2.3.8 · D3 · Physics › Modern Physics › Wave function ψ — probability density - ψ - ²
Intuition Yeh page kis kaam ki hai
Parent note ne rule sikhaya: probabilities aati hain ==∣ ψ ∣ 2 == se, aur ek wave function ko ∫ ∣ ψ ∣ 2 d x = 1 satisfy karna zaroori hai. Lekin rules tabhi pakki tarah yaad rehte hain jab tumne unhe har us situation mein survive karte dekha ho jo test mein aa sakti hai . Yeh page ek scenario matrix hai: hum har tarah ki problem list karte hain jo yeh topic throw kar sakta hai, phir examples karte hain jab tak har cell fill na ho jaye . Yahan jo bhi hai woh parent note se contradict nahi karta — hum bas deeper jaate hain.
Kuch bhi work karne se pehle, poora territory map karte hain. ψ aur ∣ ψ ∣ 2 ke baare mein har problem in cells mein se kisi ek mein girti hai. Last column us worked example ka naam deta hai jo use cover karta hai.
#
Case class
Kya tricky banata hai ise
Covered by
A
Real, everywhere-decaying ψ (Gaussian)
infinite domain, Gaussian integral
Example 1
B
Real ψ on a finite box
domain limits, sin 2 average
Example 2
C
Complex ψ with a phase e ik x
phase must cancel in ψ ∗ ψ
Example 3
D
Piecewise ψ (two regions glued)
integrate region by region, continuity
Example 4
E
Degenerate input : constant ψ on all of R
area is infinite → NOT normalizable
Example 5
F
Sub-interval probability + a symmetry shortcut
compute P ( a ≤ x ≤ b )
Example 6
G
Superposition of two states
cross terms, orthogonality
Example 7
H
Limiting behaviour : what happens as a width → 0 or → ∞
localisation vs spreading
Example 8
I
Word problem / real detector
translate physics to an integral
Example 9
J
Exam twist : normalize then a trap about "probability at a point"
density vs probability
Example 10
Ab hum har cell fill karte hain. Har example mein pehle tumhe Forecast karna hai — steps padhne se pehle answer guess karo.
ψ ( x ) = A e − x 2 / ( 2 σ 2 ) ko normalize karo
σ > 0 ek fixed width hai. Positive constant A nikalo.
Forecast: Kya A badhega ya ghutega jab bell wider hoti hai (bada σ )? Padhne se pehle guess karo.
Step 1. Density likho: kyunki ψ real hai, ∣ ψ ∣ 2 = ψ ∗ ψ = ψ 2 = A 2 e − x 2 / σ 2 .
Yeh step kyun? Real function ke liye ψ ∗ = ψ hota hai, isliye squaring yahan safe hai (dekho Complex Numbers ).
Step 2. Total probability 1 demand karo:
∫ − ∞ ∞ A 2 e − x 2 / σ 2 d x = 1.
Yeh step kyun? Particle kहीं na कहीं toh hoga — yahi normalization condition hai parent note se.
Step 3. Gaussian integral ∫ − ∞ ∞ e − α x 2 d x = π / α use karo α = 1/ σ 2 ke saath:
∫ − ∞ ∞ e − x 2 / σ 2 d x = π σ 2 = σ π .
Yeh tool kyun? Humein bell curve ke neeche ka area chahiye; Gaussian integral woh ek standard result hai jo ise closed form mein deta hai — koi elementary antiderivative exist nahi karta, isliye yahi ek hi rasta hai.
Step 4. Toh A 2 σ π = 1 ⇒ A = ( σ π ) − 1/2 = ( σ π ) 1/2 1 .
Verify: Jab σ badhta hai, A ghatta hai σ − 1/2 ki tarah — ek wider bell ko area = 1 rakhne ke liye shorter hona padta hai. Units: [ σ ] = m , toh [ A ] = m − 1/2 ✓, bilkul 1D mein ψ ki unit.
