This page is the "drill ground" for Hund's rule .
The parent note told you the rule; here we hammer it
against every kind of case you can meet — empty seats, half-full seats, over-full seats,
the tricky Cr/Cu exceptions, ions where you remove electrons, and an exam twist that tries to
fool you. If a scenario exists, it has a worked example below.
Before we start, one reminder of the vocabulary we will use again and again — no symbol will
appear until it means something to you.
Definition The three quantities we compute every time
n = number of unpaired electrons (electrons sitting alone in an orbital, no partner).
S = total spin quantum number = 2 n . (Each lone electron carries spin + 2 1 ; add them up.)
Multiplicity = 2 S + 1 = n + 1 = how many orientations the total spin can take.
Exchange pairs = ( 2 n ) = 2 n ( n − 1 ) = number of same-spin electron pairs that can "swap", each swap lowering energy by K .
Magnetic moment μ = n ( n + 2 ) μ B — bigger n ⇒ more magnetic. See Magnetic Moment of Atoms .
We draw orbitals as boxes and electrons as arrows : ↑ = spin up, ↓ = spin down. A box
with ↑↓ is paired ; a box with a single arrow is unpaired .
Every case Hund's rule can throw at you falls into one of these cells. The examples below are
tagged with the cell(s) they cover, so you can see the whole space is filled.
Cell
What makes it special
Covered by
A. Empty → part-filled, below half
fewer electrons than orbitals; all stay unpaired
Ex 1 (Carbon 2 p 2 )
B. Exactly half-filled
one electron per orbital, max unpaired
Ex 2 (Nitrogen 2 p 3 )
C. Above half → pairing begins
more electrons than orbitals; forced pairs
Ex 3 (Oxygen 2 p 4 )
D. Fully filled (degenerate zero-spin)
every box ↑↓; n = 0
Ex 4 (2 p 6 / Ne)
E. Exception by exchange (half-full d )
Aufbau "prediction" beaten by Hund/exchange
Ex 5 (Chromium)
F. Exception by exchange (full d )
d 10 steals from 4 s
Ex 6 (Copper)
G. Ion — remove electrons
strip 4 s before 3 d ; recount
Ex 7 (F e 2 + , M n 2 + )
H. Real-world / magnetism word problem
go from a measured μ back to n
Ex 8 (unknown ion)
I. Exam twist — the trap
"more electrons = more multiplicity?"
Ex 9 (2 p 6 vs 2 p 3 )
The clearest way to see cells A, B, C, D is to watch the three 2 p boxes fill up from empty.
Ex 1 — Cell A: Carbon Z = 6 , configuration 1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 2
Forecast: Two electrons, three boxes. Do they crowd into one box, or take two separate boxes? Guess the multiplicity before reading.
Count the degenerate boxes. The 2 p subshell has three orbitals p x , p y , p z , all same energy.
Why this step? Hund only applies inside a set of equal-energy ("degenerate") boxes — Aufbau Principle already told us 2 p is the box being filled.
Place electron 1 in p x (↑). Why? First electron, no competition.
Place electron 2 in a different box p y (↑), same spin. Why this step? An empty degenerate box is still available, and spreading out lowers electron–electron repulsion. Same spin adds an exchange pair.
Count: unpaired n = 2 , so S = 2/2 = 1 , multiplicity = 2 ( 1 ) + 1 = 3 (a triplet ). Exchange pairs = ( 2 2 ) = 1 .
Verify: Two lone electrons ⇒ μ = 2 ( 2 + 2 ) = 8 ≈ 2.83 μ B . Carbon is indeed paramagnetic — matches Paramagnetism and Diamagnetism . ✓
Ex 2 — Cell B: Nitrogen Z = 7 , 1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 3
Forecast: Three electrons, three boxes — will any pair up?
One electron per box, all ↑: p x ↑ p y ↑ p z ↑ . Why this step? Exactly enough electrons to give each box one; no reason to pair when empty seats existed.
Count: n = 3 , S = 3/2 , multiplicity = 2 ( 3/2 ) + 1 = 4 (a quartet ).
Exchange pairs = ( 2 3 ) = 3 . Why this matters: this half-filled 2 p 3 is unusually stable — same idea that makes d 5 special. See Exchange Energy and Half-filled Stability .
Verify: μ = 3 ( 3 + 2 ) = 15 ≈ 3.87 μ B ; three unpaired electrons is the maximum possible for p , confirming "maximum multiplicity." ✓
Ex 3 — Cell C: Oxygen Z = 8 , 1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 4
Forecast: Now there are more electrons (4) than boxes (3). Which box gets the pair?
