2.5.10Thermodynamics (Chemical)

Born-Haber cycle revisited — calculating lattice energy

1,831 words8 min readdifficulty · medium5 backlinks

WHY do we need the Born–Haber cycle?

WHAT is lattice energy?

WHY not just measure it? You cannot put a bottle of gaseous Na+^+ and Cl^- ions on a bench and let them condense in a calorimeter — those free gaseous ions don't exist under normal conditions. So we route around the unmeasurable step using steps we can measure.


HOW: building the cycle from first principles

We compare two paths from elements (in standard states) to the solid ionic compound MX(s).

Path 1 (direct): Elements \to MX(s), one step = enthalpy of formation ΔHf\Delta H_f.

Path 2 (the long way, via gaseous ions):

  1. Atomise the metal — solid/liquid \to gaseous atoms: ΔHsub\Delta H_{sub} (sublimation/atomisation). Endothermic.
  2. Ionise the metal — remove electron: ionisation energy IEIE. Endothermic.
  3. Atomise the non-metal — e.g. break 12Cl2Cl\tfrac12\text{Cl}_2 \to \text{Cl}: 12D\tfrac12 D (bond dissociation). Endothermic.
  4. Add electron to non-metal — electron affinity EAEA. Usually exothermic (negative).
  5. Assemble gaseous ions into lattice — lattice energy UU. Strongly exothermic.
Figure — Born-Haber cycle revisited — calculating lattice energy

Worked Example 1 — Lattice energy of NaCl

Given (kJ mol⁻¹): ΔHf=411\Delta H_f = -411, ΔHsub(Na)=+108\Delta H_{sub}(\text{Na}) = +108, IE1(Na)=+496IE_1(\text{Na}) = +496, 12D(Cl2)=+122\tfrac12 D(\text{Cl}_2) = +122, EA(Cl)=349EA(\text{Cl}) = -349.

U=ΔHfΔHsubIE12DEAU = \Delta H_f - \Delta H_{sub} - IE - \tfrac12 D - EA U=(411)(108)(496)(122)(349)U = (-411) - (108) - (496) - (122) - (-349)

Why the last sign flips? EAEA is already negative (349-349); subtracting a negative adds 349349.

U=411108496122+349=788 kJ mol1U = -411 - 108 - 496 - 122 + 349 = \mathbf{-788\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}}

Why negative and large? Forming a lattice from ions is very stabilising — this magnitude drives NaCl's high melting point and stability.


Worked Example 2 — MgCl₂ (a +2 cation, TWO chlorides)

Given (kJ mol⁻¹): ΔHf=641\Delta H_f = -641, ΔHsub(Mg)=+148\Delta H_{sub}(\text{Mg}) = +148, IE1=+738IE_1 = +738, IE2=+1451IE_2 = +1451, D(Cl2)=+244D(\text{Cl}_2) = +244 (full bond, since we need 2 Cl), EA(Cl)=349EA(\text{Cl}) = -349 (per Cl).

U=ΔHfΔHsub(IE1+IE2)D2EAU = \Delta H_f - \Delta H_{sub} - (IE_1+IE_2) - D - 2EA U=641148(738+1451)2442(349)U = -641 - 148 - (738+1451) - 244 - 2(-349) U=6411482189244+698=2524 kJ mol1U = -641 - 148 - 2189 - 244 + 698 = \mathbf{-2524\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}}

Why so much bigger than NaCl? Higher charge (+2) and closer, smaller ion → far stronger electrostatic attraction (recall Uq+qrU \propto \frac{q_+ q_-}{r}).


Worked Example 3 — Finding an unknown other than U

Sometimes UU is given (from theory) and you find, say, EAEA. Same equation, different unknown. Given for KBr: U=671U = -671, ΔHf=394\Delta H_f = -394, ΔHsub(K)=+89\Delta H_{sub}(\text{K})=+89, IE(K)=+419IE(\text{K})=+419, 12D(Br2,incl. vaporisation)=+112\tfrac12 D(\text{Br}_2, incl.\ vaporisation)=+112. Find EA(Br)EA(\text{Br}).

Rearrange the master equation for EAEA: EA=ΔHfΔHsubIE12DUEA = \Delta H_f - \Delta H_{sub} - IE - \tfrac12 D - U EA=39489419112(671)=343 kJ mol1EA = -394 - 89 - 419 - 112 - (-671) = \mathbf{-343\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}} Why this works: the cycle has one equation, one unknown — whichever term you don't know, isolate it.



Active Recall

Recall Why can't we measure lattice energy directly?

Because gaseous free ions (M⁺, X⁻) don't exist as isolable substances to condense in a calorimeter — so we compute UU indirectly via Hess's Law.

Recall Write the master equation from memory.

