3.4.4 · D4Coordination Chemistry

Exercises — Coordination number and geometry — 2 (linear), 4 (tetrahedral - square planar), 6 (octahedral)

2,421 words11 min readBack to topic

Before we start, one reference figure that shows the three geometries side by side — glance back at it whenever a shape is asked for.

Figure — Coordination number and geometry — 2 (linear), 4 (tetrahedral - square planar), 6 (octahedral)

Level 1 — Recognition

Goal: read a formula, count donor atoms, name the geometry from the coordination number (CN).

Problem L1.1

State the coordination number of and name its geometry.

Recall Solution L1.1

Step 1 — count donors. Two molecules, each donating through one nitrogen atom → donor atoms → ==CN = 2==. Step 2 — name shape. Two electron domains push to opposite poles of the metal → ==linear, ==. Answer: CN , linear.

Problem L1.2

Give the CN and geometry of .

Recall Solution L1.2

Step 1. Six , each donating through one O atom → donors → CN = 6. Step 2. Six domains at to their neighbours → octahedral. Answer: CN , octahedral.

Problem L1.3

How many donor atoms are in , and what is its geometry?

Recall Solution L1.3

Four , each one hand → donors → CN = 4. is bulky and weak-field → the default 4-shape is tetrahedral (). Answer: CN , tetrahedral.


Level 2 — Application

Goal: apply the donor-atom count when ligands have more than one hand (denticity).

Problem L2.1

Find the CN of (en = ethylenediamine).

Recall Solution L2.1

Step 1 — denticity of en. Ethylenediamine grips with 2 nitrogen atoms → bidentate, . Step 2 — apply the formula. , : Step 3 — geometry. CN octahedral (three en ligands wrap around the six sites). Answer: CN , octahedral.

Problem L2.2

: EDTA is hexadentate. Find the CN and geometry.

Recall Solution L2.2

Step 1. EDTA donates through 2 amine N + 4 carboxylate O = donor atoms → (hexadentate). Step 2. . Step 3. CN octahedral, with a single EDTA molecule wrapping all six positions. Answer: CN , octahedral.

Problem L2.3

A complex contains one bidentate oxalate (, ) and two monodentate around a metal. What is the CN?

Recall Solution L2.3

Mixed denticity — use the sum.

  • oxalate:
  • water: Answer: CN .

Level 3 — Analysis

Goal: for CN = 4, decide tetrahedral vs square planar using d-electron count and ligand field strength.

The two CN = 4 shapes, so you can see what "tent vs table" means:

Figure — Coordination number and geometry — 2 (linear), 4 (tetrahedral - square planar), 6 (octahedral)

Problem L3.1

vs : predict the geometry and magnetism of each.

Recall Solution L3.1

Step 1 — d-count (same metal). is group 10; has lost 2 electrons → in both complexes. Step 2 — field strength. = weak field; = strong field. Step 3 — apply the rule.

  • : + weak field → tetrahedral. Electrons stay spread out with 2 unpairedparamagnetic.
  • : + strong field → square planar. All 8 electrons pair into the lower four orbitals → 0 unpaireddiamagnetic. Answer: complex = tetrahedral, paramagnetic; complex = square planar, diamagnetic.

Problem L3.2

Predict the geometry of .

Recall Solution L3.2

Step 1 — d-count. = (full shell). Step 2 — can it be square planar? Square planar needs an empty high ; but has every d-orbital full, so nothing can be left empty — no square-planar stabilisation exists. Step 3 — default. A full, spherical shell has no orbital preference → pure VSEPR wins → tetrahedral. Answer: tetrahedral (and diamagnetic — all electrons already paired).

Problem L3.3

is square planar even though is a weak-field ligand. Explain why the L3 rule ("weak field → tetrahedral") does not break here.

Recall Solution L3.3

Step 1 — d-count. = . Step 2 — why the metal decides here. is a third-row (5d) transition metal. Its 5d orbitals are large and diffuse, so the field splitting is intrinsically enormous — even a "weak" ligand like produces a splitting big enough to force square-planar pairing. Step 3 — conclusion. For 4d and 5d ions (Pd(II), Pt(II), Au(III)), square planar is essentially always chosen, regardless of ligand. The "weak → tetrahedral" shortcut is a first-row () rule. Answer: square planar; the large 5d splitting overrides ligand-field weakness.


Level 4 — Synthesis

Goal: combine denticity, d-count, field strength and magnetism in a single prediction.

Problem L4.1

For : find the CN, the d-electron count, the geometry, and predict whether it is paramagnetic or diamagnetic (en is a strong-field ligand).

Recall Solution L4.1

Step 1 — CN. (en bidentate). Step 2 — d-count. is group 9; lost 3 electrons → . Step 3 — geometry. CN octahedral. Step 4 — magnetism. en is strong fieldlow-spin : all six electrons pair into the lower three () orbitals → 0 unpaireddiamagnetic. Answer: CN , octahedral, low-spin, diamagnetic.

Problem L4.2

A complex has two en ligands and two around . Give its formula-charge, CN and geometry.

Recall Solution L4.2

Step 1 — CN. en: ; : ; total . Step 2 — overall charge. contributes ; two contribute ; en is neutral. Net . Step 3 — geometry. CN octahedral; formula . (It even shows cis–trans isomerism.) Answer: , CN , octahedral, overall charge .


Level 5 — Mastery

Goal: borderline / trap cases where a naive rule mispredicts, and you must justify the real answer.

Problem L5.1

has CN = 4 with a strong-field ligand (CO), yet it is tetrahedral, not square planar. Why does the " + strong field → square planar" rule not apply?

Recall Solution L5.1

Step 1 — oxidation state. CO is neutral and the complex is neutral, so nickel is (oxidation state ), not . Step 2 — d-count. has configuration (in these complexes all 10 valence electrons act as d-electrons), i.e. a full d-shell — not . Step 3 — apply the rule correctly. The square-planar preference needs (one empty high orbital). A ion has no empty d-orbital to exploit → falls back to pure VSEPR → tetrahedral. Answer: it is , not , so the square-planar rule never triggers; tetrahedral is correct.

Problem L5.2

Between (CN 4) and (CN 4), one is tetrahedral and one is square planar. Assign each and justify with the d-count.

Recall Solution L5.2

Permanganate . Charge on Mn: . = (no d-electrons at all). With there is no orbital to stabilise by square-planar splitting → tetrahedral. . = + strong-field square planar (from L3.1). Answer: = tetrahedral (); = square planar ( strong field).

Problem L5.3

has CN 2. Predict its geometry and explain why copper here prefers to hold only two ligands rather than four or six.

Recall Solution L5.3

Step 1 — oxidation state & d-count. Charge: ; = . Step 2 — why only two? A shell is completely full and spherical — it gains no crystal-field stabilisation from adding more ligands (there's no empty d-orbital to lower). So the ion just minimises ligand–ligand repulsion by holding the fewest ligands (2), placed as far apart as possible. Step 3 — geometry. Two domains at opposite poles → linear, . Answer: linear; the Cu(I) has no field incentive for higher CN, so it settles at CN 2.


Recall One-line summary of every decision
  • CN from .
  • Oxidation state from charge balance → d-count group oxidation state.
  • CN 2 → linear (). CN 6 → octahedral.
  • CN 4 → square planar only if AND (strong-field OR 4d/5d metal); otherwise tetrahedral.