Intuition The big picture
A ratio is just a comparison of sizes by division , not by subtraction. When we say the ratio of apples to oranges is 3 : 2 3:2 3 : 2 , we do not mean "3 more apples" — we mean "for every 3 apples there are 2 oranges". The relationship is multiplicative . Everything in this topic (equivalent ratios, dividing in a ratio) flows from one single idea: a ratio only tells you the relative size, so you can scale both parts by the same factor without changing the ratio.
A ratio a : b a:b a : b compares two quantities of the same kind (same units) by division. It represents the fraction a b \dfrac{a}{b} b a , but written with a colon.
a a a and b b b are called the terms of the ratio.
A ratio has no units (units cancel).
Order matters: 3 : 2 ≠ 2 : 3 3:2 \neq 2:3 3 : 2 = 2 : 3 .
WHY same kind? Because dividing 3 kg 3\text{ kg} 3 kg by 2 kg 2\text{ kg} 2 kg gives a pure number 1.5 1.5 1.5 , but "3 kg to 2 metres" is meaningless as a single scaling factor.
A proportion is a statement that two ratios are equal : a : b = c : d a:b = c:d a : b = c : d , read "a a a is to b b b as c c c is to d d d ". Here a , d a,d a , d are the extremes and b , c b,c b , c are the means .
Since a : b a:b a : b means the fraction a b \dfrac{a}{b} b a , multiplying both terms by the same non-zero number k k k gives k a k b = a b \dfrac{ka}{kb}=\dfrac{a}{b} k b k a = b a — the same value. So a : b a:b a : b and k a : k b ka:kb k a : k b are equivalent ratios .
Worked example Simplifying
18 : 24 18:24 18 : 24
Step 1 — find gcd. gcd ( 18 , 24 ) = 6 \gcd(18,24)=6 g cd( 18 , 24 ) = 6 . Why? We want the largest number dividing both so the result can't be reduced further.
Step 2 — divide both terms. 18 ÷ 6 : 24 ÷ 6 = 3 : 4 18\div6 : 24\div6 = 3:4 18 ÷ 6 : 24 ÷ 6 = 3 : 4 .
Check: 18 24 = 0.75 = 3 4 \dfrac{18}{24}=0.75=\dfrac34 24 18 = 0.75 = 4 3 . ✓
4 : 6 4:6 4 : 6 and 10 : 15 10:15 10 : 15 equivalent?
Cross-multiply to test a : b = c : d ⟺ a d = b c a:b=c:d \iff ad=bc a : b = c : d ⟺ a d = b c .
Why cross-multiply? Because a b = c d \dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d} b a = d c ⇒ multiply both sides by b d bd b d ⇒ a d = b c ad=bc a d = b c . No fractions left, easy to compare.
4 × 15 = 60 4\times15 = 60 4 × 15 = 60 , 6 × 10 = 60 6\times10 = 60 6 × 10 = 60 . Equal ⇒ yes, equivalent. ✓
x : 12 = 5 : 4 x:12 = 5:4 x : 12 = 5 : 4
Cross-multiply: 4 x = 12 × 5 = 60 4x = 12\times5 = 60 4 x = 12 × 5 = 60 , so x = 15 x = 15 x = 15 .
Why this step? a d = b c ad=bc a d = b c turns the equation into a linear one — far easier than juggling fractions.
Intuition Think in "parts"
If you split ₹ 100 ₹100 ₹100 between A and B in ratio 2 : 3 2:3 2 : 3 , imagine cutting the money into equal parts : A gets 2 parts, B gets 3 parts, so there are 2 + 3 = 5 2+3=5 2 + 3 = 5 parts total. Each part is worth 100 5 = ₹ 20 \dfrac{100}{5}=₹20 5 100 = ₹20 . That's the whole trick.
₹ 560 ₹560 ₹560 between P and Q in 3 : 5 3:5 3 : 5
Step 1 — total parts. 3 + 5 = 8 3+5=8 3 + 5 = 8 . Why? We need the size of one part.
