2.5.13 · D4Thermodynamics (Chemical)

Exercises — Standard entropy S° and ΔS_rxn = Σ S°(products) − Σ S°(reactants)

2,186 words10 min readBack to topic

A reference table of standard molar entropies (all in at 298 K) is used throughout. Values are given inside each problem so you never have to guess.


Level 1 — Recognition

Here you only need to spot the sign of from the physical picture: count moles of gas, feel the mess.

Problem 1.1

Without any numbers, predict the sign of for each:

  • (a)
  • (b)
  • (c)
Recall Solution 1.1

The rule: more spread-out matter (especially more moles of gas) → higher entropy → .

  • (a) Liquid → gas. A liquid has molecules touching; a gas has them flying free with vastly more arrangements. (positive).
  • (b) Gas moles go . Fewer gas particles = fewer ways to arrange them. (negative).
  • (c) Two freely-roaming dissolved ions lock together into a solid crystal. Order goes UP, mess goes DOWN. (negative).

Problem 1.2

True or false: "The element has because elements have a zero reference, just like ."

Recall Solution 1.2

False. is an absolute quantity built from the Third Law ( only for a perfect crystal at 0 K). Every real substance at 298 K — element or compound — has a positive . In fact , nowhere near zero. See Third Law of Thermodynamics.


Level 2 — Application

Now plug numbers into the working equation, remembering the coefficients.

Problem 2.1

Compute for Data (): , , .

Recall Solution 2.1

Forecast first: gas moles go (product is liquid). Big drop → expect a large negative . Apply the equation, weighting each species by its coefficient (entropy is extensive — 2 mol carries twice the entropy of 1 mol): Large and negative, exactly as forecast — three moles of gas collapsed into liquid.

Problem 2.2

Compute for the combustion Data: , , .

Recall Solution 2.2

Forecast: gas moles (unchanged), but a solid is consumed and its entropy replaced by a gas's. Expect a small positive change. Tiny, because gas-in ≈ gas-out; the only nudge is the low-entropy solid carbon vanishing.


Level 3 — Analysis

Reverse the machine: reason from a known back to an unknown , or interpret the size.

Problem 3.1

For the measured . Given , find .

Recall Solution 3.1

Set up the equation with the unknown as a symbol: Rearrange: Sanity check: is one big molecule with more atoms and vibrational modes than a single , so its (304) exceeds that of one (240) — physically reasonable.

Problem 3.2

Two reactions each produce 1 mol of gas from solids:

  • (i) ,
  • (ii) ,

Both liberate the same gas (). Explain qualitatively why the two differ, even though the "gas released" term is identical.

Recall Solution 3.2

The from is common to both. The difference lives entirely in the solids: A change of solid values (which depend on molar mass, crystal packing, and lattice vibrations) shifts the result. Magnesium's smaller, differently-packed lattice gives a different balance between the carbonate's entropy and the oxide's entropy, so . Lesson: the gas dominates the sign, but the solids fine-tune the magnitude.


Level 4 — Synthesis

Combine with to reach spontaneity via Gibbs free energy ΔG = ΔH − TΔS.

Problem 4.1

For : and .

  • (a) Compute at 298 K.
  • (b) Above what temperature does the reaction become non-spontaneous?
Recall Solution 4.1

(a) Unit-match first. is in kJ, in J — convert to kJ: . Negative → spontaneous at 298 K. ✅

(b) As rises, the term (with , i.e. ) grows more positive and eventually overwhelms the negative . The crossover is where : Above ~465 K, and ammonia synthesis becomes non-spontaneous — which is why the Haber process is run at moderate temperature and squeezed with high pressure rather than pushed hot.

Problem 4.2

A reaction has and . Classify its spontaneity type, and find the temperature at which it becomes spontaneous.

Recall Solution 4.2

Both positive → this is the "entropy-driven, needs heat" class: unfavourable enthalpy, favourable entropy. It flips to spontaneous when beats , i.e. at high . Crossover (), with : For , → spontaneous. (This is the general "endothermic + entropy-increasing" pattern, like melting ice or decomposing limestone.)


Level 5 — Mastery

Full picture: system + surroundings + universe, tying together Second Law of Thermodynamics and Entropy of surroundings ΔS_surr = −ΔH/T.

Problem 5.1

For freezing water at (263 K), , take and . Show, using the universe, that freezing is spontaneous at 263 K even though the system's entropy drops.

Figure — Standard entropy S° and ΔS_rxn = Σ S°(products) − Σ S°(reactants)
Recall Solution 5.1

The Second Law demands for a spontaneous change — the universe, not the system alone.

Step 1 — entropy of surroundings. Freezing releases heat (); that heat flows into the surroundings, spreading energy there. Using with and : Step 2 — add them (look at the figure: the surroundings' orange gain outweighs the system's violet loss): Positive → spontaneous. The system got more ordered (ice), but it dumped enough heat to disorder the surroundings by even more. This is the rigorous answer to " means it can't happen" — false, because the universe still wins.

Problem 5.2

At what temperature does water freezing reach equilibrium ()? Use the same and , and check the result against everyday experience.

Recall Solution 5.2

Equilibrium is the balance point where : Reality check: water and ice coexist at exactly — the thermodynamics reproduces the freezing point we measure with a thermometer. Below this the surroundings term wins (freezing spontaneous, as in 5.1); above it, melting is spontaneous instead.


Wrap-up recall

Recall One-line takeaways per level
  • L1 :::- Sign of comes from moles of gas + phase changes; of any real substance is positive.
  • L2 :::- Always weight each by its coefficient before subtracting.
  • L3 :::- Solve backwards for an unknown ; it can never come out negative.
  • L4 :::- To reach , convert to kJ, then ; crossover at .
  • L5 :::- Spontaneity is judged by the universe: , with = the actual temperature.

Connections