3.1.3 · D5Compressible Flow & Aerodynamics
Question bank — Speed of sound — a = √(γRT) — derivation
True or false — justify
Sound travels faster in a highly pressurized gas than in the same gas at low pressure (same temperature).
False. Raising at fixed raises in exact proportion, so is unchanged and is unchanged — stiffness and inertia rise together and cancel.
The speed of sound in a gas depends only on its absolute temperature.
True for an ideal gas of fixed composition, because and are constants of the gas — only varies.
Sound travels faster in cold air than in warm air.
False. Colder gas has slower thermal molecular motion, so is smaller; sound is slower in cold air (295 m/s at 217 K vs 340 m/s at 288 K).
At the same temperature, sound moves faster in helium than in air.
True. Helium's molar mass is tiny ( g/mol) so its specific is large; lighter, faster molecules pass the push along quicker — hence the squeaky-voice effect (see Ideal gas law and specific gas constant).
The process governing a sound wave is isothermal because the ideal gas law holds at constant temperature.
False. The gas law always holds, but the process constraint here is adiabatic (isentropic): compression is too fast for heat to conduct away, so entropy is what stays constant, not temperature (see Adiabatic vs isothermal processes).
Newton's isothermal estimate and the correct agree in the limit .
True mathematically — but no real gas has ; for diatomic air raises by , the Laplace correction that fixed Newton's 15% error.
The in is the universal gas constant .
False. It is the specific gas constant (per kilogram), for air. Using gives a nonsensical m/s.
The relation was derived using the fact that the wave is adiabatic.
False. Steps giving used only mass and momentum conservation. The adiabatic assumption enters afterward, to evaluate .
Spot the error
"Since , differentiating gives , so ."
The error is holding constant during the differentiation. The wave is adiabatic, so also changes as changes; the correct constraint is , giving .
"The wave frame trick is invalid because you can't ride a moving wave."
You physically can't, but a Galilean frame change is legitimate: subtracting the constant wave speed from all velocities turns the unsteady problem into a steady one without changing any physics — it's a bookkeeping choice.
"In the momentum equation we keep the term to be accurate."
That term is a product of two infinitesimals, i.e. second-order small, and vanishes relative to the first-order terms as the disturbance . Keeping it would contradict the "infinitesimal pulse" definition of .
" and are different formulas giving different answers."
They are identical — the ideal gas law makes them equal. The first is the general result; the second just substitutes the equation of state.
"Because sound is a pressure wave, doubling the loudness (amplitude) doubles its speed."
Speed is defined for an infinitesimal disturbance and is amplitude-independent. Finite-amplitude waves steepen and can form shocks, but that's outside the linear-acoustics regime (see Normal shock waves).
"Entropy is constant across the wave, so no energy is dissipated, therefore the wave must be isothermal."
Constant entropy (isentropic) is not the same as constant temperature. An adiabatic compression raises while keeping fixed; isothermal would require heat flow, which contradicts adiabatic.
Why questions
Why does the derivation switch to a frame moving with the wave before applying conservation laws?
In the wave frame the flow is steady, so mass and momentum balances become simple algebraic in–out statements instead of time-dependent PDEs.
Why does appear only after choosing the isentropic process, not from mass/momentum?
Mass and momentum give the mechanical relation ; the value of that derivative depends on the thermodynamic path, and only the adiabatic path injects .
Why is the speed of sound roughly equal to the average molecular speed?
Sound is passed molecule to molecule by collisions, so it can't propagate faster than the molecules carrying it; both scale with , so and mean thermal speed track together.
Why does a jet at fixed airspeed reach a higher Mach number as it climbs?
Higher altitude means lower , hence lower ; with smaller, grows even though is unchanged (see Mach number and flow regimes).
Why can we treat the sound-carrying compression as reversible (isentropic) and not merely adiabatic?
For an infinitesimal, smooth disturbance there are no finite gradients to cause dissipation, so the adiabatic process is also reversible — combined they mean isentropic, which is exactly .
Why does raising pressure and density together leave unchanged but raising only temperature increases it?
tracks the ratio ; scaling and equally leaves the ratio fixed, whereas raising raises the ratio directly.
Edge cases
What happens to as K?
: with no thermal motion there are no molecular collisions to relay the disturbance, so sound cannot propagate.
Does the formula apply inside a shock wave?
No. A shock is a finite, irreversible discontinuity where entropy jumps; the isentropic assumption fails there, so the linear speed-of-sound relation does not describe it (see Normal shock waves).
Is valid at very low densities (near-vacuum)?
Only while the gas is dense enough to behave as a continuum; when the mean free path rivals the wavelength, there are too few collisions and classical sound propagation breaks down.
At Mach 1, what is the flow speed relative to the local sound speed, and why is that special?
, so ; disturbances can no longer outrun the object upstream, marking the boundary where compressibility becomes dominant (see Compressibility and why M > 0.3 matters).
If the gas were compressed so slowly that heat did have time to escape, which formula applies?
The isothermal one, (Newton's value). This is a limiting case that real audible sound never satisfies because oscillations are far too fast.
For a monatomic gas () versus a diatomic gas () at equal and equal , which carries sound faster?
The monatomic gas, since larger raises ; more of the compression energy goes into pressure rather than internal molecular modes.
Does the specific gas constant change if you change the gas's pressure?
No — depends only on molar mass, a property of the molecule, not on the thermodynamic state.