What defines it: the absence of turbopumps. The propellants are driven purely by a stored inert gas pressing on the tank tops.
Gas: helium (or nitrogen).
Why helium: it is inert (won't react with fuel/oxidizer), light (low mass penalty), and won't condense or dissolve into the propellant. See Turbopump-fed cycles for the alternative it replaces.
Recall Solution
Rule:ptank≈(1.3–1.5)pc. Why this range? Tank pressure must cover the injector drop (~25% of pc) plus feed/cooling losses.
1.3×8=10.4bar1.5×8=12.0barAnswer: roughly 10.4–12.0 bar.
Step 1 — injector drop.Δpinj=0.30×12=3.6 bar. Why fraction of pc? Injector drop is deliberately sized relative to chamber pressure to guarantee atomization.
Step 2 — add all downstream losses. Here Δpfeed is the feed-line friction loss and Δpcool the cooling-jacket friction loss (both defined in the symbol list).
ptank=pc+Δpinj+Δpfeed+Δpcool=12+3.6+0.8+0.6=17.0barStep 3 — ratio.17.0/12=1.417.
Answer:ptank=17.0 bar ≈1.42pc ✔ (inside the 1.3–1.5 rule). This is exactly the tank pressure drawn in the staircase figure above.
Recall Solution
Tool — why hoop stress? A pressurized sphere tries to burst; the wall carries a tension called hoop stress. Balancing burst force against wall strength (see Hoop stress and thin-walled pressure vessels) gives σ=2tpr, valid for a thin wall t≪r.
Step 1 — solve for t.t=2σpr=2(3×108)(1.7×106)(0.5)Step 2 — compute.t=6×1088.5×105=1.417×10−3 m.
Answer:t≈1.42 mm. Check the assumption: t/r=1.42×10−3/0.5=0.0028≪1, so thin-wall is valid.
Recall Solution
Tool — why ideal gas law? Helium at these conditions behaves nearly ideally, so pV=nRT where n is moles (see Ideal gas law).
Step 1 — moles.n=RTpV=8.314×290(1.7×106)(1.5)=1057.7molStep 2 — mass.m=nM=1057.7×0.004=4.23 kg.
Answer:≈4.23 kg of helium in the drained volume (real tanks carry several times this, since gas also remains in the storage bottle).
Tool — why m∝p? Wall thickness t=pr/2σ (thin-wall, t≪r) grows with pressure, and mass = (area)×t×density, so tank mass is linear in the pressure it holds.
Step 1 — Design A (p=1.8×106 Pa):
mA=2(3×108)3(2700)(1.8×106)(2)=48.6kgStep 2 — Design B (p=1.2×107 Pa):
mB=2(3×108)3(2700)(1.2×107)(2)=324kgStep 3 — ratio.mB/mA=120/18=6.67.
Step 4 — check thin-wall for Design B. From V=34πr3, r=(4π3V)1/3=(4π6)1/3=0.782 m. Then t=2σpr=6×108(1.2×107)(0.782)=0.0156 m, so t/r=0.0156/0.782=0.020≪1 ✔ thin-wall still holds even at 120 bar.
Answer: the high-pressure tank is ≈6.67× heavier (324 vs 48.6 kg). This is the core reason pressure-fed engines stay at low pc: their tanks are the pump and pump mass explodes with pressure.
Recall Solution
Tool — why Bernoulli?Bernoulli's equation says pressure energy converts to kinetic energy along a streamline. The injector's pressure drop is spent speeding the liquid up into a fast jet that breaks into droplets.
Step 1 — solve for v.v=ρ2Δpinj=10002(3×105)Step 2 — compute.v=600=24.49 m/s.
Answer:v≈24.5 m/s. This fast jet is why we deliberately keep the injector drop large — it powers atomization into fine droplets that burn cleanly.
Step 1 — injector.Δpinj=0.25×15=3.75 bar.
Step 2 — gravity/acceleration head. With a the effective acceleration (defined in the symbol list), ρah=1200×30×1.2=43,200 Pa =0.432 bar. Why subtract? The accelerating liquid column adds pressure at the bottom (toward the chamber), so the tank needs to supply less.
Step 3 — assemble the budget.ptank=pc+Δpinj+Δpfeed+cool−ρahptank=15+3.75+1.5−0.432=19.818barAnswer:ptank≈19.82 bar ≈1.32pc. The helpful acceleration head shaves off nearly half a bar.
Recall Solution
Use ptank=19.82 bar =1.982×106 Pa and m=2σ3ρmpV (derived above, thin-wall t≪r).
(a) Aluminium.mAl=2(3×108)3(2700)(1.982×106)(3)=80.27kg(b) Titanium.mTi=2(9×108)3(4500)(1.982×106)(3)=44.60kgRatio.mTi/mAl=2700/3×1084500/9×108=9×10−65×10−6=0.556.
(c) Thin-wall check.r=(4π3V)1/3=(4π9)1/3=0.895 m; t=2σpr=6×108(1.982×106)(0.895)=2.96×10−3 m, so t/r=0.0033≪1 ✔.
Answer: Al ≈80.3 kg, Ti ≈44.6 kg; titanium is ∼0.56× the mass. Why? What matters is the ratio ρm/σ (density per unit strength) — titanium's higher strength beats its higher density.
Tool — why Tsiolkovsky?Δv is the true performance measure; it weighs exhaust velocity ve against the mass ratio m0/mf (wet over dry). We must see whether the faster exhaust beats the heavier tank.
Setup. Wet mass m0=mp+ms+500. Dry mass mf=ms+500 (propellant burned away).
Case A (pc=15 bar):ms=160 kg.
m0=8000+160+500=8660,mf=160+500=660ΔvA=2900ln6608660=2900×ln(13.1212)=2900×2.5743=7465m/s
Case B (pc=30 bar):ms=320 kg.
m0=8000+320+500=8820,mf=320+500=820ΔvB=3100ln8208820=3100×ln(10.7561)=3100×2.3755=7364m/s
Answer:ΔvA≈7465 m/s vs ΔvB≈7364 m/s. Low pressure wins by ~101 m/s: the tank-mass penalty outweighs the modest exhaust-velocity gain. This is exactly why upper stages stay pressure-fed and low-pc — the analysis, not just intuition, confirms it.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — equate. We need 3100ln500+msB8500+msB=7465.
Step 2 — isolate the log.ln500+msB8500+msB=7465/3100=2.4081, so the ratio =e2.4081=11.113.
Step 3 — clear the fraction.8500+msB=11.113(500+msB)=5556.5+11.113msB.
Step 4 — collect like terms. Move the msB terms to one side and the constants to the other:
8500−5556.5=11.113msB−msB⇒2943.5=10.113msBStep 5 — solve.msB=2943.5/10.113=291.1 kg.
Answer: Case B breaks even only if its tank could be cut to ≈291 kg (below the 320 kg it actually needs). Since the real tank is heavier than the break-even, high pressure genuinely loses — confirming Exercise 10.