Step 2 — one part. x = 560 8 = ₹ 70 x = \dfrac{560}{8}=₹70 x = 8 560 = ₹70 .
Step 3 — shares. P = 3 × 70 = ₹ 210 =3\times70=₹210 = 3 × 70 = ₹210 , Q = 5 × 70 = ₹ 350 =5\times70=₹350 = 5 × 70 = ₹350 .
Check: 210 + 350 = 560 210+350=560 210 + 350 = 560 ✓ and 210 : 350 = 3 : 5 210:350 = 3:5 210 : 350 = 3 : 5 ✓ (divide both by 70).
Worked example Three-way split —
₹ 1200 ₹1200 ₹1200 in 1 : 2 : 3 1:2:3 1 : 2 : 3
Step 1 total parts = 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 =1+2+3=6 = 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 . Step 2 one part = 1200 / 6 = ₹ 200 =1200/6=₹200 = 1200/6 = ₹200 .
Step 3 shares = 200 , 400 , 600 = 200, 400, 600 = 200 , 400 , 600 .
Why extend so easily? The "parts" idea generalises to any number of terms; you just add all terms.
Check: 200 + 400 + 600 = 1200 200+400+600=1200 200 + 400 + 600 = 1200 ✓.
Recall Forecast before reading the answer
Q: A rope of length 84 84 84 m is cut in ratio 4 : 3 4:3 4 : 3 . Forecast the longer piece.
Verify: total parts = 7 =7 = 7 , one part = 84 / 7 = 12 =84/7=12 = 84/7 = 12 , longer = 4 × 12 = 48 =4\times12=48 = 4 × 12 = 48 m. Did you predict 48 48 48 ?
Common mistake Mistake 1: Adding instead of scaling
The wrong idea: "3 : 2 3:2 3 : 2 means 3 and 2, so add 1 to make it 4 : 3 4:3 4 : 3 ." Feels right because 3 + 1 = 4 , 2 + 1 = 3 3+1=4,\ 2+1=3 3 + 1 = 4 , 2 + 1 = 3 looks tidy.
Why it's wrong: ratios are multiplicative. 3 2 = 1.5 \dfrac32=1.5 2 3 = 1.5 but 4 3 = 1.33 \dfrac43=1.33 3 4 = 1.33 — different values!
Fix: to make an equivalent ratio, multiply/divide both terms by the same number, never add.
Common mistake Mistake 2: Dividing total by only one term
The wrong idea: For ₹ 100 ₹100 ₹100 in 2 : 3 2:3 2 : 3 , "each part = 100 / 2 =100/2 = 100/2 or 100 / 3 100/3 100/3 ".
Why it feels right: you see a 2 and a 3 and want to divide.
Fix: divide the total by the sum of parts ( a + b ) (a+b) ( a + b ) , not by a single term.
Common mistake Mistake 3: Forgetting order
a : b ≠ b : a a:b \ne b:a a : b = b : a . Writing P's share with Q's ratio number swaps the answer. Always label which term belongs to whom.
Mnemonic Remember dividing-in-ratio
"Add the parts, split the total, multiply back."
Add (a + b a+b a + b ) → one part = T ÷ ( a + b ) T \div (a+b) T ÷ ( a + b ) → each share = part × \times × its number.
Recall Feynman: explain to a 12-year-old
Imagine sharing a pizza with your friend so that you get 2 slices for every 3 slices your friend gets. First cut the pizza into 2 + 3 = 5 2+3=5 2 + 3 = 5 equal slices. You take 2, your friend takes 3. A "ratio" is just this recipe for sharing — it tells you the pattern of sharing, not the exact numbers, so you can use it whether the pizza is small or huge. If the pizza had 10 slices instead, you'd double everything: you take 4, friend takes 6 — still the same 2 : 3 2:3 2 : 3 pattern.
