4.1.7 · D4 · HinglishCalculus I — Limits & Derivatives

ExercisesContinuity — definition, types of discontinuity (removable, jump, infinite)

2,549 words12 min read↑ Read in English

4.1.7 · D4 · Maths › Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives › Continuity — definition, types of discontinuity (removable,

Shuru karne se pehle, ek shared picture — teen "pen-lift" shapes jo tumhe baar baar milenge:

Figure — Continuity — definition, types of discontinuity (removable, jump, infinite)
  • Blue hollow dot = ek hole (value missing par limit theek hai) → removable.
  • Orange step = left aur right alag heights par land karte hain → jump.
  • Red rocket = ek side ki taraf shoot karti hai → infinite.

Level 1 — Recognition

(Description ya formula se type read karo, heavy algebra nahi.)

Recall Solution — L1·Q1

Dono one-sided limits equal aur finite hain (), toh two-sided limit exist karta hai. Sirf ek cheez galat hai — missing value. Condition 2 ✓ (limit exists), condition 1 ✗ (value undefined) → removable. Patch: define karo.

Recall Solution — L1·Q2

Kam se kam ek side infinite hai (yahan dono), toh limit finite number ke roop mein exist nahi karta. → Infinite discontinuity ( par ek vertical asymptote). Dekho Vertical asymptotes and rational functions.

Recall Solution — L1·Q3

Dono one-sided limits finite hain par unequal () → jump discontinuity. Jump size . ( ki value yahan type ke liye irrelevant hai — koi bhi single value do alag heights ke beech ka gap band nahi kar sakti.)


Level 2 — Application

(Concrete formulas par 3-step check chalao.)

Recall Solution — L2·Q1

Step 1: — undefined. Step 2: Numerator factor karo: . ke liye, Factor kyun kiya? Limit point ko ignore karti hai; common factor cancel karne se woh height reveal hoti hai jise graph approach karta hai. Toh . Verdict: limit exist karta hai (), value undefined → removable. Patch: .

Recall Solution — L2·Q2

Step 1: — undefined (numerator , denominator : cancellation possible nahi). Step 2: se thoda neeche, ek tiny negative hai, numerator , toh . Thoda upar, ek tiny positive hai, toh . Verdict: infinite discontinuity ( par vertical asymptote).

Recall Solution — L2·Q3

Step 1: condition satisfy karta hai, toh doosra piece use karo: . (Defined.) Step 2: Verdict: dono finite, jump, size .


Level 3 — Analysis

(Decide kyun type wahi hai; standard limit use karo; do suspect points handle karo.)

Recall Solution — L3·Q1

Step 1: (defined). Step 2: Standard limit use karo. Yeh tool kyun? Direct substitution deta hai; standard limit exactly resolve karne ke liye bana machine hai. Rewrite karo taaki argument denominator se match kare: Verdict: limit exist karta hai aur finite hai, lekin removable ( redefine karo). Removable kyun, jump nahi? Left aur right dono same value approach karte hain; sirf plotted dot misplaced hai.

Recall Solution — L3·Q2

Denominator factor hota hai: , aur par zero. Dono suspect points hain. par: cancel ho jaata hai, toh (finite), lekin undefined → removable, patch . par: factor cancel nahi hota. , infinite ( par asymptote). Summary: par removable, par infinite.


Level 4 — Synthesis

(Koi unknown choose karo taaki continuity hold kare; conditions combine karo.)

Recall Solution — L4·Q1

par continuity ka matlab hai .

  • .
  • (doosra piece value bhi deta hai kyunki woh hai). Barabar set karo: . Check: ke saath, . Teeno conditions hold hoti hain — pen kabhi nahi uthta.
Recall Solution — L4·Q2

Sirf do seams aur break kar sakti hain; har middle/edge piece ek line hai (apne aap mein continuous). par: left value ; right approach . Continuity ⇒ a + b = 2. \tag{i} par: left approach ; right value . Continuity ⇒ 3a + b = 3. \tag{ii} (i) ko (ii) se subtract karo: . Phir . Check: par, ✓; par, ✓.


Level 5 — Mastery

(Deeper reasoning: ek Intermediate Value Theorem hook, aur ek subtle "removable lagta hai par hai nahi" trap.)

Recall Solution — L5·Q1

Absolute value ke sign ke hisaab se split hoti hai:

  • ke liye: , toh .
  • ke liye: , toh . Isliye , , dono finite par unequal. Aur undefined hai. Verdict: jump, size . Removable kyun nahi, jabki hai? form yeh guarantee nahi karta ki limit exist karta hai — yahan dono sides alag constants par settle hoti hain, toh koi single patch kaam nahi karta.
Recall Solution — L5·Q2

ek polynomial hai, isliye closed interval par continuous hai — including donoon endpoints, jinhe ham relevant one-sided limit se check karte hain (kahin koi holes, jumps, ya poles nahi, toh yeh automatic hai). Endpoints evaluate karo: Sign change hai: aur . Intermediate Value Theorem ke zariye, ek continuous function jo values aur leta hai, use beech mein har value leni padti hai — including — kahin mein. Isliye ka wahan kam se kam ek root hai. Jis property par rely kiya: closed interval par continuity — pen -axis ko bina uthe cross karta hai, toh woh zero skip nahi kar sakta.

Recall Solution — L5·Q3

Step 1: condition satisfy karta hai, toh (defined). Step 2:

  • .
  • : ke liye, . Toh , — dono finite, unequal. Verdict: jump, size . Subtlety: right piece apne aap mein removable lagta hai (ek hole), lekin left piece ke saath jodne par dono sides disagree karti hain → combined function ka par ek jump hai, aur poora gap fix nahi kar sakta. Yaad karo Differentiability implies continuity: kyunki yahan continuous bhi nahi hai, toh woh par definitely differentiable bhi nahi ho sakta.

Recall Self-test summary (har jawab reveal karo)

Kisi formula se type seedha kaise padhein? ::: Zero denominator with ek cancelling numerator → removable; non-cancelling → infinite; different-height pieces → jump. Kisi bhi par pehla sawaal kya hai? ::: Kya dono one-sided limits agree karte hain aur finite rehte hain? Tabhi removable. Ek unknown constant ke liye continuity kya maangti hai? ::: Har seam par — har boundary ke liye ek equation. IVT ko root guarantee karne ke liye kya chahiye? ::: Closed interval par continuity, plus endpoints par sign change.

Connections