You have seen the parent note build the rule P M P F = e . Now we drill it until no case can surprise you . Every sign of the directrix, every value of e , the degenerate limits, a word problem, and an exam twist — each gets its own fully worked example.
Intuition What "cover every scenario" means here
The recipe never changes: write P F (distance to a point ), write P M (perpendicular distance to a line ), set P F = e ⋅ P M , square, simplify. What changes between problems is only:
which side the directrix sits on (sign inside ∣ x ± d ∣ ),
whether the directrix is vertical or horizontal (do we use ∣ x ± d ∣ or ∣ y ± d ∣ ),
the value of e (which shape falls out),
degenerate inputs (e → 0 , or focus on the directrix).
Learn to read those knobs and every problem becomes the same problem.
Every cell below is hit by at least one worked example on this page.
#
Case class
Concrete knob setting
Example
A
Directrix left of focus, e = 1
x = − a , parabola
Ex 1
B
Directrix right of focus, 0 < e < 1
x = + d , ellipse
Ex 2
C
Directrix right of focus, e > 1
x = + d , hyperbola
Ex 3
D
Horizontal directrix
y = + d , opens down
Ex 4
E
Degenerate : e → 0
circle limit
Ex 5
F
Word problem (real world)
satellite dish, e = 1
Ex 6
G
Exam twist : recover e , F , L from an equation
reverse-engineer
Ex 7
H
Edge case : focus lies close, extract latus rectum
semi-latus rectum ℓ
Ex 8
Prerequisites you may want open: Distance formula and distance from a point to a line and Latus rectum and semi-latus rectum .
Focus F = ( 2 , 0 ) , directrix x = − 2 , eccentricity e = 1 . Find the curve.
Forecast: Equal distances to a point and a vertical line — guess the shape and where it opens before reading on.
Step 1. P F = ( x − 2 ) 2 + y 2 .
Why this step? Straight distance formula from P = ( x , y ) to the point ( 2 , 0 ) .
Step 2. P M = ∣ x − ( − 2 ) ∣ = ∣ x + 2∣ .
Why this step? Distance to the vertical line x = − 2 is purely horizontal — the y -coordinate is irrelevant. Look at the green dashed segment in the figure: it is flat.
Step 3. Set P F = e ⋅ P M = 1 ⋅ ∣ x + 2∣ and square:
( x − 2 ) 2 + y 2 = ( x + 2 ) 2 .
Why square? Both sides are non-negative distances, so squaring is safe and it removes the root and the absolute value at once.
Step 4. Expand and cancel:
x 2 − 4 x + 4 + y 2 = x 2 + 4 x + 4 ⇒ y 2 = 8 x .
Why did the x 2 vanish? Because e = 1 : the two squared brackets are identical except for the sign of the middle term, so x 2 subtracts out. This is the algebraic fingerprint of a parabola .
Verify: Compare y 2 = 8 x with the standard y 2 = 4 a x (see Parabola - Standard equation y^2=4ax ). Then 4 a = 8 ⇒ a = 2 , so the focus should be at ( a , 0 ) = ( 2 , 0 ) ✅ and the directrix x = − a = − 2 ✅ — exactly our inputs.
Focus F = ( 0 , 0 ) , directrix x = 8 , eccentricity e = 2 1 . Find the curve.
Forecast: Since e < 1 the point must stay closer to the focus , so the curve should close up . Ellipse — but where is its centre?
Step 1. P F = x 2 + y 2 , P M = ∣ x − 8∣ .
Why the ∣ x − 8∣ ? The directrix is now to the right , at x = 8 , so the horizontal gap is x − 8 (magnitude taken).
Step 2. P F = 2 1 P M : x 2 + y 2 = 2 1 ∣ x − 8∣ .
Step 3. Square: x 2 + y 2 = 4 1 ( x − 8 ) 2 .
Why square? Same reason — non-negative sides, kill root and modulus.
Step 4. Multiply by 4 : 4 x 2 + 4 y 2 = x 2 − 16 x + 64 .
Why multiply? Clears the fraction so we can collect integer coefficients.
Step 5. Collect: 3 x 2 + 16 x + 4 y 2 = 64 .
