1.1.14 · D5Arithmetic & Number Systems
Question bank — Addition, subtraction, multiplication, division of fractions
True or false — justify
Multiplying two fractions always gives a smaller answer than both.
False — only true when both are positive and less than 1. For example , bigger than either; and two negatives multiply to a positive, e.g. .
Multiplying two negative fractions gives a negative answer.
False — a negative times a negative is positive (two flips of the number line undo each other): .
Adding two positive fractions always gives an answer bigger than each of them.
True for positive fractions — you're combining pieces, so the total exceeds either part (e.g. , bigger than each ). This fails once a negative is involved.
Adding a positive and a negative fraction always gives a positive answer.
False — the sign of the sum follows the larger piece. , because you subtract the halves' worth and the negative wins.
Dividing a fraction by a fraction always gives an answer bigger than the first one.
False — it grows only when you divide by a positive fraction less than 1. Dividing by a fraction greater than 1 shrinks it: .
is valid.
False — this adds unequal-sized pieces as if equal. Test : it gives , but two halves make a whole, .
You must find a common denominator before multiplying fractions.
False — multiplication takes a fraction of a fraction (an area), which needs no matching piece sizes. You multiply straight across.
works even when share factors with .
True — cancelling common factors first just applies the golden rule () early; the final value is identical either way.
The reciprocal of a fraction always exists.
False — the reciprocal of would require dividing by 0, which is undefined. Every fraction except zero has a reciprocal.
works for any nonzero .
True — flipping the divisor multiplies by its reciprocal, which undoes the multiply; it fails only if (dividing by zero).
Dividing by a negative fraction gives a negative answer (when the first fraction is positive).
True — the reciprocal of a negative fraction is still negative, so a positive times a negative is negative: .
The three forms , and are different numbers.
False — they all mark the same point on the number line. Convention is to keep the sign out front or on the numerator, never on the denominator.
Using the LCM as the common denominator gives a different answer than using .
False — both give the same value; the LCM (smallest common denominator) just keeps numerators smaller. is via LCM and via .
Spot the error
"."
Wrong — you can't subtract numerators and denominators separately. Rewrite over a common bottom: .
" has no answer because you can't take a bigger piece from a smaller one."
Wrong — the answer is simply negative: . Subtracting more than you have gives a debt, a perfectly valid rational number.
"."
Wrong — the sign must ride along with the numerator: . Opposite signs mean the numerators subtract.
"."
Wrong — the reciprocal of keeps its sign: it's , not . Correct: .
" because the denominators match."
Wrong — is really , so it's . Normalise the negative denominator to the numerator before adding.
"To divide, I flip the first fraction: ."
Wrong — you flip the divisor (the one you divide by), not the first. Correct: .
", and is bigger than because I multiplied."
Wrong conclusion — multiplying by takes part of , so the result shrinks. Indeed since .
": common denominator is , so ."
Wrong — you changed the denominator but forgot to scale the numerators. , , giving .
": I cancelled the 3 with the 8, giving ."
Wrong — you may only cancel a numerator with a denominator, not two numerators or two denominators. Cancel the 4 with 8 and the 3 with 9: .
" is undefined because dividing is scary."
Wrong — this is fine: . It's that is undefined, since no number times 0 gives .
Why questions
Why do we need a common denominator to add but not to multiply?
Addition counts pieces, so the pieces must be the same size (matched denominators); multiplication takes a fraction of a fraction — an area — which needs no matching.
Why does multiplying two negatives give a positive?
Multiplying by a negative flips the number line about ; flipping twice returns you to the original direction, so the two minus signs cancel and the result is positive (see the flip figure).
Why should you never leave the minus sign on the denominator?
All of , , are equal, but a sign hidden in the denominator is easy to lose while adding or flipping; pulling it onto the numerator (or out front) keeps sign-tracking honest.
Why does adding a positive and a negative fraction turn into a subtraction?
A negative fraction points the opposite way, so combining them is a tug-of-war: you subtract the smaller pull from the larger, and the answer takes the sign of the larger.
Why does the divisor flip in division?
Multiplying by its reciprocal gives 1, which cancels the divisor and leaves the multiplication that division undoes.
Why is (the golden rule) true?
Cutting each piece into smaller pieces gives times as many pieces, each times smaller — the total amount of "pie" is unchanged.
Why does dividing by a number smaller than 1 make the answer grow?
You're asking "how many of these tiny chunks fit?" — and many small chunks fit into a fixed amount, so the count is large.
Why can we cancel common factors before multiplying instead of after?
Cancelling early is the golden rule applied in reverse (); the value never changes, but the numbers stay small.
Why does "multiplying by 1" let us change a fraction's look without changing its value?
Writing and multiplying keeps the value (times 1 changes nothing) while rescaling both parts — this is exactly the golden rule.
Edge cases
What is , and why isn't it "impossible"?
It's — over the common bottom . Subtracting a larger fraction just gives a negative result, a legitimate rational number.
What is , and what sign does it have?
It's — flip the divisor keeping its minus: ; positive ÷ negative is negative.
What is written in standard form?
It's — move the minus off the denominator onto the numerator (or out front); the value and its number-line position are unchanged.
What is ?
It's — rewrite as ; the negative half wins because it's the larger piece.
What is ?
It's — two negatives multiply to a positive, and .
What is , and why?
It's — since , its reciprocal is itself, so dividing by 1 leaves any number unchanged.
What happens to if (dividing by zero)?
Undefined — the divisor has no reciprocal, and no number times 0 can equal a nonzero .
What is ?
It's — zero pieces plus zero pieces is zero, regardless of denominators; you can write it as .
What is ?
It's — taking zero copies of , or taking of nothing, leaves nothing.
What is for any nonzero fraction?
Always — dividing any nonzero quantity by itself asks "how many fit into itself?", which is exactly one.
Can a denominator ever be 0, like ?
No — the denominator says how many equal parts make a whole, and you cannot split a whole into zero parts, so is undefined.
What is , and why does the answer surprise no one?
Both equal 1, so the difference is — a fraction with equal top and bottom is one whole, so this is .