Intuition Why a "scenario matrix" first?
The parent note Logarithmic scale gave you the tools. But tools only stick when you meet every kind of situation they must handle. So before solving anything, we list all the case classes a log-scale problem can throw at you — the way a chess player learns every opening trap. Then each worked example is tagged with the exact cell it defends.
Everything below uses only three master facts from the parent note. Say them once, out loud:
Every log-scale problem falls into one of these cells. The last column names the example that defends it.
#
Case class
What makes it tricky
Covered by
A
Forward, plain — given quantity, find scale value
choosing the right k
Ex 1
B
Backward, plain — given scale value, find quantity
inverting the log
Ex 2
C
Ratio/step — "how many times bigger?"
subtract then exponentiate
Ex 3
D
Adding sources — combining two loudnesses
add intensities , never dB
Ex 4
E
Negative-log scale (pH) — the minus sign
sign flips the direction
Ex 5
F
Fractional scale value — non-integer pH / dB
1 0 0.5 = 10 etc.
Ex 6
G
Degenerate: quantity = reference (I = I 0 )
log 10 1 = 0
Ex 7
H
Limiting: quantity → 0
log 10 ( tiny ) → − ∞
Ex 7
I
Real-world word problem — reverse-engineer a factor
translate words to r
Ex 8
J
Exam twist — mix two scales / hidden step
don't panic at the wrapping
Ex 9
We will hit all ten cells in nine examples (Ex 7 covers both G and H — the two edge cases live together on one picture).
The figure above is your map: read the horizontal axis as the raw quantity (multiplying by 10 each big tick) and the vertical axis as the scale value (rising by a constant step). Every example below is a point, an arrow, or a gap on this one picture.
Worked example Ex 1 · Sound intensity → decibels
A vacuum cleaner produces intensity I = 1 0 − 4 W/m 2 . The threshold of hearing is I 0 = 1 0 − 12 W/m 2 . Find the sound level in dB.
Forecast: Guess first — is the answer closer to 8, 80, or 800 dB? Jot it down.
Write the decibel formula. Why this step? Cell A means we have the quantity and want the scale value, so we use the forward fact with k = 10 .
L = 10 log 10 ( I 0 I ) .
Form the ratio I 0 I = 1 0 − 12 1 0 − 4 = 1 0 − 4 − ( − 12 ) = 1 0 8 . Why? The quotient rule of logs is easiest when the ratio is a clean power of 10 — subtract exponents (see Laws of Logarithms ).
L = 10 log 10 ( 1 0 8 ) = 10 × 8 = 80 dB . Why? log 10 ( 1 0 8 ) asks "10 to what power is 1 0 8 ?" — answer 8 .
Verify: Units: I / I 0 is dimensionless (W/m² over W/m²), so log is legal and dB is unitless. A vacuum cleaner is around 80 dB in real life. ✓ (Did your forecast say 80?)
Worked example Ex 2 · Richter magnitude → amplitude
A quake registers magnitude M = 6 . The reference amplitude is A 0 = 1 μ m . What is the actual ground amplitude A ?
Forecast: Bigger or smaller than a millimetre?
Start from the Richter formula M = log 10 ( A / A 0 ) with k = 1 . Why this step? Cell B: we have the scale value M and want the raw quantity A , so we invert.
Undo the log by exponentiating both sides: A 0 A = 1 0 M = 1 0 6 . Why this tool? 1 0 ( ⋅ ) is the inverse of log 10 — it "un-logs" the equation (Exponential Functions ).
A = A 0 × 1 0 6 = 1 μ m × 1 0 6 = 1 0 6 μ m = 1 m . Why? 1 0 6 μ m = 1 0 6 × 1 0 − 6 m = 1 m .
Verify: Plug back: log 10 ( 1 0 6 μ m /1 μ m ) = log 10 ( 1 0 6 ) = 6 = M . ✓ A metre of ground shaking is catastrophic — matches a magnitude-6 quake.
Worked example Ex 3 · "How many times louder?"
Speaker P plays at 85 dB , speaker Q at 61 dB . By what factor is P's intensity greater than Q's?
Forecast: The dB difference is 24. Is the intensity ratio 24, 240, or something wilder?
Difference of levels: Δ L = 85 − 61 = 24 dB . Why this step? Cell C asks for a ratio , and the step rule Δ L = k log 10 r links a level difference straight to a ratio r — no need to find either intensity separately.
Solve for r : 24 = 10 log 10 r ⇒ log 10 r = 2.4 ⇒ r = 1 0 2.4 . Why? Divide by k = 10 , then exponentiate to undo the log.
r = 1 0 2.4 = 1 0 2 × 1 0 0.4 ≈ 100 × 2.512 = 251 times. Why? 1 0 0.4 ≈ 2.512 ; splitting off the integer power keeps arithmetic clean.
