Visual walkthrough — Spacecraft bus — structure, power, thermal, ADCS, C&DH, comms, propulsion
This deep dive belongs to Spacecraft Bus — Structure, Power, Thermal, ADCS, C&DH, Comms, Propulsion. We go deeper than the parent's "Energy Balance in Orbit" formula — we earn every symbol.
Step 1 — What is "power," and why does an orbit split into two halves?
WHAT. A satellite in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) circles the planet in about an hour and a half. For part of that loop it is bathed in sunlight; for the rest it passes through Earth's shadow.
WHY split it. Solar panels only make power when they see the Sun. So the orbit has a fundamentally different character in each half, and energy must be tracked separately in each.
PICTURE. The circle below is one orbit. The yellow arc is the sunlit phase (duration ); the gray arc is the eclipse phase (duration ). Together they add to one full orbit, .

- — time for one full loop (seconds or minutes).
- — how long the panels are lit.
- — how long the satellite is in the dark.
Step 2 — The load never sleeps
WHAT. We draw a flat line: the load demands the same watts every second of the orbit.
WHY it matters. During eclipse there is no sunlight, yet the load still demands its watts. That demand has only one possible source: a battery. So the panel isn't just feeding the load in daylight — it must have pre-charged the battery to cover the whole eclipse.
PICTURE. The orange line is the constant load. The yellow bar (daylight) is the panel's output; notice it towers above the load — the surplus is what charges the battery. In the gray region (eclipse) the panel gives nothing, and the battery alone carries the orange line.

- — constant demand, present in both halves.
- — solar-array output, present only in daylight (this is what we're solving for).
Step 3 — The eclipse deficit: how much energy the darkness costs
WHAT. Compute the energy the battery must supply during eclipse. Energy = power × time, so:
- — energy (joules) the battery must deliver in the dark.
- — the constant watts drawn.
- — how long the darkness lasts.
WHY. This is the debt the daylight must have paid off in advance. It is a plain rectangle: height = load, width = eclipse duration. Area = energy.
PICTURE. The shaded gray rectangle below is exactly this energy — the "hole" the battery must fill.

Step 4 — Batteries are leaky buckets: efficiency enters
WHAT. We correct the raw energies for these leaks.
WHY these two, and why divide vs. multiply?
- Charging: we put in , but only is stored. We multiply by a number below 1 → less survives.
- Discharging: the load needs , but the battery must give more to cover its own losses: . We divide by a number below 1 → the requirement grows.
PICTURE. A funnel diagram: energy poured in shrinks (charge loss); energy demanded on the far side forces an even bigger draw (discharge loss). Both leaks make the panel's job harder.

Step 5 — The daylight surplus: what actually charges the battery
WHAT. In daylight the panel makes , the load eats , and the leftover charges the battery:
- — surplus watts flowing into the battery.
- — solar-array output (the unknown).
- — the same constant demand as always.
Over the sunlit duration this surplus delivers energy , of which only survives into the battery.
WHY. This is the supply side of the ledger — the energy we manage to bank while the Sun is up.
PICTURE. The tall yellow bar minus the orange load line leaves a green surplus band. Its area (times ) is the energy we're saving up.

Step 6 — Balance the ledger: stored = withdrawn
WHAT. For the battery to never run empty, the energy successfully stored in daylight must equal the energy the eclipse withdraws:
WHY this equality. If the left side were larger, the battery would end each orbit fuller than it started — wasted panel. If smaller, it drains a little each orbit and eventually dies. Steady state = exact balance. This is the heart of the derivation.
PICTURE. A two-pan balance scale: the green "banked" area on one pan, the gray "withdrawn" area on the other, level.

Now substitute and solve for :
Divide through, add back, and factor it out:
Read it term by term:
- The leading : the panel must at least cover the running load.
- The : that daytime load itself.
- The fraction: the extra fraction of panel needed to also refill the battery.
- : longer dark or shorter light → bigger extra.
- in the denominator: leaky batteries → bigger extra.
Step 7 — Edge and degenerate cases (never let the reader hit an unshown scenario)
Case A — No eclipse (). A satellite in permanent sunlight (e.g. a dawn-dusk Sun-synchronous orbit). The fraction vanishes: Sensible: no darkness to prepare for, so the panel just matches the load.
Case B — Perfect battery (). The panel enlargement is purely the day/night time ratio — the cleanest possible case.
Case C — Vanishing sunlight (). The denominator , so . Physically correct: with almost no light, no finite panel could bank enough energy. This warns designers that very short sunlit arcs are a hard limit.
PICTURE. A single plot of the enlargement factor versus , showing it flatten toward 1 for long daylight and blow up as daylight shrinks — with the three cases marked.

Step 8 — The worked number (the parent's LEO example, retraced)
Reveal-yourself check:
The extra-fraction number 0.626 comes from where?
Why is the BOL panel bigger than 81.3 W?
The one-picture summary

The whole story on one graph: a tall yellow daylight bar overtops the flat orange load; the green surplus (banked, shrunk by ) exactly fills the gray eclipse deficit (grown by ). Balance those two areas and out drops the boxed formula.
Recall Feynman retelling — tell it back in plain words
A satellite spends part of every orbit in sunlight and part in Earth's shadow. Its gadgets need a steady trickle of power the whole time. In sunlight the panels do double duty: they run the gadgets and stuff extra energy into a battery. In shadow the panels are useless, so the battery alone runs everything. Energy is just power multiplied by time, which on a power-vs-time graph is area. So the rule is simple: the energy area banked in daylight must equal the energy area drained in darkness. Batteries leak, though — some energy is lost going in, and even more coming out — so you have to bank a bit extra to cover the leaks. Solve that "areas must match" equation for the panel size and you get: the panel equals the load, plus a top-up that grows with how long the dark lasts, how short the light is, and how leaky the battery is. Push it to the extremes and it stays honest: no shadow → panel just equals the load; almost no sunlight → panel size explodes. For a real LEO bird pulling 50 W, that's about 81 W, bumped to ~93 W so it still works after five years of Sun damage.