Why bounded? Both x 2 and y 2 carry positive coefficients (3 and 4 ) → the curve cannot run off to infinity → ellipse ✅.
Step 6 (optional polish). Complete the square in x :
3 ( x + 3 8 ) 2 + 4 y 2 = 64 + 3 64 = 3 256 .
Why complete the square? It exposes the centre at ( − 3 8 , 0 ) , matching the form in Ellipse - Standard form and c^2 = a^2 - b^2 .
Verify: Take the point x = y = 0 (the focus). Then P F = 0 and P M = 8 , ratio 0/8 = 0 = 2 1 , so the focus is not on the curve (correct — it's inside). Now test a genuine point: put y = 0 in 3 x 2 + 16 x = 64 , i.e. 3 x 2 + 16 x − 64 = 0 ⇒ x = 6 − 16 ± 256 + 768 = 6 − 16 ± 32 , giving vertices x = 3 8 and x = − 8 . Check x = 3 8 : P F = 3 8 , P M = ∣ 3 8 − 8∣ = 3 16 , ratio = 16/3 8/3 = 2 1 = e ✅.
Focus F = ( 0 , 0 ) , directrix x = 1 , eccentricity e = 2 . Find the curve.
Forecast: e > 1 lets a point sit farther from the focus than from the line — the curve should open into two branches .
Step 1. x 2 + y 2 = 2∣ x − 1∣ .
Why 2 ? e = 2 multiplies the perpendicular distance.
Step 2. Square: x 2 + y 2 = 4 ( x − 1 ) 2 = 4 x 2 − 8 x + 4 .
Step 3. Move everything to one side:
0 = 3 x 2 − 8 x + 4 − y 2 ⇒ 3 x 2 − y 2 − 8 x + 4 = 0.
Why one side? To read the signs. Here x 2 has coefficient + 3 while y 2 has − 1 — opposite signs → hyperbola ✅ (compare Hyperbola - Standard form and c^2 = a^2 + b^2 ).
Step 4. Why two branches? Solve for y 2 = 3 x 2 − 8 x + 4 . For large x this is positive and grows without bound, so y → ± ∞ — the curve escapes to infinity on both sides, never closing.
Verify: Find where y = 0 : 3 x 2 − 8 x + 4 = 0 ⇒ x = 6 8 ± 64 − 48 = 6 8 ± 4 , giving vertices x = 2 and x = 3 2 . Test x = 3 2 , y = 0 : P F = 3 2 , P M = ∣ 3 2 − 1∣ = 3 1 , ratio = 2 = e ✅.
Focus F = ( 0 , 3 ) , directrix y = − 3 , eccentricity e = 1 . Find the curve.
Forecast: The directrix is a horizontal line now, and the focus is above it. A e = 1 curve equidistant from both should be a parabola opening upward .
Step 1. P F = x 2 + ( y − 3 ) 2 .
Why? Distance to the point ( 0 , 3 ) .
Step 2. P M = ∣ y − ( − 3 ) ∣ = ∣ y + 3∣ .
Why ∣ y + 3∣ and not ∣ x ± d ∣ ? The directrix is horizontal , so the perpendicular gap is vertical — it depends on y , not x . This is the twin of the earlier rule; look at the figure's vertical green segment.
Step 3. P F = P M , square: x 2 + ( y − 3 ) 2 = ( y + 3 ) 2 .
Step 4. Expand: x 2 + y 2 − 6 y + 9 = y 2 + 6 y + 9 ⇒ x 2 = 12 y .
Why did y 2 cancel? Same e = 1 fingerprint — but this time the x -role and y -role are swapped , so it's the y 2 that disappears, leaving x 2 = 12 y : a parabola opening upward .
Verify: Standard form x 2 = 4 a y gives 4 a = 12 ⇒ a = 3 , so focus ( 0 , a ) = ( 0 , 3 ) ✅ and directrix y = − a = − 3 ✅.
Take F = ( 0 , 0 ) and directrix x = d with e tiny. What happens as e → 0 if we push the directrix to infinity so that e d stays fixed?
