3.1.22 · D4 · HinglishCompressible Flow & Aerodynamics

ExercisesFinite wing theory — induced drag, Prandtl's lifting line

2,820 words13 min read↑ Read in English

3.1.22 · D4 · Physics › Compressible Flow & Aerodynamics › Finite wing theory — induced drag, Prandtl's lifting line

Shuru karne se pehle, ek shared picture notation ki jo aapko har problem mein chahiye hogi:

Figure — Finite wing theory — induced drag, Prandtl's lifting line

Level 1 — Recognition

L1.1

Batao ki span ke saath konsi circulation distribution ek given lift aur span ke liye sabse kam induced drag deti hai, aur woh induced-drag coefficient likhо jo woh produce karta hai.

Recall Solution

Winner elliptical distribution hai — figure ke right panel mein oval-shaped curve, yaani jahan spanwise relabelling hai (sirf pehla Fourier coefficient nonzero). Saare higher harmonics drag add karte hain lekin koi lift nahi, isliye unhe switch off karna optimal hai. Result hai

L1.2

Ek elliptic wing ke liye span efficiency factor hai aur general (non-elliptic) formula padhta hai . Elliptic case ke liye batao aur ka physically kya matlab hai.

Recall Solution

Elliptic loading ke liye — yeh best possible hai, isliye kabhi isse zyada nahi ho sakta. ka matlab hai lift oval se worse shaped hai, isliye wing extra induced drag pay karta hai: usi lift ke liye elliptic minimum ka guna lagta hai.


Level 2 — Application

L2.1

Ek elliptic wing ka aspect ratio hai aur woh par fly karta hai. compute karo.

Recall Solution

Elliptic ⇒ , clean formula use karo. Toh .

L2.2

Ek glider ka span aur planform area hai. Uska aspect ratio nikalo, phir par uska induced drag coefficient (elliptic loading assume karo).

Recall Solution

Pehle aspect ratio (definition ): Phir, elliptic toh : — bahut chhota, aur yahi reason hai kyun gliders in lambi patli wings ka use karte hain.

L2.3

Elliptic wing, . 3D lift slope (per radian) nikalo, given 2D slope .

Recall Solution

use karo. Yahan . 2D value /rad se compare karte hue finite wing "softer" hai: kuch geometric angle downwash kha jaata hai.


Level 3 — Analysis

L3.1

Ek wing ke Fourier coefficients mein aur hain, saare higher terms zero. Drag-penalty factor , span efficiency , aur elliptic minimum se upar induced drag ka percentage compute karo.

Recall Solution

Yaad karo ki woh numbers hain jo mein har harmonic ko weight karte hain. Penalty higher harmonics ko weighted sum karta hai: . Efficiency . Drag elliptic minimum ka guna hai, yaani usse upar.

L3.2

Do wings same lift carry karte hain same speed aur altitude par aur unka sama span hai, lekin wing X ka area aur wing Y ka area hai. Dono elliptic hain. Kaun sa zyada induced drag coefficient rakhta hai, aur kaun sa zyada induced drag force rakhta hai? use karke explain karo.

Recall Solution

Induced drag coefficient ko se rewrite karo: Yahan dynamic pressure hai (upar define kiya gaya): dono wings ke liye same hai kyunki woh same speed aur altitude par fly karte hain. Lift fixed hai, isliye fixed hai ⇒ . Tab Toh chhhote-area wala wing X ka bada hai. Induced-drag force hai — actually equal! Cleaner route se confirm karte hain: , jo sirf lift, speed aur span par depend karta hai — area par bilkul nahi. Isliye dono wings ki induced drag force same hai. Area coefficient ko affect karta hai, span ( ke zariye) force fix karta hai. Takeaway: span, area nahi, induced drag force control karta hai.

L3.3

Ek rectangular (untwisted, constant-chord) wing elliptically loaded nahi hoti; uska typically hota hai. Agar woh par operate kare, toh uska induced drag identical aur wali elliptic wing se kitna compare karta hai?

