Intuition Why a whole page of examples?
The parent note gave you the formulas. But formulas hide traps: what happens when the sail is edge-on? When the surface is grey (part-mirror, part-black)? When you move to Jupiter's distance? When two forces fight? This page walks every case class so you never meet a scenario you haven't already solved once.
Before we start, here are the only symbols we will use, each in plain words:
Definition The toolkit (every symbol earned)
S ( r ) — intensity : how many watts of sunlight cross one square metre at distance r . Units W/m 2 .
c — speed of light = 2.998 × 1 0 8 m/s . The conversion factor from energy to momentum.
P rad = S / c — base radiation pressure on a black (fully absorbing) surface facing the Sun. Units Pa = N/m 2 .
η — reflectivity : a dial from 0 (black, absorbs everything) to 1 (perfect mirror, bounces everything). No units.
θ — incidence angle : the angle between the surface's normal (the arrow sticking straight out of the surface) and the direction back to the Sun. When the surface faces the Sun head-on, θ = 0 .
A — the plate's flat area. m — its mass. A / m — area-to-mass ratio .
AU — astronomical unit , Earth–Sun distance ≈ 1.496 × 1 0 11 m .
The two working formulas, restated:
P rad ( r ) = c S ( r ) , S ( r ) = S ⊕ ( r 1 AU ) 2 , S ⊕ = 1361 W/m 2 .
F = P rad A ( 1 + η ) cos θ , a SRP = m F .
The ( r 1 AU ) 2 shrink factor comes from the Inverse-square law — the same power spread over a bigger sphere.
Every SRP problem is one (or a mix) of these cells. Each example below is tagged with the cell(s) it fills.
Cell
What varies
Degenerate / limit to watch
A. Base pressure
just P = S / c at one distance
—
B. Reflectivity dial
η = 0 , 2 1 , 1
grey surface between the extremes
C. Angle sweep
cos θ for θ = 0 , 6 0 ∘ , 9 0 ∘
edge-on θ = 9 0 ∘ ⇒ F = 0
D. Distance scaling
1/ r 2 near (0.39 AU) and far (5.2 AU)
limit r → ∞ ⇒ P → 0
E. Acceleration & A / m
dense probe vs featherweight sail
limit A / m → 0
F. Force balance (word problem)
SRP vs Sun's gravity
ratio independent of r
G. Exam twist
solve backwards for a design number
infer A / m from a required a
Cells covered: A→Ex1, B→Ex2, C→Ex3, D→Ex4, E→Ex5, F→Ex6, G→Ex7. Ex8 combines B+C.
Worked example Pressure on a black panel at Venus (0.723 AU)
Q: A perfectly black solar panel sits at Venus's distance, facing the Sun. Find P rad .
Forecast: Venus is closer than Earth, so guess: bigger than the 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 Pa Earth value. By how much?
Step 1. Intensity at Venus: S = 1361 × ( 1/0.723 ) 2 .
Why this step? Intensity obeys the Inverse-square law ; closer means more watts per square metre.
S = 1361 × 1.913 = 2604 W/m 2 .
Step 2. Convert to pressure: P = S / c = 2604/ ( 2.998 × 1 0 8 ) .
Why this step? Each joule of light carries 1/ c of momentum (Photon momentum and relativity ); momentum-per-second-per-area is pressure. Black surface ⇒ no reflection factor.
P rad = 8.69 × 1 0 − 6 Pa .
Verify: Ratio to Earth = ( 1/0.723 ) 2 = 1.91 , and 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 1.91 = 8.68 × 1 0 − 6 ✓. Units: ( W/m 2 ) / ( m/s ) = W⋅s / m 3 = J/m 3 = N/m 2 = Pa ✓.
Worked example Same panel, three coatings
Q: At 1 AU, face-on (θ = 0 ), area A = 10 m 2 . Find the force for a black panel (η = 0 ), a grey panel (η = 0.5 ), and a mirror (η = 1 ).
Forecast: Black is baseline; the mirror should be exactly double; grey lands in the middle at × 1.5 .
Step 1. Base pressure at 1 AU: P rad = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 Pa .
Why this step? It's our reference number; every case just multiplies it.
Step 2. Force = P rad A ( 1 + η ) , with cos θ = 1 .
Why this step? Face-on kills the angle factor. The ( 1 + η ) counts recoil: absorb takes p , reflect returns − p for a change of 2 p .
F 0 = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 10 × 1 = 4.54 × 1 0 − 5 N ,
F 0.5 = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 10 × 1.5 = 6.81 × 1 0 − 5 N ,
F 1 = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 10 × 2 = 9.08 × 1 0 − 5 N .
Verify: F 1 / F 0 = 2 exactly, F 0.5 / F 0 = 1.5 exactly ✓. The mirror doubling is the recoil rule of Section 2 in the parent note.
Worked example Tilting the sail:
θ = 0 ∘ , 6 0 ∘ , 9 0 ∘
Q: A mirror sail (η = 1 ), A = 1000 m 2 , at 1 AU. Find the force at three tilts.