Forecast: e = 0 should collapse the curve to a circle centred at the focus (see Circle as limiting case e=0 ). But P M → ∞ as the wall recedes — how does the equation survive?
Step 1. General squared equation with directrix x = d :
x 2 + y 2 = e 2 ( x − d ) 2 = e 2 x 2 − 2 e 2 d x + e 2 d 2 .
Why start general? We want to watch the coefficients as e → 0 .
Step 2. Let e → 0 with the product k = e d held fixed (push the wall out as e shrinks).
Why hold e d fixed? If we just set e = 0 with d finite the right side vanishes and we'd get only the single point ( 0 , 0 ) — a doubly degenerate limit. Holding e d = k keeps a finite-size circle.
Step 3. As e → 0 : e 2 x 2 → 0 and 2 e 2 d x = 2 e ( e d ) x = 2 e k x → 0 , while e 2 d 2 = ( e d ) 2 = k 2 stays. We are left with
x 2 + y 2 = k 2 .
Why this is a circle: x 2 + y 2 = r 2 is the equation of a circle of radius r = k centred at the origin (the focus). The directrix has vanished to infinity and stopped mattering.
Verify: Every point of x 2 + y 2 = k 2 is exactly distance k from the origin, so P F = k is constant — the hallmark of a circle. With k = 5 , the point ( 3 , 4 ) satisfies 3 2 + 4 2 = 25 = 5 2 ✅ and P F = 9 + 16 = 5 ✅.
A cross-section of a satellite dish is a parabola. The receiver (focus) sits 0.5 m above the vertex, and the dish "wall" (directrix) sits 0.5 m below the vertex. Place the vertex at the origin. Find the equation, and how wide the dish is at the height of the receiver.
Forecast: Focus above the vertex, directrix below → a parabola opening upward (just like Ex 4). The width at focus-height is a famous quantity — take a guess at its name.
Step 1. Vertex at origin, focus ( 0 , 0.5 ) , directrix y = − 0.5 , and e = 1 (all parabolas).
Why e = 1 ? A dish is a parabola; parabolas are the e = 1 conic.
Step 2. Equidistance: x 2 + ( y − 0.5 ) 2 = ∣ y + 0.5∣ , square and simplify exactly as in Ex 4:
x 2 = 2 y .
Why the coefficient 2 ? Standard x 2 = 4 a y with a = 0.5 gives 4 a = 2 .
Step 3. Width at receiver height means y = a = 0.5 (the focus level). Substitute:
x 2 = 2 ( 0.5 ) = 1 ⇒ x = ± 1.
Why plug y = 0.5 ? We want the horizontal span of the curve exactly where the receiver sits.
Step 4. The full width is 2 × 1 = 2 m .
Why is this special? This chord through the focus, perpendicular to the axis, is the latus rectum ; here it equals 4 a = 2 m (see Latus rectum and semi-latus rectum ).
Verify: Latus rectum of x 2 = 4 a y is 4 a = 4 ( 0.5 ) = 2 m ✅, and units are metres throughout ✅.
You are handed the conic 16 x 2 + 25 y 2 = 400 and told it came from a focus–directrix rule. Recover e , a focus, and the matching directrix.
Forecast: Two positive squared coefficients → ellipse, so we expect 0 < e < 1 . Which axis is longer?
Step 1. Divide by 400 : 25 x 2 + 16 y 2 = 1 .
Why divide? To reach standard ellipse form a 2 x 2 + b 2 y 2 = 1 so we can read a and b .
Step 2. Read a 2 = 25 , b 2 = 16 , so a = 5 , b = 4 (major axis along x since 25 > 16 ).
Step 3. c 2 = a 2 − b 2 = 25 − 16 = 9 ⇒ c = 3 .
Why this formula? For an ellipse the focal distance obeys c 2 = a 2 − b 2 (from Ellipse - Standard form and c^2 = a^2 - b^2 ).
Step 4. Eccentricity e = a c = 5 3 = 0.6 .
Why c / a ? This is the geometric formula for e established in the parent note; it agrees with the focus–directrix ratio.
Step 5. A focus is at ( c , 0 ) = ( 3 , 0 ) . The directrix is the vertical line x = e a = 3/5 5 = 3 25 .
