You have met the definitions in the parent note . This page is the practice arena . We list every kind of problem inverse trig can throw at you, then knock each one down with a fully worked example — you forecast first, we build the answer step by step.
Before we start, a one-line reminder of the only three "safe zones" (ranges) — every answer must land inside its zone:
Recall The three safe zones (memorise the picture, not the words)
arcsin : answers live in [ − 2 π , 2 π ] — right half of the circle.
arccos : answers live in [ 0 , π ] — top half of the circle.
arctan : answers live in ( − 2 π , 2 π ) — right half, endpoints never reached.
If you ever forget why these zones exist, revisit One-to-one functions and invertibility — a function can only be reversed where each output has exactly one input.
Every problem below belongs to one of these cells . Together the worked examples cover all of them.
Cell
What makes it tricky
Example that hits it
A. Positive input, standard
plain lookup on the increasing branch
Ex 1
B. Negative input, sign rules
odd (sin, tan) vs. reflection (arccos ( − x ) = π − arccos x )
Ex 2
C. Zero / boundary input
x = 0 , ± 1 — where graphs start, end, or touch asymptotes
Ex 3
D. Out-of-range "snap back"
arcsin ( sin θ ) , arccos ( cos θ ) in every quadrant + multi-turn
Ex 4, Ex 4b, Ex 4c
E. Nested / composite identity
tan ( arccos x ) — build an expression, both signs of x
Ex 5
F. Limiting behaviour
x → + ∞ and x → − ∞ for arctan ; both asymptotes
Ex 6
G. Real-world word problem
angle of elevation from a distance
Ex 7
H. Exam-style twist
solve an equation using an inverse, then check all cases
Ex 8
Worked example Ex 1. Compute
arccos ( 2 2 ) .
Forecast: which angle between 0 and π has cosine 2 2 ≈ 0.707 ? Guess before reading.
Ask the defining question. arccos asks: "which angle y ∈ [ 0 , π ] satisfies cos y = 2 2 ?"
Why this step? An inverse is just a question posed backwards; naming the question stops us guessing blindly.
Recall the reference angle. From Unit circle and reference angles , cos 45° = cos 4 π = 2 2 .
Why this step? The standard angles 6 π , 4 π , 3 π are the only exact values you're expected to know by sight.
Check the zone. Is 4 π ∈ [ 0 , π ] ? Yes. So no adjustment needed.
Why this step? If the reference angle already sits in the safe zone, it is the answer.
Answer: arccos ( 2 2 ) = 4 π .
Verify: cos 4 π = 2 2 ✅, and 4 π lies in [ 0 , π ] ✅.
Here the reflection rule matters. arccos is not odd — feeding a negative flips it a different way than arcsin or arctan do. To cover the full cell we compute a negative input through all three functions in one shot.
The figure below is a unit circle (radius-1 circle centred at the origin). Its horizontal axis reads off cos , its vertical axis reads off sin ; angles are measured anticlockwise from the positive cos -axis. Three coloured radius-arrows show where each answer lands: teal = arcsin ( − 2 1 ) in the lower-right (a negative angle, correctly in arcsin's zone), orange = arccos ( − 2 1 ) in the upper-left (arccos's zone is the top half, so it climbs up , never negative), and plum = arctan ( − 1 ) also in the lower-right (arctan is odd, so a negative input gives a negative angle). The plum dashed vertical line marks the input value x = − 2 1 used by arcsin/arccos.
Worked example Ex 2. Compute
arcsin ( − 2 1 ) , arccos ( − 2 1 ) , and arctan ( − 1 ) — three negative inputs, three different sign behaviours.
Forecast: arcsin of a negative should be negative, and arctan of a negative should be negative (both odd). But is arccos of a negative also negative? Predict all three.
arcsin — use oddness. arcsin ( − x ) = − arcsin x because sine is an odd function, so its inverse is odd too.
Why this step? Oddness turns a negative-input problem into a positive one we already know.
arcsin 2 1 = 6 π (since sin 30° = 2 1 ), so arcsin ( − 2 1 ) = − 6 π .
