2.4.9 · D4Thermodynamics & Statistical Mechanics (Advanced)

Exercises — Boltzmann's entropy S = k_B ln(Ω)

2,514 words11 min readBack to topic

This page assumes only the parent note Boltzmann's entropy $S=k_B\ln\Omega$. Every symbol is re-explained the moment it appears.


Level 1 — Recognition

Recall Solution L1.1
  • (a) is entropy, units J/K (joule per kelvin). It is a macroscopic, thermodynamic quantity.
  • (b) is Boltzmann's constant, J/K. Its whole job is to carry the units.
  • (c) is the multiplicity — a pure number, the count of microstates matching the macrostate. A count has no units.
  • of a pure number is a pure number, so is dimensionless. All the J/K in comes from . ✔
Recall Solution L1.2

. Why the subtraction becomes a ratio: — logarithms turn division into subtraction. Since , . So . ✔


Level 2 — Application

Figure s01 (below): a bar chart of against the number of heads . The bars form a symmetric "bell": short at the ends (1,1), tall in the middle (peak 6, coloured orange). Look at how the orange bar towers over the end bars — that height is the multiplicity, and taller means higher entropy . The figure is here to make "the middle macrostate has the most microstates" something you see, not just compute.

Figure — Boltzmann's entropy S = k_B ln(Ω)
Recall Solution L2.1

The number of ways to choose which of coins are heads is the binomial coefficient (this is just "how many distinct arrangements have heads"):

  • 0 heads:
  • 1 head:
  • 2 heads:
  • 3 heads:
  • 4 heads:

Total ✔ (every coin independently H or T). The peak is "2 heads" with , so . The bell shape in the figure shows why the middle macrostate dominates. ✔

Recall Solution L2.2

The multiplicity of a gas factorizes into a position part and a momentum part: . Only the position part changes here.

  • Momentum part is unchanged. In free expansion into vacuum the gas does no work () and exchanges no heat, so its total kinetic energy is unchanged. The momentum-shell volume depends only on (it is the surface ), so with fixed the momentum count is identical before and after. This is why the process is also isothermal for an ideal gas ( depends only on ).
  • Position part doubles per particle. Doubling the accessible volume doubles each particle's position choices, so (each of particles independently gains a factor 2).

Numerically . ✔ This equals the textbook with — the counting picture reproduces classical thermodynamics.


Level 3 — Analysis

Recall Solution L3.1

(a) Each spin is independently up/down, so choosing which of the are up gives . (b) peaks at . There , so (c) Stirling's approximation comes in two grades. The crude form handles huge factorials but loses the sub-leading piece. The refined form keeps one more term: Substitute this refined form into . The leading pieces collapse to (the same crude answer), and the three terms combine: That is exactly the correction term — now derived, not quoted. So . With : The two agree to two decimals — Stirling is superb even at . ✔ (For real gases , where exact factorials are impossible and Stirling is essential.)


Level 4 — Synthesis

Recall Solution L4.1

Take the log, keeping every factor explicit (nothing hidden in a "const"): Now apply Stirling to both and . Group terms: Recognising and tidying gives the famous Sackur–Tetrode form in which Planck's constant sits inside the log — that is where quantum mechanics enters the entropy of a classical gas, and it is why has an absolute zero-point (the Third Law of Thermodynamics). (a) Extensivity test: scale . Inside the bracket (intensive) and (intensive), so the whole bracket is unchanged; only the prefactor . Hence . Extensive ✔ — the is what converted into , replacing by the intensive density ratio . (b) Without : the from Stirling disappears, leaving instead of . Scaling now gives , an extra term that has no business being there. Mixing two identical gas boxes () then predicts a spurious entropy of mixing even though nothing physical happened — Gibbs' paradox. The removes it. ✔ See Gibbs Paradox & Indistinguishability.


Level 5 — Mastery

Figure s02 (below): the entropy plotted against energy (which equals the fraction of up-spins). The curve rises from the left, reaches a single peak at (marked green, where ), then falls back to zero on the right. The blue-shaded rising side is where so ; the red-shaded falling side is where so . Watch the slope flip sign at the peak — that sign flip is negative temperature.

Figure — Boltzmann's entropy S = k_B ln(Ω)
Recall Solution L5.1

(a) . (b) Why we may treat as continuous: jumps by discrete steps, but for large the fractional change from to is tiny (), so the staircase is smooth on the scale that matters and we may differentiate. Using the refined Stirling form (as derived in L3.1) on each factorial, Edge caution: at or this derivative diverges ( of or ) and the continuous approximation fails — there , exactly, and one must treat the ends discretely. Away from the edges the formula is excellent. Since , , so

  • If : , , so (normal). Adding energy adds microstates.
  • At : , , so — multiplicity is maximal, entropy peaks.
  • If : , , so . Adding energy now removes microstates (). Negative temperature — hotter than any positive . See Negative Temperature & Spin Systems. ✔

(c) (well away from the edges, so the formula applies): , so . So — negative, as predicted. ✔ The figure shows rising, peaking at , then falling; lives on the falling () side.

Recall Solution L5.2

If each of molecules has independent orientational choices, the total multiplicity is (independent choices multiply). Then Numerically . ✔ This matches the experimental J/(mol·K) beautifully — a striking confirmation that literally counts orientational disorder, and that the Third Law of Thermodynamics () requires a perfectly ordered crystal, which ice is not.


Connections