2.3.12 · D3 · Physics › Modern Physics › Hydrogen atom — solving in spherical coordinates
Yeh page ek drill hai. Parent note ne machinery banayi — quantum numbers n , ℓ , m ℓ , energy ladder E n = − 13.6/ n 2 eV, degeneracy n 2 . Yahan hum har tarah ke questions handle karenge jo yeh machinery throw kar sakti hai: sabse chhota case, sabse bada allowed case, illegal case (taaki tum use reject karna seekho), limit n → ∞ , lab mein ek real photon, aur ek exam-style trap.
Shuru karne se pehle, chaar chhoti reminders taaki koi symbol unearned na rahe:
Definition Teen counters aur do constants (parent se)
== n == = principal quantum number = 1 , 2 , 3 , … Yeh energy aur atom ki size set karta hai.
== ℓ == = orbital angular-momentum quantum number = 0 , 1 , … , n − 1 . Yeh shape set karta hai aur electron kitna "orbit" karta hai.
== m ℓ == = magnetic quantum number = − ℓ , − ℓ + 1 , … , + ℓ . Yeh tilt set karta hai (orbit kis direction mein point karti hai).
ℏ = reduced Planck constant = h /2 π , angular momentum ka fundamental "chunk size" (≈ 1.055 × 1 0 − 34 J·s).
μ = electron–proton pair ki reduced mass , μ = m e + m p m e m p ≈ m e . Yeh effective mass hai jo do-body atom ko ek one-body problem mein convert karti hai (dekho Reduced mass and two-body problem ).
Arrows ko ek waterfall ki tarah padhna: n decide karta hai ℓ kitna upar chadh sakta hai; ℓ decide karta hai m ℓ kitna spread ho sakta hai. Koi level skip nahi hoti.
Har hydrogen-atom problem in cells mein se ek hai. Neeche ke worked examples mein cell tag diya gaya hai.
Cell
Case class
Tricky kyon hai
Example
A
Sabse chhota input (n = 1 )
Sirf ek state exist karti hai — "degenerate/trivial" end
Ex 1
B
Ek beech wala n , saari states count karo
Har ℓ ke liye 2 ℓ + 1 sum karna padega
Ex 2
C
Illegal quantum numbers
Tum reject karo, compute nahi
Ex 3
D
Energy difference (emission)
Δ E ka sign, photon kaun sa hai
Ex 4
E
Energy difference (absorption)
Ulta sign, atom upar chadhta hai
Ex 5
F
Limit n → ∞ (ionisation)
Ladder ki top rung; series limit
Ex 6
G
Real-world word problem (photon → wavelength)
eV ko nanometres mein convert karo
Ex 7
H
Exam twist: max ℓ , phir angular momentum magnitude
ℓ m a x = n − 1 ko ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) ℏ se combine karo
Ex 8
I
Centrifugal barrier: degenerate ℓ = 0 (zero barrier) vs large ℓ
Division-by-zero edge case
Ex 9
Hum do figures reference karte hain: energy ladder (Ex 4–6) aur centrifugal barrier (Ex 9).
Worked example Ex 1 — Ground state,
har allowed state list karo
n = 1 ke liye, saare allowed ( ℓ , m ℓ ) pairs aur energy likhna.
Forecast: Padhne se pehle guess karo — n = 1 par kitne distinct states expect karte ho? (Hint: n 2 socho.)
Allowed ℓ dhundho. Rule: ℓ = 0 , 1 , … , n − 1 = 0 , … , 0 . Toh ℓ = 0 sirf.
Yeh step kyon? n , ℓ ko n − 1 par cap karta hai. n = 1 ke saath cap 0 hai, toh chadhne ki koi jagah nahi.
Allowed m ℓ dhundho. Rule: m ℓ = − ℓ , … , + ℓ = 0 sirf.
Yeh step kyon? ℓ = 0 m ℓ ko spread hone ki koi jagah nahi deta.
Energy batao. E 1 = − 1 2 13.6 = − 13.6 eV.
Yeh step kyon? Energy sirf n par depend karti hai, aur yahan n = 1 .
Verify: States ki count n 2 = 1 2 = 1 honi chahiye. Humne exactly ek pair ( ℓ , m ℓ ) = ( 0 , 0 ) paya. ✓ Energy negative hai (bound state, free-electron zero se neeche). ✓ Yeh 1 s orbital hai.
n = 4 ki Degeneracy
Kitne orbital states (electron spin ignore karo) energy level n = 4 share karte hain?
Forecast: Odd numbers aane wale hain. Sum karne se pehle total guess karo.
Allowed ℓ list karo: 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 .
Yeh step kyon? ℓ , 0 se n − 1 = 3 tak chalta hai.