Why this step? − 6 π is in [ − 2 π , 2 π ] — the teal arrow in the lower-right of the figure. Valid.
arccos — use the reflection rule. arccos ( − x ) = π − arccos x . This is NOT − arccos x : negatives are illegal outputs for arccos .
Why this step? The safe zone [ 0 , π ] has no negatives, so a "sign flip" can't work; the correct move is π − ( ⋅ ) , mirroring across 2 π .
arccos 2 1 = 3 π , so arccos ( − 2 1 ) = π − 3 π = 3 2 π — the orange arrow, top-left, still inside [ 0 , π ] .
Why this step? Confirms arccos climbs into the second quadrant instead of going negative.
arctan — use oddness (like arcsin). arctan ( − x ) = − arctan x because tangent is odd.
Why this step? arctan shares arcsin's symmetric zone ( − 2 π , 2 π ) , so its negative-input rule is a plain sign flip, unlike arccos.
arctan 1 = 4 π (slope 1 is a 45° line), so arctan ( − 1 ) = − 4 π — the plum arrow, lower-right.
Why this step? A slope of − 1 is a line tipping the other way; the angle is the mirror of 4 π below the axis.
Answers: arcsin ( − 2 1 ) = − 6 π , arccos ( − 2 1 ) = 3 2 π , arctan ( − 1 ) = − 4 π .
Verify: sin ( − 6 π ) = − 2 1 ✅, cos 3 2 π = − 2 1 ✅, tan ( − 4 π ) = − 1 ✅. All three land in their zones; only arccos avoids negatives.
The endpoints x = 0 , ± 1 are where the graphs start , end , or touch an asymptote . Get these and you own the shape of every curve — see Reflection of graphs across y=x .
Worked example Ex 3. Evaluate the full boundary set:
arcsin 0 , arcsin 1 , arcsin ( − 1 ) , arccos 1 , arccos ( − 1 ) , arctan 0 .
Forecast: these are the "corner" values. Sketch each on the unit circle in your head first. Note arcsin ( − 1 ) — don't forget the bottom endpoint.
arcsin 0 : which y ∈ [ − 2 π , 2 π ] has sin y = 0 ? Only y = 0 .
Why this step? Zero sine happens at 0 , π , 2 π , … ; only 0 is in the zone.
arcsin 1 : sin y = 1 at y = 2 π — the top of the safe zone (a closed endpoint, so it's allowed).
Why this step? Unlike arctan 's open ends, arcsin includes ± 2 π , so arcsin ( ± 1 ) is defined.
arcsin ( − 1 ) : sin y = − 1 at y = − 2 π — the bottom endpoint of the zone.
Why this step? By oddness, arcsin ( − 1 ) = − arcsin ( 1 ) = − 2 π ; it is the mirror image of the top corner.
arccos 1 : which y ∈ [ 0 , π ] has cos y = 1 ? At y = 0 .
Why this step? Cosine peaks at 1 when the angle is 0 — the right edge of the top half.
arccos ( − 1 ) : cosine is − 1 at y = π (the far left of the circle).
Why this step? This is the other endpoint of the [ 0 , π ] range — the arccos graph ends here.
arctan 0 : tan y = 0 at y = 0 .
Why this step? Tangent (slope) is flat only at 0 inside the open zone.
Answers: arcsin 0 = 0 , arcsin 1 = 2 π , arcsin ( − 1 ) = − 2 π , arccos 1 = 0 , arccos ( − 1 ) = π , arctan 0 = 0 .
Verify: sin 0 = 0 , sin 2 π = 1 , sin ( − 2 π ) = − 1 , cos 0 = 1 , cos π = − 1 , tan 0 = 0 ✅.
This is the classic trap: an inverse cannot return an angle outside its zone, even if you feed it the sine (or cosine) of one. To be exhaustive we cover an angle from quadrant II (Ex 4), one from quadrant III (Ex 4b), and a quadrant-IV multi-turn angle (Ex 4c) — so every position of the inner angle is demonstrated.
