: and . By the Intermediate Value Theorem, a continuous function taking values and must hit every value between — including — somewhere in . Therefore has at least one root there. The property relied on: continuity on a closed interval — the pen crosses the -axis without lifting, so it cannot skip zero.

Recall Solution — L5·Q3

Step 1: satisfies , so (defined). Step 2:

  • .
  • : for , . So , — both finite, unequal. Verdict: jump, size . Subtlety: the right piece looks removable on its own (a hole), but glued to the left piece the two sides disagree → the combined function has a jump at , and cannot fix a whole gap. Recall Differentiability implies continuity: since isn't even continuous here, it certainly can't be differentiable at .

Recall Self-test summary (reveal each answer)

How do you read the type straight from a formula? ::: Zero denominator with a cancelling numerator → removable; non-cancelling → infinite; different-height pieces → jump. What is the first question to ask at any ? ::: Do the two one-sided limits agree and stay finite? Only then removable. What does continuity for an unknown constant require? ::: at every seam — one equation per boundary. What does the IVT need to guarantee a root? ::: Continuity on a closed interval, plus a sign change at the endpoints.

Connections