Har ℓ ke liye m ℓ count karo: har ℓ 2 ℓ + 1 values deta hai.
ℓ = 0 : 1 , ℓ = 1 : 3 , ℓ = 2 : 5 , ℓ = 3 : 7 .
Yeh step kyon? m ℓ , − ℓ se + ℓ tak span karta hai, jo 2 ℓ + 1 integers hain.
Add karo: 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 16 .
Yeh step kyon? Is n par har distinct ( ℓ , m ℓ ) ek alag state hai jiski same energy hai.
Verify: Pehle n odd numbers ka sum n 2 hota hai. Yahan n = 4 ⇒ n 2 = 16 . ✓ Yeh tidy match confirm karta hai ki energy ℓ aur m ℓ ko ignore karti hai — pure 1/ r potential ki special "accidental" degeneracy (dekho Zeeman effect , jahan magnetic field break karta hai ise aur 16 ko split karta hai).
Worked example Ex 3 — In mein se kaun se impossible hain?
Har proposed triple ke liye, batao ki yeh ek legal hydrogen state hai ya nahi, aur agar nahi, toh kaun si rule tooti .
(i) ( n , ℓ , m ℓ ) = ( 2 , 2 , 0 )
(ii) ( 3 , 2 , − 2 )
(iii) ( 2 , 1 , − 2 )
(iv) ( 3 , 0 , 0 )
Forecast: Compute karne se pehle, expect karo ki kam se kam do forbidden honge — sawaal yeh hai ki kaun si rule .
(i) ℓ ≤ n − 1 check karo: ℓ ≤ 1 chahiye, par ℓ = 2 . Illegal.
Yeh step kyon? Radial solution sirf ℓ ≤ n − 1 ke liye terminate hota hai; ℓ = n blow up kar deta hai.
(ii) Dono rules check karo: ℓ = 2 ≤ n − 1 = 2 ✓, aur ∣ m ℓ ∣ = 2 ≤ ℓ = 2 ✓. Legal.
Yeh step kyon? Dono waterfall steps satisfy hue.
(iii) ∣ m ℓ ∣ ≤ ℓ check karo: yahan ∣ − 2 ∣ = 2 > ℓ = 1 . Illegal.
Yeh step kyon? m ℓ magnitude mein ℓ se zyada nahi ho sakta — full turn ki single-valued condition ise cap karti hai.
(iv) Dono check karo: ℓ = 0 ≤ 2 ✓, m ℓ = 0 (single choice) ✓. Legal.
Verify: Legal ones hain (ii) aur (iv). Sanity check: (ii) ke liye state 3 d hai; d matlab ℓ = 2 , aur n = 3 ℓ = 2 tak allow karta hai, toh 3 d orbital exist karta hai — reality se match karta hai. ✓ (iii) ke liye, 2 p shell mein sirf m ℓ ∈ { − 1 , 0 , + 1 } hain, toh m ℓ = − 2 genuinely exist nahi kar sakta. ✓
H α line, n = 3 → n = 2
Jab electron n = 3 se n = 2 par girti hai toh kitni energy release hoti hai. Energy kis direction flow karti hai?
Forecast: Neeche lower rung par girna — kya atom energy gain ya lose karta hai? Sign guess karo.
Dono levels compute karo. E 3 = − 13.6/9 = − 1.511 eV, E 2 = − 13.6/4 = − 3.400 eV.
Yeh step kyon? Har rung ki height − 13.6/ n 2 hai; difference lene ke liye dono chahiye.
Δ E = E final − E initial = E 2 − E 3 lo.
Δ E = − 3.400 − ( − 1.511 ) = − 1.889 eV .
Yeh step kyon? Final minus initial batata hai ki atom ki energy kaise badi. Negative ⇒ atom ne energy khoyi.
Photon energy = ∣Δ E ∣ = 1.889 eV.
Yeh step kyon? Energy conserved hoti hai: atom jo khoye, photon le jaaye.
Verify: Ladder figure (s01) par, n = 3 se n = 2 ka arrow neeche point karta hai aur chhota hai. ∣Δ E ∣ = 1.89 eV red visible band mein land karta hai — yeh famous red H α line hai. ✓ Positive photon energy, atom ke liye negative Δ E — consistent. ✓
n = 1 → n = 4 chadhna
Ek photon absorb hoti hai, electron ko ground state se n = 4 par kick karti hai. Kitni photon energy chahiye?
Forecast: Ladder par upar chadhna — is baar atom ke liye Δ E ka sign kya hoga?
Dono levels compute karo. E 1 = − 13.6 eV, E 4 = − 13.6/16 = − 0.850 eV.
Yeh step kyon? Same ladder formula, alag rungs.
Δ E = E 4 − E 1 = − 0.850 − ( − 13.6 ) = 12.750 eV.
