These test whether you can read off r, θ, n and plug in. No cleverness — just the recipe.
Recall Solution 1.1
WHAT we need: count of roots, and their radius.
WHY: A nonzero complex number always has exactly nn-th roots, all on one circle of radius r1/n.
Here n=5, so there are ==exactly 5== distinct roots.
The modulus of w=3+4i is
r=∣w∣=32+42=25=5.
Common modulus of the roots: r1/5=51/5≈1.3797.
Answer:5 roots, each at distance 51/5≈1.380 from the origin.
Recall Solution 1.2
WHAT: apply RAD-k with r=27, θ=2π, n=3.
Modulus of each root: 271/3=3.
WHY divide the angle by n (not root it)? Raising to the n-th power multiplies the angle by n (that is De Moivre's theorem: (cisϕ)n=cisnϕ). To undo a multiplication by n you divide by n — so the root's angle is θ/n, plus the 2πk turns that unlock the other roots. The modulus behaves differently: powering multiplies moduli (ρn), so undoing that needs the n-th rootr1/n. Different operations because angle adds while modulus multiplies.
Angle of the k-th root:
ϕk=nθ+2πk=32π+2πk=6π+32πk,k=0,1,2.Answer:zk=3cis(6π+32πk).
Now you compute actual roots and simplify to a+bi form.
Recall Solution 2.1
Step 1 — polar form.−2i points straight down with length 2, so r=2 and, using the principal-argument convention, θ=−2π (equivalently 23π — same direction, one turn apart, so same roots).
Step 2 — RAD-k, n=2: modulus 21/2=2; angles ϕk=2−2π+2πk=−4π+πk.
k=0:ϕ=−4π⇒2cis(−4π)=2(21−i21)=1−i.
k=1:ϕ=43π⇒2cis43π=2(−21+i21)=−1+i.
Check:(1−i)2=1−2i+i2=−2i. ✓
Answer:z=1−i and z=−1+i (negatives of each other, as square roots always are).
Recall Solution 2.2
Polar:−27=27cisπ, so r=27, θ=π, n=3.
Modulus of roots: 271/3=3. Angles: ϕk=3π+2πk.
k=0:ϕ=3π⇒3cis3π=3(21+i23)=23+i233.
k=1:ϕ=π⇒3cisπ=−3.
k=2:ϕ=35π⇒3cis35π=23−i233.
Answer:−3,23±i233. The one real root is −3; the other two are conjugates.
Here you reason about structure: symmetry, sums, which roots lie where.
Recall Solution 3.1
WHAT: a sum and one specific value.
WHY sum =0: the roots are the six vertices of a regular hexagon centred at the origin (Argand Diagram). Opposite vertices are negatives, so the vectors cancel in pairs. Algebraically it is a Geometric Progression:
1+ω+⋯+ω5=ω−1ω6−1=ω−11−1=0.ω3: using eiθ=cisθ, ω3=eiπ/3⋅3=eiπ=cisπ=−1.
Combine ideas: factor a polynomial with roots, or build a number from a root condition.
Recall Solution 4.1
WHY this works: by the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, a degree-3 polynomial factors over C as (z−z0)(z−z1)(z−z2). The two complex roots are conjugates, and a conjugate pair multiplies to a real quadratic.
Real factor: (z−2).
Conjugate pair z1,2=−1±i3. Their quadratic:
(z−(−1+i3))(z−(−1−i3))=(z+1)2−(i3)2=z2+2z+1+3=z2+2z+4.Answer:z3−8=(z−2)(z2+2z+4).
Check: expand (z−2)(z2+2z+4)=z3+2z2+4z−2z2−4z−8=z3−8. ✓
Recall Solution 4.2
Step 1:z4−z=0⇒z(z3−1)=0.
So either z=0, or z3=1.
Step 2 — the nonzero part is the cube roots of unity:
zk=cis32πk,k=0,1,2⇒1,−21+i23,−21−i23.Answer: four solutions — z=0,1,−21+i23,−21−i23.
Notice a degree-4 equation gave 4 solutions, but they did not all sit on one circle — z=0 is the centre. That is fine: this was not a pure zn=w equation with w=0.
Full generality, degenerate cases, and a chained argument.
Recall Solution 5.1
Polar:−64=64cisπ, r=64, θ=π, n=6.
Modulus: 641/6=2. Angles: ϕk=6π+2πk=6π+3πk, k=0,…,5. Marching k through its six values:
k=0:ϕ=6π=30∘⇒2cis30∘=3+i.
k=1:ϕ=2π=90∘⇒2cis90∘=2i.
k=2:ϕ=65π=150∘⇒2cis150∘=−3+i.
k=3:ϕ=67π=210∘⇒2cis210∘=−3−i.
k=4:ϕ=23π=270∘⇒2cis270∘=−2i.
k=5:ϕ=611π=330∘⇒2cis330∘=3−i.
All six have modulus 2 and are spaced 62π=60∘ apart → a regular hexagon.
Read the figure: the six coloured arrows all reach the same circle of radius 2, and each is rotated exactly 60∘ from its neighbour — starting at 30∘ (k=0, the arrow into the first quadrant) and sweeping anticlockwise. Because 60∘×6=360∘ closes the loop with six equal steps, the tips are the six vertices of a regular hexagon. Notice the pairs k=0,3; k=1,4; k=2,5 point in exactly opposite directions — that opposite-vertex symmetry is why the six roots sum to zero.
Answer:±3+i,±2i,±3−i (six roots).
Recall Solution 5.2
WHAT: solve zn=0.
The only solution is z=0 (a product z⋅z⋯z equals zero only if a factor is zero).
WHY the rule breaks: the formula needs w=rcisθ with r>0 and a defined argument θ. But 0 has modulus 0 and no well-defined argument — every direction is equally "toward" the origin. Take r1/n=0 and every angle collapses to the same point. So instead of n distinct roots you get one root, z=0, counted with multiplicity n.
Answer:z=0 only. The "exactly n distinct roots" statement explicitly requires w=0.
Recall Solution 5.3
Sum: all five 5th roots of unity sum to 0 (regular pentagon, symmetry / GP), so
1+ω+ω2+ω3+ω4=0.Product: add the exponents (eiθ multiplies by adding angles):
ω⋅ω2⋅ω3⋅ω4=ω1+2+3+4=ω10=(ω5)2=12=1.Answer: sum =0, product =1.
Recall Feynman check: what did every problem share?
Every single solution did the same three things: (1) turn w into a length and an angle, (2) take the ordinary positive root of the length, and (3) fan the angle out into n equal slices. Recognition (L1) tested step 2 vs 3; Analysis (L3) read off where the slices land; Synthesis (L4) fed roots back into polynomials; Mastery (L5) tested the fine print (dividing by zero, w=0). The picture never changed: equal length, spread the angle.