The figure is again a unit circle (horizontal axis = cos , vertical axis = sin ). The orange arrow points to the raw inner angle 6 5 π (outside arcsin's zone); the teal arrow points to the snapped-back answer 6 π (inside the zone). The plum dashed horizontal line at height 2 1 shows that both arrows have the same sin -value — that shared height is exactly why arcsin returns the lower one.
Worked example Ex 4. (Quadrant II) Compute
arcsin ( sin 6 5 π ) .
Forecast: the tempting (wrong) answer is 6 5 π . Why can't it be?
Check the inner angle against the zone. Is 6 5 π ∈ [ − 2 π , 2 π ] ? No — 6 5 π = 150° > 90° (quadrant II).
Why this step? arcsin ( sin θ ) = θ only when θ is already inside the zone. Here it isn't, so we must reduce.
Collapse to a ratio. sin 6 5 π = sin ( π − 6 5 π ) = sin 6 π = 2 1 .
Why this step? Sine of an obtuse angle equals sine of its supplement (the two equal-height dots on the plum line). We keep only the ratio.
Ask arcsin the clean question. arcsin 2 1 = 6 π , which IS in the zone.
Why this step? The inverse always returns the one angle inside [ − 2 π , 2 π ] giving that ratio — it "snaps back."
Answer: arcsin ( sin 6 5 π ) = 6 π .
Verify: sin 6 5 π = 2 1 and sin 6 π = 2 1 produce the same ratio ✅; 6 π is in range while 6 5 π is not.
Worked example Ex 4b. (Quadrant III) Compute
arccos ( cos 6 7 π ) — the arccos snap-back (different zone!).
Forecast: naive answer 6 7 π . But arccos can only return [ 0 , π ] , and 6 7 π > π . Which angle in [ 0 , π ] comes out?
Check the inner angle against the zone. Is 6 7 π ∈ [ 0 , π ] ? No — 6 7 π = 210° > 180° (quadrant III).
Why this step? arccos ( cos θ ) = θ only if θ already sits in [ 0 , π ] . It doesn't, so reduce.
Collapse to a ratio. cos 6 7 π = − cos 6 π = − 2 3 . (In quadrant III cosine is negative, reference angle 6 7 π − π = 6 π .)
Why this step? We keep only the cosine value; the "which angle" information is deliberately discarded.
Ask arccos the clean question. Which y ∈ [ 0 , π ] has cos y = − 2 3 ? Using arccos ( − x ) = π − arccos x : π − 6 π = 6 5 π .
Why this step? Negative cosine forces a second-quadrant answer inside [ 0 , π ] — arccos snaps up , not down.
Answer: arccos ( cos 6 7 π ) = 6 5 π .
Verify: cos 6 7 π = − 2 3 = cos 6 5 π ✅; 6 5 π ∈ [ 0 , π ] while 6 7 π is not. (General rule: for θ ∈ [ π , 2 π ] , arccos ( cos θ ) = 2 π − θ ; here 2 π − 6 7 π = 6 5 π ✅.)
Worked example Ex 4c. (Quadrant IV, multi-turn) Compute
arctan ( tan 4 9 π ) and arcsin ( sin 6 11 π ) — spin past 2 π and dip into quadrant IV.
Forecast: 4 9 π is more than a full turn, and 6 11 π sits in quadrant IV (below the axis). Both must snap into their zones.
Multi-turn first: peel off full circles. tan repeats every π , so tan 4 9 π = tan ( 4 9 π − 2 π ) = tan 4 π = 1 .
Why this step? Subtracting whole periods leaves the ratio unchanged; 4 π is already inside ( − 2 π , 2 π ) .
Ask arctan the clean question. arctan 1 = 4 π , in the zone. So arctan ( tan 4 9 π ) = 4 π .
Why this step? Shows multi-turn inputs are no harder — reduce to one period, then snap.
Quadrant IV next. 6 11 π = 330° is in quadrant IV, where sine is negative: sin 6 11 π = − sin 6 π = − 2 1 (reference angle 2 π − 6 11 π = 6 π ).
Why this step? Quadrant IV gives a negative ratio, so the snapped answer will be negative — the opposite sign story from Ex 4.
Ask arcsin the clean question. arcsin ( − 2 1 ) = − 6 π , inside [ − 2 π , 2 π ] . So arcsin ( sin 6 11 π ) = − 6 π .