First three electrons singly, ↑ ↑ ↑ (same as nitrogen). Why this step? Fill every seat once before doubling — Pauli Exclusion Principle permits 2 per box, but Hund delays pairing.
Fourth electron has no empty degenerate box , so it must pair: p x ↑↓ p y ↑ p z ↑ . Why this step? Only after all singly-filled does pairing start; the pair goes in with opposite spin (Pauli).
Count: unpaired n = 2 , multiplicity = 3 (a triplet again — but for a different reason than carbon).
Verify: μ = 2 ( 2 + 2 ) = 8 ≈ 2.83 μ B . This surviving pair of unpaired electrons is exactly why molecular O 2 is paramagnetic. ✓
Ex 4 — Cell D: Neon Z = 10 , 2 p 6 (fully filled)
Forecast: All boxes ↑↓. How many unpaired? What is the multiplicity of a "closed shell"?
Every box paired: p x ↑↓ p y ↑↓ p z ↑↓ . Why this step? Six electrons, three boxes, two per box — no choice left.
Count: n = 0 , S = 0 , multiplicity = 2 ( 0 ) + 1 = 1 (a singlet ).
Verify: μ = 0 ( 0 + 2 ) = 0 μ B — diamagnetic, no net spin, as every noble gas is. This is the degenerate zero-input case: the formula still works, giving multiplicity 1. ✓
A pure Aufbau count would predict Chromium as 3 d 4 4 s 2 and Copper as
3 d 9 4 s 2 . Nature disagrees, because promoting one 4 s electron into 3 d creates a
half-filled or fully-filled d shell whose extra exchange energy outweighs the small cost
of moving an electron. The figure counts the exchange pairs on both sides.
Ex 5 — Cell E: Chromium Z = 24
Forecast: Is it [ Ar ] 3 d 4 4 s 2 or [ Ar ] 3 d 5 4 s 1 ? Count exchange pairs to decide.
Naïve config 3 d 4 : four d boxes singly ↑, n d = 4 . Exchange pairs = ( 2 4 ) = 6 .
Actual config 3 d 5 4 s 1 : all five d boxes singly ↑, n d = 5 . Exchange pairs = ( 2 5 ) = 10 .
Why this step? Keeping all five spins parallel jumps the swap-count from 6 to 10 — four extra − K discounts.
Why it wins: the gain of 4 K exchange stabilization exceeds the small energy to move one electron from 4 s to 3 d . So the ground state is [ Ar ] 3 d 5 4 s 1 .
Count for the atom: unpaired = 5 ( d ) + 1 ( s ) = 6 , multiplicity = 6 + 1 = 7 (a septet ).
Verify: μ = 6 ( 6 + 2 ) = 48 ≈ 6.93 μ B ; Cr has the most unpaired electrons of any first-row transition metal, consistent with maximum multiplicity. ✓
Ex 6 — Cell F: Copper Z = 29
Forecast: [ Ar ] 3 d 9 4 s 2 or [ Ar ] 3 d 10 4 s 1 ? Which is more stable?
Naïve 3 d 9 : four boxes ↑↓ and one box ↑, so parallel-spin set is not maximal; d is one short of full.
Actual 3 d 10 4 s 1 : all five d boxes ↑↓ (completely full), one lone 4 s electron. Why this step? A completely filled d 10 maximizes exchange among both spin sets (five ↑ and five ↓), a specially stable closed subshell.
Count for the atom: in d 10 , all paired ⇒ 0 unpaired there; only the 4 s 1 is unpaired ⇒ n = 1 , multiplicity = 2 (a doublet ).
Verify: μ = 1 ( 1 + 2 ) = 3 ≈ 1.73 μ B . Copper(0) has exactly one unpaired electron. ✓
Common mistake The classic ion trap
Feels right: "F e is [ Ar ] 3 d 6 4 s 2 , so for F e 2 + just take two 3 d electrons."
Wrong: You remove electrons from the highest n shell first — that is 4 s , not 3 d , even though 4 s filled first. Fix: strip 4 s before 3 d , then apply Hund to what remains.
Ex 7 — Cell G: F e 2 + and M n 2 +
Forecast: How many unpaired electrons does each ion keep? Are they equal?
F e 2 + (Z = 26 , remove 2 electrons):
Neutral F e = [ Ar ] 3 d 6 4 s 2 . Remove the two 4 s electrons first ⇒ F e 2 + = [ Ar ] 3 d 6 . Why this step? Outermost (4 s ) leaves first.
