This page drills Vieille's lawr=aPn. Keep this near you:
Here r is the linear burn rate (how fast the solid surface recedes, in mm/s), P is the chamber pressure, a the burn-rate coefficient, and n the pressure exponent.
What: we plug in P=1. Why: anything raised to a power, when the base is 1, is 1: 10.4=1.
r=a⋅10.4=a=3mm/s.
That's the whole point of defining a "at 1MPa": ais the burn rate at unit pressure. The exponent never gets a chance to act because 1 to any power stays 1.
Recall Solution L1.2
(i) the exponent n=0.35 — it is the sensitivity; a bigger n means pressure changes swing the rate harder.
(ii) the coefficient a — the rate when P=1.
(iii) r itself — the speed the burning surface eats into the solid, not the exhaust speed.
What: direct substitution. Why the exponential appears:80.3 is easiest through 80.3=e0.3ln8 — the log turns the power into a multiply, then e undoes the log.
80.3=e0.3×2.0794=e0.6238=1.866.r=5×1.866=9.33mm/s.Sense check: pressure went up 8× but r barely doubled — that's exactly what a small n should do.
Recall Solution L2.2
What: solve 12=6P0.5 for P. Why: divide first to isolate the power, then undo the 0.5 power by raising to 1/0.5=2.
P0.5=612=2⇒P=21/0.5=22=4MPa.
Because n=0.5 means "square root of P", to get twice the burn rate you need four times the pressure.
Recall Solution L2.3
Why the ratio trick: we don't know a, but dividing the law at two pressures cancels it completely:
r1r2=(P1P2)n=(39)0.45=30.45.30.45=e0.45×1.0986=e0.4944=1.6396.r2=7×1.6396=11.48mm/s.
Step 1 (why divide): the ratio kills a so we can isolate n:
46=(25)n⇒1.5=2.5n.Step 2 (why logs): logs pull n down from the exponent:
n=ln2.5ln1.5=0.91630.4055=0.4426.Step 3 — recover a by putting n back into one point:
a=P1nr1=20.44264=1.3594=2.943mm/s.Sense check:n<1 → this propellant is stable. ✔
Recall Solution L3.2
Why a straight line at all: taking log10 of r=aPn gives logr=loga+nlogP — the equation of a line with slope n and intercept loga.
Slope (=n): rise over run between the two marked points:
n=log10−log1log12.6−log5=1−01.1004−0.6990=0.4014≈0.40.Intercept (=loga): at logP=0 (i.e. P=1), logr=log5, so a=5mm/s.
This is exactly the extraction method engineers use on real strand-burner runs.
Why compare exponents: at equilibrium generation = exhaust. Bump P up a little; whichever term grows faster wins.
A (n=0.85<1): exhaust (P1) grows faster than generation (P0.85). Extra gas leaves faster than it is made → pressure falls back → stable, survives. ✅
B (n=1.15>1): generation (P1.15) outpaces exhaust (P1). The bump feeds itself → runaway → explodes. ❌
The single dividing line is n=1. This is the 80/20 fact of the whole topic.
Recall Solution L4.2
Why divide distance by rate:r is the recession speed, so time = distance ÷ speed, exactly like walking distance over walking speed:
tb=rw=9mm/s30mm=3.33s.Link: the web w comes from the Solid Rocket Motor Grain Geometry; the value of r comes from Vieille's law given the operating P. This is where the burn-rate law meets the actual hardware.
Recall Solution L4.3
Why the ratio: percent change only needs the factor, and the factor drops a:
r1r2=(46)0.4=1.50.4=e0.4×0.4055=e0.1622=1.176.
So r rises by 1.176−1=0.176=17.6%.
Sense check: pressure rose 50% but rate only ∼18% — small n softens the response, as it should.
Why a moves with temperature: a warmer grain starts closer to its ignition temperature, so less heat is needed to burn the next layer → faster recession → larger a. This is Temperature Sensitivity of Propellants in action.
50.35=e0.35×1.6094=e0.5633=1.7565.rcold=4.6×1.7565=8.080mm/s,rhot=5.4×1.7565=9.485mm/s.
Since P and n are shared, the ratio is just ahot/acold:
rcoldrhot=4.65.4=1.1739⇒+17.4%.Consequence: the same rocket burns ∼17% faster on a hot day — higher peak P, shorter burn. This is why motors are temperature-conditioned before firing.
Recall Solution L5.2
Stability first: both have n<1, so both are stable — that filter alone doesn't decide it.
Doubling test: when P→2P, rate factor =2n:
20.35=1.274(+27%),20.95=1.932(+93%).
Y (20.95=1.93≈2) nearly doubles — it meets spec (ii). X gives only +27%.
The tension: Y is closer to the n=1 knife-edge, so it is stable but less forgiving; a real designer weighs "responsiveness" (large n) against "safety margin" (distance below n=1). Spec-matching alone points to Y here.
Recall Solution L5.3
Why check the ratios: if one power law fits, then each doubling of logP must give the same slope. Use the two ratios:
n1=ln(4/1)ln(4.9/3)=ln4ln1.6333=1.38630.4907=0.3540,n2=ln(16/4)ln(8.0/4.9)=ln4ln1.6327=1.38630.4903=0.3537.
The two slopes agree (≈0.354) → one law fits. From the first point P=1: a=r=3mm/s.
r=3P0.354.Verify the middle point: 3×40.354=3×1.633=4.90 ✔.
Recall One-paragraph recap
Every problem here is one law, r=aPn, read in three directions: forward (plug in P), backward (solve for P), and sideways (ratios and logs to get n,a without knowing a). Stability is the single inequality n<1; temperature lives inside a; the web-over-rate gives burn time. Master those four moves and D4 is done.