2.4.4 · D2Trigonometry — Foundation

Visual walkthrough — Trig ratios of standard angles — 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90° (derive, don't memorize blindly)

1,572 words7 min readBack to topic

This page rebuilds the entire table from the parent note — the standard-angle table — starting from a single right triangle and two ideas: a ratio, and the Pythagorean Theorem. By the last picture you will be able to redraw every value with a pencil.

We never assume you know what "sine" is. We build it.


Step 0 — What a "trig ratio" even means

WHY divide sides at all? Because a ratio of sides doesn't care how big you draw the triangle — only its shape (its angles) sets the ratio. So each of these numbers is a fingerprint of the angle , nothing else. That is the whole reason trigonometry works.

In the figure: sits at the bottom-left corner. Trace the red opposite side (across from ), the orange adjacent side (under ), and the violet hypotenuse (the slope). Every value below is one of these divided by another.


Step 1 — Draw the 45° triangle from equality

WHAT. Build the triangle for .

WHY 45° first? Because is the balanced case: the two non-right angles are equal (). Equal angles force equal opposite sides — the two legs must be the same length. That symmetry hands us the triangle for free, with no measuring.

PICTURE. Make both legs length . This is an isosceles right triangle (two equal legs). See Special Triangles.

Here is the square built on the slanted side; the two 's are the squares on the legs. The Pythagorean Theorem says the big square equals the two small ones added — so (the number that squares to , about ).


Step 2 — Read off the 45° values

WHAT. Plug the sides into the Step 0 definitions.

WHY. We now have all three sides (, , ), so the ratios are just division.

Why is rewritten as ? That is Rationalization: multiply top and bottom by so no root sits underneath — . Same number, tidier for later addition. See Exact vs Approximate Values.

PICTURE. means the slope rises exactly as fast as it runs — a perfect diagonal. The figure in Step 1 already shows this: equal legs, slant.


Step 3 — Build one equilateral triangle for BOTH 30° and 60°

WHAT. Draw an equilateral triangle (all sides equal, all angles ) with each side .

WHY size 2? So that when we cut it in half the pieces come out as whole numbers, not fractions. It is a convenience, nothing more.

WHY does one triangle give two angles? Because dropping a straight line from the top vertex down to the base does two things at once: it splits the top angle into two angles, and (by the triangle's mirror Symmetry in Trigonometry) it cuts the base exactly in half. One clean cut manufactures a triangle.

PICTURE.

The dashed violet line is the cut. On the left half: the base became (half of ), the slanted side stays , and the height is still unknown — call it .


Step 4 — Find the height with Pythagoras

WHAT. Solve for the height of the half-triangle.

WHY. We know two sides of the half-triangle (, ) and need the third to read any ratio.

is the square on the tall side; the square on the short base; the square on the slant. Subtract to isolate the height: .

PICTURE.

The completed triangle: short side sits opposite the small angle; long side sits opposite the bigger angle; hypotenuse across from the right angle. The small angle always faces the small side — that single fact keeps you from ever mixing up and .


Step 5 — Read off 30° and 60°

WHAT. Apply the definitions to the same triangle, once looking from the corner, once from the corner.

WHY the same triangle twice? Because "opposite" and "adjacent" swap depending on which corner you stand at. Stand at : the short side () is opposite. Stand at : now the tall side () is opposite. One triangle, two viewpoints.

PICTURE.

Notice the swap: and . That is not a coincidence — and are Complementary Angles (they sum to ), and swapping viewpoints swaps opposite with adjacent, which swaps sine with cosine.


Step 6 — The edge cases: 0° and 90° by squashing the triangle

WHAT. Get and where no fat triangle exists.

WHY a limit and not a triangle? At exactly or the triangle collapses flat — one side shrinks to nothing. So instead of building, we watch what happens as slides toward the extreme, using the Unit Circle (a circle of radius ). A point on it at angle sits at position : its horizontal reach is cosine, its height is sine.

PICTURE.

  • At the point rests at : no height, full width. So , , and .
  • At the point is at : full height, no width. So , , and is undefined — you cannot divide by zero, and geometrically the slope is straight up (infinitely steep).


The one-picture summary

Everything above lives in this one frame: the two source triangles on the left ( and ), the unit circle for the flat cases on the right, and the finished table underneath. If you can redraw the two triangles, you own every entry.

Angle
undefined
Recall Feynman retelling — say it out loud

A trig ratio is just one side of a right triangle divided by another. Because a ratio ignores size, it only depends on the angle — so it's a code for the angle. For I draw a triangle with two equal sides of ; Pythagoras gives the slant , and dividing gives for both sine and cosine, and for tangent. For and I draw an equilateral triangle of side , chop it down the middle, and get a triangle with sides , , . Standing at the small angle, the small side is opposite, so . Standing at the big angle, the tall side is opposite, so . Small angle faces small side — that's how I never confuse them. For and I picture a dot on a circle of radius : its height is sine, its width is cosine. At it's flat right (sine , cosine ); at it's straight up (sine , cosine ), and tangent blows up because we'd divide by zero.

Recall

Why does a ratio of two sides only depend on the angle, not the triangle's size? ::: Scaling a triangle multiplies every side by the same factor, which cancels in a ratio — so shape (angle) alone sets the value. On the 30-60-90 triangle, why is and not ? ::: The small angle faces the short side (length ); opposite over hypotenuse is . Why is undefined? ::: It equals ; division by zero is undefined and the line is vertical (infinite slope). Where does come from in the case? ::: Pythagoras on legs and : hypotenuse .