The parent gave you the machinery: a functional group is the reactive atom-cluster; a
homologous series is the same group carried on chains that grow by one CH2 (mass 14)
at a time. Everything below just stress-tests those two ideas at their edges.
Before the traps, keep two pictures in your head. First, the three oxygen groups people always
confuse — the ether (oxygen wedged between two carbons, C−O−C, with noO–H
bond), the aldehyde (a C=O at the chain end, so it also carries one H, written −CHO), and
the ketone. The ketone shorthand >C=O deserves a word: the ">" is not a maths symbol here —
it is a little picture of two bonds coming off the same carbon on the left, and the "=O" is the
double bond to oxygen on the right. So >C=O literally means a carbon holding two other carbons
plus a double-bonded oxygen. Study the highlighted atoms in the figure below.
True — alkanes share the general formula CnH2n+2 and consecutive members differ by exactly one CH2, which is the definition of a series.
All members of one homologous series have the same molecular formula.
False — they share the same general formula (a pattern in n), but each member has a different actual formula because n changes; only the type of formula is shared.
Two compounds with the same molecular formula must react the same way with sodium.
False — ethanol (C2H5OH) and dimethyl ether (CH3OCH3) are both C2H6O, yet only ethanol's –OH releases H2 with Na; reactivity follows the functional group, not the formula (see Isomerism).
Adding more CH2 units always makes a molecule chemically more reactive.
False — extra CH2 is inert skeleton; it changes physical properties (boiling point, solubility) and only tunes the group slightly via inductive effects, but the reaction type stays the same.
Boiling point always rises as you go up a homologous series.
True as a trend — longer chains have more electrons and larger surface, so stronger London forces raise boiling point; the rise is gradual ("gradation"), which is why we call it a series (see Intermolecular Forces).
CnH2n can only be an alkene.
False — CnH2n is also the general formula of a cycloalkane (a ring costs the same 2 H as one double bond), so the formula alone doesn't pin the functional group.
An aldehyde and a ketone have the same functional group.
False — both contain C=O, but the aldehyde (–CHO) has that carbonyl at a chain end with an H attached, while the ketone (>C=O) has it between two carbons; the environment differs, so they are distinct groups with distinct suffixes (−al vs −one).
Members of a homologous series are always structural isomers of one another.
False — isomers share the same molecular formula; series members differ by CH2, so they have different formulas and are never isomers of each other.
"CH3OCH3 has an –OH group, so it is an alcohol."
Error — there is no O–H bond here; the oxygen sits between two carbons (C–O–C), making it an ether (defined and drawn above). Alcohols need oxygen bonded to both a carbon and a hydrogen.
"Ethene (C2H4) and ethane (C2H6) are consecutive members of one homologous series."
Error — they differ by H2, not CH2, and they carry different functional groups (C=C vs none). Consecutive members must differ by exactly one CH2and share the group.
"The suffix for a carboxylic acid is −al."
Error — −al is the aldehyde suffix; carboxylic acids (–COOH) take −oicacid. Mixing these swaps a mild aldehyde for a proton-donating acid (see IUPAC Nomenclature).
"C3H8 and C5H12 are consecutive alkanes because both fit CnH2n+2."
Error — they are in the same series but not consecutive; C4H10 sits between them, so they differ by two CH2 units, not one.
"Since the carbon chain is inert, it plays no role at all in a molecule's behaviour."
Error — "chemically lazy" is not "irrelevant"; the chain controls physical properties and, through the inductive effect, slightly modulates the group's reactivity (see Inductive and Mesomeric Effects).
"Methanol has no homologues because it's the smallest alcohol."
Error — being smallest just means it has no member below it; its homologues (C2H5OH, C3H7OH, …) all lie above it, so it very much belongs to the alcohol series.
Why does a small functional group, not the big chain, control reactivity?
Because C–C and C–H bonds are strong and nonpolar (no electron imbalance), while the group carries a π-bond, lone pair, or polar bond — the electron-rich or electron-poor site where reactions actually start.
Why do consecutive members differ by a fixed mass of 14?
Because inserting one CH2 adds one carbon (mass 12) and two hydrogens (mass 2×1), giving 12+2=14 every single step.
Why do all members of a series show the same chemical reactions?
Because the reactive site — the functional group — is identical across the whole family; only the inert skeleton changes length, so the chemistry it drives is unchanged.
Why do boiling points rise gradually rather than jumping randomly?
Because each added CH2 adds a small, roughly constant amount of polarizable surface and electrons, so London forces increase in even steps — a smooth gradation is a hallmark of a homologous series (see Intermolecular Forces).
Why can we predict a brand-new molecule's chemistry just by spotting its group?
Because the group is transferable — –COOH is acidic and –OH H-bonds and reacts with Na wherever they appear, so recognising the group imports all its known behaviour at once.
Why does the alcohol → aldehyde → carboxylic acid ladder change chemistry at each rung?
Because each oxidation step alters the functional group itself (adds oxygen / removes hydrogen), and a new group means new characteristic reactions, not just a longer chain (see Oxidation of Alcohols).
Is CH4 (methane) a valid "first member" even though it has no CH2 to remove below it?
Yes — a series only requires each member to differ from the next by CH2; the first member has nothing below it, which is fine and expected.
Can one molecule contain two different functional groups at once?
Yes — e.g. an amino acid carries both –NH2 and –COOH; such a molecule then shows the characteristic reactions of both groups, so you classify it by whichever the question probes.
Does a straight-chain and a branched isomer with the same group belong to the same series?
They belong to the same type (same general formula and group), but they are structural isomers of each other, not consecutive members — series membership is about the CH2 ladder, not branching (see Isomerism).
What happens to the boiling-point trend for a series member with heavy branching?
Branching lowers boiling point relative to the straight-chain isomer (more compact shape, less surface contact, weaker London forces), so the smooth trend holds only when you compare like shapes.
Is a cycloalkane a "degenerate" case that breaks the CnH2n+2 rule?
Yes — closing a ring removes 2 H, giving CnH2n, the same formula as an alkene; the ring itself is not a classical functional group, so identity must be confirmed by structure, not formula alone.
Recall One-line survival summary
Group decides what reaction; chain length decides how sticky (boiling point). Same formula ≠ same chemistry; same series ≠ same formula; +14 up the ladder every step.