Worked examples — Trigonometric ratios in right triangle — sin, cos, tan, cosec, sec, cot
Before anything, one reminder of the picture every example leans on.

The scenario matrix
| Cell | Scenario class | What's given | What's asked | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Two legs known | , | all six ratios | Ex 1 |
| B | One ratio + one side | , | missing sides | Ex 2 |
| C | Reciprocal ratio given | Ex 3 | ||
| D | Ratio → other ratio (no triangle) | Ex 4 | ||
| E | Limiting / degenerate | , | behaviour of ratios | Ex 5 |
| F | Special angles (exact values) | , | exact ratios | Ex 6 |
| G | Real-world word problem | ladder height | angle & sides | Ex 7 |
| H | Exam twist (mixed reciprocals) | isolate | Ex 8 |
Eight examples, eight cells — no gaps.
Cell A — both legs known
Forecast: guess — will the hypotenuse be a whole number here? Jot a yes/no before reading on.
-
Find with Pythagoras theorem. Why this step? The three ratios that use (sin, cos, and their reciprocals) can't be written until we know . Pythagoras is the only tool that gets a side from two other sides in a right triangle.
-
Write the primary three. Why this step? These are the definitions from SOH-CAH-TOA — read straight off the labelled triangle.
-
Flip each for the reciprocals. Why this step? Cosec/sec/cot are literally sin/cos/tan turned upside down — no new geometry needed.
Verify: the Pythagorean identity must hold: (Your forecast: yes, was whole — an triple.)
Cell B — one ratio and one side
Forecast: which side does hand you directly — opposite or adjacent?
-
Use the definition to get the adjacent side. Why this step? , and we know the hypotenuse, so cross-multiplying frees .
-
Get the opposite side with Pythagoras. Why this step? We now know two sides; Pythagoras is again the bridge to the third.
Verify: (units cm consistent).
Cell C — a reciprocal ratio is given
Forecast: secant flips cosine. So which ratio drops out first with zero effort?
-
Undo the reciprocal to get cosine. Why this step? is defined as ; flipping a fraction is the fastest legal move.
-
Read cosine as sides, then find the missing leg. means , (up to scale). Then Why this step? Reconstructing the triangle turns one ratio into all three sides — Pythagoras supplies the leg we lack.
-
Read off the remaining ratios. Why this step? With all three sides in hand every ratio is a direct definition.
Verify:
Cell D — ratio to ratio, no triangle drawn
Forecast: we have one equation. What second equation lets us pin down two unknowns?
-
Bring in the identity that links tan to sin/cos. Why this step? The quotient identity converts the given into a relation between and — pure algebra, no geometry.
-
Feed that into the Pythagorean identity. Why this step? Two equations, two unknowns — substitution collapses them into one solvable equation.
-
Take the positive root (acute angle) and back-substitute. Why this step? For an acute both sin and cos are positive, so we keep ; step 1 then gives sin.
Verify:
Cell E — limiting and degenerate cases
Forecast: a right triangle can't actually reach or (it would flatten). So we ask what the ratios approach.

-
Squash the triangle: . The opposite side shrinks to nothing while adjacent hypotenuse. So Why this step? Reading the definitions off the flattening picture tells us the limits directly.
-
Spot the blow-ups at . Since , any ratio dividing by explodes: while . Why this step? Dividing a fixed length by a vanishing length grows without bound — that's why csc and cot "go to infinity."
-
Tip it the other way: . Now adjacent , opposite hypotenuse: Why this step? By the mirror-image logic, dividing by the vanishing adjacent makes tan and sec blow up.
Verify (sanity, at ): (near ) and (large) — matches the "blow-up" claim. We check the exact limit values numerically in VERIFY.
Cell F — special (exact) angles
Forecast: at the triangle is symmetric — what does that force the two legs to be?

-
The case: an isosceles right triangle. Equal acute angles equal legs, say both . Then . Why this step? Symmetry gives the leg lengths for free; Pythagoras gives ; then read definitions.
-
The case: half of an equilateral triangle. Split an equilateral triangle of side down the middle. The half has hypotenuse , the short (opposite to ) side , and the long side . Why this step? Cutting a known equilateral triangle produces a right triangle with exact side lengths, no measuring.
Verify: ; and
Cell G — real-world word problem
Forecast: where is the right angle hiding in this picture?

-
Model it as a right triangle. The wall meets the ground at . Ladder = hypotenuse , ground distance = adjacent , wall height = opposite . (This is exactly angle of elevation geometry.) Why this step? Naming physical parts as , , lets us reuse every ratio we know.
-
Height by Pythagoras. Why this step? Two sides known, third wanted — Pythagoras again.
-
Angle from a ratio. Why ? We know the cosine and want the angle — answers "which angle has this cosine?", undoing cos. (See Solving right triangles.)
Verify: check with sine of the found angle: , and ; units are metres throughout.
Cell H — exam twist with mixed reciprocals
Forecast: both terms share the same denominator — what is it?
-
Rewrite everything over . Why this step? Reciprocal and quotient definitions turn a scary mix into one clean fraction in sin and cos.
-
Clear the fraction, then use the Pythagorean identity. Why this step? We have two unknowns; replacing by leaves an equation in only.
-
Solve the resulting equation. Let . Note : Why this step? Factoring lets us cancel the common (nonzero for acute ), collapsing to a linear equation.
Verify: with , an acute gives ; then
Recall Quick self-test across the matrix
Which ratios blow up as ? ::: and (they divide by the vanishing opposite side). From , what is ? ::: (secant is the reciprocal of cosine). Exact value of ? ::: (equal legs). In the ladder problem, which side is the hypotenuse? ::: the ladder itself. Why can not be a number? ::: adjacent is , so divides by zero — undefined.
Related build-outs: Similar triangles (why ratios ignore size), Unit circle definition of trig functions (how these extend past ), Components of vectors (sin/cos as projections).