Recall Solution

Elliptic reference: . Real rectangular wing: se divide karo: Toh rectangular wing ka induced drag guna hai, yaani elliptic ideal se same lift aur aspect ratio par zyada.


Level 4 — Synthesis

L4.1

Ek aircraft cruise karta hai aisa wing loading ke saath ki cruise par use chahiye. Uski elliptic wing ka hai. Profile (zero-lift) drag coefficient hai, constant. Total drag coefficient aur induced se profile drag ka ratio nikalo.

Recall Solution

Induced part (elliptic): Total: Ratio . Is cruise condition par induced drag profile drag se thoda zyada hai — ek reminder ki moderate-to-high par, drag-due-to-lift budget dominate karta hai.

L4.2

L4.1 wale same aircraft ke liye (elliptic, , ), woh lift coefficient nikalo jo lift-to-drag ratio ko maximise kare, aur maximum khud. use karo.

Recall Solution

Maximum tab hota hai jab induced drag equals profile drag (parabolic drag polars ke liye ek standard result). maano. set karo: Is point par , isliye Interpretation: best glide theek wahan hoti hai jahan "lift-tax" aur "friction-tax" balanced hain — zyada push karo toh induced drag explode karta hai; kam karo toh aap bahut tez fly karte ho profile drag dominate karte hue.


Level 5 — Mastery

Derivations se pehle, definitions ka ek bundle taaki neeche har symbol earned ho:

L5.1

ka lift result derive karo se shuru karke substitutions aur ke saath. Explicitly dikhao ki sirf kyun bachta hai.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — variable change. se milta hai; jaise run karta hai , run karta hai . Ye substitution kyun? Ye finite span ko par map karta hai jahan sine series natural hain aur tips () automatically dete hain.

Step 2 — series insert karo.

Step 3 — orthogonality. Integral equals if aur otherwise. Yahi key fact hai: alag sine harmonics "perpendicular" hain, isliye ke alawa har term integrate hokar kuch nahi deta.

Step 4 — coefficient form karo. Definition se ( dynamic pressure ke saath): Sirf appear karta hai — higher harmonics "lift-invisible" hain.

L5.2

aur given hain, derive karo jahan , aur prove karo with equality iff loading elliptic hai.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — pehla term factor out karo.

Step 2 — ko lift se replace karo. se milta hai, isliye . Substitute karo:

Step 3 — ka sign. Har term mein hai aur ek squared factor hai, isliye har term hai aur thus . Equality ke liye har term ka vanish hona zaroori hai, yaani : sirf bachta hai, jo exactly hai — elliptic distribution. Isliye elliptic loading unique minimiser hai.

L5.3

Dikhao ki finite-wing lift slope elliptic-wing ke us fact se follow karta hai ki induced angle span ke across uniform hai aur ke barabar hai. ( use karo, aur effective-angle idea ke saath.)

Recall Solution

Step 1 — lift slope ki do definitions. Section (2D) airfoil follow karta hai: lift local, tilted flow ke response mein, section ke zero-lift angle ke against measure kiya. Wing (3D) follow karta hai: lift us geometric angle ke against measure kiya jo hum stick se set karte hain.

Step 2 — dono angles link karo. Effective = geometric − induced: . Section law mein substitute karo:

Step 3 — elliptic downwash insert karo. Elliptic loading ke liye (span ke across constant — yeh khubsoorat special feature hai). Tab

Step 4 — ke liye solve karo. terms collect karo: se compare karte hue ke saath yeh hai. Jab , : infinite wing 2D slope recover kar leta hai.

Numeric check (L2.3 wala same ): /rad — L2.3 mein compute ki gayi value se match karta hai, isliye dono routes agree karte hain.


Connections used here

  • Kutta–Joukowski theorem — strip lift lift integral ke peeche.
  • Thin airfoil theory — section slope jo L2.3 aur L5.3 mein use hui.
  • Biot–Savart law downwash factor.
  • Aspect ratio & wing design — kyun lambi patli wings drive karta hai.
  • Oswald efficiency factor jo L1.2, L3.3 mein appear karta hai.
  • d'Alembert's paradox — reminder ki induced drag inviscid hai, friction nahi.