Verify: Reverse it — an intensity ratio of 251 gives 10 log 10 ( 251 ) = 10 × 2.400 = 24 dB . ✓
Worked example Ex 4 · Three identical drummers
One drummer measures 70 dB . Three identical drummers play together. New level?
Forecast: More than 210 dB? (Trap!) Or barely above 70?
Convert to intensity. Each drummer: I = I 0 1 0 70/10 = I 0 1 0 7 . Why this step? You cannot add decibels (Cell D's whole trap). Physical intensities add; decibels are logarithms of them.
Total intensity I tot = 3 × I 0 1 0 7 . Why? Three equal, independent sources deliver three times the power to your ear.
Back to dB: L = 10 log 10 ( I 0 3 × 1 0 7 I 0 ) = 10 log 10 ( 3 × 1 0 7 ) . Why? Forward fact again, now with the combined intensity.
Split with the product rule: L = 10 ( log 10 3 + 7 ) = 10 ( 0.4771 + 7 ) = 74.77 ≈ 74.8 dB . Why? log ( 3 × 1 0 7 ) = log 3 + log 1 0 7 (Laws of Logarithms ).
Verify: Tripling intensity should add 10 log 10 3 ≈ 4.77 dB on top of 70 → 74.8 . ✓ Notice: three times the sound is under 5 dB louder — that's the log scale crushing the range.
Worked example Ex 5 · Concentration → pH (the minus sign)
A cola has hydrogen-ion concentration [ H + ] = 2 × 1 0 − 3 mol/L . Find its pH.
Forecast: pH of cola — around 2, 7, or 11?
pH formula: pH = − log 10 [ H + ] , i.e. k = − 1 and I 0 = 1 mol/L . Why this step? Cell E: this scale carries a minus , which flips direction so that more acid (bigger [ H + ] ) reads as smaller pH.
pH = − log 10 ( 2 × 1 0 − 3 ) = − ( log 10 2 + log 10 1 0 − 3 ) . Why? Product rule splits the messy number.
= − ( 0.301 + ( − 3 )) = − ( − 2.699 ) = 2.70 . Why? log 10 1 0 − 3 = − 3 ; the outer minus lifts the whole thing to a friendly positive.
Verify: Invert — [ H + ] = 1 0 − 2.70 = 1 0 − 3 × 1 0 0.30 ≈ 1 0 − 3 × 2.00 = 2 × 1 0 − 3 . ✓ Cola really is near pH 2.5–3.
Worked example Ex 6 · pH 4.5 back to concentration
Rainwater over a polluted city has pH = 4.5 . Find [ H + ] .
Forecast: Will the answer be a neat power of 10, or something with a 10 in it?
Invert pH: [ H + ] = 1 0 − pH = 1 0 − 4.5 . Why this step? Cell F is a fractional scale value, so the inverse won't land on a clean power of 10 — expect a decimal factor.
Split the fraction: 1 0 − 4.5 = 1 0 − 5 × 1 0 0.5 . Why this tool? 1 0 0.5 = 10 , a value worth memorising (≈ 3.162 ), so any half-integer becomes exact-ish arithmetic.
= 1 0 − 5 × 3.162 = 3.16 × 1 0 − 5 mol/L . Why? 10 ≈ 3.162 .
Verify: Forward check — − log 10 ( 3.162 × 1 0 − 5 ) = − ( 0.5 − 5 ) = 4.5 = pH . ✓
Both edge cases live on one picture. Look at where the curve crosses zero and where it dives off the bottom.
Worked example Ex 7 · When quantity equals the reference, and when it vanishes
(G) Degenerate: A sound has intensity exactly equal to the threshold, I = I 0 . What is L ?
L = 10 log 10 ( I 0 / I 0 ) = 10 log 10 ( 1 ) . Why this step? Cell G tests the reference point — the value the whole scale is measured from .
log 10 ( 1 ) = 0 because 1 0 0 = 1 . So L = 10 × 0 = 0 dB . Why? The reference is defined to sit at zero on the scale — that's what "reference" means.
(H) Limiting: What happens to the pH as [ H + ] → 0 (pure, ion-free water in the ideal limit)?
pH = − log 10 [ H + ] . As [ H + ] shrinks toward 0 , its log dives toward − ∞ , so − log 10 [ H + ] → + ∞ . Why this matters? The log scale has no top and no bottom of quantity except zero — you can never reach quantity = 0 on the scale; you only run off to infinity. Look at the red dashed asymptote in the figure: the curve hugs the vertical axis but never touches it.