Fill six into five d boxes by Hund: five singly ↑, then one pair ⇒ n = 4 .
Multiplicity = 5 ; μ = 4 ( 4 + 2 ) = 24 ≈ 4.90 μ B .
M n 2 + (Z = 25 , remove 2 electrons):
Neutral M n = [ Ar ] 3 d 5 4 s 2 . Remove 4 s 2 ⇒ M n 2 + = [ Ar ] 3 d 5 .
Five d boxes, one electron each, all ↑ ⇒ n = 5 (half-filled, maximally stable).
Multiplicity = 6 ; μ = 5 ( 5 + 2 ) = 35 ≈ 5.92 μ B .
Verify: M n 2 + (5 unpaired, μ ≈ 5.92 ) is more paramagnetic than F e 2 + (4 unpaired, μ ≈ 4.90 ) — measured moments agree. ✓
Ex 8 — Cell H: identify the ion from its magnetic moment
Statement: A first-row transition-metal ion has a measured "spin-only" magnetic moment of about 3.87 μ B . How many unpaired electrons does it have, and could it be V 2 + ([ Ar ] 3 d 3 )?
Forecast: Guess n from the number, then check against a real ion.
Invert the moment formula. We have μ = n ( n + 2 ) ; solve n ( n + 2 ) = μ 2 = ( 3.87 ) 2 ≈ 15 . Why this step? We measured μ , we want n — this is the only equation linking them.
Solve: n 2 + 2 n − 15 = 0 ⇒ ( n + 5 ) ( n − 3 ) = 0 ⇒ n = 3 (reject negative). Why? n must be a non-negative whole number.
Match to an ion. V 2 + = [ Ar ] 3 d 3 : three d boxes singly ↑ by Hund ⇒ n = 3 . It fits.
Verify: 3 ( 3 + 2 ) = 15 ≈ 3.87 μ B — matches the measurement, and V 2 + has exactly 3 unpaired electrons. ✓
Ex 9 — Cell I: "which has higher multiplicity, 2 p 6 or 2 p 3 ?"
Forecast: 2 p 6 has twice as many electrons — surely more multiplicity? Careful.
2 p 6 : all three boxes ↑↓ ⇒ n = 0 ⇒ multiplicity = 0 + 1 = 1 .
2 p 3 : three boxes singly ↑ ⇒ n = 3 ⇒ multiplicity = 3 + 1 = 4 .
Why this step? Multiplicity counts unpaired electrons, not total electrons.
Conclusion: 2 p 3 (fewer electrons!) has the higher multiplicity, 4 vs 1.
Verify: μ ( 2 p 6 ) = 0 (diamagnetic), μ ( 2 p 3 ) = 15 ≈ 3.87 μ B (paramagnetic). The one with fewer electrons is more magnetic. ✓
Recall Which cell forces the first pairing in
p orbitals?
Cell C — the 4th p electron (p 4 , e.g. oxygen), since only 3 boxes exist. ::: Answer above.
Multiplicity of oxygen 2 p 4 ? ::: 3 (two unpaired).
Recall Why is Cr
3 d 5 4 s 1 and not 3 d 4 4 s 2 ?
Going to 3 d 5 keeps all five spins parallel, raising exchange pairs from 6 to 10 (+ 4 K ), which outweighs the promotion cost. ::: See Ex 5.
Recall From which orbital do you remove electrons first in
F e → F e 2 + ?
The 4 s orbital (highest n ), not 3 d . ::: Ex 7.
Recall Given
μ ≈ 5.92 μ B , how many unpaired electrons?
Solve n ( n + 2 ) = 35 ⇒ n = 5 . ::: Ex 7 (M n 2 + ).
"Count the lonely ones." Multiplicity, spin, and magnetism all care only about
unpaired electrons — never total electron count.
Aufbau Principle — sets which subshell fills and the 4 s -before-3 d order that Ex 7 unwinds.
Pauli Exclusion Principle — why pairs must be opposite-spin (Ex 3).
Electron Spin Quantum Number — the + 2 1 each lone electron contributes to S .
Exchange Energy and Half-filled Stability — the deep "why" of Ex 5 & 6.
Paramagnetism and Diamagnetism — unpaired ⇒ paramagnetic (Ex 1, 3, 9).
Magnetic Moment of Atoms — μ = n ( n + 2 ) , used to close every example.
Hund's rule of maximum multiplicity — the parent statement of the rule.