Yeh step kyon? Final minus initial. Ab Positive — atom ne energy gain ki.
Photon exactly 12.75 eV supply karti hai.
Yeh step kyon? Absorption sirf tab hoti hai jab incoming photon exactly gap se match kare (isliye absorption spectra sharp lines hoti hain).
Verify: 4 → 1 se emission same 12.75 eV release karegi — arrow reverse karna sign flip karta hai par magnitude nahi. ✓ Ex 4 ke 1.89 eV se bada jump, jaisa ki lambe chadhne ke liye expected hai. ✓
Worked example Ex 6 — Ground state se ionisation energy
n = 1 se start karke electron ko completely free karne mein kitni energy lagti hai?
Forecast: "Completely free" matlab kaun si final rung? Guess karo ladder kaunse number approach karta hai.
Ladder ki top identify karo. Jab n → ∞ , E n = − 13.6/ n 2 → 0 .
Yeh step kyon? Ek free (unbound) electron ki zero binding energy hoti hai — yeh ceiling hai jiske toward rungs crowd karte hain.
Us limit tak difference lo. Δ E = E ∞ − E 1 = 0 − ( − 13.6 ) = 13.6 eV.
Yeh step kyon? Ionisation = electron ko apni rung se E = 0 tak lift karo.
Result batao: ground-state hydrogen ki ionisation energy 13.6 eV hai.
Yeh step kyon? Yeh single number exactly ∣ E 1 ∣ hai — sabse gehra well ki depth.
Verify: Ladder (s01) par, rungs bunch up hote hain aur E = 0 line ke against pile karte hain — gaps 1/ n 2 ki tarah shrink karte hain, confirming convergence. ✓ Hydrogen ki measured ionisation energy 13.6 eV hai. ✓ Note karo yeh Bohr model of hydrogen prediction se match karta hai — full Schrödinger solution Bohr ka number reproduce karta hai.
H α line ka colour kya hai?
n = 3 → 2 transition ek 1.889 eV photon emit karta hai (Ex 4). Nanometres mein wavelength dhundho.
Forecast: Visible light roughly 400 –700 nm run karta hai. Compute karne se pehle guess karo H α blue hai ya red.
Photon relation yaad karo. Photon ki energy aur wavelength E = λ h c follow karte hain, toh λ = E h c .
Yeh step kyon? Energy aur wavelength inversely linked hain — zyada energy, chhoti wave. λ paane ke liye invert karo.
Ek handy constant use karo. h c = 1240 eV·nm.
Yeh step kyon? Yeh packaged value seedha eV divide karne deta hai aur nm milta hai — koi unit gymnastics nahi.
Divide karo: λ = 1.889 eV 1240 eV⋅nm = 656.4 nm .
Yeh step kyon? Ex 4 ki photon energy seedha daalo.
Verify: Units: eV eV⋅nm = nm . ✓ 656 nm visible spectrum ke red part mein hai — observed deep-red hydrogen line se match karta hai jo astronomers glowing gas map karne mein use karte hain. ✓
n = 3 par sabse bada orbital angular momentum
n = 3 ke andar, sabse bada allowed ℓ kya hai, aur us state ke liye angular momentum ki actual magnitude ∣ L ∣ kya hai?
Forecast: Ek common trap kehta hai ∣ L ∣ = ℓ ℏ . Step 3 se pehle guess karo kya yeh sahi hai.
Max ℓ . ℓ m a x = n − 1 = 2 .
Yeh step kyon? Waterfall rule ℓ ko n se ek neeche cap karta hai.
Magnitude formula yaad karo (parent ke L ^ 2 eigenvalue se). L ^ 2 Y = ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) ℏ 2 Y , toh length hai ∣ L ∣ = ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) ℏ . (Yahan ℏ reduced Planck constant hai, angular momentum ka chunk size.)
Yeh step kyon? Measurable magnitude L ^ 2 eigenvalue ka square root hai — ℓ ℏ nahi .
ℓ = 2 daalo: ∣ L ∣ = 2 ⋅ 3 ℏ = 6 ℏ ≈ 2.449 ℏ .
Yeh step kyon? Earned formula mein direct substitution.
Verify: 6 ℏ ≈ 2.449ℏ , naive ℓ ℏ = 2ℏ se bada hai — trap answer under-count karta hai. ✓ Dekho Angular momentum operators aur Spherical harmonics yeh samajhne ke liye ki ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) , ℓ nahi, true length kyun hai. Aur ℓ = 2 ek d -orbital hai, Ex 3 ke "3d exists" se match karta hai. ✓
Yahan effective potential hai jo parent note ne banaya. Coulomb attraction ke aage extra piece centrifugal barrier hai:
V cf ( r ) = 2 μ r 2 ℏ 2 ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) ,
jahan ℏ reduced Planck constant hai aur μ electron–proton pair ki reduced mass hai (dono opening definition box mein recall kiye). Notice karo ki barrier ki state par sirf ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) factor ke through dependence hai — constants ℏ , μ aur radius r har state mein common hain, toh kisi bhi ratio mein cancel ho jaate hain.
