Batao ki span ke saath konsi circulation distribution Γ(y) ek given lift aur span ke liye sabse kam induced drag deti hai, aur woh induced-drag coefficient likhо jo woh produce karta hai.
Recall Solution
Winner elliptical distribution hai — figure ke right panel mein oval-shaped Γ curve, yaani Γ∝sinθ jahan θ spanwise relabelling y=−2bcosθ hai (sirf pehla Fourier coefficient A1 nonzero). Saare higher harmonics A2,A3,… drag add karte hain lekin koi lift nahi, isliye unhe switch off karna optimal hai. Result hai
CD,i=πARCL2.
Ek elliptic wing ke liye span efficiency factore=? hai aur general (non-elliptic) formula padhta hai CD,i=πeARCL2. Elliptic case ke liye e batao aur e<1 ka physically kya matlab hai.
Recall Solution
Elliptic loading ke liye e=1 — yeh best possible hai, isliye e kabhi isse zyada nahi ho sakta. e<1 ka matlab hai lift oval se worse shaped hai, isliye wing extra induced drag pay karta hai: usi lift ke liye elliptic minimum ka 1/e guna lagta hai.
Ek glider ka span b=15m aur planform area S=9m2 hai. Uska aspect ratio nikalo, phir CL=1.0 par uska induced drag coefficient (elliptic loading assume karo).
Recall Solution
Pehle aspect ratio (definition AR=b2/S):
AR=9152=9225=25.
Phir, elliptic toh e=1:
CD,i=π⋅251.02=78.541=0.01273.CD,i≈0.0127 — bahut chhota, aur yahi reason hai kyun gliders in lambi patli wings ka use karte hain.
Elliptic wing, AR=10. 3D lift slope a (per radian) nikalo, given 2D slope a0=2π.
Recall Solution
a=1+a0/(πAR)a0 use karo. Yahan a0/(πAR)=2π/(10π)=0.2.
a=1+0.22π=1.26.2832=5.236/rad.
2D value 6.283/rad se compare karte hue finite wing "softer" hai: kuch geometric angle downwash kha jaata hai.
Ek wing ke Fourier coefficients mein A2/A1=0.08 aur A3/A1=0.06 hain, saare higher terms zero. Drag-penalty factor δ, span efficiency e, aur elliptic minimum se upar induced drag ka percentage compute karo.
Recall Solution
Yaad karo ki An woh numbers hain jo Γ(θ)=2bV∞∑nAnsinnθ mein har harmonic ko weight karte hain. Penalty higher harmonics ko weighted sum karta hai: δ=∑n≥2n(An/A1)2.
δ=2(0.08)2+3(0.06)2=2(0.0064)+3(0.0036)=0.0128+0.0108=0.0236.
Efficiency e=1+δ1=1.02361=0.9769.
Drag elliptic minimum ka (1+δ)=1.0236 guna hai, yaani ≈2.36% usse upar.
Do wings same lift carry karte hain same speed aur altitude par aur unka sama spanb hai, lekin wing X ka area SX=10m2 aur wing Y ka area SY=15m2 hai. Dono elliptic hain. Kaun sa zyada induced drag coefficient rakhta hai, aur kaun sa zyada induced drag force rakhta hai? CD,i=CL2S/(πb2) use karke explain karo.
Recall Solution
Induced drag coefficient ko AR=b2/S se rewrite karo:
CD,i=πARCL2=πb2CL2S.
Yahan q≡21ρ∞V∞2dynamic pressure hai (upar define kiya gaya): dono wings ke liye same hai kyunki woh same speed aur altitude par fly karte hain. Lift L=qSCL fixed hai, isliye SCL fixed hai ⇒ CL∝1/S. Tab
CD,i∝CL2S∝S21⋅S=S1.
Toh chhhote-area wala wing X ka CD,i bada hai.
Induced-drag forceDi=qSCD,i∝S⋅(1/S)=const hai — actually equal! Cleaner route se confirm karte hain: Di=qπb2L2, jo sirf lift, speed aur span par depend karta hai — area par bilkul nahi. Isliye dono wings ki induced drag force same hai. Area coefficient ko affect karta hai, span (b2 ke zariye) force fix karta hai.
Takeaway: span, area nahi, induced drag force control karta hai.
Ek rectangular (untwisted, constant-chord) wing elliptically loaded nahi hoti; uska typically e≈0.9 hota hai. Agar woh AR=7,CL=0.6 par operate kare, toh uska induced drag identical AR aur CL wali elliptic wing se kitna compare karta hai?
Recall Solution
Elliptic reference: CD,iell=π⋅70.62=21.990.36=0.016368.
Real rectangular wing: e se divide karo:
CD,i=eCD,iell=0.90.016368=0.018187.
Toh rectangular wing ka induced drag 1/0.9=1.111 guna hai, yaani elliptic ideal se same lift aur aspect ratio par ≈11.1% zyada.
Ek aircraft cruise karta hai aisa wing loading ke saath ki cruise par use CL=0.5 chahiye. Uski elliptic wing ka AR=9 hai. Profile (zero-lift) drag coefficient CD,0=0.008 hai, constant. Total drag coefficient CD=CD,0+CD,i aur induced se profile drag ka ratio nikalo.
Recall Solution
Induced part (elliptic):
CD,i=π⋅90.52=28.2740.25=0.008842.
Total:
CD=0.008+0.008842=0.016842.
