3.2.12 · D3 · Physics › Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics › Specific angular momentum h = √(GMp)
Intuition Yeh page kya hai
Parent note ne h = GM p prove kiya tha aur kuch clean cases dikhaye the. Yahan hum har tarah ka problem dhundhte hain jo yeh ek formula de sakta hai: circles, ellipses, special apside points, degenerate limits (radial fall, parabola, straight line), ek mid-orbit point jahan r aur v perpendicular nahin hain, ek word problem, aur ek exam trap. Har baar steps padhne se pehle apna answer guess karo — yeh "Forecast" ki aadat hi ideas ko pakka karti hai.
Shuru karne se pehle, ek refresher taaki koi bhi symbol anjaan na rahe:
GM — central pull strength (gravitational parameter), units m 3 / s 2 . Earth ke liye G M ⊕ = 3.986 × 1 0 14 .
h = ∣ r × v ∣ — specific angular momentum, units m 2 /s . Yeh r v sin ϕ hai jahan ϕ position arrow r aur velocity arrow v ke beech ka angle hai (Flight-path angle ).
p = h 2 / GM — semi-latus rectum, orbit ki "focus par half-width"; aur p = a ( 1 − e 2 ) .
Is topic ka har problem inhi cells mein se kisi ek mein aata hai. Neeche ke examples ek-ek karke sab ko tick karte hain.
Cell
Kya special hai
Kaun sa tool use karo
Example
A Circle, e = 0
p = a = r , speed constant
h = GM r = v c i r c r
Ex 1
B Ellipse at an apside
v ⊥ r , so sin ϕ = 1
h = r p v p = r a v a
Ex 2
C Ellipse at a general point
v ⊥ r
h = r v sin ϕ
Ex 3
D Geometry → h
sirf a , e diye hain
p = a ( 1 − e 2 ) , phir h = GM p
Ex 4
E Degenerate: parabola limit
e → 1 , a → ∞
p finite rakho
Ex 5
F Degenerate: radial drop
h = 0 , straight-line fall
sin ϕ = 0
Ex 6
G Real-world word problem
GEO / apogee-kick style
B aur D mix karo
Ex 7
H Exam twist / trap
wrong-quadrant, unit trap
sin ϕ dhyan se, vs /2
Ex 8
Signs & special values covered: e = 0 (A), 0 < e < 1 (B,C,D,G), e = 1 (E), h = 0 (F); angle ϕ = 9 0 ∘ (B), ϕ = 9 0 ∘ (C,H), ϕ = 0 ∘ (F). Constants: G M ⊕ = 3.986 × 1 0 14 m 3 / s 2 throughout.
r = 7000 km par Circular orbit
Ek satellite Earth ke around r = 7 × 1 0 6 m radius par circle kar rahi hai. h do tareekon se nikalo.
Forecast: circle mein har point "peri = apo" hai, isliye h = r v with v constant. Guess karo: kya h 5 × 1 0 10 ke paas hai ya 5 × 1 0 12 ke?
Circle matlab e = 0 , so p = a = r = 7 × 1 0 6 m .
Yeh step kyun? p = a ( 1 − e 2 ) sirf a ban jaata hai jab e = 0 , aur circle ke liye a = r .
Master formula mein plug karo:
h = GM p = 3.986 × 1 0 14 ⋅ 7 × 1 0 6 = 2.79 × 1 0 21 ≈ 5.28 × 1 0 10 m 2 /s .
Yeh step kyun? h = GM p hi poora topic hai; yahan p bas radius hai.
Speed se cross-check: circular speed v = GM / r = 3.986 × 1 0 14 /7 × 1 0 6 = 7546 m/s .
Yeh step kyun? Circle mein v ⊥ r har jagah hota hai, isliye seedha h = r v .
Verify: r v = 7 × 1 0 6 ⋅ 7546 = 5.28 × 1 0 10 m 2 /s ✓ step 2 se match karta hai. Units: m 3 / s 2 ⋅ m = m 4 / s 2 = m 2 /s ✓.
Worked example Ex 2 — Periapsis data
→ h , p , e
Periapsis par ek probe ka r p = 8000 km = 8 × 1 0 6 m aur v p = 9.0 km/s = 9000 m/s hai. h , p , aur e nikalo.