Figure dekho: blue ψ aur orange ∣ ψ ∣ 2 . Orange curve narrower hai (squaring tails ko zyada fast neeche kheenchta hai) aur uska total shaded area exactly 1 hai.
Worked example Box ke ground state ko normalize karo
ψ ( x ) = A sin L π x for 0 ≤ x ≤ L , aur bahar ψ = 0 . A nikalo.
Forecast: Kya A depend karega L par? Agar box double width ka ho jaye, toh kya A badhega ya ghutega?
Step 1. Sirf region [ 0 , L ] contribute karta hai (ψ = 0 elsewhere):
∫ 0 L A 2 sin 2 L π x d x = 1.
Yeh step kyun? Box ke bahar ∣ ψ ∣ 2 = 0 hai, toh woh parts kuch add nahi karte — integral collapse ho jaata hai [ 0 , L ] par.
Step 2. sin 2 θ = 2 1 ( 1 − cos 2 θ ) use karo:
∫ 0 L sin 2 L π x d x = ∫ 0 L 2 1 d x − 2 1 ∫ 0 L cos L 2 π x d x = 2 L − 0 = 2 L .
Yeh tool kyun? sin 2 ka apna koi simple antiderivative nahi hota; double-angle identity ise ek constant aur ek cosine mein convert kar deti hai jo ek full period mein zero integrate ho jaata hai. Cosine term vanish hota hai kyunki 0 se L tak exactly ek cycle complete hoti hai.
Step 3. Toh A 2 ⋅ 2 L = 1 ⇒ A = L 2 .
Verify: Bada box ⇒ chota A (A ∝ L − 1/2 ): same total probability zyada room mein pheli hui hai, isliye peak height girti hai. Yeh Particle in a Box se match karta hai. Units: [ A ] = m − 1/2 ✓.
Worked example Ek travelling, decaying wave ki density
ψ ( x ) = A e ik x e − ∣ x ∣/ L jahan A real > 0 hai. ∣ ψ ∣ 2 nikalo, phir normalize karo.
Forecast: Kya momentum-carrying wiggle e ik x probability density mein dikhega?
Step 1. Conjugate: ψ ∗ = A e − ik x e − ∣ x ∣/ L .
Yeh step kyun? Conjugation i → − i flip karta hai, matlab e ik x → e − ik x (dekho Complex Numbers ).
Step 2. Multiply karo:
∣ ψ ∣ 2 = ψ ∗ ψ = A 2 e − ik x e ik x e − 2∣ x ∣/ L = A 2 e − 2∣ x ∣/ L .
Yeh step kyun? e − ik x e ik x = e 0 = 1 : phase factor divide out ho jaata hai . Woh particle ka momentum carry kar raha tha, lekin ∣ ψ ∣ 2 ke liye invisible hai.
Step 3. Normalize karo. e − 2∣ x ∣/ L ki even symmetry se:
∫ − ∞ ∞ A 2 e − 2∣ x ∣/ L d x = 2 A 2 ∫ 0 ∞ e − 2 x / L d x = 2 A 2 ⋅ 2 L = A 2 L = 1.
Factor 2 kyun? Integrand x = 0 ke baare mein symmetric hai, isliye puri line right half ke double ke equal hai — ek shortcut jo kaam aadha kar deta hai.
Step 4. A = L 1 .
Verify: A 2 L = ( 1/ L ) 2 ⋅ L = 1 ✓. Result k se independent hai — do waves with different momenta lekin same envelope same ∣ ψ ∣ 2 share karte hain, exactly wahi "global-phase-invisible" lesson.
Worked example Two-region wave function
ψ ( x ) = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ A x , A ( 2 − x ) , 0 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 1 ≤ x ≤ 2 otherwise
(lengths metres mein). A nikalo.
Forecast: Yeh ek triangular "tent" hai. Peak x = 1 par hai. Kya A bada hoga ya chota 1 se?