Ratio CD,i/CD,0=0.008842/0.008=1.105. Is cruise condition par induced drag profile drag se thoda zyada hai — ek reminder ki moderate-to-high CL par, drag-due-to-lift budget dominate karta hai.
L4.1 wale same aircraft ke liye (elliptic, AR=9, CD,0=0.008), woh lift coefficient CL⋆ nikalo jo lift-to-drag ratioCL/CD ko maximise kare, aur maximum L/D khud. CD=CD,0+πARCL2 use karo.
Recall Solution
Maximum L/D tab hota hai jab induced drag equals profile drag (parabolic drag polars ke liye ek standard result). k=πAR1=28.2741=0.035368 maano.
CD,0=kCL⋆2 set karo:
CL⋆=kCD,0=CD,0πAR=0.008⋅28.274=0.226195=0.47560.
Is point par CD=2CD,0=0.016, isliye
(DL)max=2CD,0CL⋆=0.0160.47560=29.725.Interpretation: best glide theek wahan hoti hai jahan "lift-tax" aur "friction-tax" balanced hain — CL zyada push karo toh induced drag explode karta hai; kam karo toh aap bahut tez fly karte ho profile drag dominate karte hue.
CL=πARA1 ka lift result derive karo L=ρ∞V∞∫−b/2b/2Γdy se shuru karke substitutions y=−2bcosθ aur Γ(θ)=2bV∞∑nAnsinnθ ke saath. Explicitly dikhao ki sirf A1 kyun bachta hai.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — variable change.y=−2bcosθ se dy=2bsinθdθ milta hai; jaise y run karta hai −b/2→b/2, θ run karta hai 0→π. Ye substitution kyun? Ye finite span ko [0,π] par map karta hai jahan sine series natural hain aur tips (θ=0,π) automatically Γ=0 dete hain.
Step 2 — series insert karo.L=ρ∞V∞∫0π(2bV∞∑nAnsinnθ)2bsinθdθ=ρ∞V∞2b2∑nAn∫0πsinnθsinθdθ.
Step 3 — orthogonality. Integral ∫0πsinnθsinθdθ equals 2π if n=1 aur 0 otherwise. Yahi key fact hai: alag sine harmonics "perpendicular" hain, isliye n=1 ke alawa har term integrate hokar kuch nahi deta.
L=ρ∞V∞2b2A1⋅2π.
Step 4 — coefficient form karo. Definition se CL=21ρ∞V∞2SL=qSL (q dynamic pressure ke saath):
CL=21ρ∞V∞2Sρ∞V∞2b2A12π=Sπb2A1=πA1Sb2=πARA1.
Sirf A1 appear karta hai — higher harmonics "lift-invisible" hain. ■
CD,i=πAR∑n≥1nAn2 aur CL=πARA1 given hain, derive karo CD,i=πARCL2(1+δ) jahan δ=∑n≥2n(An/A1)2, aur prove karo δ≥0 with equality iff loading elliptic hai.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — pehla term factor out karo.CD,i=πAR(A12+∑n≥2nAn2)=πARA12(1+∑n≥2nA12An2)=πARA12(1+δ).
Step 2 — A1 ko lift se replace karo.CL=πARA1 se A1=πARCL milta hai, isliye A12=π2AR2CL2. Substitute karo:
CD,i=πAR⋅π2AR2CL2(1+δ)=πARCL2(1+δ).
Step 3 — δ ka sign. Har term n(An/A1)2 mein n≥2>0 hai aur ek squared factor ≥0 hai, isliye har term ≥0 hai aur thus δ≥0. Equality δ=0 ke liye har term ka vanish hona zaroori hai, yaani A2=A3=⋯=0: sirf A1 bachta hai, jo exactly Γ(θ)=2bV∞A1sinθ hai — elliptic distribution. Isliye elliptic loading unique minimiser hai. ■
Dikhao ki finite-wing lift slope a=1+a0/(πAR)a0 elliptic-wing ke us fact se follow karta hai ki induced angle αi span ke across uniform hai aur αi=πARCL ke barabar hai. (a0=2π use karo, aur CL=a(α−αL=0) effective-angle idea αeff=α−αi ke saath.)
Recall Solution
Step 1 — lift slope ki do definitions.Section (2D) airfoil CL=a0(αeff−αL=0) follow karta hai: lift local, tilted flow ke response mein, section ke zero-lift angle αL=0 ke against measure kiya. Wing (3D) CL=a(α−αL=0) follow karta hai: lift us geometric angle ke against measure kiya jo hum stick se set karte hain.
Step 2 — dono angles link karo. Effective = geometric − induced: αeff=α−αi. Section law mein substitute karo:
CL=a0(α−αi−αL=0).
Step 3 — elliptic downwash insert karo. Elliptic loading ke liye αi=πARCL (span ke across constant — yeh khubsoorat special feature hai). Tab
CL=a0(α−αL=0−πARCL)=a0(α−αL=0)−πARa0CL.
Step 4 — CL ke liye solve karo.CL terms collect karo:
CL(1+πARa0)=a0(α−αL=0)⇒CL=1+a0/(πAR)a0(α−αL=0).CL=a(α−αL=0) se compare karte hue
a=1+a0/(πAR)a0.a0=2π ke saath yeh a=1+2/AR2π hai. Jab AR→∞, a→a0: infinite wing 2D slope recover kar leta hai. ■
Numeric check (L2.3 wala same AR=10):a=1+2/102π=1.22π=5.236/rad — L2.3 mein compute ki gayi value se match karta hai, isliye dono routes agree karte hain.