Foundations — Optical instruments — human eye, simple microscope, compound microscope, telescope
This page assumes nothing. Before you touch the magnifying-power formulas in the parent note, you must be able to read every symbol on sight. We build them one at a time, each on the shoulders of the last.
1. Height — the true size of a thing
The picture: an upright arrow of length . The arrow points from the bottom of the object to the top; its length is .
Why the topic needs it: we will discover that this real size is not what decides how big something looks. Naming it lets us prove that surprising fact instead of just asserting it.

2. Distance (and , ) — how far away it sits
The picture: a horizontal ruler laid along the line of sight. The object sits at one tick, the eye/lens at another; the gap between them is . The formulas care about these gaps, not where you painted the "zero" of your ruler.
Sign conventions for and (why some are negative) are built in Lens equation and sign conventions — for now just read them as distances.
3. The angle — how big it looks
Here is the symbol the whole subject stands on.
The picture: the object arrow of height sits a distance away. Two rays run from your eye to its tip and its base, opening up a wedge. That wedge's opening is .

4. Why the tool is , and why we can drop it
To turn the picture of the wedge into a number we need a rule linking the angle to the sides and . That rule is the tangent.
Why this tool and not another? We have a right angle sitting at the object's base, a height opposite our angle, and a distance next to it. Of the three trig ratios, only uses exactly opposite over adjacent — the two quantities we actually have. Sine would need the slant hypotenuse (we never measure it); cosine would ignore the height. So is the one ratio that speaks in and .
The picture / why it's legal: for a thin wedge the straight object-arrow and the curved arc it would sweep are almost the same length. So the angle (arc-based) and its tangent (straight-side-based) agree. This is why the parent writes without apology.

5. Magnifying power — the score we keep
Now we can state what every instrument is graded on.
Why a ratio of angles, not of heights? Because the retina only reads the wedge. Two objects with equal paint equal-sized images even if their true heights differ wildly. So the honest measure of "bigger" is the angle ratio. This is why the parent insists on angular magnification everywhere — deepened in Linear vs angular magnification.
is dimensionless
6. Focal length and power — the lens's strength
The picture: flat parallel rays enter the lens and squeeze to a single dot; the gap lens-to-dot is .
Why the topic needs : every instrument formula (, , ) is really a statement about how strongly each lens bends light. Naming lets us compare lenses with one number.
7. The subscripts — objective vs eyepiece
Instruments with two lenses need to say which lens.
The picture: a tube. Object on the left, objective lens, a gap , eyepiece lens, your eye on the right. Light flows object → objective → eyepiece → eye, so the subscripts just read left to right.
Why the topic needs them: microscope and telescope both chain two lenses. Without labels we couldn't write "objective makes a picture, eyepiece magnifies that picture" — the whole two-stage story lives in these subscripts.
8. The lens equation — the machine that places images
Why it appears: to find the visual angle with the instrument, we must know where the lens throws the image (its ) and how big (its magnification). The lens equation is the only tool that answers "given object and lens, where's the image?"
Prerequisite map
Read it as: heights, distances and build the angle; the angle builds magnification; power sets focal length which drives the lens equation and image position; subscripts let us chain two lenses. All streams pour into the topic.
Equipment checklist
Test yourself — cover the right side.
What does the symbol stand for, and does it change with distance?
What is ?
What is and its standard value?
Define the visual angle in one sentence.
Which two sides does use and why those?
When may we write , and in what units?
Write the magnifying-power definition.
Why angles and not heights for ?
What is the focal length ?
What is a lens's power and its unit?
What do the subscripts and mark?
State the thin-lens equation.
Connections
- Parent topic
- Lens equation and sign conventions
- Linear vs angular magnification
- Power of a lens and dioptres
- Resolving power and diffraction limit
- Defects of vision — myopia, hypermetropia
- Reflecting telescope (Cassegrain) vs refracting