Forecast: Full at head-on, half at 6 0 ∘ (since cos 6 0 ∘ = 2 1 ), and — the important one — exactly zero edge-on, because a razor-thin sail edge catches no light.
Step 1. Head-on force: F = P rad A ( 1 + η ) cos 0 ∘ = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 1000 × 2 × 1 .
Why this step? This is our maximum; every tilt scales it by cos θ .
F ( 0 ∘ ) = 9.08 × 1 0 − 3 N ≈ 9.1 mN .
Step 2. At 6 0 ∘ : multiply by cos 6 0 ∘ = 0.5 .
Why this step? cos θ measures how much of the flat area the Sun actually "sees" — the projected area shrinks as you tilt.
F ( 6 0 ∘ ) = 9.08 × 1 0 − 3 × 0.5 = 4.54 × 1 0 − 3 N .
Step 3. At 9 0 ∘ (edge-on): cos 9 0 ∘ = 0 .
Why this step? Edge-on, the projected area is a line — zero area, zero photons intercepted, zero force. This is the degenerate limit you must always name.
F ( 9 0 ∘ ) = 0 N .
Verify: F ( 6 0 ∘ ) / F ( 0 ∘ ) = cos 6 0 ∘ = 0.5 ✓, and F ( 9 0 ∘ ) = 0 matches "an edge catches nothing." Note this simple cos θ model gives the along-Sun component only; the fuller mirror model gives a cos 2 θ normal force (see the parent's mistake box).
1/ r 2 span, plus the r → ∞ limit
Q: For the same spacecraft, compare P rad at Mercury (0.39 AU) and Jupiter (5.2 AU) to Earth. What happens as r → ∞ ?
Forecast: Mercury much stronger (it's close), Jupiter much weaker (it's far). Deep space → nothing.
Step 1. Mercury factor = ( 1/0.39 ) 2 .
Why this step? P rad ∝ S ∝ 1/ r 2 ; square the distance ratio.
( 1/0.39 ) 2 = 6.57 ⇒ P = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 6.57 = 2.98 × 1 0 − 5 Pa .
Step 2. Jupiter factor = ( 1/5.2 ) 2 .
Why this step? Same law, far side.
( 1/5.2 ) 2 = 0.0370 ⇒ P = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 0.0370 = 1.68 × 1 0 − 7 Pa .
Step 3 (limit). As r → ∞ , 1/ r 2 → 0 , so P rad → 0 .
Why this step? You must state the limiting behaviour: SRP fades to nothing in the outer dark, which is why sails are useless past the outer planets.
Verify: Mercury/Jupiter pressure ratio = ( 5.2/0.39 ) 2 = 177.7 , and 2.98 × 1 0 − 5 /1.68 × 1 0 − 7 = 177.4 ✓ (rounding). Consistent with the Inverse-square law .
Worked example Featherweight sail vs dense brick
Q: At 1 AU, mirror (η = 1 ), face-on. Compare (a) a sail: A = 1000 m 2 , m = 10 kg ; (b) a solid tungsten cube of side 0.1 m , ρ = 19300 kg/m 3 .
Forecast: The sail's A / m is huge → real acceleration. The brick's A / m is tiny → negligible.
Step 1. Sail acceleration: a = P rad ( 1 + η ) ( A / m ) .
Why this step? Orbits respond to acceleration, and mass cancels only in gravity, not here — SRP acceleration lives or dies by A / m .
a sail = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 2 × ( 1000/10 ) = 9.08 × 1 0 − 4 m/s 2 .
Step 2. Brick numbers: mass = ρ V = 19300 × ( 0.1 ) 3 = 19.3 kg ; face area A = ( 0.1 ) 2 = 0.01 m 2 ; so A / m = 0.01/19.3 = 5.18 × 1 0 − 4 m 2 / kg .
Why this step? We need A / m for the brick — it's the whole story.
a brick = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 2 × 5.18 × 1 0 − 4 = 4.70 × 1 0 − 9 m/s 2 .
Step 3 (limit). As A / m → 0 (a very dense, compact body), a SRP → 0 .
Why this step? Name the degenerate case: a heavy dense probe barely notices SRP.
Verify: Ratio a sail / a brick = ( 1000/10 ) / ( 5.18 × 1 0 − 4 ) = 100/5.18 × 1 0 − 4 = 1.93 × 1 0 5 — the sail accelerates ~200 , 000 × harder ✓. This is exactly why Solar sails work and dense probes ignore SRP.
Worked example What area-to-mass makes SRP cancel the Sun's gravity?
Q: For a black spacecraft (η = 0 ), what A / m makes the outward SRP acceleration exactly equal the Sun's inward gravitational acceleration? (This defines a "solar-static" sail.) Sun mass M ⊙ = 1.989 × 1 0 30 kg , G = 6.674 × 1 0 − 11 .
Forecast: Both accelerations go as 1/ r 2 , so the answer should be a single number, independent of distance — this is the punchline from the parent's mistake box.
