This page is your self-test. Read each problem, try it on paper, THEN open the collapsible solution. Problems climb five rungs: L1 Recognition → L2 Application → L3 Analysis → L4 Synthesis → L5 Mastery. Every solution is complete — no "left as an exercise".
Before you start, make sure you're comfortable with the parent note Applications — heights and distances problems and the raw ratios in 2.4.01-Trigonometric-ratios. A few problems lean on 2.4.03-Complementary-angles, 1.3.07-Pythagoras-theorem and 3.2.04-Similar-triangles; one echoes real fieldwork from 2.5.02-Surveying-and-navigation.
Look at the triangle above. The angle θ lives at the observer's eye. The side straight across from θ (never touching it) is the opposite side — here the height. The side that runs along the angle to the right angle is the adjacent side — here the ground distance. The slanted side facing the right angle is the hypotenuse — the line of sight. Keep this labelling in front of you.
Exact values you'll reuse (memorise these three angles):
A pole is 12 m tall. From a point on the ground the angle of elevation to its top is 45°. How far is the point from the base of the pole?
Recall Solution
What we know: height (opposite the angle) =12, angle =45°, want the ground distance d (adjacent).
Why tan: we have opposite, we want adjacent — the two legs. That's exactly tan.
tan45°=adjacentopposite=d12
Since tan45°=1:
1=d12⟹d=12 mSanity check: at 45° the triangle is isosceles — height equals distance. 12=12. ✓
From the top of a lighthouse the angle of depression to a boat is 60°. In the right triangle formed by the lighthouse height, the sea-level distance, and the line of sight to the boat, which side is opposite the 60° angle measured at the boat, and which is adjacent?
Recall Solution
Key idea (from the parent note): the angle of depression at the top equals the angle of elevation at the boat — they are alternate interior angles across the two horizontal (parallel) lines cut by the line of sight.
Placing the angle at the boat (elevation =60°):
Opposite the 60° angle = the lighthouse height (straight up, not touching the boat's angle).
Adjacent to the 60° angle = the sea-level distance (runs along the water from the boat to the base).
No arithmetic needed — this is pure recognition. Getting this right is what makes every later problem trivial.
A student stands 40 m from a tower. The angle of elevation to the top is 60°. Find the height of the tower.
Recall Solution
Setup: adjacent (ground) =40, want opposite (height) h, angle =60°.
Why tan: we KNOW the ground leg (40 m, adjacent) and WANT the vertical leg (height, opposite). Two legs, no line of sight involved — that is precisely what tan relates. Reaching for sin or cos would drag in the unknown hypotenuse for nothing.
tan60°=40h⟹h=40tan60°=403h=40×1.732≈69.28 mSanity check: the angle is steep (>45°), so the height should exceed the distance. 69.28>40. ✓
From the top of a 90 m cliff the angle of depression to a fishing boat is 30°. How far is the boat from the foot of the cliff?
Recall Solution
Setup: depression 30° = elevation 30° at the boat. Height (opposite) =90, want distance (adjacent) d.
Why tan: we KNOW the vertical leg (90 m, opposite) and WANT the horizontal leg (distance, adjacent). Again two legs meet at the angle — the ratio that ties them together is tan, so no hypotenuse is needed.
tan30°=d90⟹d=tan30°90=903d=90×1.732≈155.88 mSanity check: shallow angle (<45°) → the boat is far, distance bigger than height. 155.88>90. ✓
A ladder 10 m long leans against a wall, making an angle of 60° with the ground. How high up the wall does it reach?
Recall Solution
Careful: here we DO know the slanted side — the ladder is the hypotenuse (=10). We want the vertical reach, which is opposite the 60° angle.
Why sin not tan: we have hypotenuse and want opposite → that's sin.
sin60°=10height⟹height=10sin60°=10×23=53height=5×1.732≈8.66 mSanity check: the reach must be less than the ladder length. 8.66<10. ✓
A man observes the top of a tower at an elevation of 30°. He walks 30 m directly toward the tower; the elevation becomes 60°. Find the height of the tower.
Recall Solution
Let height =h, first distance =x, second distance =x−30.
First position (30°):tan30°=xh⟹x=h3(1)Second position (60°):tan60°=x−30h⟹x−30=3h(2)Why subtract (2) from (1): it kills x, leaving only h.
x−(x−30)=h3−3h30=h(33−1)=h⋅32h=30×23=153≈25.98 mSanity check: he walked 30 m and the height (≈26 m) is comparable — moving closer made the angle jump 30°→60°, exactly as expected. ✓
The angle of elevation of a cloud from a point 60 m above a lake is 30°, and the angle of depression of its reflection in the lake is 60°. Find the height of the cloud above the lake surface.
Recall Solution
The trick — the reflection is as far below the water as the cloud is above. Let the cloud be H above the lake; the observer sits 60 m above the lake. Let horizontal distance from observer to the cloud's vertical line =d.