Step 1. Integral ko seam x = 1 par split karo:
∫ 0 2 ∣ ψ ∣ 2 d x = A 2 ∫ 0 1 x 2 d x + A 2 ∫ 1 2 ( 2 − x ) 2 d x .
Yeh step kyun? ψ ka har side par alag formula hai, isliye tum har region ko alag integrate karo, phir add karo.
Step 2. Left piece: ∫ 0 1 x 2 d x = 3 1 . Right piece: u = 2 − x , d u = − d x substitute karo; jab x : 1 → 2 , u : 1 → 0 , deta hai ∫ 0 1 u 2 d u = 3 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Tent symmetric hai, isliye dono halves same 3 1 contribute karte hain.
Step 3. Total: A 2 ( 3 1 + 3 1 ) = 3 2 A 2 = 1 ⇒ A = 2 3 = 1.5 ≈ 1.2247 .
Verify: Continuity check — x = 1 par left deta hai A ⋅ 1 = A aur right deta hai A ( 2 − 1 ) = A : woh match karte hain, toh ψ continuous hai, physical conditions mein se ek. A > 1 as forecast (ek narrow tent tall honi chahiye). Units: area metres mein tha, [ A ] = m − 1/2 ✓.
Worked example Har jagah constant — ek trap
Kya ψ ( x ) = A (ek nonzero constant, sab x ke liye) kabhi normalize ho sakta hai?
Forecast: Computing se pehle haan ya nahi bolo.
Step 1. Condition try karo: ∫ − ∞ ∞ ∣ A ∣ 2 d x = ∣ A ∣ 2 ⋅ ( ∞ ) = ∞ .
Yeh step kyun? Ek infinite line par constant density infinite area enclose karta hai — koi finite A ∞ ko rescale karke 1 nahi bana sakta.
Step 2. Conclusion: not square-integrable ⇒ valid physical wave function nahi hai. Sirf woh "constant" normalize hoti hai jo A = 0 hai, jo koi particle nahi describe karta.
Verify: Yahi reason hai ki parent ki condition "ψ → 0 as x → ± ∞ " exist karti hai. Plane wave e ik x (constant magnitude) same story hai — ek useful idealisation, lekin strictly normalize hone ke liye ek box ya wave packet chahiye. Cross-check karo de Broglie Wavelength se: ek infinitely long pure wave ka momentum perfectly known hota hai lekin position completely unknown — dekho Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle .
Worked example Box ke left half mein probability
Normalized ground state ψ = 2/ L sin L π x (Example 2 se) use karke, P ( 0 ≤ x ≤ L /2 ) nikalo.
Forecast: Density sin 2 box centre x = L /2 ke baare mein symmetric hai. Integrate karne se pehle P guess karo.
Step 1. Symmetry argument: sin 2 L π x mein x = L /2 ke baare mein mirror symmetry hai, toh left half ka area right half ke area ke barabar hai.
Yeh step kyun? Agar do halves equal hain aur 1 mein add hote hain, toh har ek exactly 2 1 hai.
Step 2. Integration se confirm karo:
P = ∫ 0 L /2 L 2 sin 2 L π x d x = L 2 [ 2 x − 4 π L sin L 2 π x ] 0 L /2 .
Yeh step kyun? Example 2 jaisi hi double-angle trick; bracket sin 2 ka antiderivative hai.
Step 3. x = L /2 par: 2 L /2 − 4 π L sin π = 4 L − 0 = 4 L . x = 0 par: 0 . Toh P = L 2 ⋅ 4 L = 2 1 .
Verify: P = 2 1 symmetry forecast se match karta hai ✓. Ek Forecast-then-Verify win: picture ne algebra se pehle hi answer bata diya.
Ab ek non-symmetric slice, yeh dikhane ke liye ki shortcut hamesha available nahi hota:
Worked example Cell F continued —
[ 0 , L /4 ] mein probability
Same ψ . P ( 0 ≤ x ≤ L /4 ) nikalo.