Step 1. SRP acceleration: a SRP = c S ⊕ ( 1 AU / r ) 2 ( 1 + η ) m A .
Why this step? Write both sides at general r so we can watch r cancel.
Step 2. Gravity: a g = r 2 G M ⊙ . Set a SRP = a g :
c r 2 S ⊕ ( 1 AU ) 2 ( 1 + η ) m A = r 2 G M ⊙ .
Why this step? Both sides carry 1/ r 2 — it divides out, proving distance-independence.
Step 3. Solve for A / m with η = 0 :
m A = S ⊕ ( 1 AU ) 2 ( 1 + η ) G M ⊙ c .
Plug numbers: numerator = 6.674 × 1 0 − 11 × 1.989 × 1 0 30 × 2.998 × 1 0 8 = 3.979 × 1 0 28 . Denominator = 1361 × ( 1.496 × 1 0 11 ) 2 × 1 = 3.046 × 1 0 25 .
m A = 3.046 × 1 0 25 3.979 × 1 0 28 = 1306 m 2 / kg .
Verify: r vanished ✓ (the ratio is universal, as promised). Units: ( W/m 2 ) ( m 2 ) ( m 3 kg − 1 s − 2 ) ( kg ) ( m/s ) = W m 4 s − 3 = kg⋅m 2 s − 3 m 4 s − 3 = m 2 / kg ✓. A required A / m ≈ 1300 m 2 / kg is enormous — real sails only partly offset gravity. This links to Orbital perturbations .
Worked example Mission requires a set acceleration — find the sail area
Q: A mission needs a SRP = 1.0 × 1 0 − 4 m/s 2 at 1 AU from a mirror sail (η = 1 ) attached to a 50 kg payload. What sail area A is required (ignore sail mass)?
Forecast: Rearrange the acceleration formula for A ; expect hundreds of square metres.
Step 1. Start from a SRP = P rad ( 1 + η ) A / m and solve for A :
A = P rad ( 1 + η ) a SRP m .
Why this step? Exams often give the target performance and ask for the design — invert the formula.
Step 2. Plug in P rad = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 , η = 1 , m = 50 :
A = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 2 1.0 × 1 0 − 4 × 50 = 9.08 × 1 0 − 6 5.0 × 1 0 − 3 = 550.7 m 2 .
Why this step? Direct substitution.
Verify (plug back): a = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 2 × ( 550.7/50 ) = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 2 × 11.01 = 1.0 × 1 0 − 4 m/s 2 ✓ — recovers the target. Units: Pa ( m/s 2 ) ( kg ) = N/m 2 m⋅kg⋅s − 2 = N/m 2 N = m 2 ✓.
Worked example Grey sail (
η = 0.6 ) tilted 4 5 ∘
Q: A = 200 m 2 , η = 0.6 , θ = 4 5 ∘ , at 1 AU. Force?
Forecast: Reflectivity factor 1.6 , angle factor cos 4 5 ∘ ≈ 0.707 — expect roughly 1.6 × 0.71 ≈ 1.13 times the black-face-on value.
Step 1. Black face-on baseline: F 0 = P rad A = 4.54 × 1 0 − 6 × 200 = 9.08 × 1 0 − 4 N .
Why this step? Isolate the reference so the two correction factors are transparent.
Step 2. Apply both factors: F = F 0 ( 1 + η ) cos θ = 9.08 × 1 0 − 4 × 1.6 × 0.7071 .
Why this step? ( 1 + η ) handles partial recoil; cos θ handles the projected area.
F = 9.08 × 1 0 − 4 × 1.1314 = 1.027 × 1 0 − 3 N .
Verify: Combined factor 1.6 × 0.7071 = 1.131 ; 9.08 × 1 0 − 4 × 1.131 = 1.027 × 1 0 − 3 ✓. Sanity: bigger than the black-face-on 9.08 × 1 0 − 4 (reflectivity wins over the tilt loss) — matches the forecast.
Recall Test yourself (hide the answers)
Edge-on (θ = 9 0 ∘ ) force on any flat plate? ::: exactly zero — projected area is a line
As r → ∞ , what happens to P rad ? ::: it goes to 0 like 1/ r 2
Why does SRP-vs-gravity give a distance-independent A / m ? ::: both accelerations carry 1/ r 2 , which cancels
To hit a target acceleration, solve for area with which rearrangement? ::: A = a m / [ P rad ( 1 + η )]
A grey sail's two correction factors are? ::: ( 1 + η ) for recoil and cos θ for projected area
"Distance dims, mirror doubles, tilt trims." 1/ r 2 (distance), ( 1 + η ) (reflect), cos θ (angle).
Solar radiation pressure — parent note with the derivations.
Solar sails — Examples 3, 5, 7 are sail design in miniature.
Orbital perturbations — Example 6's balance sets the perturbation scale.
Inverse-square law — Examples 1 and 4 lean on it.
Atmospheric drag — the competing force at low altitude.
Yarkovsky effect — thermal cousin of these pushes on asteroids.
Photon momentum and relativity — the p = E / c behind every S / c .