Visual walkthrough — Bohr model of hydrogen — postulates, radius rₙ = 0.529 n² - Z Å, energy Eₙ = −13.6 Z² - n² eV
We build on the parent topic and it leans on the Rutherford model (nucleus in the centre) and Planck's quantisation (energy comes in lumps).
Step 1 — Draw the players: nucleus, electron, and the pull between them
WHAT. Put a fat positive dot in the middle — the nucleus, charge . A tiny dot circles it at distance — the electron, charge . A red arrow points from the electron back toward the nucleus: the electric attraction.
WHY. Before any equation, we must agree on what each letter is — otherwise every symbol later is a mystery. This is just Rutherford's picture: charge in the middle, electron outside.
WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.

Step 2 — Balance the two forces (this pins down the speed)
WHAT. The electron does not fall in and does not fly away — it circles steadily. For that, the inward electric pull must exactly equal the inward force a circle demands (the centripetal force). We set them equal.
WHY this and not something else? A circling object is always accelerating toward the centre (its direction keeps turning). Newton says a force must cause that, aimed inward. The only inward force here is the electric pull. So: electric pull centripetal requirement. This is the one equation that ties speed to radius .
Term by term: bundles the electric constants into one symbol; is "charge times charge" (bigger charges pull harder); in the bottom says the pull weakens with the square of distance; is the electron's mass; its speed. Cancel one from each side:
\boxed{\,\frac{kZe^2}{r} = mv^2\,}\tag{1}
WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.

Step 3 — One equation, two unknowns: we need a second rule
WHAT. Equation (1) has two things we don't know: the speed and the radius . One equation can't solve for two unknowns. We need a second, independent fact.
WHY. Classically, any is allowed — pick a radius, equation (1) hands you the matching speed, done. That would give a continuous smear of orbits. But hydrogen glows in sharp lines, so nature forbids most orbits. Bohr's second postulate is exactly that forbidding rule.
Here is Planck's constant (the size of nature's smallest action-lump), and is just " per radian." is the quantum number — the step you're standing on.
WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. The allowed values are a ladder, not a ramp:

Step 4 — Solve for the radius
WHAT. From the quantisation rule solve for the speed, , and slot it into equation (1). Now only is left.
WHY. Two equations, two unknowns → eliminate to isolate . This is the moment the allowed radii pop out.
Multiply both sides by , divide by :
Term by term of the answer: on top → orbits grow fast with the step number; on the bottom → a stronger nucleus pulls the electron in, shrinking the orbit; everything else () is a fixed bundle of constants.
WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. The allowed circles, spaced by ():

Step 5 — Build the total energy from kinetic + potential
WHAT. The electron's total energy is its energy of motion (kinetic, ) plus its energy of position in the electric pull (potential, ).
WHY. "Energy of the orbit" is what determines the light emitted — so we need it. is negative because the electron is trapped: it sits inside an attractive well, below the "free at infinity" zero line.
WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. Picture the well: the nucleus digs a funnel, and the electron sits partway down it.

Step 6 — Use the force balance to simplify (the virial shortcut)
WHAT. From equation (1), , so the kinetic energy is . Substitute:
E = \underbrace{\frac{kZe^2}{2r}}_{KE} \;-\; \underbrace{\frac{kZe^2}{r}}_{|PE|} \;=\; -\frac{kZe^2}{2r}\tag{2}
WHY. This is why Step 2 was worth keeping around: it lets us replace and get in terms of alone. Notice the beautiful result — total energy is negative and exactly half the (negative) potential. That's the virial theorem signature of an inverse-square pull.
WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. Stack the bars: up, twice as long down, net below zero.

Step 7 — Insert the quantised radius → the energy ladder
WHAT. Put from Step 4 into equation (2):
WHY. Only allowed radii exist, so only allowed energies exist. Reading the answer: on top → a stronger nucleus digs a deeper well; on the bottom → higher steps are shallower, crowding up toward zero.
WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. The energy ladder — rungs crammed near as climbs:

Step 8 — The limiting case : the electron breaks free
WHAT. Let the step number grow without bound. Then (orbit huge) and (well vanishes).
WHY. We must show every case, including the edge. At the electron is infinitely far and has zero energy — it is free, no longer bound. The energy you must supply to drag it from out to here is the ionisation energy:
For hydrogen that's exactly eV — the measured ionisation energy. A triumph.
WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. The ladder converging onto the free line at :

The one-picture summary
Everything above compressed: force balance → quantised ladder → radii → energies , all landing on the ionisation edge.

Recall Feynman retelling of the whole walkthrough
We drew a positive nucleus and a tiny electron circling it, with a red arrow for the electric pull (Step 1). To keep circling, that pull must equal the "keep-me-turning" force — one equation linking speed and radius (Step 2). But that's one equation with two unknowns, so we can't solve it alone (Step 3). Bohr's magic rule saves us: the electron may only carry whole-number lumps of circling-motion — a ladder, not a ramp. Plug that in and the radius pops out: allowed orbits sized (Step 4). Then we asked for the orbit's total energy — motion energy plus the negative "trapped in a well" energy (Step 5). Using our force balance, the kinetic part is exactly half the well depth, so the total is negative: the electron has fallen partway into the funnel (Step 6). Feeding in the allowed radii turns that into an energy ladder, , deep for strong nuclei and shallow for high steps (Step 7). Finally, climbing to the top of the ladder () frees the electron — the climb costs eV for hydrogen, exactly the measured ionisation energy (Step 8). Two boxes, one picture: radius up as , energy down as .
Recall Rebuild the logic yourself
Which equation links and ? ::: The force balance (Coulomb = centripetal). Why do we need a second equation? ::: Force balance has two unknowns ( and ); quantisation is the second. Where does the negative sign in come from? ::: From the potential energy (electron bound in an attractive well). Why is ? ::: Force balance makes while ; virial signature of an inverse-square force. What happens as ? ::: , ; the electron is free. The climb from is the ionisation energy.
Connections
- Parent topic — the formulas this page derives.
- Rutherford model — the picture we started from in Step 1.
- Planck's quantisation — the lump behind Step 3.
- de Broglie wavelength — a deeper reason the ladder in Step 3 exists.
- Hydrogen spectrum & Rydberg formula — what the energy ladder predicts.
- Ionisation energy — the climb of Step 8.
- Quantum mechanical model of atom — where these sharp orbits get replaced by clouds.