4.1.6 · D3 · Maths › Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives › Important limits — lim(sin x - x) = 1, lim((1+1 - n)ⁿ) = e
Intuition Yeh page kya hai
> parent note ne do bade limits prove kiye the aur kuch examples dikhaye the. Yahan hum har tarah ke problem ka ek map banate hain jo yeh do limits throw kar sakte hain — phir har ek ka ek representative solve karte hain. Jab tum finish karo, koi bhi exam variant naya nahi lagega.
In do limits par bane har problem neeche diye gaye cells mein se kisi ek mein aata hai. Right column us example ka naam batata hai jo us cell mein aata hai.
#
Cell (kya cheez ise different banati hai)
Kaunsa limit
Chhupi hui trap
Example
1
scaled s i n ( scaled ) , plain rescale
sin
arguments match karna bhool jaana
A
2
Higher power x 3 , needs the x 2 1 − c o s x helper
sin
power ko galat split karna
B
3
Two-sided check: does the limit exist as x → 0 − too? (x ka sign)
sin
even/odd blindly assume karna
C
4
Geometric / word problem (arc vs chord shrinking)
sin
picture galat padhna
D
5
Degrees, radians nahi (the "= 1 is a lie" case)
sin
degrees mein radian value use karna
E
6
( 1 + x a ) x negative a ke saath
e
exponent ka sign
F
7
Base x 1 ki tarah nahi shrink karta (degenerate e )
e
pattern bahut jaldi match karna
G
8
Real-world compound growth (continuous interest)
e
galat a choose karna
H
9
Exam twist: ek expression mein dono limits mix hain
both
pieces ko alag evaluate karna jab nahi kar sakte
I
Rows 1–5 sin limit ko sign, power, dimension, aur units ke across stress karte hain. Rows 6–8 e limit ko sign aur degeneracy ke across stress karte hain. Row 9 boss fight hai.
Shuru karne se pehle, do engines jo hum baar baar reuse karte hain. Neeche sab kuch inhi mein se ek hai, disguise mein:
Worked example Compute karo
x → 0 lim sin 2 x sin 7 x .
Forecast: padhne se pehle answer guess karo. (Hint: dono apne arguments ki tarah shrink karte hain — to yeh arguments ka ratio hai.)
Step 1. Multiply aur divide karo taaki har sin ko uske apne argument ke saath force kar sako:
s i n 2 x s i n 7 x = 7 x s i n 7 x ⋅ s i n 2 x 2 x ⋅ 2 x 7 x .
Yeh step kyun? Master u s i n u ko upar aur neeche argument match karna chahiye. Yahan do alag sines hain, to hum har ek ko uska matching denominator dete hain, phir bache hue 2 x 7 x se correct karte hain.
Step 2. Jab x → 0 : 7 x → 0 to 7 x s i n 7 x → 1 ; similarly s i n 2 x 2 x → 1 (→ 1 quantity ka reciprocal bhi 1 hota hai). Last factor 2 x 7 x = 2 7 already constant hai.
Yeh step kyun? Hum master limit ek baar har sine ke liye use karte hain, phir bachne wale numbers multiply karte hain.
Step 3. 1 ⋅ 1 ⋅ 2 7 = 2 7 .
Verify: chhota x = 0.001 plug karo: sin ( 0.007 ) / sin ( 0.002 ) ≈ 0.006999.../0.001999... ≈ 3.4999 ≈ 2 7 . ✓
Worked example Compute karo
x → 0 lim x 3 x − sin x .
Forecast: yeh 0/0 hai; answer ek chhota fraction hai, 0 ya ∞ nahi. Guess karo.
Step 1. Yeh ek single sine se nahi milega. Taylor Series anchor sin x = x − 6 x 3 + 120 x 5 − … use karo, to x − sin x = 6 x 3 − 120 x 5 + … .
Yeh step kyun? x s i n x → 1 sirf leading behaviour dekhta hai; x 3 order ka 0 0 ko next term chahiye. Taylor exactly next term deta hai.
Step 2. x 3 se divide karo:
x 3 x − s i n x = 6 1 − 120 x 2 + … .
Yeh step kyun? Term-by-term division us constant ko expose karta hai jo x → 0 par survive karta hai; baaki har term mein abhi bhi x 2 ka factor hai aur woh mar jaata hai.
Step 3. lim x → 0 ( 6 1 − 120 x 2 + … ) = 6 1 .
Verify: x = 0.01 : ( 0.01 − sin 0.01 ) /0.0 1 3 ≈ ( 1.6666 × 1 0 − 7 ) /1 0 − 6 ≈ 0.16667 ≈ 6 1 . ✓
x → 0 lim x sin x = 1 left se bhi , yaani x → 0 − par.
Forecast: humne ise x > 0 ke liye areas use karke prove kiya. Kya negative jaana answer badalta hai ya tod deta hai?
Step 1. Graph dekho. x = − t set karo jahan t > 0 ho.
− t s i n ( − t ) = − t − s i n t = t s i n t .