Step 1. Koi symmetry help nahi karti (L /4 off-centre hai), toh integrate karo:
P = L 2 [ 2 x − 4 π L sin L 2 π x ] 0 L /4 .
Step 2. x = L /4 par: 8 L − 4 π L sin 2 π = 8 L − 4 π L .
Step 3. P = L 2 ( 8 L − 4 π L ) = 4 1 − 2 π 1 ≈ 0.25 − 0.159 = 0.0908 .
Verify: P ≈ 0.091 < 0.25 . Particle box edge se bachta hai (density x = 0 ke paas small hai), isliye naive "box ka ek quarter = quarter probability" se kam — physically makes sense.
Worked example Do box states ka equal mix
Maano ϕ 1 = 2/ L sin L π x aur ϕ 2 = 2/ L sin L 2 π x do normalized box states hain. Consider karo ψ = c ( ϕ 1 + ϕ 2 ) . Constant c nikalo jo ψ ko normalize kare.
Forecast: Naively tum guess kar sakte ho ki norm 1 + 1 = 2 hai toh c = 1/ 2 . Kya ek cross term yeh bigadega?
Step 1. ∣ ψ ∣ 2 = c 2 ( ϕ 1 + ϕ 2 ) 2 = c 2 ( ϕ 1 2 + 2 ϕ 1 ϕ 2 + ϕ 2 2 ) expand karo.
Yeh step kyun? Middle cross term 2 ϕ 1 ϕ 2 wahan hai jahan interference rehti hai — humein ise check karna hoga.
Step 2. Term by term integrate karo:
∫ ϕ 1 2 = 1 , ∫ ϕ 2 2 = 1 , ∫ ϕ 1 ϕ 2 d x = L 2 ∫ 0 L sin L π x sin L 2 π x d x = 0.
Cross term zero kyun hai? Do box states orthogonal hain — sin L π x aur sin L 2 π x alag standing-wave modes hain; unka product box mein zero integrate hota hai. Yeh Particle in a Box se ek key fact hai.
Step 3. Toh ∫ ∣ ψ ∣ 2 = c 2 ( 1 + 0 + 1 ) = 2 c 2 = 1 ⇒ c = 2 1 .
Verify: Naive guess sahi nikla — lekin sirf isliye kyunki states orthogonal hain. Agar nahi hote, toh cross term c change kar deta. Hamesha check karo.
Worked example Gaussian width
→ 0 aur → ∞ hone par kya hota hai?
Example 1 ki normalized Gaussian density lo: ∣ ψ ∣ 2 = σ π 1 e − x 2 / σ 2 . Do limits study karo.
Forecast: Kis limit mein particle "sharply located" hai? Kis mein woh "everywhere aur nowhere" hai?
Step 1 — peak height at x = 0 : ∣ ψ ( 0 ) ∣ 2 = σ π 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Peak measure karta hai ki "fog" kitna concentrated hai.
Step 2 — limit σ → 0 : peak → ∞ , width → 0 , lekin total area 1 rehta hai. Yeh ek spike hai (Dirac-delta-like localisation): particle ki position almost certain ho jaati hai.
Physically kyun? Perfect position knowledge ⇒ (Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle se) totally unknown momentum.
Step 3 — limit σ → ∞ : peak → 0 , bell Example 5 ke constant ki taraf flatten ho jaata hai — non-normalizable case ki taraf ja raha hai: particle puri space par smeared hai, momentum sharply defined hai.
Verify: Kisi bhi σ par area compute karo: ∫ σ π 1 e − x 2 / σ 2 d x = σ π 1 ⋅ σ π = 1 ✓ — hamesha exactly 1 , chahe width kuch bhi ho. Trade-off height vs spread ka hai, kabhi total probability ka nahi.
Worked example Ek detector slit
Ek electron box ground state ψ = 2/ L sin L π x mein hai jahan L = 1.0 nm hai. Ek detector central strip x = 0.4 nm se x = 0.6 nm tak cover karta hai. Electron ke pakde jaane ki probability kya hai?