Forecast: periapsis par v exactly tangential hoti hai (figure dekho: velocity arrow radius ke perpendicular hai). Isliye h = r p v p bina kisi sin loss ke. Guess karo kya e ∼ 0.6 aata hai ya ∼ 0.06 .
h = r p v p sin 9 0 ∘ = r p v p = 8 × 1 0 6 ⋅ 9000 = 7.2 × 1 0 10 m 2 /s .
Yeh step kyun? Apside par flight-path angle ϕ = 9 0 ∘ hota hai, isliye sin ϕ = 1 — yahi cell B ka poora trick hai.
p = GM h 2 = 3.986 × 1 0 14 ( 7.2 × 1 0 10 ) 2 = 1.301 × 1 0 7 m ≈ 13 , 010 km .
Yeh step kyun? h = GM p ko invert karo.
r p = 1 + e p se: e = r p p − 1 = 8000 13010 − 1 = 0.626 .
Yeh step kyun? Periapsis orbit equation mein θ = 0 hai, yahan se e padhna sabse asaan hai.
Verify: r p = p / ( 1 + e ) = 1.301 × 1 0 7 /1.626 = 8.0 × 1 0 6 m ✓ rebuild hota hai. Kyunki 0 < e < 1 hai, orbit genuine ellipse hai ✓.
Worked example Ex 3 — Mid-orbit snapshot se
h
Apsides ke beech kisi jagah ek spacecraft ka r = 1.0 × 1 0 7 m , speed v = 6500 m/s , aur r aur v ke beech angle ϕ = 5 0 ∘ hai. h nikalo, phir p .
Forecast: yahan v tilted hai r ke relative (figure dekho). Agar sin ϕ bhool gaye toh overshoot ho jaoge. Guess karo: kya h , r v se bada hoga ya chhota?
General relation h = r v sin ϕ use karo.
Yeh step kyun? h = ∣ r × v ∣ aur cross product ki magnitude r v sin ( angle between them ) hoti hai. Sirf v ka wo component jo r ke perpendicular hai, area sweep karne mein contribute karta hai.
sin 5 0 ∘ = 0.766 , isliye h = 1.0 × 1 0 7 ⋅ 6500 ⋅ 0.766 = 4.98 × 1 0 10 m 2 /s .
Yeh step kyun? Numbers plug karo; note karo ki yeh r v = 6.5 × 1 0 10 se kam hai — tilt ki wajah se kuch speed radially "waste" ho jaati hai.
p = h 2 / GM = ( 4.98 × 1 0 10 ) 2 /3.986 × 1 0 14 = 6.22 × 1 0 6 m .
Yeh step kyun? Wahi inversion jaise hamesha.
Verify: h / ( r v ) = 4.98 × 1 0 10 /6.5 × 1 0 10 = 0.766 = sin 5 0 ∘ ✓. Aur h < r v jaisa forecast kiya tha kyunki ϕ = 9 0 ∘ ✓.
Worked example Ex 4 — Sirf ellipse ki shape diye ho toh
Ek Molniya-jaisi orbit ka semi-major axis a = 2.66 × 1 0 7 m aur eccentricity e = 0.74 hai. h nikalo.
Forecast: yahan p = a mat use karna (woh sirf circles ke liye hai!). Hume a ko ( 1 − e 2 ) se shrink karna hoga. Guess karo kya h circular value GM a se upar hoga ya neeche.
p = a ( 1 − e 2 ) = 2.66 × 1 0 7 ( 1 − 0.7 4 2 ) = 2.66 × 1 0 7 ⋅ 0.4524 = 1.203 × 1 0 7 m .
Yeh step kyun? p = a ( 1 − e 2 ) "size" a aur h -carrying half-width p ke beech ka bridge hai.
h = GM p = 3.986 × 1 0 14 ⋅ 1.203 × 1 0 7 = 4.795 × 1 0 21 = 6.93 × 1 0 10 m 2 /s .
Yeh step kyun? Master formula, ab jab p pata hai.
Verify: "agar same a ka circle hota" wala value GM a = 3.986 × 1 0 14 ⋅ 2.66 × 1 0 7 = 1.03 × 1 0 11 hota, aur sach mein 6.93 × 1 0 10 < 1.03 × 1 0 11 ✓ — eccentric orbits same a ke liye kam h carry karti hain (focus par wo zyada patli hoti hain). Units ✓.
