This page is the drill hall for the p-scales topic . The parent note built the definitions; here we throw every possible kind of problem at those definitions until none can surprise you.
Before we start, one promise about notation — every symbol used below was defined in the parent note, but let us re-anchor the three we lean on hardest, so a reader landing here cold is never lost.
Definition The three tools we reuse (plain words)
[ H + ] means "how many moles of hydrogen ions sit in one litre of the solution." A big number = very acidic. Written in mol/L (M).
log 10 ( x ) answers the question "10 raised to WHAT power gives x ?" So log 10 ( 1000 ) = 3 because 1 0 3 = 1000 . It counts zeros , turning a giant range into a small one.
p X = − log 10 ( X ) — the minus flips it so that a small concentration gives a big, friendly p-number. See Kw for where the 1 0 − 14 comes from.
Every problem this topic can throw at you lives in one of these cells. The examples below are each tagged with the cell they kill.
Cell
Case class
What makes it tricky
A
pH → [H⁺] (forward, non-integer)
inverse log, scientific notation
B
[OH⁻] → pH (cross the pH–pOH bridge)
must go through pOH first
C
Neutral / degenerate: pure water
[H⁺]=[OH⁻], the balance point
D
Limiting: ultra-dilute strong acid
naïve formula gives wrong sign of acidity
E
pKa ↔ pKb conjugate flip
uses the = 14 bridge
F
Compare two acids by pKa
ratio = 10^(ΔpKa)
G
pH = pKa buffer midpoint
50/50 point, links to [[2.6.8-Henderson-Hasselbalch-equation
H
Real-world word problem
translate English → concentration
I
Exam twist: mixing / negative pH
pH can go below 0 and above 14
Worked example Example 1 (Cell A)
Problem: A cola drink measures pH = 2.5. What is [ H + ] ?
Forecast: Guess first — will the answer be bigger or smaller than 1 0 − 3 M? (Lower pH than 3 means more acid, so bigger concentration.)
Write the definition backwards: [ H + ] = 1 0 − pH .
Why this step? The exponential is the exact undo of − log 10 ; if pH = − log 10 [ H + ] then raising 10 to − pH recovers the original number.
Substitute: [ H + ] = 1 0 − 2.5 .
Why this step? Just plugging the measured value into the inverse.
Split the exponent: 1 0 − 2.5 = 1 0 0.5 × 1 0 − 3 = 3.16 × 1 0 − 3 M.
Why this step? Breaking − 2.5 into an easy power of ten (− 3 ) times a leftover (1 0 0.5 ≈ 3.16 ) is how you read it without a full calculator.
Verify: Take − log 10 ( 3.16 × 1 0 − 3 ) . That is − ( log 3.16 − 3 ) = − ( 0.5 − 3 ) = 2.5 . ✓ And 3.16 × 1 0 − 3 > 1 0 − 3 , matching our forecast of "more acidic."
Worked example Example 2 (Cell B)
Problem: Household ammonia has [ OH − ] = 4.0 × 1 0 − 3 M at 25 °C. Find its pH.
Forecast: Lots of OH − means basic , so pH should be well above 7.
First get pOH: pOH = − log 10 ( 4.0 × 1 0 − 3 ) .
Why this step? We only have the hydroxide number, and the p-operator on [ OH − ] is exactly pOH.
Split the log: − ( log 4.0 + log 1 0 − 3 ) = − ( 0.60 − 3 ) = 2.40 .
Why this step? Product rule log ( ab ) = log a + log b turns one hard log into two easy ones.
Cross the bridge: pH = 14 − pOH = 14 − 2.40 = 11.60 .
Why this step? At 25 °C, pH + pOH = 14 (from K w ), so knowing one hands you the other for free.
Verify: 11.60 > 7 ✓ basic, as forecast. Cross-check via [ H + ] = 1 0 − 11.60 = 2.5 × 1 0 − 12 , and [ H + ] [ OH − ] = ( 2.5 × 1 0 − 12 ) ( 4.0 × 1 0 − 3 ) = 1.0 × 1 0 − 14 = K w . ✓
Worked example Example 3 (Cell C)
Problem: Pure water at 25 °C. Find pH, pOH, and confirm neutrality.
Forecast: No added acid or base — should sit dead centre.