Forecast: Central strip wahan hai jahan density peak karti hai. Kya tum 0.2/1.0 = 0.2 "flat" guess se zyada expect karte ho ya kam?
Step 1. Ek integral mein translate karo (jahan L = 1 nm toh L π x = π x , x nm mein):
P = ∫ 0.4 0.6 2 sin 2 ( π x ) d x .
Yeh step kyun? Ek physical "detection chance over a region" exactly ∫ a b ∣ ψ ∣ 2 d x hai.
Step 2. Antiderivative: 2 ∫ sin 2 ( π x ) d x = x − 2 π sin ( 2 π x ) .
Yeh tool kyun? Double-angle identity phir se — sin 2 ke liye workhorse.
Step 3. Evaluate karo:
P = [ x − 2 π s i n 2 π x ] 0.4 0.6 = ( 0.6 − 2 π s i n 1.2 π ) − ( 0.4 − 2 π s i n 0.8 π ) .
Numerically sin 1.2 π ≈ − 0.5878 , sin 0.8 π ≈ 0.5878 , toh
P ≈ ( 0.6 + 0.09355 ) − ( 0.4 − 0.09355 ) = 0.69355 − 0.30645 ≈ 0.3871.
Verify: P ≈ 0.39 , jo flat guess 0.20 se zyada hai — sahi hai, kyunki density middle mein peak karti hai jahan detector rakha hai. Probability dimensionless hai (nm units x mein aur ψ 2 ∼ nm − 1 mein cancel ho jaate hain) ✓.
Worked example Classic trap
Ek student ψ = 2/ L sin L π x normalize karta hai aur puchha jaata hai: "Particle ko exactly x = L /2 par paane ki probability kya hai?" Woh answer deta hai ∣ ψ ( L /2 ) ∣ 2 = L 2 sin 2 2 π = L 2 . Ise mark karo.
Forecast: Kya L 2 koi probability hai bhi?
Step 1. Units check: L 2 ke units m − 1 hain. Probability dimensionless hoti hai. Toh L 2 probability ho hi nahi sakta — yeh ek density hai.
Yeh step kyun? Units physics mein sabse fast lie-detector hain.
Step 2. Sahi answer: ek single exact point par probability hai
P ({ L /2 }) = ∫ L /2 L /2 ∣ ψ ∣ 2 d x = 0.
Kyun? Zero width ka ek interval zero area enclose karta hai. Nonzero number sirf ek strip [ x 0 − 2 Δ , x 0 + 2 Δ ] par milta hai, jahan small Δ ke liye P ≈ ∣ ψ ( x 0 ) ∣ 2 Δ = L 2 Δ hota hai.
Verify: Box ke liye, agar centre ke around Δ = 0.01 L ka strip ho, toh P ≈ L 2 ⋅ 0.01 L = 0.02 — small lekin nonzero, aur dimensionless ✓. Student ne density (L 2 ) ko probability (jisme width factor chahiye) ke saath confuse kiya.
Common mistake Density probability nahi hoti
∣ ψ ∣ 2 ke units m − 1 hain. Real probability paane ke liye ek length se multiply karo (integrate karo). Parent note ka pehla mistake box dekho.
Recall Kya humne har cell fill ki?
A Gaussian ::: Example 1
B finite box ::: Example 2
C complex phase ::: Example 3
D piecewise ::: Example 4
E degenerate/non-normalizable ::: Example 5
F sub-interval probability ::: Example 6
G superposition cross terms ::: Example 7
H limiting behaviour ::: Example 8
I word problem ::: Example 9
J exam density-vs-point trap ::: Example 10
Mnemonic Ek line sab carry karne ke liye
"Domain split karo, phase cancel karo, strip integrate karo, aur kabhi ek aisi density par trust mat karo jiske units hoon."