3.4.8 · D5Conic Sections
Question bank — Difference of focal radii = 2a property
Before you start, one anchor so every symbol below is earned:
- and are the two foci (fixed points). Here is half the distance between the two vertices — the two sharp turning points where each branch is nearest the centre (informally, its "tips"), sitting at . The number (the eccentricity, always for a hyperbola) measures how "open" the curve is — see Eccentricity of Conics.
- is the second scale of the standard hyperbola ; it controls the slope of the asymptotes and is tied to and by — see b² = a²(e²−1) relation.
- For a point on the curve, and are its focal radii — the two straight distances from to each focus.
- The property: . The working formulas and come from substituting with into and , which collapses each into a perfect square — full derivation in the parent note here. On the right branch () the moduli drop to , ; on the left branch () the signs inside the moduli flip.
The picture below is the mental image to hold for every question on this page — the two branches, the two foci farther out than the vertices, and the same gap appearing on both sides.

And this one shows why the difference stays pinned while the individual radii blow up as the point runs to infinity — keep it in mind for the "edge cases" section.

True or false — justify
Is the SUM constant on a hyperbola?
False. On the right branch () ; on the left branch () both moduli flip so . Either way it depends on — only the difference cancels the term. The constant sum belongs to the ellipse.
"Both branches together give ." True or false?
True. On the right branch ; on the left branch . The far focus swaps sides, so the absolute value covers both cases at once.
Using the two-foci definition (constant difference of distances to two fixed points), a hyperbola can be drawn with a single focus. True or false?
False for the two-foci definition: you need two fixed points to subtract distances, so one focus gives nothing to difference. (Note that a different definition — the focus–directrix one — does use a single focus plus a directrix line; that is a separate construction, not the one this property is about.)
For every point on a hyperbola, equals . True or false?
False. It equals on one branch and on the other; only holds everywhere.
The constant equals the distance between the two vertices. True or false?
True. The vertices sit at , so they are apart, which is exactly the fixed difference.
Increasing (making the hyperbola more open) changes the constant difference . True or false?
False. The difference is fixed at regardless of ; only moves the foci () and reshapes the branches, not the vertex gap.
" holds for a hyperbola." True or false?
False — that is the ellipse relation (). For a hyperbola , so we must use to keep ; see b² = a²(e²−1) relation.
A focal radius of a hyperbola can be negative. True or false?
False. A focal radius is a genuine distance, so it is always ; the formulas carry a modulus, , precisely to protect that.
Spot the error
", so at we get ." What went wrong?
The unsigned form only holds on the right branch (); the general formula is , and no real hyperbola point has anyway (the branches start at ). Plugging describes a point off the curve, so the formula does not apply there.
"Since ellipse and hyperbola have twin equations, both fix the SUM to ." Find the flaw.
The equations differ by a sign: ellipse has , hyperbola has . That minus in the equation mirrors the difference (not sum) in the definition — sum on a hyperbola is , not constant.
A student writes but then says "so and are each ." Spot the error.
A constant difference says nothing about the individual radii; and each vary with position (they are ). Only their gap stays fixed at .
" on the right branch." Correct the sign.
On the right branch the left focus is farther, so , giving . Writing there yields , so the labels are reversed.
"The foci are at ." What's wrong?
Those are the vertices. The foci sit farther out at with , so — the foci always lie beyond the vertices.
"For , the difference of radii is ." Fix it.
The constant difference is , not . Here , so the difference is ; never enters the focal-difference value.
Why questions
Why does the term cancel when we subtract the two focal radii?
On one branch both radii share the same piece ( and ), so subtraction removes it, leaving only . That cancellation is why the difference is position-independent.
Why is an absolute value needed in ?
Because which focus is farther flips between the two branches, flipping the sign of ; the modulus collapses and into one clean statement.
Why does a hyperbola have two disconnected branches while an ellipse is one closed loop?
A difference of distances splits points into "closer to " and "closer to " groups, forming two arms; a sum traps every point inside one bounded oval, so the ellipse stays connected.
Why must for the difference construction to give a real curve?
We need the foci () farther apart than the vertices (), i.e. , so . If the foci meet the vertices and the curve degenerates; would place foci inside and give an ellipse instead.
Why does the substitution make the focal-radius algebra collapse to a perfect square?
Start with and put . With the term becomes ; adding gives . The chosen relation is exactly what makes those pieces line up as a square.
Why is actually useful even though it is not constant?
Its magnitude grows linearly with (it is ), so a distances-sum that scales with position flags a hyperbola, whereas a constant sum flags an ellipse — a one-glance test, provided you take the absolute value since the raw sign flips between branches.
Edge cases
At a vertex , what are the two focal radii and their difference?
and ; their difference is . The property holds even at the vertex.
What happens to the two focal radii as races off to infinity along a branch?
Both and grow without bound (roughly like ), yet their difference stays pinned at exactly — the gap never widens no matter how far out you go.
Can the constant difference ever be , and what curve would that be?
If the "hyperbola" degenerates to the perpendicular bisector line of the two foci (all points equidistant), not a genuine hyperbola — so we always need .
Is the point where ever on the hyperbola?
No. forces , so such points lie on the axis of symmetry (the -axis), which the branches never touch.
If the given difference exceeds the distance between the foci, is a hyperbola possible?
No. We need , i.e. ; if the required difference matched or beat the focal separation, no point could satisfy it (the triangle inequality forbids ).
Connections
- Difference of focal radii = 2a property (index 3.4.8)
- Hyperbola — Standard Equation and Definition
- Ellipse — Sum of Focal Radii = 2a
- Eccentricity of Conics
- Focus–Directrix Property
- Latus Rectum of a Hyperbola
- b² = a²(e²−1) relation