What does a ratio a : b a:b a : b compare, and how? Two quantities of the same kind, by division — it equals the fraction
a / b a/b a / b .
How do you make an equivalent ratio? Multiply (or divide) BOTH terms by the same non-zero number.
How do you simplify a ratio to lowest terms? Divide both terms by their
gcd \gcd g cd.
Test whether a : b = c : d a:b=c:d a : b = c : d Cross-multiply: they're equal iff
a d = b c ad=bc a d = b c (product of extremes = product of means).
To divide total T T T in ratio a : b a:b a : b , value of one part? x = T / ( a + b ) x=T/(a+b) x = T / ( a + b ) .
Formula for A's share when dividing T T T in a : b a:b a : b ? A = a a + b T A = \frac{a}{a+b}\,T A = a + b a T .
Why must ratio terms have the same units? So units cancel and the ratio is a pure comparison number.
Common error when making equivalent ratios? Adding the same number to both terms instead of multiplying.
Divide ₹ 560 ₹560 ₹560 in 3 : 5 3:5 3 : 5 — Q's share? One part
= 70 =70 = 70 , Q
= 5 × 70 = ₹ 350 =5\times70=₹350 = 5 × 70 = ₹350 .
In proportion a : b = c : d a:b=c:d a : b = c : d , which are the means? The inner terms
b b b and
c c c .
Fractions and simplification — a ratio is a fraction in disguise.
Highest Common Factor (GCD) — used to reduce ratios.
Percentages — a percentage is a ratio out of 100.
Unitary method — "value of one part" is the unitary idea.
Direct and inverse proportion — proportions where ratios stay constant / reciprocal.
Similar figures — corresponding sides are in equal ratios.
share = part fraction times total
Intuition Hinglish mein samjho
Dekho, ratio ka matlab sirf comparison hai — do cheezon ko divide karke compare karna, subtract karke nahi. Jab hum bolte hain apples aur oranges ka ratio 3 : 2 3:2 3 : 2 hai, iska matlab "har 3 apples pe 2 oranges" — yeh ek multiplicative rishta hai. Isiliye agar tum dono terms ko same number se multiply ya divide karo, ratio same rehta hai. Yehi equivalent ratio ka funda hai: 2 : 3 = 4 : 6 = 6 : 9 2:3 = 4:6 = 6:9 2 : 3 = 4 : 6 = 6 : 9 , sab barabar, kyunki fraction 2 / 3 2/3 2/3 same rehta hai.
Dividing in a ratio ka trick bilkul simple hai — "parts" mein socho. Maan lo ₹ 560 ₹560 ₹560 ko 3 : 5 3:5 3 : 5 mein baantna hai. Total parts = 3 + 5 = 8 =3+5=8 = 3 + 5 = 8 . Ek part ki value = 560 / 8 = ₹ 70 = 560/8 = ₹70 = 560/8 = ₹70 . Ab P ko 3 × 70 = ₹ 210 3\times70=₹210 3 × 70 = ₹210 , Q ko 5 × 70 = ₹ 350 5\times70=₹350 5 × 70 = ₹350 . Bas! Formula ratta maarne ki zaroorat nahi — add the parts, split the total, multiply back yaad rakho.
Sabse badi galti students yeh karte hain ki equivalent ratio banane ke liye dono terms mein same number add kar dete hain (jaise 3 : 2 3:2 3 : 2 ko 4 : 3 4:3 4 : 3 bana dena). Yeh galat hai, kyunki ratio multiplication se chalti hai, addition se nahi — 3 / 2 = 1.5 3/2 = 1.5 3/2 = 1.5 but 4 / 3 = 1.33 4/3 = 1.33 4/3 = 1.33 , alag values! Dusri galti: total ko sirf ek term se divide kar dena. Hamesha sum of parts ( a + b ) (a+b) ( a + b ) se divide karo. Ratio topic aage percentages, similar triangles, aur direct/inverse proportion sab mein kaam aata hai, isliye base solid rakho.