Worked example Ex 5 — Escape (parabolic) trajectory
Ek comet parabolic (e = 1 ) escape path par r p = 5.0 × 1 0 10 m par periapsis graze karta hai. h nikalo. a ka kya hota hai?
Forecast: parabola matlab "just barely unbound". Semi-major axis blow up kar jaata hai (a → ∞ ), lekin p finite rehta hai. Kya phir bhi finite h mil sakta hai?
e = 1 ke liye: r p = 1 + e p = 2 p , isliye p = 2 r p = 1.0 × 1 0 11 m .
Yeh step kyun? Periapsis form kisi bhi e ke liye valid hai; bas e = 1 set karo.
a = 1 − e 2 p = 0 p → ∞ — undefined/infinite.
Yeh step kyun? e = 1 par 1 − e 2 = 0 ; ellipse formula degenerate ho jaata hai. Isliye hum limit mein a nahin, p use karte hain.
h = GM p = 3.986 × 1 0 14 ⋅ 1.0 × 1 0 11 = 3.986 × 1 0 25 = 6.31 × 1 0 12 m 2 /s .
Yeh step kyun? p finite hai, isliye h bilkul finite hai chahe a na ho.
Verify: parabolic periapsis speed escape speed honi chahiye v esc = 2 GM / r p . Check karo h = r p v esc = r p 2 GM / r p = 2 GM r p = 2 ⋅ 3.986 × 1 0 14 ⋅ 5 × 1 0 10 = 6.31 × 1 0 12 ✓ — match karta hai, aur GM ⋅ 2 r p = GM p ✓ bhi.
Worked example Ex 6 — Centre ki taraf seedha girna
Ek patthar Earth ke upar se rest se release hota hai aur seedha neeche girta hai. Ek instant par r = 1.0 × 1 0 7 m , v = 3000 m/s , lekin v seedha centre ki taraf point kar raha hai (ϕ = 0 ∘ ). h aur p nikalo.
Forecast: agar velocity seedha focus ki taraf aim hai, toh koi area sweep ho raha hai? Guess karo h = 0 — lekin prove karo.
h = r v sin ϕ = 1.0 × 1 0 7 ⋅ 3000 ⋅ sin 0 ∘ = 0 .
Yeh step kyun? r aur v parallel (ya anti-parallel) hain, isliye unka cross product zero hai — koi perpendicular velocity component nahin, koi sweeping nahin.
p = h 2 / GM = 0 .
Yeh step kyun? Ek "line" orbit ki half-width zero hoti hai: conic ek radial segment ban gayi hai (e = 1 aur p = 0 , ek degenerate straight line).
Verify: Kepler's Second Law kehta hai d A / d t = h /2 = 0 — radius koi area sweep nahin karta, jo radius ke saath seedhe motion ke saath consistent hai ✓. Units: m 2 /s , value 0 ✓.
Worked example Ex 7 — Geostationary transfer orbit (GTO)
Ek satellite ek transfer ellipse par hai jiska perigee radius r p = 6.578 × 1 0 6 m (200 km altitude) aur apogee radius r a = 4.216 × 1 0 7 m (GEO) hai. h , p , e , aur perigee speed v p nikalo.
Forecast: do apside radii poori ellipse fix kar dete hain. Guess karo kya v p LEO circular speed (≈ 7.9 km/s ) se upar hogi ya neeche.
Semi-major axis a = 2 r p + r a = 2 6.578 × 1 0 6 + 4.216 × 1 0 7 = 2.437 × 1 0 7 m .
Yeh step kyun? Peri aur apo major axis ke do ends hain; unka average a hai.
Eccentricity e = r a + r p r a − r p = 4.874 × 1 0 7 3.558 × 1 0 7 = 0.730 .
Yeh step kyun? r a = a ( 1 + e ) , r p = a ( 1 − e ) ; subtract karo aur divide karo.
p = a ( 1 − e 2 ) = 2.437 × 1 0 7 ( 1 − 0.73 0 2 ) = 2.437 × 1 0 7 ⋅ 0.4671 = 1.138 × 1 0 7 m .
Yeh step kyun? Cell D bridge, ab derived a , e ke saath.
h = GM p = 3.986 × 1 0 14 ⋅ 1.138 × 1 0 7 = 6.735 × 1 0 10 m 2 /s .