Why this step? Confirms snap-back works below the axis too, completing all four quadrants.
Answers: arctan ( tan 4 9 π ) = 4 π , arcsin ( sin 6 11 π ) = − 6 π .
Verify: tan 4 9 π = 1 = tan 4 π ✅; sin 6 11 π = − 2 1 = sin ( − 6 π ) ✅. Both answers sit in their zones.
Sometimes the answer isn't a number but an algebraic expression . We turn the inverse into a triangle — but a triangle only handles the acute case, so we must also treat x < 0 separately, where the angle is obtuse. This connects directly to Trigonometric identities .
The figure is a right triangle carrying the angle θ = arccos x at the lower-left corner, drawn for the acute case x > 0 . Its adjacent side (teal, along the bottom) has length x ; its hypotenuse (plum) has length 1 ; its opposite side (orange, vertical) has length 1 − x 2 by Pythagoras. Reading tan = opposite / adjacent straight off this triangle gives the formula.
Worked example Ex 5. Simplify
tan ( arccos x ) for all valid x ∈ [ − 1 , 1 ] , x = 0 .
Forecast: for x > 0 the answer should be positive and shrink to 0 at x = 1 . What sign should it take when x < 0 ? Predict before reading.
Name the angle. Let θ = arccos x , so cos θ = x with θ ∈ [ 0 , π ] .
Why this step? Naming the inverse lets us build a triangle (for x > 0 ) or reason by quadrant (for x < 0 ).
Acute case x ∈ ( 0 , 1 ] : draw the triangle. Adjacent = x , hypotenuse = 1 , opposite = 1 − x 2 (figure). Then tan θ = x 1 − x 2 , positive.
Why this step? Here θ ∈ [ 0 , 2 π ) where tan ≥ 0 , so the + root and positive value are correct.
Obtuse case x ∈ [ − 1 , 0 ) : check the quadrant. Now cos θ = x < 0 forces θ ∈ ( 2 π , π ] , the second quadrant, where tan θ < 0 .
Why this step? The triangle picture no longer applies (the angle is obtuse); we must decide the sign from the quadrant instead.
Fix the sign. The magnitude is still ∣ x ∣ 1 − x 2 , but since x < 0 , x 1 − x 2 is already negative — so the single expression x 1 − x 2 works for both signs.
Why this step? Dividing the (always non-negative) 1 − x 2 by x itself carries the correct sign automatically, so one formula covers the whole domain.
Answer: tan ( arccos x ) = x 1 − x 2 for all x ∈ [ − 1 , 1 ] , x = 0 (positive for x > 0 , negative for x < 0 ).
Verify: at x = 2 1 : 1/2 3 /2 = 3 = tan 3 π , and arccos 2 1 = 3 π ✅. At x = − 2 1 : − 1/2 3 /2 = − 3 = tan 3 2 π , and arccos ( − 2 1 ) = 3 2 π ✅ (negative, as forecast). At x = 1 : 0 = tan 0 ✅.
arctan never reaches ± 2 π ; it approaches them from both directions. This is the two-asymptote story, and it foreshadows Derivatives of inverse trig functions (the slope flattens to 0 far out on either side).
The figure plots y = arctan x (teal S-curve) against x . Two orange dashed horizontal lines at y = ± 2 π are the asymptotes: the curve hugs the upper one as x → + ∞ and the lower one as x → − ∞ , but touches neither.
Worked example Ex 6. Find
x → + ∞ lim arctan x and x → − ∞ lim arctan x , plus arctan ( 1000 ) and arctan ( − 1000 ) numerically.
Forecast: as x grows hugely positive the line becomes nearly vertical upward ; as x grows hugely negative it becomes nearly vertical downward . Guess both ceilings.
Interpret geometrically. arctan x is the angle whose slope (rise/run) is x . As x → + ∞ the line is nearly vertical with positive steepness.
Why this step? Tangent = slope; an infinite positive slope means a vertical line, i.e. angle → + 90° .
Positive limit. The angle approaches but never equals + 2 π (upper dashed line in the figure).
