3.2.10 · D4Exponentials & Logarithms

Exercises — Solving exponential equations using logarithms

2,270 words10 min readBack to topic

All decimal answers below use and are rounded to 4 significant figures unless stated. You could use (see The Number e and Natural Logarithms) and get the identical final answer — the Change of Base Formula guarantees it.


Level 1 — Recognition

Here the goal is only to notice when a log is needed and to run the cleanest version of the method. No isolation, no brackets — just .

Recall Solution L1.1

WHAT: the unknown sits in the exponent, so ordinary algebra can't free it → we need a log. Step 1 (Log both sides): . Step 2 (Drop): power law turns the exponent into a multiplier: Step 3 (Solve): is now just a fixed number, so divide: Sanity check: and , and lies between → between and . ✓

Recall Solution L1.2

Because the base is 10, taking is the inverse operation directly (see Inverse Functions): Why so quick? by definition of an inverse — the log and the base-10 power cancel with nothing left over. Check: , , is between → between and . ✓

Recall Solution L1.3

This is a degenerate / edge case — do NOT reach for a calculator yet. The key fact: because (any base to the power is ). So Why it must be : for every base . The log method still works but the answer is exactly , no rounding needed. ✓


Level 2 — Application

Now there is a coefficient or constant blocking the pure power. Isolate first — the power law only helps once stands alone.

Recall Solution L2.1

Isolate first: divide by . Spot it: , so exact answer without any log! But by method: Why divide by 4 before logging? The multiplies the whole power; if you logged too early you'd get (product law) and a messier line. Isolating keeps it clean. ✓

Recall Solution L2.2

Isolate the power: subtract . (You subtract, not divide, because is added, not multiplied.) Check: , so just under . ✓

Recall Solution L2.3

Isolate: divide by . Here's the twist: is negative (since , and of a number below 1 is negative). Both sides negative: Why still positive ? Two negatives divide to a positive. Note exactly. This is a decay base — see Exponential Growth and Decay. ✓


Level 3 — Analysis

The unknown lives inside a bracketed exponent. The whole bracket comes down as one lump, then you finish with ordinary linear algebra.

Recall Solution L3.1

Log both sides: . Drop the WHOLE exponent as a bracket: Solve the linear part: Why bracket it? The exponent is one connected object ; the power law multiplies all of it by . Forget the bracket and you'd wrongly get . ✓

Recall Solution L3.2

Watch the sign: the means the answer is . Careful subtraction, not . ✓

Recall Solution L3.3

WHY logs, not base-matching: and share no common base, so the "match the exponents" trick fails. Log is the only route. Log both sides: Expand (both brackets must open): Collect -terms on one side: Solve: Why factor out ? Once every is on one side, is a common factor — pull it out and divide, exactly like solving . ✓


Level 4 — Synthesis

These combine isolation, base-matching, or a hidden quadratic. Choose the smart tool.

Recall Solution L4.1

Base-matching beats logs here: and , both powers of . Equation becomes . If bases are equal, exponents are equal: Why exact? Rewriting to a common base avoids entirely — no rounding at all. Use it whenever bases are powers of a common number. ✓

Recall Solution L4.2

Spot the disguise: let . Then . The equation becomes a plain quadratic: So or , i.e. or .

  • (since ).
  • (since ). Both are valid is always positive, and both -values ( and ) are positive, so neither is rejected. Answers: and . Why substitute? The equation looks exponential but is structurally quadratic in ; naming that block reveals the familiar factorisation. ✓
Recall Solution L4.3

Let (so always). Then : Reject : has no solution because is positive for every real (an exponential never dips to or below zero). This is the crucial edge case. Keep : Answer: only. ✓


Level 5 — Mastery

Real-world modelling: growth, decay, and comparison. Set up the equation yourself, then solve.

Recall Solution L5.1

Set up the equation (doubling means value ): Isolate the power: divide by . Log and drop: Interpret: at years it hits exactly £1000; since interest is added yearly, it first exceeds £1000 after whole years. Why round UP here? The question asks when it first exceeds, and years isn't a whole year — you must wait to year . See Exponential Growth and Decay. ✓

Recall Solution L5.2

Set up: " remains" means : Cancel (it's on both sides, and ): . Log both sides, drop the bracketed exponent : Sanity check with half-lives: after h → , h → , h → , h → . sits between h and h → our h is right. ✓

Recall Solution L5.3

Set them equal: Group the powers — divide both sides by and by : So , with . Log and drop: Interpret: the slower-starting-but-faster-growing B catches A at about years. (Cross-check graphically with Solving Equations Graphically — the two curves intersect there.) ✓


Recall Master checklist (Feynman recap)
  1. Is the power alone? If not, undo the blocker (÷ for , − for ).
  2. Do the bases match as powers of one number? If yes → equate exponents (exact, no logs).
  3. Is it secretly a quadratic in ? If yes → substitute , solve, reject .
  4. Otherwise → log both sides, drop the whole bracketed exponent, solve linearly.
  5. Round toward the question's real meaning, not blindly.

Connections