Intuition What this page is for
The parent note gave you seven fractions and one master formula. This page hunts down every kind of question those fractions can produce — and works each one from zero. If you finish this page, no concentration problem should surprise you.
Parent: Concentration units
Before we start, one word we lean on constantly is density . Density ρ (read "rho") is just mass packed into each millilitre : if ρ = 1.14 g/mL, then every 1 mL of liquid weighs 1.14 g. It is the bridge that lets us swap between "how much volume" and "how much mass". See Density . We also convert grams to moles using Molar Mass and Formula Mass via n = M w mass , where n is the count of moles (The Mole and Avogadro's Number ).
Every concentration problem you will ever meet falls into one of these cells. The goal below is to hit all of them at least once .
Cell
What makes it that case
Example that hits it
A. Simple ratio
Straight numerator ÷ denominator × base
Ex 1 (mass %)
B. Grams → moles first
Must convert mass to moles before dividing
Ex 2 (molarity)
C. Solvent-mass unit
Denominator is kg of solvent , not solution
Ex 3 (molality)
D. Sum-to-one unit
Mole fraction, must total 1
Ex 4 (mole fraction)
E. Density-bridge conversion
Need ρ to link M ↔ m ↔ x
Ex 5 (M → m)
F. Trace / dilute limit
ppm, ppb, the M ≈ m limit
Ex 6 (ppm)
G. Degenerate / zero input
Pure solvent, or "add nothing"
Ex 7 (zero solute)
H. Real-world word problem
Hidden numbers, everyday framing
Ex 8 (seawater)
I. Exam twist
Reverse direction, or trap built in
Ex 9 (find density from m and M)
Worked example Ex 1 — mass percent (Cell A)
Dissolve 15 g of sugar in 135 g of water . Find the mass percent of sugar.
Forecast: guess — is it above or below 10%? (Sugar is 15 out of 150 total…)
Mass of solution = 15 + 135 = 150 g.
Why this step? Mass % divides by the whole solution , and solution = solute + solvent. Masses always add exactly.
Divide and scale to 100:
mass % = 150 15 × 100 = 10%.
Why ×100? "Percent" means "per 100 g of solution", so we rescale the ratio to a base of 100.
Verify: 10% of 150 g = 15 g solute ✓. Units: g/g cancels, leaving a pure number — correct for a percent.
Worked example Ex 2 — molarity from a mass (Cell B)
11.7 g of NaCl (M w = 58.5 g/mol) is dissolved to make 250 mL of solution . Find the molarity.
Forecast: 11.7 g looks like a small pile — will M be near 0.1, 1, or 10?
Grams → moles: n = 58.5 11.7 = 0.200 mol.
Why this step? Molarity counts particles , not grams, so we must convert with molar mass first.
mL → L: 250 mL = 0.250 L.
Why? Molarity's denominator is litres of solution , so the volume must be in litres.
Divide: M = 0.250 0.200 = 0.800 M.
Verify: 0.8 mol/L × 0.25 L = 0.2 mol = 11.7/58.5 ✓. Units: mol/L = M ✓.
Worked example Ex 3 — molality (Cell C)
0.5 mol of glucose is dissolved in 200 g of water . Find the molality.
Forecast: the solvent is less than 1 kg. Will m be above or below 0.5?
Grams of solvent → kg: 200 g = 0.200 kg.
Why this step? Molality's denominator is mass of solvent in kilograms — never solution, never volume.
Divide: m = 0.200 0.5 = 2.5 m.
Why the answer jumps above 0.5? Dividing by 0.2 (a number smaller than 1) makes the result larger. Less solvent → stronger solution.
Verify: 2.5 mol/kg × 0.2 kg = 0.5 mol ✓. Note we used water's mass only , correctly ignoring the glucose mass — that is what "solvent" means. This unit feeds directly into Colligative Properties .
Worked example Ex 4 — mole fraction, both components (Cell D)
A mixture holds 3 mol of water and 1 mol of ethanol . Find both mole fractions.
Forecast: which fraction is bigger — and do you expect them to add to exactly 1?
Total moles: n total = 3 + 1 = 4 mol.
Why this step? Mole fraction divides each part by the total count of moles .
Water fraction: x water = 4 3 = 0.75 .
Ethanol fraction: x eth = 4 1 = 0.25 .
Verify: 0.75 + 0.25 = 1.00 ✓ — the defining property. If your fractions don't total 1, you made an arithmetic error. Dimensionless (moles/moles cancel), so it is temperature-independent.
The master formula from the parent note is
m = 1000 ρ − M M w M × 1000 .
Let us see where every piece comes from geometrically before using it.
The red bar is 1 litre of solution — our chosen basis. Its total mass is 1000 ρ g. A slice of it (grey) is the solute, weighing M ⋅ M w g. What is left over is the solvent, weighing 1000 ρ − M M w g. Molality then divides the moles M by that leftover mass (in kg).
Worked example Ex 5 — molarity → molality (Cell E)
A 2.0 M sulfuric acid solution has density ρ = 1.14 g/mL and M w = 98 g/mol. Find its molality.
Forecast: will m come out bigger or smaller than M = 2 ? (Hint: is the solvent less than 1 kg?)
Take 1 L of solution. Then moles of solute = M = 2.0 mol.
Why this step? Choosing exactly 1 L makes "moles per litre" become just "moles".
Mass of whole solution: 1000 mL × 1.14 g/mL = 1140 g.
Why? Density turns volume into mass.