Why x = a / e ? For a standard ellipse the directrix corresponding to focus ( + c , 0 ) sits at x = a / e (equivalently a 2 / c = 25/3 ).
Verify: Check the vertex ( 5 , 0 ) with focus ( 3 , 0 ) and directrix x = 25/3 : P F = ∣5 − 3∣ = 2 , P M = ∣5 − 25/3∣ = ∣ − 10/3 ∣ = 10/3 , ratio = 10/3 2 = 10 6 = 0.6 = e ✅. Also a 2 / c = 25/3 = 8. 3 ✅.
For the parabola of Ex 1, y 2 = 8 x (focus ( 2 , 0 ) , e = 1 ), find the semi-latus rectum ℓ — the distance from the focus straight up to the curve.
Forecast: "Semi" means half the latus-rectum chord. Guess: is it 2 a , a , or something else?
Step 1. The latus rectum is the vertical chord through the focus. Set x = 2 (the focus's x ) in y 2 = 8 x :
y 2 = 16 ⇒ y = ± 4.
Why x = 2 ? The chord passes through the focus at x = 2 ; we intersect it with the curve.
Step 2. Full chord length = 4 − ( − 4 ) = 8 . The semi-latus rectum is half: ℓ = 4 .
Why half? "Semi" = from the focus to one side only, i.e. y = + 4 distance from ( 2 , 0 ) up to ( 2 , 4 ) , which is 4 .
Step 3. Cross-check with the formula ℓ = 2 a . Here 4 a = 8 ⇒ a = 2 , so 2 a = 4 = ℓ ✅.
Why ℓ = 2 a ? For y 2 = 4 a x the latus rectum is 4 a , so its half is 2 a (see Latus rectum and semi-latus rectum ).
Verify: The point ( 2 , 4 ) lies on y 2 = 8 x : 4 2 = 16 = 8 ( 2 ) ✅, and its distance from the focus ( 2 , 0 ) is 4 = ℓ ✅.
Recall Scenario checklist — can you place any new problem?
Given a fresh problem, answer these and you already know the shape and method:
Is the directrix vertical or horizontal? ::: Vertical → use ∣ x ± d ∣ ; horizontal → use ∣ y ± d ∣ .
Which side is the directrix on? ::: Sets the sign inside the modulus; nothing else changes.
What does e tell you before any algebra? ::: e = 0 circle, 0 < e < 1 ellipse, e = 1 parabola, e > 1 hyperbola.
After squaring, how do you name the conic from coefficients? ::: One squared term missing → parabola; same signs → ellipse; opposite signs → hyperbola.
How do you sanity-check any answer? ::: Pick a vertex, compute P F / P M , confirm it equals e .
In Ex 4 which squared term cancelled, and why did the parabola open upward?
In the e → 0 limit, why must e d be held fixed?
For 16 x 2 + 25 y 2 = 400 , what are c and e ?
Parabola from F = ( 2 , 0 ) , directrix x = − 2 , e = 1 ? y 2 = 8 x , with a = 2 .
Ellipse from F = ( 0 , 0 ) , directrix x = 8 , e = 2 1 ? 3 x 2 + 16 x + 4 y 2 = 64 .
Hyperbola from F = ( 0 , 0 ) , directrix x = 1 , e = 2 ? 3 x 2 − y 2 − 8 x + 4 = 0 .
Parabola from F = ( 0 , 3 ) , directrix y = − 3 , e = 1 ? x 2 = 12 y , opening upward, a = 3 .
Limit of the focus–directrix curve as e → 0 (with e d fixed = k )? The circle x 2 + y 2 = k 2 .
For 16 x 2 + 25 y 2 = 400 , find e and a focus. e = 3/5 = 0.6 , focus ( 3 , 0 ) , directrix x = 25/3 .
Semi-latus rectum of y 2 = 8 x ? ℓ = 4 (equals 2 a with a = 2 ).
How to check a focus–directrix answer at a vertex? Compute P F / P M there; it must equal e .
Vertical directrix use x plus or minus d
Horizontal directrix use y plus or minus d
Check at a vertex ratio equals e