Verify: Numerically, [ H + ] = 1 0 − 14 gives pH 14 ; 1 0 − 20 gives pH 20 — it keeps climbing without limit. ✓ (And log 10 ( 1 ) = 0 exactly.) This is why 0 dB is "the quietest audible sound," not "silence."
Common mistake "0 dB means no sound"
Why it feels right: zero usually means "nothing."
The fix: 0 dB means I = I 0 — the reference intensity, the faintest audible sound, not silence. True silence (I → 0 ) is − ∞ dB , off the bottom of the scale.
Worked example Ex 8 · Noise regulation
A factory must cut its noise power to one-quarter of its current value to meet code. By how many dB does the reading drop?
Forecast: More or less than a 4 dB drop?
Translate the words: "one-quarter the power" means the multiplier r = 4 1 = 0.25 . Why this step? Cell I is about turning English into a ratio r , then the step rule does the rest.
Apply Δ L = k log 10 r with k = 10 : Δ L = 10 log 10 ( 0.25 ) . Why? The change depends only on the factor, not on the starting level (the parent's key result).
log 10 ( 0.25 ) = log 10 ( 1/4 ) = − log 10 4 = − 0.602 . So Δ L = 10 × ( − 0.602 ) = − 6.0 dB . Why? Quotient rule turns 1/4 into a negative log; a drop correctly comes out negative.
Verify: Cross-check with the "+3 dB per ×2" fact: quarter = two halvings = − 3 − 3 = − 6 dB . ✓ The two methods agree.
Worked example Ex 9 · The hidden step
A quiet library is at pH-style thinking… no — here's the real twist. An earthquake of magnitude M 1 has 1000 times the ground amplitude of one at magnitude M 2 . Then a separate sound doubles in intensity. Combine both facts into scale changes.
Forecast: Will the Richter difference be 3, and the dB change 3 as well — coincidence?
Richter part. Amplitude ratio r = 1000 = 1 0 3 , with k = 1 : Δ M = log 10 ( 1 0 3 ) = 3 . So the magnitudes differ by exactly 3 . Why this step? Cell J hides two independent applications of the same step rule inside one sentence; peel them apart.
Decibel part. Intensity ratio r = 2 , with k = 10 : Δ L = 10 log 10 ( 2 ) = 10 × 0.301 = 3.01 dB . Why the different constant? Same rule Δ = k log 10 r , but k = 10 for sound versus k = 1 for Richter — the constant k is the only thing that changes between scales.
Note the "coincidence": log 10 ( 1 0 3 ) = 3 and 10 log 10 2 ≈ 3 both give ≈ 3 , but for completely different reasons — one is an exact power of ten, the other is a doubling scaled by ten. Why point this out? Exams love numbers that look equal to trap you into merging unrelated scales.
Verify: Richter: log 10 ( 1000 ) = 3 exactly. dB: 10 log 10 2 = 3.0103 . Both confirmed independently. ✓
Recall One-line recipe for any cell
Ask two questions: (1) Do I have the quantity or the scale value? → pick forward L = k log 10 ( I / I 0 ) or backward I = I 0 1 0 L / k . (2) Am I asked for a ratio/change? → use Δ L = k log 10 r . Then just plug in k (10 dB, 1 Richter, − 1 pH). Every example above is one of these two moves.
Redo without the answers, then check:
Ex 1 answer (vacuum, 1 0 − 4 W/m²) 80 dB , since log 10 ( 1 0 8 ) = 8 .
Ex 3 answer (85 dB vs 61 dB intensity ratio) 1 0 2.4 ≈ 251 times.
Ex 4 answer (three 70-dB drummers) ≈ 74.8 dB (add intensities: 10 log 10 3 ≈ 4.77 up).
Ex 5 answer (pH of 2 × 1 0 − 3 ) pH ≈ 2.70 .
Ex 6 answer (concentration at pH 4.5) 3.16 × 1 0 − 5 mol/L (that
10 factor).
Ex 7 answer (I = I 0 , and [ H + ] → 0 ) 0 dB ; pH → + ∞ .
Ex 8 answer (quarter the power) drop of 6.0 dB (two halvings).
Ex 9 answers (1000× amplitude; doubled intensity) Δ M = 3 exactly; Δ L ≈ 3.01 dB .
Laws of Logarithms — every "split the log" step is the product/quotient rule.
Exponential Functions — the 1 0 ( ⋅ ) that un-logs a scale value (Cells B, F).
Change of Base Formula — why base-10 keeps these ratios readable.
Orders of Magnitude — "×10 is one step" is the beating heart of every cell.
Weber–Fechner Law — why perception itself is a log scale (Cell D's intuition).