3.5.5 · D5Complex Numbers
Question bank — Polar form — r(cos θ + i sin θ) = r·cis θ
Before we start, a quick reminder of the words we will lean on (so no symbol is used unexplained):
- modulus — the length of the arrow from the origin to the point , always .
- argument — the direction of that arrow, an angle measured anticlockwise from the positive real axis.
- principal argument — the one value of the argument chosen in the half-open range , so every arrow gets exactly one "official" angle.
- ==cis == — shorthand for (a sum, not a product).
True or false — justify
TRUE or FALSE: The modulus of a complex number can be negative if the imaginary part is negative.
False. squares both parts, so it is never negative; a "backwards" arrow is recorded by adding to the angle, not by making the length negative.
TRUE or FALSE: means .
False. It is a sum: . Read the letters as "cos is summed with ", a plus in the middle.
TRUE or FALSE: Every non-zero complex number has exactly one argument.
False. It has infinitely many, all differing by full turns of ; we single out one principal value in so each arrow has one official label.
TRUE or FALSE: The number has a well-defined argument.
False. The zero arrow has length and points in no direction, so is undefined — polar form is stated only for non-zero .
TRUE or FALSE: Two complex numbers with the same modulus are equal.
False. Same length does not mean same direction; e.g. and both have modulus but point differently. You need both and to match.
TRUE or FALSE: If two complex numbers are equal, their principal arguments must be equal.
True. Equal arrows point the same way, and the principal argument is a unique label in , so the labels coincide.
TRUE or FALSE: Multiplying a complex number by another of modulus leaves its length unchanged.
True. Lengths multiply, and multiplying by does nothing to length; only the angle shifts. This is a pure rotation.
TRUE or FALSE: is always exactly true for principal arguments.
False. The sum of angles is right, but the total may fall outside , so you sometimes add or subtract to get back the principal value.
TRUE or FALSE: A purely real positive number has argument .
True. It lies on the positive real axis, so the arrow points along it and makes zero angle.
TRUE or FALSE: The point has principal argument , not .
True. The principal range is — the right end is included, the left is not — so the arrow along the negative real axis is labelled .
TRUE or FALSE: Writing is a valid polar form.
False. Polar form requires the leading modulus . A negative in front must be absorbed into the angle: .
Spot the error
Spot the error: "For , ."
The key is blind to quadrant. is in Quadrant II, but points into Quadrant IV. Correct: .
Spot the error: "For , the modulus is ."
Modulus adds the squares: . Squaring already kills the minus sign of , so there is no negative under the root.
Spot the error: " so (the conjugate) too, since is unchanged."
The conjugate flips the sign of the imaginary part, i.e. reflects the arrow across the real axis, so its angle negates: . Only the modulus stays.
Spot the error: "To multiply by , add the moduli and multiply the angles."
Backwards. You multiply the moduli () and add the arguments (). Length scales, directions accumulate.
Spot the error: " converts to ."
In Quadrant II the cosine is negative: , so . Forgetting the sign of cos/sin off the reference angle is the classic slip.
Spot the error: "The reference angle for is ."
The reference angle uses the magnitude , giving . Signs are handled afterwards by the quadrant rule, not inside the reference angle.
Spot the error: " is already in principal form."
is more than a full turn and lies outside . Subtract : , so it equals .
Why questions
Why do we bother converting to polar form at all?
Because multiplying and dividing arrows becomes trivial — multiply lengths, add angles — instead of the messy FOIL expansion needed in Cartesian form.
Why must we "fix the quadrant" after using ?
Because repeats every (180°): points that are exactly opposite each other give the same ratio , so cannot tell them apart on its own.
Why is the principal argument range chosen as rather than ?
Both are valid conventions, but keeps the numbers small and symmetric about the real axis, so a conjugate simply flips the sign of the angle. It is the standard used by Modulus and Argument.
Why does multiplying by rotate a point by ?
Because , and multiplying by a cis of angle adds to the argument while keeping the length (modulus ) fixed — a pure quarter-turn anticlockwise.
Why does the product of two cis terms collapse to a single cis of the summed angle?
Why is enough, given that arrows point in every direction?
Because all directional information is carried by the angle , which ranges over a full turn. Length only measures "how far", so it never needs a sign.
Why does Euler's formula make polar form feel like an exponent?
Because multiplying automatically adds the angles — the "add the arguments" rule is just the exponent-addition law in disguise.
Edge cases
Edge case: What is the polar form of a positive real number like ?
, : . The arrow lies flat along the positive real axis.
Edge case: What is as a principal value?
. The arrow points straight down; (not ) is the value inside .
Edge case: What happens to for a point exactly on the negative real axis, e.g. ?
(included in the principal range), , so . Its neighbour is not used because the left endpoint is excluded.
Edge case: What is the argument of a point on the positive imaginary axis, e.g. ?
, : . Here , so is undefined — you must read the direction geometrically.
Edge case: If and , why can't you compute from ?
Division by is undefined, so the formula breaks. Read it straight off the picture: the arrow points down, so .
Edge case: What is the modulus of any , and why does this matter for roots?
It is always , since . This is why cis terms act as pure rotations and why -th roots all sit on a circle of the same radius.
Connections
- Argand Diagram — the plane where every trap here is visualised.
- Modulus and Argument — the two ingredients being probed.
- Multiplication and Division of Complex Numbers — the "multiply lengths, add angles" claims.
- De Moivre's Theorem — the power rule built on the product rule.
- Euler's Formula — the exponent view of "add the arguments".
- Roots of Complex Numbers — uses the unit-modulus fact of cis.