4.1.6 · D5 · HinglishCalculus I — Limits & Derivatives
Question bank — Important limits — lim(sin x - x) = 1, lim((1+1 - n)ⁿ) = e
4.1.6 · D5· Maths › Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives › Important limits — lim(sin x - x) = 1, lim((1+1 - n)ⁿ) = e
True or false — justify
because and are equal near
False — woh ke liye kabhi equal nahi hote; unka ratio approach karta hai kyunki dono same rate se shrink karte hain. Dekho Squeeze (Sandwich) Theorem.
holds whether is in degrees or radians
equals , which is
False — ek indeterminate form hai; base hai, exactly nahi, aur yeh tiny excess baar compound hokar tak pahunchta hai.
The proof of using L'Hôpital's Rule is fully valid
Spirit mein False — L'Hôpital ko chahiye, jo khud is limit se prove hota hai, toh yeh circular hai. Geometric squeeze is circle se bachata hai.
means the sine graph is a straight line near the origin
Pehle approximation ke taur par roughly true — chhote ke liye, toh par tangent ka slope hai; lekin phir bhi curve karta hai (agla term hai). Dekho Taylor Series.
False — lene par milta hai, toh limit hai. Base ka decay jaisa scale karna chahiye tabhi milega.
can be defined only as
False — equivalently bhi hai, ya woh base jahan ho. Sabhi same number define karte hain. Dekho The Number e and ln.
False — woh limit hai (odd/even powers matter karte hain). Yeh hai jo deta hai.
Spot the error
" since the top " — find the flaw
Bottom bhi hai, toh yeh hai, na ki . Ek form relative speed measure karta hai, aur yahaan dono equally shrink karte hain .
"" — flaw?
Tum ek variable base ko variable power wale limit ko aise split nahi kar sakte; base aur exponent ek doosre ke saath race karte hain aur inhe saath mein evaluate karna padta hai (pehle log lao).
", so too" — flaw?
Nahi — hota hai (top aur bottom par same argument). Extra mismatched denominator se aaya tha, sine ratio se nahi.
" because it's " — flaw?
Bottom hai, argument nahi. Likho . Ratio mein top aur bottom mein exactly same expression hona chahiye.
"" — flaw?
Galat log law hai. , toh yeh hai, ek product, na ki .
"Sector area works with in degrees" — flaw?
Sirf radians mein. Degrees mein sector area hai; clean formula (aur poora proof) Radian Measure par depend karta hai.
", and both bounds , so we're done for all " — flaw?
Yeh chain ke liye derive ki gayi thi. ke liye tumhe doosri side bhi check karni hogi; kyunki even hai, negative side same limit deti hai, jisse sab cases complete hote hain.
Why questions
Why must we use the Squeeze (Sandwich) Theorem and not just plug in ?
Plug in karne se milta hai, jo undefined hai; squeeze ratio ko do cheezون ke beech trap karta hai jo dono ki taraf ja rahe hain, ratio ko force karta hai bina par evaluate kiye.
Why divide the inequality by and not multiply by something?
se divide karne par target isolate hota hai (reciprocal ke baad); kyunki hai par, inequality directions preserve rehti hain.
Why take reciprocals in the middle of the proof, and what does it do to the inequalities?
Reciprocals ko useful mein convert karte hain; positive quantities ke reciprocals lena inequality direction flip kar deta hai.
Why does the -limit require taking a logarithm first?
Log awkward exponent ko multiplier mein convert karta hai: , ek fight ko manageable limit mein badal deta hai. Dekho Indeterminate Forms.
Why is the natural fact to use for ?
Yeh par ki derivative hi hai: . Dekho The Number e and ln.
Why does instead of ?
Log deta hai , toh poori cheez . Base mein constant growth rate set karta hai.
Why do radians make the arc length equal the angle?
Radian Measure ki definition se, unit circle par angle se subtended arc ki length exactly hoti hai; yahi identity hai jo arc, chord, aur ko par merge karne deti hai.
Edge cases
What is (from the negative side)?
Phir bhi — function even hai (dono aur sign flip karte hain, cancel hoke), toh left aur right limits agree karte hain.
Is defined at ?
Nahi — wahan yeh hai, ek removable hole; limit hai, toh hum hole fill kar sakte hain value ko define karke (sinc function).
What does do for small like or ?
deta hai , deta hai ; sequence ki taraf increase karta hai lekin kabhi pahunchta nahi — limit neeche se approach hoti hai.
What is (note the minus)?
Yeh hai, master rule ko ke saath use karke; negative base-correction reciprocal growth deta hai.
What is at ?
— ke saath numerator hai sab ke liye, toh ratio identically hai; formula "" consistently deta hai.
Does hold as too?
Nahi — ke paas, ; limit "" sirf par ek local statement hai, jo aur se banta hai.
What happens to if ranges over reals, not just integers?
Same limit — log argument mein koi integrality use nahi hoti, toh continuous bilkul same kaam karta hai. Dekho Derivative of sin and cos analogous continuous trick ke liye.
Connections
- Squeeze (Sandwich) Theorem — trap "" collapse ho jaata hai jab tum squeeze yaad karte ho.
- Radian Measure — degrees trap ki root cause.
- Indeterminate Forms — yahaan har aur trap rehta hai.
- The Number e and ln — -definition traps ke liye.
- L'Hôpital's Rule — circularity trap.
- Taylor Series — " ke paas straight hai" refinement.
- Derivative of sin and cos — kyun geometric proof matter karta hai.