Why this step? A truly vertical line has undefined slope, so the range is open at + 2 π .
Negative limit. As x → − ∞ the slope is huge but negative, so the line tips the other way: angle → − 2 π (lower dashed line).
Why this step? arctan is odd, so its behaviour at − ∞ mirrors that at + ∞ across 0 — the graph has TWO horizontal asymptotes.
Numerical feel. arctan ( 1000 ) ≈ 1.5698 rad (just under 2 π ≈ 1.5708 ); arctan ( − 1000 ) ≈ − 1.5698 rad (just above − 2 π ).
Why this step? Concrete numbers make "approaches from both sides" tangible.
Answers: x → + ∞ lim arctan x = 2 π and x → − ∞ lim arctan x = − 2 π (neither reached); arctan ( ± 1000 ) ≈ ± 1.5698 .
Verify: 2 π − arctan ( 1000 ) > 0 and arctan ( − 1000 ) + 2 π > 0 , confirming the values stay strictly inside both ceilings ✅.
Worked example Ex 7. You stand
30 m from the base of a tower. Your eye-line to the top rises 40 m . What is the angle of elevation?
Forecast: the rise (40 ) beats the run (30 ), so the angle should be more than 45° . Guess a number.
Set up the ratio. Angle of elevation α satisfies tan α = adjacent opposite = 30 40 = 3 4 .
Why this step? Elevation is a slope: vertical rise over horizontal distance — exactly a tangent.
Invert with arctan. α = arctan ( 3 4 ) .
Why arctan and not arcsin? We know the two legs (opposite and adjacent), not the hypotenuse. tan uses those two legs, so its inverse is the right tool.
Evaluate. arctan ( 1.333 … ) ≈ 0.9273 rad . Convert to degrees: 0.9273 × π 180 ≈ 53.13° .
Why this step? A positive input gives a first-quadrant answer, comfortably in ( − 2 π , 2 π ) ; degrees make the answer intuitive.
Sanity-check the size. 53.13° > 45° , matching the forecast that a rise bigger than the run tilts past 45° .
Why this step? Guarding against calculator-mode errors (radians vs degrees) by comparing to the 45° landmark.
Answer: α = arctan 3 4 ≈ 0.9273 rad ≈ 53.13° .
Verify: tan ( 53.13° ) = cos sin ≈ 0.6 0.8 = 1.333 = 3 4 ✅, and 53.13° > 45° as forecast ✅. (This is the famous 3 –4 –5 triangle.)
Worked example Ex 8. Solve
2 arcsin x = 3 π for x , then state which values of x are legal.
Forecast: halving the equation gives an arcsin we can undo. But watch the domain of x .
Isolate the inverse. Divide by 2 : arcsin x = 6 π .
Why this step? We want arcsin x alone so we can apply sin to both sides.
Undo with sine. Apply sin : x = sin 6 π = 2 1 .
Why this step? sin ( arcsin x ) = x is always valid for x ∈ [ − 1 , 1 ] (this direction never leaves the zone), so applying sine is safe.
Domain check. For arcsin x to exist we need x ∈ [ − 1 , 1 ] ; and 6 π must lie in the range [ − 2 π , 2 π ] — it does. So x = 2 1 is the unique solution.
Why this step? Inverse-trig equations can hide illegal or missing solutions; a range/domain audit catches them. See Solving trigonometric equations .
Answer: x = 2 1 .
Verify: 2 arcsin 2 1 = 2 ⋅ 6 π = 3 π ✅.
Common mistake The single error that spans cells B, D, and H
Treating every inverse as "just undo the trig function." It only undoes cleanly when the angle is already inside the safe zone (Ex 4, Ex 4b, Ex 4c), and negatives obey different sign rules — a plain flip for arcsin /arctan (odd), but π − ( ⋅ ) for arccos (Ex 2). Always audit the zone before writing the answer.
Mnemonic Attack order for any inverse-trig problem
"Zone → Sign → Snap → Verify."
Name the zone, fix the sign (odd for sin/tan, π − ( ⋅ ) for cos), snap out-of-range angles back in, then plug your answer into the forward function to confirm.