Yeh step kyun? sin ek odd function hai (sin ( − t ) = − sin t ), aur denominator ka sign bhi flip hota hai. Dono minus signs cancel ho jaate hain — ratio even hai.
Step 2. Jab x → 0 − , t → 0 + , aur t s i n t → 1 already proven right-hand result se.
Yeh step kyun? Humne untested left side ko tested right side par reduce kar diya.
Step 3. Left limit = right limit = 1 , to two-sided limit exist karti hai aur 1 ke barabar hai.
Verify: x = − 0.001 : sin ( − 0.001 ) / ( − 0.001 ) = sin ( 0.001 ) /0.001 ≈ 0.99999983 . ✓ Positive side jaisa hi.
Worked example Ek point unit circle par ride kar raha hai. Jab central angle
x (radians) shrink hota hai, straight chord length aur arc length ka limiting ratio kya hai?
Forecast: chord arc ke across ek shortcut hai, to chord < arc hamesha. Lekin jab angle shrink hota hai, kya ratio 0 , kuch fraction, ya 1 par jaata hai?
Step 1. Picture par lengths set up karo.
Unit circle par arc length = x (yahi reason hai ki Radian Measure use hota hai — angle hi arc hai).
Dono endpoints ke beech chord length = 2 sin 2 x (perpendicular daalo; har half sin 2 x hai).
Yeh step kyun? Hum ek geometry question ko do familiar quantities ke ratio mein convert karte hain.
Step 2. Ratio form karo aur master limit ki shape mein reshape karo:
arc chord = x 2 s i n 2 x = 2 x s i n 2 x .
Yeh step kyun? x = 2 ⋅ 2 x likhne se sin ka argument denominator ke barabar ho jaata hai — exactly u s i n u ki shape jahan u = 2 x hai.
Step 3. Jab x → 0 , u = 2 x → 0 , to ratio → 1 .
Verify: x = 0.1 rad: chord = 2 sin ( 0.05 ) = 0.099979 , arc = 0.1 , ratio = 0.99979 → 1 . ✓ "Thin pizza slice" intuition numerically confirm ho gaya.
Worked example Compute karo
x → 0 lim x sin ( x ∘ ) , jahan x degrees mein measure ho.
Forecast: zyaadatar log "1" bol dete hain. Yeh 1 nahi hai. Guess karo kya break hota hai.
Step 1. Degrees ko radians mein convert karo sine ke andar , kyunki sin hamare saari theory mein radians leta hai: x ∘ = 180 π x radians.
Yeh step kyun? Master limit u s i n u = 1 sector area 2 1 r 2 θ se prove hua tha, jo sirf radians mein valid hai. To sin ko radian argument dena zaroori hai.
Step 2. Substitute karo aur arguments match karo:
x s i n ( 180 π x ) = 180 π x s i n ( 180 π x ) ⋅ 180 π .
Yeh step kyun? Sine ko uska matching denominator 180 π x do; correction factor 180 π baacha rehta hai.
Step 3. Matched fraction → 1 , to
lim x → 0 x s i n ( x ∘ ) = 180 π ≈ 0.01745.
Verify: x = 1 degree: sin ( 1 ∘ ) = 0.0174524 , 1 se divide karo = 0.0174524 ≈ 180 π . ✓ Saaf "= 1 " sirf radians ka privilege tha.
Worked example Compute karo
x → ∞ lim ( 1 − x 4 ) x .
Forecast: yeh 1 ∞ hai. Base 1 se neeche hai, to answer 1 se neeche hona chahiye — ek decaying quantity. Guess karo kya yeh e 4 hai ya e − 4 .
Step 1. Master ( 1 + x a ) x → e a se match karo. Yahan − x 4 = x a deta hai a = − 4 .
Yeh step kyun? Rule a ke sign ki parwah nahi karta; woh sirf x 1 ke upar constant padhta hai.
Step 2. (Safety ke liye log check.) ln ( expr ) = x ln ( 1 − x 4 ) = 1/ x l n ( 1 − x 4 ) . Small t = − x 4 ke liye ln ( 1 + t ) ≈ t use karo, yeh hai 1/ x − 4/ x = − 4 .
Yeh step kyun? Log karna 1 ∞ ko 0 0 mein convert karta hai jise hum evaluate kar sakte hain — indeterminate powers ke liye safe universal method, dekho Indeterminate Forms .
Step 3. ln ( expr ) → − 4 , to expr → e − 4 ≈ 0.0183 .
Verify: x = 100000 : ( 1 − 4/100000 ) 100000 ≈ 0.018314 ≈ e − 4 = 0.018316 . ✓ 1 se neeche, jaise forecast tha.
Worked example Compute karo
n → ∞ lim ( 1 + n 2 5 ) n .
Forecast: yeh e pattern jaisa lagta hai. Lekin base ka extra bit n 2 5 hai, n 5 nahi. Kya yeh matter karta hai?