Neutral means [ H + ] = [ OH − ] ; call this common value x .
Why this step? "Nothing added" forces the two ion counts to be equal — the definition of neutral.
Plug into K w : x ⋅ x = 1 0 − 14 ⇒ x = 1 0 − 7 M.
Why this step? Kw always holds; with both equal we solve one unknown.
pH = − log 10 ( 1 0 − 7 ) = 7 , and likewise pOH = 7 .
Why this step? Applying the p-operator to a clean power of ten just reads off the exponent.
Verify: pH + pOH = 7 + 7 = 14 ✓. Neutral is the balance point where acid and base tools cancel exactly.
This is the case that catches almost everyone. See strong-acid pH calculations for the full machinery.
Worked example Example 4 (Cell D — limiting behaviour)
Problem: You add HCl until its formal concentration is 1.0 × 1 0 − 8 M. Naïvely, pH = − log 10 ( 1 0 − 8 ) = 8 . But that says an acid is basic — impossible! Fix it.
Forecast: The true pH must be just below 7 (slightly acidic), never above 7.
Spot the flaw: at 1 0 − 8 M, the acid's H + is smaller than water's own 1 0 − 7 . You cannot ignore water.
Why this step? The naïve formula assumes the acid dominates; here it doesn't, so the assumption breaks.
Charge balance: [ H + ] = [ OH − ] + [ Cl − ] , with [ Cl − ] = 1 0 − 8 (all HCl dissociated).
Why this step? Total positive charge must equal total negative charge — the honest bookkeeping when sources are comparable.
Substitute [ OH − ] = K w / [ H + ] : let h = [ H + ] , then h = h 1 0 − 14 + 1 0 − 8 .
Why this step? K w links the two ions so we get one equation in one unknown.
Rearrange to h 2 − 1 0 − 8 h − 1 0 − 14 = 0 and solve the quadratic:
h = 2 1 0 − 8 + ( 1 0 − 8 ) 2 + 4 ⋅ 1 0 − 14 = 1.05 × 1 0 − 7 M .
Why this step? A quadratic is the tool because two additive sources of H + multiply into a squared term; only the positive root is physical (concentration can't be negative).
pH = − log 10 ( 1.05 × 1 0 − 7 ) = 6.98 .
Verify: 6.98 < 7 ✓ — genuinely acidic, forecast confirmed. Contrast the naïve "8." Check K w : [ OH − ] = 1 0 − 14 /1.05 × 1 0 − 7 = 9.5 × 1 0 − 8 ; then h − [ OH − ] = 1.05 × 1 0 − 7 − 9.5 × 1 0 − 8 = 1.0 × 1 0 − 8 = [ Cl − ] ✓.
Worked example Example 5 (Cell E)
Problem: Ammonia's conjugate acid NH 4 + has pK a = 9.25 . Find pK b of ammonia.
Forecast: Ammonia is a decent (but weak) base, so expect a small-ish pKb (well below 7).
Use the conjugate bridge: pK a + pK b = 14 .
Why this step? Any acid and its conjugate base satisfy K a K b = K w , and taking − log 10 of that product gives the sum-14 rule.
Rearrange: pK b = 14 − pK a = 14 − 9.25 = 4.75 .
Why this step? Simple subtraction once the bridge is in place.
Verify: pK a + pK b = 9.25 + 4.75 = 14 ✓. And pK b = 4.75 < 7 ✓ — ammonia really is a moderately strong weak base, matching the forecast.
Worked example Example 6 (Cell F)
Problem: Formic acid (pK a = 3.75 ) vs. acetic acid (pK a = 4.76 ). Which is stronger, and by what factor in K a ?
Forecast: Lower pKa = stronger. Formic wins. The gap is about 1 unit, so roughly 10× stronger.
Lower pKa ⇒ larger K a ⇒ stronger acid: formic acid .
Why this step? The minus sign in pK a = − log 10 K a means smaller p ↔ bigger K.
Turn the difference into a ratio: K a ( acetic ) K a ( formic ) = 1 0 Δ pK a = 1 0 4.76 − 3.75 = 1 0 1.01 .
Why this step? Subtracting logs = dividing the originals; each pKa unit is a factor of 10.
Evaluate: 1 0 1.01 ≈ 10.2 .
