2.2.2 · D4Doping & PN Junctions

Exercises — P-type doping with acceptor atoms (boron)

2,705 words12 min readBack to topic

This page is a self-testing ladder. Each problem is stated cleanly, then a hidden [!recall]- solution unfolds every step: WHAT we do, WHY we do it, and WHAT the numbers mean. Work each one on paper first, then reveal.

Everything here builds on the parent note. If a symbol feels unfamiliar, here is the entire toolkit before we use it:


LEVEL 1 — Recognition

(Can you spot which carrier is which and read the definitions?)

Exercise 1.1

A silicon sample is doped with boron. State (a) the majority carrier, (b) the minority carrier, and (c) the sign of the fixed dopant ion left behind.

Recall Solution 1.1

WHAT: Boron has 3 valence electrons, one fewer than Si's 4, so it makes holes. WHY: Each boron eventually accepts an electron from a neighbouring bond, releasing a mobile hole and becoming stuck as a negative ion.

  • (a) Majority carrier = holes (positive, mobile).
  • (b) Minority carrier = electrons.
  • (c) The boron ion is ==, a fixed negative charge==. The crystal stays neutral: mobile hole balanced by fixed ion.

Exercise 1.2

Pure (intrinsic) silicon has . After doping with , which of or goes up and which goes down relative to ?

Recall Solution 1.2

WHAT: Holes are injected, so rises far above . WHY: , so increases by ~6 orders of magnitude. Mass-action fixes the product: . Since shot up, must drop below .

  • (majority), (minority). Their product stays .

LEVEL 2 — Application

(Plug into the master equations.)

Exercise 2.1

Silicon with , . Find and .

Recall Solution 2.1

WHAT: Check whether . Here (a factor ), so the simple limit applies. WHY: the , so .

  • .
  • . Holes outnumber electrons by — overwhelmingly p-type.

Exercise 2.2

A p-type sample has hole density , hole mobility . Compute the conductivity and resistivity .

Recall Solution 2.2

WHAT: Use (electrons negligible since ). WHY: conductivity = charge × carrier count × how mobile each carrier is. WHAT it means: resistivity — a decent conductor, far better than intrinsic Si.

Exercise 2.3

You want a p-type resistor with using boron, . What boron concentration do you need? (Assume .)

Recall Solution 2.3

WHAT: Invert to solve for . WHY: we know the target conductivity and the mobility, so the only unknown is the dopant crowd size. Check ? ✓, so was valid.


LEVEL 3 — Analysis

(When does the approximation break? Handle BOTH the near-intrinsic case AND the very-high, degenerate case.)

Exercise 3.1

(comparable to ). Find and using the full quadratic. By what percent does the crude underestimate ?

Recall Solution 3.1

WHAT: is only , so we must NOT drop . Use the full root. WHY: the term inside the square root is now the same order as . Error of crude estimate: crude gives . Lesson: near intrinsic, the crude formula is off by ~17%. Use the quadratic.

Exercise 3.2

Verify charge neutrality for your Exercise 3.1 answer: does hold?

Recall Solution 3.2

WHAT: Add electrons plus acceptor ions and check it equals holes. WHY: neutrality is the physical constraint the quadratic was built from — a good self-check. This equals ✓. The books balance — our root is consistent.

Exercise 3.3 — the OTHER breakdown: degenerate doping

Now push the opposite extreme: (very heavy boron). The formula still returns . Explain why this answer is no longer trustworthy, i.e. which hidden assumption behind ALL of our master equations has quietly failed.

Recall Solution 3.3

WHAT: Numerically the quadratic gives — nothing looks wrong. But the physics behind the equations has broken. WHY it fails: the mass-action law and the simple formula both assume non-degenerate (Boltzmann) statistics — the carriers are so dilute that they never "bump into each other" for states. That holds only when the Fermi level stays a few inside the band gap. At the holes are so crowded that pushes into the valence band itself. Then:

  • The exponential Boltzmann approximation must be replaced by the full Fermi–Dirac statistics.
  • Not every boron atom stays ionized in the simple way; the band edges shift ("band-gap narrowing").
  • is no longer exactly valid. WHAT it means: for degenerate material, is still roughly true as a count of holes, but the derived quantities (, from the Boltzmann formula) are wrong. This is the ceiling of our toolbox — see Mass-Action Law and Carrier Statistics for the Fermi–Dirac fix. Rule of thumb: trust our formulas only for roughly .

LEVEL 4 — Synthesis

(Combine doping, temperature effects, and compensation.)

Exercise 4.1 — Compensated silicon

A crystal is doped with BOTH boron and phosphorus . Is it p-type or n-type? Find the majority carrier density (assume all dopants ionized, ).

Recall Solution 4.1

WHAT: Donors and acceptors partly cancel. Net acceptor density = . WHY: each donor electron (recall = donor/phosphorus count from the toolkit) fills one acceptor hole. Only the excess dopant sets the carrier type. See N-type doping with donor atoms (phosphorus) for the donor side. Acceptors win → p-type. With net doping : WHAT it means: even though boron atoms are present, of their holes are "eaten" by phosphorus electrons. Only holes survive.

Exercise 4.2 — Minority carrier and diffusion current setup

For the compensated sample above (, ), which carrier's diffusion current matters for a nearby pn junction, and why? Compute the ratio .

Recall Solution 4.2

WHAT: In a diode, the current is limited by injection of minority carriers. Here minorities are electrons. WHY: majority carriers are abundant; the bottleneck is the scarce minority carriers crossing the junction (see Drift and Diffusion Currents). WHAT it means: holes outnumber electrons by ~. The tiny electron population is what governs the reverse/minority-injection behaviour of a junction made from this material.


LEVEL 5 — Mastery

(Temperature freeze-out, the Fermi level, and a physical design.)

Exercise 5.1 — Fermi level position

For , the hole density is . Using with , find how far below the intrinsic level the Fermi level sits (in eV). (Recall from the toolkit: = midgap reference, = the electron "sea level.")

Recall Solution 5.1

WHAT: Solve for the energy gap . WHY: in p-type, more holes ⟺ moves down toward the valence band. This is exactly the shift described in Fermi Level in Doped Semiconductors. We invert the exponential with a natural log. WHAT it means: the Fermi level drops 0.35 eV below midgap — clearly on the valence-band side, confirming p-type.

The band diagram below draws exactly this: the black line at midgap and the red line pushed down by . Notice how close now sits to the valence band — that "downward slide" is what "p-type" means on an energy diagram.

Figure — P-type doping with acceptor atoms (boron)

Exercise 5.2 — Freeze-out reasoning

At very low temperature () the boron acceptors are only 20% ionized. If , what is the actual hole density (ignore , which is essentially zero at 30 K)? Contrast with room temperature.

Recall Solution 5.2

WHAT: Only ionized acceptors release holes. Ionized fraction = 20% = 0.20. WHY: at low there isn't enough thermal energy ( is tiny) for valence electrons to jump up into boron's acceptor level. Un-ionized boron holds no free hole — this is freeze-out. With and neutrality : Contrast: at room T, . At 30 K only a fifth of that, . The dopant is present but electrically dormant — the material is 5× less conductive.

The curve below traces free-hole density as temperature climbs: read off the red 30 K point (only 20% ionized, ) and watch it rise to the room-temperature plateau where . The flat top is the "fully ionized" regime our earlier exercises assumed.

Figure — P-type doping with acceptor atoms (boron)

Recall One-line summary of the whole ladder

Compute from , drop to only when , subtract donors when compensated (), multiply by the ionized fraction under freeze-out, then get , , and .


Connections