This is a self-testing ladder. Each rung is harder than the last. Try the problem with the Solution callout collapsed, then open it to check every step. All numbers are verified in the appendix machinery of this vault.
Everything here rests on the two headline results from the parent note.
For a prograde orbit with inclination i=30°, is the nodal drift Ω˙ positive (eastward) or negative (westward)? What about i=120°?
The figure below plots the whole story of the sign — glance at it, then answer.
Recall Solution
The only inclination-dependent piece in Ω˙ is −cosi, and n,J2,(RE/p)2 are all positive. So the sign of Ω˙ is the opposite sign of cosi — follow the solid drift curve in the figure (labelled Ω˙).
At i=30°: cos30°=+0.866>0, so −cosi<0 → Ω˙<0 → westward (node regresses).
At i=120°: cos120°=−0.5<0, so −cosi>0 → Ω˙>0 → eastward (node advances).
The switch happens at i=90° where cosi=0 and there is zero nodal precession (the curve crosses the horizontal axis, marked by the dotted vertical line).
A satellite has a=7.0×106m. Compute its mean motion n in rad/s and its orbital period in minutes.
Recall Solution
Why n first? Every precession rate scales linearly with n, so it is the base timescale.
n=a3μ=(7.0×106)33.986×1014.
Denominator: (7.0×106)3=3.43×1020. Ratio =1.1621×10−6. Square root:
n=1.0780×10−3rad/s.
Period T=2π/n=6.2832/1.0780×10−3=5828s=97.1min.
This links straight back to the KeplerianT=2πa3/μ.
For a circular orbit (e=0) with a=7.0×106m and i=55°, compute Ω˙ in °/day.
Recall Solution
Use n=1.0780×10−3 rad/s from L2.1. Since e=0, p=a, so
(pRE)2=(7.0×1066.378×106)2=(0.9111)2=0.8302.cos55°=0.5736. Then
Ω˙=−23(1.0780×10−3)(1.0826×10−3)(0.8302)(0.5736).
Multiply step by step: 23×1.0780×10−3=1.617×10−3; ×1.0826×10−3=1.7506×10−6; ×0.8302=1.4535×10−6; ×0.5736=8.337×10−7.
Ω˙=−8.337×10−7rad/s.
Convert: ×86400×(180/π)=×4.9536×106:
Ω˙≈−4.13°/day(westward).
Two orbits share a=8.0×106m and i=40°. Orbit A is circular (e=0); orbit B has e=0.3. Find the ratio Ω˙B/Ω˙A.
Recall Solution
Both share a, hence the samen, and the same i, so the only difference is the (RE/p)2 factor, because p=a(1−e2).
Ω˙AΩ˙B=(RE/pA)2(RE/pB)2=pB2pA2=[a(1−e2)]2a2=(1−e2)21.
With e=0.3: 1−e2=0.91, (0.91)2=0.8281.
Ω˙AΩ˙B=0.82811=1.2076.
The eccentric orbit precesses ~21% faster. This is exactly the "use p, not a" warning: eccentricity is not a small correction.
Solve ω˙=0 for inclination. Report both solutions in the range 0°–180°.
Recall Solution
Why set ω˙=0? A vanishing apsidal rate means perigee is frozen — the whole point of a Molniya design.
ω˙∝(5cos2i−1), so set the bracket to zero:
5cos2i−1=0⇒cos2i=51⇒cosi=±0.2=±0.4472.i=arccos(0.4472)=63.43°,i=arccos(−0.4472)=116.57°.
Both are the critical inclination. Molniya uses the prograde one, 63.4°.
You want Ω˙=+1.991×10−7rad/s (= 0.9856°/day, matching Earth's motion round the Sun). For a circular orbit with a=7.2×106m, find the required inclination i.
Use the design chart below: it plots Ω˙ against i and marks exactly where the dashed Sun-sync target line crosses the solid drift curve.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — mean motion.n=μ/a3=3.986×1014/(7.2×106)3. Cube: (7.2×106)3=3.7325×1020; ratio =1.0679×10−6; root n=1.0334×10−3 rad/s.
Step 2 — bulge factor.e=0⇒p=a, so (RE/p)2=(6.378/7.2)2=(0.8858)2=0.7847.
Step 3 — isolate cosi. We want i, but i sits insidecosi, which is multiplied by the known constants −23nJ2(RE/p)2. So we divide both sides by that whole constant block to leave cosi alone on the right — a legal move because the block is a fixed nonzero number. Note the block is negative (the leading −23), and this sign will matter:
cosi=−23nJ2(RE/p)2Ω˙.
Denominator: −23(1.0334×10−3)(1.0826×10−3)(0.7847)=−1.3167×10−6.
cosi=−1.3167×10−6+1.991×10−7=−0.1512.
A positive target Ω˙ divided by a negative constant block gives a negativecosi — the sign flip is forced, and it tells you the orbit must be retrograde.
Step 4 — invert.cosi is negative, so i must lie past 90°: i=arccos(−0.1512)=98.70°.
The retrograde (i>90°) inclination is exactly what makes cosi negative, flipping −cosi positive so the node drifts eastward to chase the Sun. See the marked crossing point in the chart.
The satellite from L4.1 flies for 2 years. Through what total angle has its ascending node swept, and does that match one full trip of Earth around the Sun?
Recall Solution
Rate is 0.9856°/day by construction. Over 2×365.25=730.5 days:
ΔΩ=0.9856×730.5=719.98°≈720°.
That is exactly two full turns (2×360°) — one per year — which is the defining property of a Sun-synchronous orbit: the plane keeps pace with the Sun, so the local solar time at each equator crossing stays fixed.
(b) Perigee.5cos2i−1=5(0.4472)2−1=5(0.2)−1=0. So ω˙=0 — perigee is frozen, exactly the Molniya design goal. Apogee stays parked over the northern hemisphere.
Isolate cosi. Same isolation move as L4.1: divide the observed Ω˙ by the constant block −23nJ2(RE/p)2 to strip everything off cosi. Build the block:
−23nJ2(RE/p)2:23×9.7200×10−4=1.458×10−3;×1.0826×10−3=1.5784×10−6;×0.7232=1.1415×10−6.
With the leading minus the block is −1.1415×10−6. Now divide:
cosi=−23nJ2(RE/p)2Ω˙=−1.1415×10−6−6.056×10−7=0.5305.
Here both numerator and block are negative, so the ratio comes out positive — we are in the prograde regime (i<90°).
Invert.cosi=0.5305⇒i=arccos(0.5305)=57.96°≈58.0°.
Since the observed Ω˙<0 (westward) forces cosi>0, we take the prograde root i≈58.0°. (The retrograde alias i=122.0° would give cosi<0 hence Ω˙>0, contradicting the westward observation.)