Cloud is H−60above the observer’s eye level ⇒
tan30°=dH−60⟹d=(H−60)3(1)
Reflection is H below the lake, so it is H+60below the eye ⇒
tan60°=dH+60⟹d=3H+60(2)Set (1) = (2) to eliminate d:(H−60)3=3H+60
Multiply both sides by 3:
3(H−60)=H+60⟹3H−180=H+60⟹2H=240H=120 mSanity check: the depression to the reflection (60°) is steeper than the elevation to the cloud (30°) because the reflection is genuinely lower (further below) than the cloud is high. Consistent. ✓
From a point on the ground, the elevation to the bottom of a flagpole standing on a building is 30°, and to the top of the flagpole is 45°. The building is 30 m tall. Find the length of the flagpole.
Recall Solution
Let flagpole length =f, ground distance =d.
To the top of the building (30 m), 30°:tan30°=d30⟹d=303(1)To the top of the flagpole (30+f), 45°:tan45°=d30+f⟹30+f=d(2)
Substitute (1) into (2):
30+f=303⟹f=30(3−1)=30×0.732≈21.96 mSanity check: at 45°, top height = distance =303≈51.96 m, which indeed exceeds the 30 m building. ✓
A tower and a building stand on opposite sides of a straight 80 m road. From the base of the tower the angle of elevation of the building's top is 45°; from the base of the building the angle of elevation of the tower's top is 60°. Find the height of the tower, and use the 45° reading to state the building's height as a cross-check.
Recall Solution
Two triangles share the same 80 m horizontal base (the road width).
Elevation of tower top from building base (60°): the whole road (80 m) is adjacent, tower height t is opposite.
tan60°=80t⟹t=803≈138.56 mNow use the 45° reading (the second, opposite-facing triangle): looking from the tower base across the same 80 m road to the building top, the road is adjacent and the building height b is opposite.
tan45°=80b⟹b=80×1=80 mWhy this cross-check matters: the two elevations are read in opposite directions across one fixed gap. Confirming b=80 m (an 45° isosceles triangle: height = road width) proves we assigned the shared 80 m base correctly to both triangles — if we had mistakenly used two different distances, this clean b=80 would not appear.
Sanity check: the tower is seen at a steep 60° across the same 80 m, so it should be taller than the road is wide. 138.56>80. ✓
The angle of elevation of the top of a tower from a point A on the ground is 30°. On walking 40 m toward the tower to a point B, the elevation becomes 45°. Find (a) the height of the tower and (b) the distance from B to the tower base — all in exact surd form, then to 2 decimals.
Recall Solution
Let height =h, distance from B to base =y, so distance from A=y+40.
At B (45°):tan45°=yh⇒y=h(1)At A (30°):tan30°=y+40h⇒y+40=h3(2)Why substitute (1) into (2): equation (1) tells us y is just h in disguise, so replacing it collapses two unknowns into one — leaving a single equation in h alone.
h+40=h3⟹40=h3−h=h(3−1)⟹h=3−140Why rationalise: a surd in the denominator is hard to read and to approximate, so multiply top and bottom by the conjugate 3+1 to clear it.
h=(3−1)(3+1)40(3+1)=3−140(3+1)=240(3+1)=20(3+1)h=20(3+1)≈20×(1.732+1)=20×2.732≈54.64 m(b) From (1), y=h, so the distance from B to the base is
y=20(3+1)≈54.64 m.Sanity check: at 45° from B the triangle is isosceles, so the height must equal the distance from B — indeed h=y. ✓ And A is 40 m further out with a smaller angle (30°), consistent with a longer, shallower line of sight. ✓
A drone is spotted at elevation 60° from a ground station. It flies horizontally away at constant height; the elevation drops to 30° after the drone covers a horizontal distance reported as 100 m by its GPS. Assuming the height stays fixed, is the GPS figure geometrically consistent? If so, what is the drone's height?
Recall Solution
Let height =h, first horizontal distance =d1, second =d2.
tan60°=d1h⇒d1=3h,tan30°=d2h⇒d2=h3
The geometry forces the horizontal travel to be
d2−d1=h3−3h=h⋅33−1=32h.Answering the consistency question FIRST: the two angles do NOT over-determine anything on their own — for any height h there exists a matching travel 32h. So the pair "60°→30° plus travel =100 m" is consistent provided a single positive h satisfies 32h=100. Solve it:
32h=100⟹h=21003=503≈86.60 m.
Since this gives one clean positive height, YES — the 100 m GPS reading is geometrically consistent, and the drone's height is 503≈86.60 m. (Back-check: d1=50, d2=150, difference =100. ✓)
Contrast (from the parent's steel-man): if instead the height were pinned independently and the angles were 45°→30°, the travel would be h(3−1)≈0.73h, which would generally clash with a raw "100 m" claim. Always recompute the implied displacement and compare — that is exactly the field discipline of 2.5.02-Surveying-and-navigation.
Recall Quick recall — pick your ratio
Two legs (vertical + horizontal), no slant known ::: use tan
Hypotenuse (line of sight / ladder) and the opposite side ::: use sin
Hypotenuse and the adjacent side ::: use cos
Angle of depression from the top equals... ::: the angle of elevation from the bottom (alternate interior angles)