Exercises — Continuity — definition, types of discontinuity (removable, jump, infinite)
Before we start, one shared picture — the three "pen-lift" shapes you will keep meeting:

- Blue hollow dot = a hole (value missing but limit fine) → removable.
- Orange step = left and right land at different heights → jump.
- Red rocket = a side shoots to → infinite.
Level 1 — Recognition
(Read off the type from a description or a formula, no heavy algebra.)
Recall Solution — L1·Q1
Both one-sided limits are equal and finite (), so the two-sided limit exists. The only thing wrong is the missing value. Condition 2 ✓ (limit exists), condition 1 ✗ (value undefined) → removable. Patch: define .
Recall Solution — L1·Q2
At least one side is infinite (here both), so the limit does not exist as a finite number. → Infinite discontinuity (a vertical asymptote at ). See Vertical asymptotes and rational functions.
Recall Solution — L1·Q3
Both one-sided limits are finite but unequal () → jump discontinuity. Jump size . (The value of is irrelevant to the type here — no single value can close a gap between two different heights.)
Level 2 — Application
(Run the 3-step check on concrete formulas.)
Recall Solution — L2·Q1
Step 1: — undefined. Step 2: Factor the numerator: . For , Why factor? The limit ignores the point itself; cancelling the common factor reveals the height the graph approaches. So . Verdict: limit exists (), value undefined → removable. Patch: .
Recall Solution — L2·Q2
Step 1: — undefined (numerator , denominator : no cancellation possible). Step 2: Just below , is a tiny negative, numerator , so . Just above, is a tiny positive, so . Verdict: infinite discontinuity (vertical asymptote at ).
Recall Solution — L2·Q3
Step 1: satisfies , so use the second piece: . (Defined.) Step 2: Verdict: both finite, → jump, size .
Level 3 — Analysis
(Decide why the type is what it is; use the standard limit; handle two suspect points.)
Recall Solution — L3·Q1
Step 1: (defined). Step 2: Use the standard limit . Why this tool? Direct substitution gives ; the standard limit is the machine built exactly to resolve . Rewrite so the argument matches the denominator: Verdict: limit exists and is finite, but → removable (redefine ). Why removable, not jump? Left and right both approach the same value ; only the plotted dot is misplaced.
Recall Solution — L3·Q2
The denominator factors: , zero at and . Both are suspect points. At : the cancels, so (finite), but undefined → removable, patch . At : the factor does not cancel. , → infinite (asymptote at ). Summary: removable at , infinite at .
Level 4 — Synthesis
(Choose an unknown so continuity holds; combine conditions.)
Recall Solution — L4·Q1
Continuity at means .
- .
- (the second piece also gives the value since it's ). Set them equal: . Check: with , . All three conditions hold — pen never lifts.
Recall Solution — L4·Q2
Only the two seams and can break; each middle/edge piece is a line (continuous on its own). At : left value ; right approach . Continuity ⇒ a + b = 2. \tag{i} At : left approach ; right value . Continuity ⇒ 3a + b = 3. \tag{ii} Subtract (i) from (ii): . Then . Check: at , ✓; at , ✓.
Level 5 — Mastery
(Deeper reasoning: an Intermediate Value Theorem hook, and a subtle "looks removable but isn't" trap.)
Recall Solution — L5·Q1
The absolute value splits by sign of :
- For : , so .
- For : , so . Hence , , both finite but unequal. And is undefined. Verdict: jump, size . Why not removable, despite the ? A form does not guarantee the limit exists — here the two sides settle on different constants, so no single patch works.
Recall Solution — L5·Q2
is a polynomial, hence continuous on the closed interval — including the two endpoints, each of which we check with the relevant one-sided limit (no holes, jumps, or poles anywhere, so this is automatic). Evaluate the endpoints: The sign changes: and . By the Intermediate Value Theorem, a continuous function taking values and must hit every value between — including — somewhere in . Therefore has at least one root there. The property relied on: continuity on a closed interval — the pen crosses the -axis without lifting, so it cannot skip zero.
Recall Solution — L5·Q3
Step 1: satisfies , so (defined). Step 2:
- .
- : for , . So , — both finite, unequal. Verdict: jump, size . Subtlety: the right piece looks removable on its own (a hole), but glued to the left piece the two sides disagree → the combined function has a jump at , and cannot fix a whole gap. Recall Differentiability implies continuity: since isn't even continuous here, it certainly can't be differentiable at .
Recall Self-test summary (reveal each answer)
How do you read the type straight from a formula? ::: Zero denominator with a cancelling numerator → removable; non-cancelling → infinite; different-height pieces → jump. What is the first question to ask at any ? ::: Do the two one-sided limits agree and stay finite? Only then removable. What does continuity for an unknown constant require? ::: at every seam — one equation per boundary. What does the IVT need to guarantee a root? ::: Continuity on a closed interval, plus a sign change at the endpoints.
Connections
- Parent: Continuity & types
- Limits — definition and one-sided limits
- Standard limit sin(x)/x = 1
- Piecewise functions
- Vertical asymptotes and rational functions
- Intermediate Value Theorem
- Differentiability implies continuity