Before we talk about poles moving, we need the place they move in.
Why do we need this? A real number is a point on a line — a 1D thing. But the answers to the equations in this topic (the poles) can be off the line: they oscillate. To store both "how fast it decays" (σ) and "how fast it wiggles" (ω) you need two numbers, so you need a 2D map. That map is the complex plane.
A complex number also has two other descriptions we will need constantly:
Why these two? Because the parent's whole method — the "angle condition" and "magnitude condition" — is nothing but reading off these two numbers for a special quantity. We meet them again in §6.
Why a ratio and not just one polynomial? Because two different things break a system: the recipe blowing up (D=0) and the recipe vanishing (N=0). Keeping numerator and denominator separate lets us talk about each. Those two events have names — poles and zeros — coming next.
Why a single knob and not many? Because for one knob the pole-paths are curves (1D), which you can draw by hand. Evans' whole method is built around this one-parameter sweep. See PID / PD controller design for how extra knobs add zeros to reshape those curves.
Everything the parent does flows from one line. Here is where it comes from, built slowly.
The closed-loop transfer function (output over input, with feedback wired up) is
T(s)=1+KG(s)H(s)KG(s).
The right-hand form comes from multiplying through by D(s): since GH=N/D,
1+KDN=0⇒D+KN=0.
This is the polynomial whose roots are the closed-loop poles — the thing Characteristic equation & closed-loop poles is all about. As K varies, its roots trace the locus.
The characteristic equation rearranges to KG(s)H(s)=−1. Now −1 is itself a complex number — go back to §1's picture and find it: it sits one unit to the left of centre. That means:
its magnitude is 1 (distance from centre),
its angle is 180° (pointing straight left) — or 180° plus any full turn, i.e. ±180°(2k+1).
For a point s to be a pole, L(s) must equal−1, so its magnitude and angle must match:
How do you compute an angle to a point? Draw an arrow from each pole and each zero to your test point s. Measure each arrow's angle. Add the zero-angles, subtract the pole-angles — that sum is ∠G(s)H(s). Every sketching rule (real-axis test, departure angle, asymptotes) is just this arrow-arithmetic in disguise.
Read it top-down: the map (§1) hosts poles/zeros (§3), which build the transfer function (§2). Feedback (§4) plus that function give the master equation (§5). Splitting −1 into size and direction (§6) yields the two conditions, and those — helped by the derivative and Routh (§7) — power every sketching rule in the parent note.