Perigee speed: apside par h = r p v p ⇒ v p = h / r p = 6.735 × 1 0 10 /6.578 × 1 0 6 = 10238 m/s ≈ 10.2 km/s .
Yeh step kyun? Cell B: perigee par v ⊥ r hoti hai.
Verify: harmonic-mean check p 2 = r p 1 + r a 1 : RHS = 1/6.578 × 1 0 6 + 1/4.216 × 1 0 7 = 1.7576 × 1 0 − 7 , aur 2/ p = 2/1.138 × 1 0 7 = 1.758 × 1 0 − 7 ✓. Aur v p = 10.2 > 7.9 km/s ✓ (apogee ko GEO tak uthane ke liye extra burn karna padta hai). Vis-viva equation v p = GM ( 2/ r p − 1/ a ) se cross-check karo (verify block dekho).
Worked example Ex 8 — Do-trap wala question
"Ek orbit ke kisi point par r = 1.2 × 1 0 7 m , v = 5000 m/s , aur velocity aur local horizontal (jo r ke perpendicular hai) ke beech angle γ = 3 0 ∘ hai. Ek student likhta hai h = GM ⋅ r v . Do errors theek karo aur h aur p nikalo."
Forecast: do traps yahan chhupe hain — (i) GM ⋅ r v bakwaas hai (h = GM p hota hai, aur r v p nahin hai); (ii) diya gaya angle horizontal se measure kiya gaya hai, r se nahin. Guess karo sin mein kaun sa angle jaata hai.
r aur v ke beech angle ϕ = 9 0 ∘ − γ = 6 0 ∘ hai, kyunki γ (Flight-path angle ) local horizontal se measure hota hai, jabki ϕ radial line se measure hota hai.
Yeh step kyun? sin ϕ ke liye dono vectors ke beech ke angle ki zaroorat hai; horizontal aur radial 9 0 ∘ se different hote hain.
h = r v sin ϕ = 1.2 × 1 0 7 ⋅ 5000 ⋅ sin 6 0 ∘ = 1.2 × 1 0 7 ⋅ 5000 ⋅ 0.8660 = 5.196 × 1 0 10 m 2 /s .
Yeh step kyun? Sahi general formula, sahi angle ke saath. (Equivalently h = r v cos γ .)
p = h 2 / GM = ( 5.196 × 1 0 10 ) 2 /3.986 × 1 0 14 = 6.774 × 1 0 6 m .
Yeh step kyun? Master formula invert karo. Student ka GM ⋅ r v = 3.986 × 1 0 14 ⋅ 6 × 1 0 10 = 1.55 × 1 0 13 lagbhag 300× off hota, aur dimensionally bhi galat hota (r v ke units m 2 /s hain, length nahin).
Verify: h = r v cos γ = 6 × 1 0 10 ⋅ cos 3 0 ∘ = 6 × 1 0 10 ⋅ 0.8660 = 5.196 × 1 0 10 ✓ (step 2 se match karta hai kyunki sin 6 0 ∘ = cos 3 0 ∘ ). p ke units: ( m 2 /s ) 2 / ( m 3 / s 2 ) = m ✓.
Common mistake Char traps jo yeh page khatam kar deta hai
Ellipse ke liye p = a use karna (Ex 4/5) — p = a ( 1 − e 2 ) use karo.
Apside se door hone par sin ϕ drop karna (Ex 3/8) — h = r v tabhi jab v ⊥ r ho.
Flight-path angle γ (horizontal se) aur ϕ (radial se) confuse karna: ϕ = 9 0 ∘ − γ (Ex 8).
h = GM p — square root , kabhi GM p /2 nahin (parent mistake), kabhi GM ⋅ r v nahin.
Recall Scenario self-test
"Diye a aur e , nikalo h " — kaun sa cell hai? ::: Cell D — pehle p = a ( 1 − e 2 ) compute karo.
Kaun sa cell h = 0 deta hai aur kyun? ::: Cell F — radial fall, v ∥ r isliye sin ϕ = 0 .
Parabolic limit mein kya finite rehta hai, a ya p ? ::: p finite rehta hai; a → ∞ (Cell E).
Horizontal se angle γ diya ho toh sin mein kya jaata hai? ::: ϕ = 9 0 ∘ − γ , yaani h = r v cos γ (Cell H).