Step 1. Log karo: ln ( expr ) = n ln ( 1 + n 2 5 ) .
Yeh step kyun? Hamesha wahi reflex — kabhi 1 ∞ par trust mat karo, pehle log karo.
Step 2. Bade n ke liye, ln ( 1 + t ) ≈ t jahan t = n 2 5 :
n ⋅ n 2 5 = n 5 → 0.
Yeh step kyun? Exponent n order n 2 1 ka base-bump multiply karta hai; product order n 1 ka hota hai, jo mar jaata hai. Bump ko n 1 ki tarah scale karna chahiye (exponent se match karke) taaki finite log bach sake.
Step 3. ln ( expr ) → 0 , to expr → e 0 = 1 .
Verify: n = 1 0 5 : ( 1 + 5/1 0 10 ) 1 0 5 = exp ( 1 0 5 ⋅ 5 × 1 0 − 10 ) = exp ( 5 × 1 0 − 5 ) ≈ 1.00005 → 1 . ✓ e 5 nahi — pattern ek decoy tha.
6% annual interest offer karta hai, continuously compound hoti hai (infinitely often). Ek deposit 1 saal mein kis factor se grow karti hai? 10 saal mein?
Forecast: 6% simple × 1.06 deta ek saal mein. Continuous compounding thoda zyaada deta hai. Guess karo kitna zyaada.
Step 1. Saal ko n tiny periods mein split karo; har period n 0.06 pay karta hai, n times apply hota hai:
factor 1 = ( 1 + n 0.06 ) n .
Yeh step kyun? "n times compounded" ka matlab literally hai base 1 + n rate ko khud se n baar multiply karna.
Step 2. n → ∞ jaane do (continuous). Yeh master hai a = 0.06 ke saath:
( 1 + n 0.06 ) n → e 0.06 ≈ 1.06184.
Yeh step kyun? Continuous = infinitely many splits = exact limit jo e a define karta hai; dekho The Number e and ln .
Step 3. 10 saal mein exponent scale hota hai: factor = e 0.06 × 10 = e 0.6 ≈ 1.82212 .
Yeh step kyun? Continuous growth ke das saal rate stack karte hain: e r t jahan r = 0.06 , t = 10 .
Verify: e 0.06 = 1.061837 (vs simple 1.06 — lagbhag 0.18% zyaada, jaise forecast tha). e 0.6 = 1.822119 , to $1000 ki deposit lagbhag $1822.12 ban jaati hai. ✓
Worked example Compute karo
x → ∞ lim ( cos x 1 ) x 2 .
Forecast: jab x → ∞ , x 1 → 0 to cos x 1 → 1 — phir 1 ∞ . Yahan cosine limit aur e machinery dono chupi hain. Guess karo: kya yeh 1 , e − 1/2 , ya 0 jaata hai?
Step 1. Log karo: ln ( expr ) = x 2 ln ( cos x 1 ) .
Yeh step kyun? 1 ∞ — pehle log karo, hamesha.
Step 2. t = x 1 → 0 set karo. To x 2 = t 2 1 aur humein t 2 l n ( c o s t ) chahiye. ln ( cos t ) = ln ( 1 − ( 1 − cos t ) ) ≈ − ( 1 − cos t ) likho small t ke liye:
t 2 l n ( c o s t ) ≈ t 2 − ( 1 − c o s t ) = − t 2 1 − c o s t → − 2 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Yahan sin-family helper t 2 1 − c o s t → 2 1 (parent se) log expansion ln ( 1 + u ) ≈ u mein seedha plug hota hai. Do atomic limits ek line mein mil rahe hain.
Step 3. ln ( expr ) → − 2 1 , to expr → e − 1/2 = e 1 ≈ 0.6065 .
Verify: x = 1000 : ( cos 0.001 ) 1 0 6 = exp ( 1 0 6 ln cos 0.001 ) = exp ( 1 0 6 ⋅ ( − 5.0 × 1 0 − 7 )) = exp ( − 0.5 ) ≈ 0.60653 . ✓ 1 nahi — compounding jeet jaata hai.
Recall Kaunsa cell kaunsa hai — cover karo aur trap ka naam lo
Example E ki trap ::: degrees mein argument hone par radian value 1 use karna; sahi answer 180 π hai.
Example G ki trap ::: e se pattern-match karna jab base bump n 2 1 ho, n 1 nahi; answer 1 hai.
Example F ki trap ::: a ka sign drop karna; answer e − 4 hai, e 4 nahi.
Tool jo Example B ko possible banata hai ::: sin x ki Taylor Series , kyunki x s i n x akela x 3 order limit tak nahi pahunch sakta.
Example C ki limit even kyun hai ::: sin odd hai, denominator bhi flip hota hai, minus signs cancel ho jaate hain.
Mnemonic One-line survival kit
Argument match karo (sin) — har sine ko uska apna denominator do.
Log karo, trust mat karo (1 ∞ ) — phir x 1 ke upar bacha constant padho.
Sirf radians — degrees 180 π chupaate hain.