ℓ = 0 zero, aur kyun ek naive ratio fail karta hai
Ek fixed radius r par, ℓ = 0 , ℓ = 1 , aur ℓ = 2 ke centrifugal barrier compare karo. Task "ℓ = 0 se ℓ = 2 jaane" ka ratio maangta hai — ise carefully handle karo.
Forecast: ℓ = 0 ke liye barrier... kuch special hai. Step 1 se pehle guess karo, phir guess karo ki requested ratio kya karta hai.
ℓ = 0 par state-factor evaluate karo. ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) = 0 ⋅ 1 = 0 , toh V cf ( ℓ = 0 ) = 0 exactly , har radius par.
Yeh step kyon? Ek s -state (ℓ = 0 ) mein koi angular motion nahi hai, isliye koi centrifugal barrier nahi — electron nucleus ke paas baith sakta hai. Yeh degenerate/zero case hai.
ℓ = 1 aur ℓ = 2 ke liye evaluate karo. ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) = 1 ⋅ 2 = 2 aur 2 ⋅ 3 = 6 .
Yeh step kyon? Higher ℓ mein zyada angular motion hai, toh bada barrier factor.
Requested ratio V cf ( ℓ = 0 ) V cf ( ℓ = 2 ) banao — aur ruko. Denominator 0 hai, toh yeh ratio undefined (yeh + ∞ tak diverge karta hai) hai. Yahan koi finite number report nahi kar sakte.
Yeh step kyon? Division by zero "ek bada number" nahi hai — yeh ek genuine edge case hai. Kyunki ℓ = 0 literally zero barrier deta hai, "kitne times bada" ka koi jawab nahi: koi bhi positive barrier none se infinitely bada hai. Honest statement yeh hai: ℓ = 2 mein ek barrier hai jahan ℓ = 0 mein exactly kuch nahi.
Ek well-defined comparison do. Do nonzero barriers compare karne ke liye, ℓ = 2 ko ℓ = 1 se ratio karo: V cf ( ℓ = 1 ) V cf ( ℓ = 2 ) = 2 6 = 3 .
Yeh step kyon? Dono denominators nonzero hain, toh constants aur r cleanly cancel ho jaate hain aur hume ek finite, meaningful factor milta hai: ℓ = 2 wall har radius par ℓ = 1 wall se 3 × taller hai.
Verify: Barrier figure (s02) par, ℓ = 0 curve pure attraction hai (koi bump nahi — "0 " case), jabki ℓ = 1 aur ℓ = 2 origin ke paas steeply rise karte hain, ℓ = 2 har r par ℓ = 1 se teen times zyada. ✓ ℓ = 2 -to-ℓ = 0 ratio ka koi finite value nahi hai kyunki tum us flat-zero curve se divide karte — exactly jo step 3 ne warn kiya. ✓ Bada ℓ ⇒ stronger barrier ⇒ wavefunction outward push hoti hai, jaisa parent ke skater analogy ne kaha. ✓
Common mistake Cross-example traps jinse bachna hai
Δ E sign confusion (Ex 4 vs 5): hamesha E final − E initial compute karo. Negative = atom emit karta hai, positive = atom absorb karta hai. Photon energy dono cases mein magnitude hoti hai.
∣ L ∣ = ℓ ℏ (Ex 8): galat. Yeh ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) ℏ hai. Sirf z -projection plain integer times ℏ hai: L z = m ℓ ℏ .
"ℓ up to n " (Ex 3): nahi — ℓ m a x = n − 1 .
ℓ = 0 ke against ratio (Ex 9): s -state barrier exactly zero hai, toh koi bhi "how many times bigger" ratio uske against diverge karta hai — nonzero cases compare karo.
Recall Self-test (pehle khud jawab do, phir reveal karo)
Q — n = 4 par states ki number?
A — n 2 = 16 .
Q — 3 → 2 ke liye photon energy?
A — 1.89 eV (red H α , 656 nm).
Q — Ground state se ionisation energy?
A — 13.6 eV.
Q — ℓ = 2 ke liye L ki magnitude?
A — 6 ℏ ≈ 2.45ℏ .
Q — s -state ke liye centrifugal barrier, aur ℓ = 2 -to-ℓ = 0 ratio?
A — Zero (ℓ = 0 ); ratio undefined hai (zero se divide hota hai).