Mass of solute: 2.0 × 98 = 196 g.
Why? moles × molar mass = grams.
Mass of solvent = 1140 − 196 = 944 g = 0.944 kg.
Why subtract? solvent = solution − solute (see the red bar figure).
Molality: m = 0.944 2.0 = 2.12 m.
Verify: plug into the master formula: 1000 ( 1.14 ) − 2 ( 98 ) 2 × 1000 = 944 2000 = 2.12 ✓. And m > M because we divided by 0.944 kg , which is less than 1 kg — exactly as forecast.
Worked example Ex 6 — ppm and the mg/L shortcut (Cell F)
A water sample contains 0.0025 g of lead in 5 kg of water (ρ ≈ 1 g/mL). Express the lead concentration in ppm.
Forecast: ppm uses a base of a million — will the number be tiny or a clean small integer?
Same ratio as %, but scale by 1 0 6 :
ppm = 5000 0.0025 × 1 0 6 .
Why this step? Percent scales by 100; ppm scales by 1 0 6 because the amounts are so small that a percent would read "0.00005%" — ugly. (Both masses in grams so units cancel: 5 kg = 5000 g.)
Compute: 5000 0.0025 = 5 × 1 0 − 7 , then × 1 0 6 = 0.5 ppm.
Verify — the mg/L cross-check: for water, 1 ppm ≈ 1 mg/L. Here 0.0025 g = 2.5 mg in 5 L ⇒ 2.5/5 = 0.5 mg/L = 0.5 ppm ✓. The two methods agree only because ρ ≈ 1 g/mL (mass/mass matches mass/volume).
Worked example Ex 7 — the zero-solute and pure-solvent cases (Cell G)
(a) You add 0 g of salt to 500 g of water. (b) You have pure ethanol (no water at all). Find every concentration you can.
Forecast: which quantities are 0, which are 1, and which are simply undefined?
(a) Zero solute: numerator of every unit is the solute amount = 0 .
mass % = 500 0 × 100 = 0% ; molarity = 0 M; molality = 0 m.
Why? Zero over any nonzero denominator is zero — the water is just water.
(b) Pure ethanol, mole fraction: here ethanol is the only component, so n total = n eth .
x eth = n eth n eth = 1 , x water = n eth 0 = 0.
Why? A mole fraction of a pure substance is always 1 — it is 100% of itself.
Verify: (a) 0 + 500 = 500 g solution, 0% of it is solute ✓. (b) x eth + x water = 1 + 0 = 1 ✓ — still sums to one, the defining check. Trap: molarity of a pure substance divides by its own volume — it is a valid number, but molality of a pure substance is undefined (no solvent, so denominator = 0 ).
Worked example Ex 8 — seawater salinity (Cell H)
Seawater is about 3.5% salt by mass and has density ρ = 1.025 g/mL . Treating all the salt as NaCl (M w = 58.5 g/mol), estimate its molarity .
Forecast: ocean salt "feels" strong — do you expect roughly 0.6 M, 6 M, or 0.06 M?
Pick 1 L of seawater. Its mass: 1000 mL × 1.025 = 1025 g.
Why this basis? Molarity is per litre, so start from exactly 1 L.
Mass of salt in it: 3.5% of 1025 g = 0.035 × 1025 = 35.875 g.
Why? Mass % tells us how many grams of solute sit inside that mass of solution.
Grams → moles: n = 58.5 35.875 = 0.613 mol.
Why? Molarity counts moles, so convert with molar mass.
Molarity: M = 1 L 0.613 = 0.613 M.
Verify: dimensional path grams → moles → mol/L is clean; answer ≈ 0.6 M, matching the real ocean value of ~0.6 M NaCl ✓.
Worked example Ex 9 — back out the density (Cell I)
A solution is 1.0 M and 1.09 m in a solute with M w = 60 g/mol. Find the density ρ .
Forecast: this reverses Ex 5 — instead of finding m from ρ , we solve the same equation for ρ .
Start from the master formula:
m = 1000 ρ − M M w M × 1000 .
Why this step? The same relation links all four quantities; we simply treat ρ as the unknown.
Isolate the denominator. Multiply both sides by ( 1000 ρ − M M w ) then divide by m :
1000 ρ − M M w = m M × 1000 .
Why? We move the unknown out of the fraction so we can solve linearly.
Plug numbers: 1.09 1.0 × 1000 = 917.4 , and M M w = 1.0 × 60 = 60 . So
1000 ρ = 917.4 + 60 = 977.4 ⟹ ρ = 0.977 g/mL .
Verify: feed ρ = 0.977 back into the forward formula: 1000 ( 0.977 ) − 60 1 × 1000 = 917 1000 = 1.09 m ✓. The trap: students forget the − M M w term and get ρ = 0.917 , which is wrong — the solute mass is real and must be subtracted.
Recall Self-test: match the cell before you compute
For each, name the matrix cell first , then solve.
Given moles + mL of solution, find concentration ::: Cell B → molarity.
Given M, ρ, and molar mass, find m ::: Cell E → density-bridge master formula.
Given a pure substance's fraction of itself ::: Cell G → mole fraction = 1.
Given salt-by-mass and density, find molarity ::: Cell H → real-world, use 1 L basis.
Mnemonic The one-line strategy for any conversion
"Pick 1 L (or 1 kg), then let density and molar mass do the rest."
Fix a basis → get its total mass from ρ → split into solute (M M w ) and solvent (the leftover) → apply whichever definition the question wants.