U=ΔHfΔHsubIE12DEAU = \Delta H_f - \Delta H_{sub} - IE - \tfrac12 D - EA.

Recall For MgCl₂ what changes vs NaCl?

Two ionisation energies (IE1+IE2IE_1+IE_2), full D(Cl2)D(\text{Cl}_2), and 2×EA2\times EA.

Recall Feynman: explain to a 12-year-old

Imagine LEGO bricks stuck in a giant sculpture (the salt crystal). Ripping the sculpture into single floating bricks would take a huge pull — that pull is the "lattice energy." We can't measure the rip directly, so we count the cost of every other step of building the sculpture a different way, then figure out the missing rip cost by making the total match. Energy, like counting money, gives the same total no matter which route you take.


Flashcards

Definition of lattice energy
Enthalpy change forming 1 mol ionic solid from its gaseous ions; strongly exothermic.
Which law makes the Born–Haber cycle valid
Hess's Law — enthalpy is a state function, path-independent.
Master Born–Haber equation for U
U=ΔHfΔHsubIE12DEAU = \Delta H_f - \Delta H_{sub} - IE - \tfrac12 D - EA.
Sign of electron affinity for Cl in the cycle
Negative (349-349 kJ/mol), it releases energy.
NaCl lattice energy from standard data
788\approx -788 kJ/mol.
Why is MgCl₂ lattice energy much larger than NaCl
Higher cation charge (+2) and smaller ion → stronger q+q/rq_+q_-/r attraction.
For MgCl₂, which terms double or change
Use IE1+IE2IE_1+IE_2, full D(Cl2)D(\text{Cl}_2), and 2EA2EA.
Why can't lattice energy be measured directly
Free gaseous ions can't be isolated/condensed in a calorimeter.
What does Uq+q/rU \propto q_+q_-/r tell us
Bigger charges and smaller ionic radii → more exothermic (larger) lattice energy.
If U is known and EA unknown, how to solve
Rearrange same equation: EA=ΔHfΔHsubIE12DUEA = \Delta H_f - \Delta H_{sub} - IE - \tfrac12 D - U.

Connections

Concept Map

path 1: direct

ΔHf enthalpy of formation

ΔHsub atomise metal +

IE ionise metal +

½D atomise non-metal +

EA electron affinity −

assemble ions

assemble ions

U lattice energy −−

both paths equal

rearrange for unknown

unmeasurable step

Elements in standard states

Ionic solid MX

Gaseous metal atoms

Gaseous metal cations

Gaseous non-metal atoms

Gaseous anions

Gaseous ions

Hess's Law · H is state function

ΔHf = ΔHsub + IE + ½D + EA + U

U = ΔHf − ΔHsub − IE − ½D − EA

Hinglish (regional understanding)

Intuition Hinglish mein samjho

Dekho, lattice energy ka matlab hai — jab gaseous ions (jaise Na⁺ aur Cl⁻) aapas me chipak ke solid crystal banate hain, tab jitni energy release hoti hai. Ye value bahut badi aur exothermic hoti hai, lekin problem ye hai ki isko seedha calorimeter me measure karna impossible hai, kyunki free gaseous ions ko bottle me rakhna hi possible nahi.

Toh hum Born–Haber cycle use karte hain, jo basically Hess's Law ka application hai. Idea simple hai: elements se solid tak pahunchne ke do raaste hain. Ek seedha raasta (enthalpy of formation, ΔHf\Delta H_f), aur ek lamba raasta jisme metal ko sublime karo, ionise karo, non-metal ka bond todo, electron add karo, aur phir ions ko jodo (lattice energy). Kyunki energy ek state function hai, dono raaston ka total same hoga. Bas equation likho aur unknown UU solve kar lo: U=ΔHfΔHsubIE12DEAU = \Delta H_f - \Delta H_{sub} - IE - \tfrac12 D - EA.

Sabse bada trap hai signs ka. Upar jaana (endothermic) = plus, neeche jaana (exothermic) = minus. Electron affinity already negative hota hai, toh use minus karoge to wo add ho jayega — dhyan rakho! Aur MgCl₂ jaise compound me, Mg do electron chodta hai (toh IE1+IE2IE_1+IE_2) aur do chlorine hote hain (toh poora DD aur 2×EA2\times EA) — stoichiometry match karo, warna answer galat.

Ye important isliye hai kyunki lattice energy hi decide karti hai ki koi salt kitna stable hai, melting point kitna high hai, aur water me kitna dissolve hoga. Zyada charge aur chhota ion = zyada strong lattice (Uq+q/rU \propto q_+q_-/r). Ye ek short trick hai jo poore ionic bonding topic ko connect karti hai.

Go deeper — visual, from zero

Test yourself — Thermodynamics (Chemical)

Connections