Verify: Direct: K a ( formic ) = 1 0 − 3.75 = 1.78 × 1 0 − 4 , K a ( acetic ) = 1 0 − 4.76 = 1.74 × 1 0 − 5 ; ratio = 10.2 ✓. Formic acid is ~10× stronger, as forecast.
Worked example Example 7 (Cell G — geometric)
Problem: A buffer is made from an acid with pK a = 4.76 so that [ A − ] = [ HA ] . What is the pH? Show why geometrically.
Forecast: Equal amounts of acid and conjugate base — the "balanced seesaw." pH should land exactly on pKa.
Start from Henderson–Hasselbalch : pH = pK a + log 10 [ HA ] [ A − ] .
Why this step? This equation is the pKa/pH relationship rearranged for buffers (buffers ).
Set the ratio to 1: log 10 ( 1 ) = 0 .
Why this step? When the two are equal, their ratio is exactly 1, and log 10 1 = 0 — the log of "no imbalance."
Therefore pH = pK a + 0 = 4.76 .
Look at the figure: the curve is the fraction of acid dissociated as pH rises. At the flat, steepest-resistance crossover, the two coloured areas (HA and A⁻) are equal, and that point sits directly above pH = pK a .
Verify: log 10 ( 1 ) = 0 so pH = pK a exactly ✓. This is the maximum-buffering midpoint — 50/50 as the parent note proved.
Worked example Example 8 (Cell H)
Problem: A swimming pool holds water at [ H + ] = 6.3 × 1 0 − 8 M. Pool rules demand pH between 7.2 and 7.8. Is this pool compliant?
Forecast: Concentration is a bit below 1 0 − 7 , so pH should be a touch above 7 — likely inside range.
Translate to pH: pH = − log 10 ( 6.3 × 1 0 − 8 ) .
Why this step? The rulebook speaks pH; we must convert the measured concentration.
Split: − ( log 6.3 + log 1 0 − 8 ) = − ( 0.80 − 8 ) = 7.20 .
Why this step? Product rule again — cleanest path by hand.
Compare: 7.20 sits at the lower edge of [ 7.2 , 7.8 ] ⇒ just compliant .
Verify: 1 0 − 7.20 = 6.3 × 1 0 − 8 M ✓ recovers the input. The pool is exactly at the minimum allowed pH.
Worked example Example 9 (Cell I — degenerate/limiting extreme)
Problem: Concentrated battery acid is effectively [ H + ] = 5.0 M (strong acid, fully dissociated). Find pH. Then a lab base has [ OH − ] = 3.0 M — find its pH.
Forecast: These concentrations are above 1 M, so the logs flip sign — pH will fall below 0 for the acid and rise above 14 for the base. The "0–14 scale" is only a convenience, not a law.
Acid part:
pH = − log 10 ( 5.0 ) = − 0.70 .
Why this step? log 10 of a number bigger than 1 is positive, so its negative is below zero — perfectly valid.
Base part:
2. pOH = − log 10 ( 3.0 ) = − 0.48 .
Why this step? Same reasoning applied to hydroxide.
3. pH = 14 − ( − 0.48 ) = 14.48 .
Why this step? The pH–pOH bridge still holds; it just pushes us past 14.
Verify: [ H + ] = 1 0 − ( − 0.70 ) = 1 0 0.70 = 5.0 M ✓. For the base, 1 0 − ( − 0.48 ) = 3.0 M of OH − ✓. Negative and >14 pH values are real and expected for concentrated solutions.
Recall Which cell is each phrase pointing at?
"Ultra-dilute HCl needs a quadratic" ::: Cell D — water's own ions matter.
"pH = pKa" ::: Cell G — the 50/50 buffer midpoint.
"ΔpKa of 2 means 100× stronger" ::: Cell F — ratio is 1 0 Δ pK a .
"pH can be −0.7" ::: Cell I — concentrations above 1 M break the 0–14 comfort zone.
"Given [OH⁻], go through pOH then subtract from 14" ::: Cell B — cross the bridge.
Mnemonic The one-line master check
Every answer: recompute [ H + ] [ OH − ] — it must equal K w = 1 0 − 14 at 25 °C. If it doesn't, a step is wrong. See Kw and Arrhenius acids/bases for the foundation; Ksp uses the same "product of ions" idea.